You've documented lots of things around these forums. The reality is, far from being an technical "authority" on cryptos
Dude I've been schooling Gmaxwell and for example TierNolan among many others. Get a grip on reality. Evan replied in my thread and did not refute my assertion of the egregious math error. Please don't waste my time again. Please. I don't have time to respond to all your slobbering. |
|
|
|
You've documented lots of things around these forums. The reality is, far from being an technical "authority" on cryptos
Dude I've been schooling Gmaxwell and for example TierNolan among many others. Get a grip on reality. Evan replied in my thread and did not refute my assertion of the egregious math error. Please don't waste my time again. Please. I don't have time to respond to all your slobbering. |
|
|
|
As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. |
|
|
|
As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. |
|
|
|
As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. |
|
|
|
Come on now boys. If you are so sure this is not a scam, then make your sworn disclosures about your involvement in it. Are you afraid of future SEC and FinCEN actions and thus afraid to disclosure. Hmmm.
Stop obfuscating with off topic diversionary tactics.
I am trying to rescue you idiots. But you are determined to dig own pathway to jail.
Wake up and see the light pronto for your own sake.
Thank you for your interest, if genuine. However, to quote Hillary Clinton (since you mentioned the Clintons a lot in some of your posts): "It’s a stark fact that the United States has less than five percent of the world’s population, yet we have almost 25 percent of the world’s total prison population."I'm in the 95%+ of the global population (=non US citizen). I'm also unaffected by the prison-mania of the USA, FinCEN, SEC etc. Not that if I were affected I would have something to worry about. Come-from-Beyond (who is in Belarus) make a similar line of argument to me. It seems to me that those who grew up in these (former?) Communist states developed a culture of theft, because that was the only way to game the totalitarian system. We all know that Communism is a philosophy of stealing from each other. And now they blame that on the Americans who worked more diligently and with attention to quality and pride in one's work, than any other nation except perhaps Japan. Globalist leaders insinuate it is okay for your to steal to take back from the evil Americans who took more than their fair share. They urge you to continue the Communist paradigm of ganging up on your neighbor. I call on American software developers to take the high ground and show the world our cultural heritage and values. Let's teach these Eastern Europeans why America kicks ass with productivity and trying to do the right thing. Now I will surely agree with you that so many Americans have become dysfunctional Socialists and are milking the reserve currency status. And I will agree with you that American leaders have abused other nations, and in fact Antony Sutton researched and concluded that the banksters from America and Europe installed the Bolshevik revolution. I haven't studied your history enough, so I don't want to make any claim. I will just try to urge you to please lose that Communist attitude and please work to make the world a better place. We need to not end up in an unethical clusterfuck Dark Age. And take back your right to own a gun because without that, you are nothing against totalitarianism. The USA is fucked up and it will need to break up into separate regions where those who have shared values can congregate. There are big changes coming to world accelerating as of 2018. I urge you to look past the tip of your nose and be part of the better future. Let's go make it. I am 51. My time to be highly productive at the top level has peaked; and I am on the tail end of my career. You are young. You make this world. Please think about what you are doing. Edit: and Evan is an American and thus all the more I demand he not insult the reputation of American developers by operating perhaps the most scammy altcoin by market cap (although some might argue that is Ripple). |
|
|
|
Come on now boys. If you are so sure this is not a scam, then make your sworn disclosures about your involvement in it. Are you afraid of future SEC and FinCEN actions and thus afraid to disclosure. Hmmm.
Stop obfuscating with off topic diversionary tactics.
I am trying to rescue you idiots. But you are determined to dig own pathway to jail.
Wake up and see the light pronto for your own sake.
Thank you for your interest, if genuine. However, to quote Hillary Clinton (since you mentioned the Clintons a lot in some of your posts): "It’s a stark fact that the United States has less than five percent of the world’s population, yet we have almost 25 percent of the world’s total prison population."I'm in the 95%+ of the global population (=non US citizen). I'm also unaffected by the prison-mania of the USA, FinCEN, SEC etc. Not that if I were affected I would have something to worry about. Come-from-Beyond (who is in Belarus) make a similar line of argument to me. It seems to me that those who grew up in these (former?) Communist states developed a culture of theft, because that was the only way to game the totalitarian system. We all know that Communism is a philosophy of stealing from each other. And now they blame that on the Americans who worked more diligently and with attention to quality and pride in one's work, than any other nation except perhaps Japan. Globalist leaders insinuate it is okay for your to steal to take back from the evil Americans who took more than their fair share. They urge you to continue the Communist paradigm of ganging up on your neighbor. I call on American software developers to take the high ground and show the world our cultural heritage and values. Let's teach these Eastern Europeans why America kicks ass with productivity and trying to do the right thing. Now I will surely agree with you that so many Americans have become dysfunctional Socialists and are milking the reserve currency status. And I will agree with you that American leaders have abused other nations, and in fact Antony Sutton researched and concluded that the banksters from America and Europe installed the Bolshevik revolution. I haven't studied your history enough, so I don't want to make any claim. I will just try to urge you to please lose that Communist attitude and please work to make the world a better place. We need to not end up in an unethical clusterfuck Dark Age. And take back your right to own a gun because without that, you are nothing against totalitarianism. The USA is fucked up and it will need to break up into separate regions where those who have shared values can congregate. There are big changes coming to world accelerating as of 2018. I urge you to look past the tip of your nose and be part of the better future. Let's go make it. I am 51. My time to be highly productive at the top level has peaked; and I am on the tail end of my career. You are young. You make this world. Please think about what you are doing. Edit: and Evan is an American and thus all the more I demand he not insult the reputation of American developers by operating perhaps the most scammy altcoin by market cap (although some might argue that is Ripple). |
|
|
|
Well, that's your opinion and you are entitled to it, but I don't agree with it. There are quite a few people who also don't agree with it. Imo, Synereo is a thousand times better than the centralized alternatives like Facebook and Twitter, and Synereo's business model makes much more sense than theirs. I respect your intelligence, but you aren't the only "genius level" person on this forum.
Thanks. I will quote from my other reply to you and leave it at that. Good luck to them. May the best competitor win. [...]
I will suggest you refer to my project's crowdfund to read the details on what I think a real business and ecosystem model is for this type of project.
I am less respectful than I would be, because they presold the AMP tokens. Thus for me it is scam just like Ethereum. That is my opinion. I don't hate them though. Afaik, they have not been egregiously deceptive, i.e. not like Dash.
Oh and yes, Greg is smart. And probably (almost certaintly) smarter than me at math. |
|
|
|
Making my opinion about Synereo known. Please debate me in those threads, not here in my thread. Thanks. Never heard of this coin but I'm still 99% sure it's just another shitcoin.
Agreed. You'll find links to my analysis in the other Synereo thread. Why Just 99% sure? Why aren't you 100% sure? I am not even 100% sure I will live until tomorrow. Seriously I know software development. I know how to detect which projects are capable. Synereo doesn't have the chops. I listened to their Hangouts and I studied the technology. I am quite confident this is just a scheme to sell a token to fund the math delusions of Greg Meredith. I already explained they the economics they are proposing for a business model make no sense. Sorry because I know readers do want to see a real decentralized alternative for social networking. And that is what I am working on. So yes my comments are biased. Synereo and my project are competitors. The difference is I did not launch a token before making the social network popular. I don't put the scam horse before the development cart.
Synereo is a vaporware P&D so keep that in mind
Synereo's beta will be released in a few weeks. Just like Ethereum releases up to now, it will be software that doesn't work for anything real or meaningfully adoptable. They are having fun inventing code that has no use case, because (as I had already explained) they don't even have the correct formulation of a use case economics and business model. I will suggest you refer to my project's crowdfund to read the details on what I think a real business and ecosystem model is for this type of project. I am less respectful than I would be, because they presold the AMP tokens. Thus for me it is scam just like Ethereum. That is my opinion. I don't hate them though. Afaik, they have not been egregiously deceptive, i.e. not like Dash.
Well, that's your opinion and you are entitled to it, but I don't agree with it. There are quite a few people who also don't agree with it. Imo, Synereo is a thousand times better than the centralized alternatives like Facebook and Twitter, and Synereo's business model makes much more sense than theirs. I respect your intelligence, but you aren't the only "genius level" person on this forum.
Thanks. I will quote from my other reply to you and leave it at that. Good luck to them. May the best competitor win. [...]
I will suggest you refer to my project's crowdfund to read the details on what I think a real business and ecosystem model is for this type of project.
I am less respectful than I would be, because they presold the AMP tokens. Thus for me it is scam just like Ethereum. That is my opinion. I don't hate them though. Afaik, they have not been egregiously deceptive, i.e. not like Dash.
Oh and yes, Greg is smart. And probably (almost certaintly) smarter than me at math.
This is the issue we are facing here with every coin, including Bitcoin. there probability of being used by a broad population is very low, but as bitcoin showed and still showing, as times passe the latter probability increase.
Don't forget that we are speaking about a disruptive innovation here, that is better in all ways that what we currently use.
Bitcoin started with a niche use case. Synereo will go no where without one. Ditto every other altcoin. … hence all the "it's not money, it's something else"/Blockchain as a Service-coins popping up, like ETH, Lisk, Waves and so on. I'm curious to see where this is going. Yeah but those niches need to actually work technically and exist. We've done a thorough job of destructing ETH in the Ethereum Paradox thread. I did an initial analysis of Synereo's niche and afaics is based on flawed concepts such as the value of paying social network users to share which I think is entirely undesired and uneconomic for the same reason that ads have a reputation of being mostly spam (linked upthread). I don't know enough about Lisk and Waves to comment meaningfully on them. Well, if you take it all together, you can see that something is cooking... r0ach, smooth, I, and some others think the only killer app of blockchains is probably currency because of the self-referential requirement of what a block chain can reach consensus on securely. Thus technically we think all the other crap won't work, unless it is using a centralized block chain and then what is the point of that? Bitcoin locked up large $ transfers. Monero has locked up anonymity. I am going after micro-transactions. |
|
|
|
Synereo is a vaporware P&D so keep that in mind
Synereo's beta will be released in a few weeks. Just like Ethereum releases up to now, it will be software that doesn't work for anything real or meaningfully adoptable. They are having fun inventing code that has no use case, because (as I had already explained) they don't even have the correct formulation of a use case economics and business model. I will suggest you refer to my project's crowdfund to read the details on what I think a real business and ecosystem model is for this type of project. I am less respectful than I would be, because they presold the AMP tokens. Thus for me it is scam just like Ethereum. That is my opinion. I don't hate them though. Afaik, they have not been egregiously deceptive, i.e. not like Dash. |
|
|
|
Never heard of this coin but I'm still 99% sure it's just another shitcoin.
Agreed. You'll find links to my analysis in the other Synereo thread. Why Just 99% sure? Why aren't you 100% sure? I am not even 100% sure I will live until tomorrow. Seriously I know software development. I know how to detect which projects are capable. Synereo doesn't have the chops. I listened to their Hangouts and I studied the technology. I am quite confident this is just a scheme to sell a token to fund the math delusions of Greg Meredith. I already explained they the economics they are proposing for a business model make no sense. Sorry because I know readers do want to see a real decentralized alternative for social networking. And that is what I am working on. So yes my comments are biased. Synereo and my project are competitors. The difference is I did not launch a token before making the social network popular. I don't put the scam horse before the development cart. |
|
|
|
Can anyone prove dark sent has defect? Or can anyone prove dark send is mathematically correct?
I documented a high school level math lie"error" in InstantX where the masternodes compromise the security. The similar math applies to the anonymity of DarkSend. Also I hear DarkSend requires 10 minutes. Monero's anonymity is instantaneous and no masternodes to spy on you. I mean, the inventor sneak himself a few million, big deal. Bitcoin inventor also pocket himself a million coins. We can not ask everybody as Saint as satoshi.
I wrote: As for satoshi, the coins he controls are not 1% (or 150.000)... numbers floating around are in the range of 1mn+.
5% is not 32.1%. And because no one cared about crypto-currency, because he invented the entire sector. Evan invented only how to scam cleverly because there are many now who want to mine. And I dispute that 5% estimate. |
|
|
|
Never heard of this coin but I'm still 99% sure it's just another shitcoin.
Agreed. You'll find links to my analysis in the other Synereo thread. |
|
|
|
The other question I have is, does all this matter to people who buy dash now? The devs can no longer victimize people, am I right?
The diagram of how Dash works now (and I suggest you click that quote below and read that entire thread over there): [...]
Here is diagram of the scam of the flow of electronic digits printed ongoing out of thin air:
PRINTING PRESS ----> INSIDERS -----> INVESTORSFOOLS
|
|
|
|
The other question I have is, does all this matter to people who buy dash now? The devs can no longer victimize people, am I right?
The diagram of how Dash works now (and I suggest you click that quote below and read that entire thread over there): [...]
Here is diagram of the scam of the flow of electronic digits printed ongoing out of thin air:
PRINTING PRESS ----> INSIDERS -----> INVESTORSFOOLS
|
|
|
|
Please define "ripping people off" unambiguously such that all those on the OP's list FACTUALLY qualify but Evan doesn't.
In most scams you can say a) What the scam is b) What is the financial size of the scam c) Who are the victims of the scam / Who got ripped off d) How much did the victims lose Example (Karpeles): a) "Losing" or stealing the money of investors and pretended to be hacked b) 700k+ BTC / 700mn USD c) People who had funds in his exchange d) 700k+ BTC / 700mn USD collectively / individually 700k+ BTC divided by their respective deposits in cash or BTCs. You can claim "scam" for any number of reasons but can't tell me (b), (c), (d). Okay you are focused on quantifying what got ripped off, which you claim is necessary to conclude that people did get ripped off. (which is ludicrous, there are ways of ascertaining that people got ripped off without quantifying it precisely and identifying the victims, analogous to I can see a plane crash and presume there are victims without quantifying or identifying, but let's for the moment follow your twisted mindset...) So according to your definition, there exists no scam until we are able to subpoena all the exchanges that trade DRK (and presume that all of them are strictly enforcing KYC), so that we can gather the specific calculations of whom was buying from an insider, how much the insiders were able to manipulate the price and volume with their alleged control over the float (due to 32.1% instamine and presumed further concentration of coin supply to insiders due to the dividend paying masternode scheme), and know all the identities of all the people involved. What AlexGR proposes is that we will need KYC every where because otherwise there is no way to stop scams by putting the scam leaders (and accomplices such as AlexGR!) on Shit lists such as the OP. So AlexGR is for big government and enslavement of everyone. Ostensibly Evan sends his accomplices over here to argue against honest disclosure to n00bs. However, note there was no such proof about Mt. Gox until that data was obtained by the authorities. So you can't definitively prove that b), c), and d) don't exist. And the evidence we have presented overwhelmingly favors the conclusion that b), c), and d) do exist if the authorities ever get around to collecting all the data. Thus the evidence overwhelmingly favors putting Evan into the OP's list. I believe there are many people on the OP's list that have not yet been convicted in a court of law. And thus where the numbers you demand have not yet been established as fact by an impartial authority. Therefor your definition excluded entire classes of people who should be on the list and are on the list. So you failed my challenge and have lost the debate. Now please stop wasting my time. You want to do illegal and unethical scams that rip people off. Go ahead. I want nothing to do with you. Stay far away from me please. Except for ponzi/pyramid related schemes, in which case every scammer claims there are no victims.
And nothing can be proven unequivocally until all the data around the scam can be collected and correlated. This is one reason why ponzi/pyramid scams are so difficult for n00bs to avoid. Because aholes like AlexGR get up here and tell them that everything it okay and that it is just a "free market" when in fact it is manipulated ponzi market. |
|
|
|
Helping investors make money is good, but doing it in such a way that makes it impossible for that to ever be widely adopted because you won't get many people to invest in the ecosystem built around a scam, means that this has no positive benefit. If Evan was honest in his presentation on the website, I would have nothing to say other than to say I wouldn't invest, advise others not to based on the history, and perhaps mention the possible liability of SEC and FinCEN action. But the way Evan deceives the public, means he is going to give our entire sector a bad reputation around nefarious deception. The scam can't be hidden forever. It won't just go away. It will be the poster child of altcoin corruption that people look back on. 1. Your debate starts and ends at the point where you consider Evan's actions immoral. You are entitled to think that and nobody can tell you anything about it.
Please define the difference between a scam and unethical (and probably illegal in the USA and perhaps the EU at least) deception of investors? I am still waiting for you reply. You chose to ignore this challenge, thus you lost the debate. |
|
|
|
I see you want to play legalese semantic games such as Bill Clinton's famous definition of what 'is' is. Okay. I warned you guys you will lose in a debate with me. My father is an very prolific attorney. I inherited the skill of debate. I don't typically start a debate (especially so forcefully as I have done here) unless I am sure I can win it.
1. Your debate starts and ends at the point where you consider Evan's actions immoral. You are entitled to think that and nobody can tell you anything about it. Please define the difference between a scam and unethical (and probably illegal in the USA and perhaps the EU at least) deception of investors? 2. Your debate is lost when you are saying things that are non-factual, like Evan ripping people off, and then citing "high quality" witnesses with "high quality" arguments, like those which have been presented so far.
Please define "ripping people off" unambiguously such that all those on the OP's list FACTUALLY qualify but Evan doesn't. I warned you, and you are determined to make an asshat of yourself. I will await your definitions so I can skewer you to the wall for wasting my precious time. (readers thanks to 5 organic eggs, bowl of broccoli, and copious amounts of freshly caught tuna tinola soup, my vision is back to normal ... very odd digestive system I have now ... my gf didn't prepare my normal food regimen yesterday) |
|
|
|
You sent me a PM a while ago about your debate with gmaxwel, the lead Bitcoin dev. I came and posted something to gmaxwel. gmaxwel has been a real gentleman, he was always a very nice guy and a fucking serious asset to Bitcoin, so of course I was interested in his opinion. On the other hand, I wanted to support you as well. gmaxwel replied me, as usual his post was interesting, intelligent and civil. By the time I was going reply to his post, of course, why not, you head got dizzy and you must needed to lock this thread, so I was unable to reply gmaxwel. No the thread is opened again. A usual mess around you.
The links to the thread that contains the debate between gmaxwell and myself has always been linked from an upthread post immediately after your post upthread. And gmaxwell got his ass handed to him by myself in that debate on the Ogg container format for which he was the co-inventor of one of the key codecs: Doing so would also increase the overhead for the format by 20% or so. As mentioned, accurate indexes are not small-- and many things compromise by just not providing accurate indexes; which then leaves applications linearly scanning or not permitting sample accurate seeking.
I assume the 20% estimate is only for when the optional index is present. So it is presumed someone would use an index only when that 20% was justified by their use case. Again I argue you should not remove degrees-of-freedom and hinder the optimization of use cases which you did not envision because no group or person is omniscient. And how is not having the index any worse than not allowing an index. I fail to see the logic. Seems you are arguing that the receiving end will expect indexes and not be prepared for the case where indexes are not present. But that is a bug in the receiving end's software then. And in that case, there is no assurance that software would have done the index-less seeking more efficiently for the status quo of not allowing an index. None of this makes sense to me. Also I don't understand how you calculate 20% increase in file size for adding an index. For example, lets take an average 180 second song consuming roughly 5MB for VBR encoding. Let's assume my users are satisfied with seeking in 1 second increments, so that means means I need at most 180 of 22-bit indices, so that is only 495 bytes which is only a 0.01% increase! On top of that I could even compress those 22-bit indices into relative offsets if I want to shrink it by roughly 75% to 0.0025%. The reason I locked the thread is so I wouldn't have to waste my precious time responding to fucks who can't read such as this post from you. I quote myself: I am closing this topic (at least until there is something other than a vaporcoin to talk about).
Please do not involve me anymore in your activities.
Why would I? Do you have programming skill I need? Have I contacted you over the past month or two? Sorry that you could not recruit me to become a developer for GadgetCoin. I did invest the time to talk to them and unfortunately there was no synergy. I have my own project to work on. Sorry if that makes you feel you were spurned or were not asked to invest as an angel investor. You can buy shares in the company like everyone else can when the shares are offered to the public. These are not crypto-currency tokens. The will be shares in the company and regulated as any such crowdfunded equity raise is. They are not transferable to crypto-currency tokens. I have maintained I will not promote a crypto-currency token here on this forum. I continue to maintain that pledge. Organize your P&D with your "angel investors" - we know your P&D is coming.
There will be no P&D of cyrpto-currency tokens. We are selling shares in a company, not tokens. There is no masternode or centralized governance scheme for any tokens. None of the bullshit and scams. What happened to you? You seem to be mentally unstable or simply lashing out because of not taking the time to read enough to understand what is going on? Try to get control of your rationality please. I'll forgive this one transgression but if repeats, I will just have to ignore you. I have no idea why you would pretend to be nice and friendly to me for so many months and then suddenly write such venomous words. I didn't receive any private message from you over the past month asking me to unlock the thread or complaining about anything I had done. I can only assume you are frustrated but I don't know what obligation you feel I had to you that you feel you deserve to talk to me that way. [Rant start.]
The Chinese influence in Bitcoin, the corrupt proxies of the fucking Chinese communist party officials in Bitcoin, the threat with regards to centralization which is obviously more a concern with the presence of the Chinese are anything but great help.
The Chinese, who never invented anything but the fucking umbrella - but ready to extort any Western ideas - brought nothing to Bitcoin but unethical and immoral greediness. They jumped on the Bitcoin bandwagon to make money. They do not care about decentralization nor they care about what decentralized crypto currencies could bring to society. The Chinese's moral, greedy attitude and respect to their fucking communist leaders is the oxymoron of Satoshi's libertarian project.
[Rant is over]
Oh I see you are just pissed off at the world today and taking it out me. Thanks.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
