we saw clearly that the platform has clearly changed from alpha to full beta testing, and that the matching of market requests certainly should not lag behind language , and that likely even more acute angle and that the likely acceleration of growth is not long wait and realizing that we remember about early investors and their responsibility for the transfer of technology to the masses, but not simple spekulieren goods, though,
buy the hype, sell when platform released, if they even have a working one. this is going to be the case for this get rich quick for the homeless coin. this coin have no chance for consumer level adoption and no merchant acceptance. all these hype and volume being manipulating by whales and insider like stoat to maximizing their btc wallet. when it is done, it done and i wouldn't want to get caught holding dirty useless panties. there will be many more etheruim like coming, this get rich quick coin is already too late to the game to make it own name like litecoin or dogecoin. mark my post and check back a year later this is a get rich quick scam hype from started by a homeless guy who is sneaking in with every bitcoin events. he have made millions before he even know which program to be use with his grand scheme of things
|
|
|
what is happened to 150btc buy walls at CLUB? people understand this wild wild west game yet? the 5btc left is belong to some dumb moron bagholder out there. lol
edit; check back a few hours later do see fake walls added back in
|
|
|
And what do you want ? Buterin is bash scripter, who use his Bitcoin magazine to promote his IPO. It happens that he is a genius salesman, sells like crazy. He used collected funds to hire a C++ dev to code some of his ideas. Flys around the word, sells. Now the money is gone. People is gone. No exponential grow in Dapps. Thus, I predict a slow decline in price during 2016 year. It may be a short splash cause of Buterin skills to sell a chunk of Eth some guys with big ears for USD. true. the scam by this homeless butterinse guy is done, we can see this is the last hype scam dumping, there are like a few rounds of 300btc dumping on polo yesterday. dumbs morons just never get it. this uptrend was manipulating by whale/s so they can dumps. no merchant in their right mind would take etheriuom, as you can see it have no adoption
|
|
|
all you dumb morons should give this guy a few millions $$$ in stock!
i meant in his coin
buy! buy! buy! this is a revolutionary coin in the wet pant right here!
|
|
|
when i think of microsoft i think about old and dying technology, it need to copy everything to survive.
|
|
|
your scam ioata is worth nothing in my book, useless like other scams. just some coding and idea in fantasy land, like hardwares or master jedi attacking each others which translate into endless bitcoins depositing into your pocket. it's not cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency = simple internet money/currency. good job in scamming the dumb morons.
Your integrity amazes me. Usually, inability to critically analyze your own point of view is a sign of very low IQ. Obviusly it's not your case, because with such low IQ you wouldn't be able to write such long posts. Might be an unknown mutation... now you're talking about my iq. ah, you also talking about integrity which you disgraced human scammers got none. same ol' craps which getting repeats again and again, no reason to waste much time in one subject.
|
|
|
i said again and again, technical knowledge of altcoins = scam idea. this is the reason you never see me talk about it. "Bitcoin is fundamentally flawed", prove it now! do it, pull the plug! all the scam artists keep saying bitcoin going to fail but it's keep running smoothly. you scammer keep poking and finding hole which never can prove or never prove, not possible. the scammers keep bringing all these nonsense idea just to distracting those dumb morons to fall into their many scams. heck, most of these scammers idea worth millions and some are millionaire when their idea don't even have a working wallet.
i never want to talk in your crap nonsense threads, your shits is just full of it, too much nonsense. you think you can prove or know something but basically nonsense crap which can prove nothing, you just want to plug in your cheap scam. anon, smart ledgers, smart contracts crap, we don't need your tech shit, mainstream don't need your tech shit. you think you can build some credentials here so you can pull a big scam and then be retired, you're talking about retirement life saving a lot.
also all of these scam altcoins having chance of 0.0000000000000% adoption. ask you this, what is the purpose of it when there is just 0.0000000000000% adoption?
Refer to https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/images/FallaciesPosterHigherRes.jpg and rewrite your post to conform to the rules of a civil conversation, please. PS: Even your sig is full of fallacies... your scam ioata is worth nothing in my book, useless like other scams. just some coding and idea in fantasy land, like hardwares or master jedi attacking each others which translate into endless bitcoins depositing into your pocket. it's not cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency = simple internet money/currency. good job in scamming the dumb morons.
|
|
|
I think ultimately you are perhaps concentrating on the issue of 2 or more partitions existing for an extended period of time.
You must be referring to monsterer's comments. I was always emphasizing that 2 or more temporary partitions can be tolerated if there is a resolution mechanism. I was referring to you both. No temporary partitions can be tolerated at all if the resolution of said partitions is the total destruction of one partition or another. This is the only resolution method possible if the data structure is block based with POW or POS. If you think otherwise, explain how two blocks secured with POW (or POS) could be merged between two block chains without loss of data? You don't need details on my, or anyone's protocols to explain how this is so. Temporary partitions can be merged if they don't contain conflicting double-spends. The advantage of creating temporary partitions in this context (what I contemplated in my design) is it afaics can both enable a form of instant transactions and also it can radically reduce the data that must be propagated as a transient spike on block announcement, thus solving the propagation delay which drives orphan rate which is one of the main issues with increasing the block size in Bitcoin and other Satoshi coins such as Monero. Note I didn't write that the temporary partitions have to use PoW or PoS; only the global resolution mechanism does. As for your (and Iota's) idea of using a different global resolution method, I maintain that no design will be sound if it doesn't use blocks with PoW (or the inferior PoS). The reason is because there is no way to gain Byzantine consistency on double-spends. I have thought about this in great detail for months and years. I will be very stunned if you or anyone else has found an exception to this rule. It seems to be fundamental to the Byzantine Generals Problem. As I explained upthread my understanding for Iota is that if competing cliques with less than 50% of the total hash rate each, for what ever reason decide not to confirm each other's chains, then there is no mechanism in Iota's DAG without blocks to force a consensus and thus the user of the currency has to contend with forks and multiple spends on multiple partitions. Although this may not occur in the early stages for Iota, if it really gains any significant value (not just insiders buying from themselves to pump the illusion of a large market cap and trade volume) that is when it will be tested conceptually. Satoshi's PoW design in Bitcoin (Monero, etc) has already passed this crucial test but PoS and other block chain consensus designs not yet. I suspect for eMunie what you are attempting to design is some resolution based on propagation and different powers for different types of nodes in the network, and I am confident I will be able to point out to you how this is unsound once you release the details. If you want to waste your effort in this direction, who am I to discourage you. I personally don't want to waste any more effort on pie-in-the-sky failure delusion. I can't really nail down with 100% certainty if your design is a delusion until I see all the details, but I strongly suspect it is. I don't say this to be unfriendly with you. I am concerned that we are wasting a lot of effort and resources. I am trying to be very frank with myself as well. Apologies for misspelling your username upthread.
your scam idea is delusional. the purpose of bitcoin is decentralized money and bitcoin have achieved just that. all this crap scam ideas/add-on smart contracts, smart ledger, crypto 2.0, crypto 9.0 are just delusional scam idea, simple as that.
I have never seen you display in any of your posts (that I've read) any technical knowledge and thus apparently you are not able to comment with any level of sufficient technical understanding. Thus your comments are a total waste of time for readers who are technically capable. So please don't spam this thread. You seem to want to spam every thread I write for some personal reasons. If you want to try to display some technical knowledge, then go ahead and make my day.
In this thread, we have already started documenting why Bitcoin is fundamentally flawed:
The post linked in the above quote, explains that Bitcoin (and any other coin that uses Satoshi's PoW design) is also a "mining the investors" paradigm. In future posts, I will elaborate on the following quote from the OP: I went off on several days of just thinking all day. I contemplated all the possible designs (including Iota's DAG, Lightning Networks, DPOS, Proof-of-Stake, Masternodes, Raiblocks/Blocklattice, etc), and I can't think of any design that uses a block chain or a DAG (or any other form of determining the longest chain of truth) which doesn't either centralize (factoring in society's ability to regulate the consistent partition) or diverge into inconsistent truths. Due to the CAP theorem it is fundamentally impossible for there to exist any block chain or consistent DAG design that won't centralize (even without regulation once you require scaling). Worse yet, it is impossible to attain any sort of end-to-end principled, decentralized scaling of transaction processing, because consistency is lost without centralization (even Proof-of-Work centralizes economically due to the Power Law distribution of capital).
Note I have proposed that including PoW with each transaction may be a solution to the flaws in Satoshi's design which causes it to drive centralization, government takeover, and oligarchy. But I need to spend some more time going over the details of that idea. Note apparently Iota may be implementing some variant of that idea, but as I explained upthread, I don't think it can be Byzantine fault tolerant on Consistency without blocks. i said again and again, technical knowledge of altcoins = scam idea. this is the reason you never see me talk about it. "Bitcoin is fundamentally flawed", prove it now! do it, pull the plug! all the scam artists keep saying bitcoin going to fail but it's keep running smoothly. you scammer keep poking and finding holes which never can prove or never prove, not possible. example holes, oh bitcoin taking so long, oh the 51% attack, oh.. oh.. oh.. i'm sure the taking too long is easy fix but do they want to fix? no reason to. the scammers keep bringing all these nonsense ideas just to distracting those dumb morons to fall into their many scams. heck, most of these scammers idea worth millions and some are millionaire when their idea don't even exist or have a working wallet. i never want to talk in your crap nonsense threads, your shits is just full of it, too much nonsense. i have posts a few replied to your crap threads and you have asked them to delete, which all got deleted. i've never bother to repost or post to your nonsense crap beside this post here. you think you can prove or know something but basically nonsense crap which can prove nothing, you just want to plug in your cheap scam. anon, smart ledgers, smart contracts crap, we don't need your tech shit, mainstream don't need your tech shit. cryptocurrency = decentralized internet money/currency, simple as that, not the type of money which come with a fridge, a bath, a cat with string attached, a borrower, a fat man in a hat with big fat wallet, none of that nonsense craps. you think you can build some credentials here so you can pull a big scam and then be retired, you're talking about retirement/life saving a lot here. also all of these scam altcoins having chance of 0.0000000000001% adoption. ask you this, what is the purpose of it when there is just 0.0000000000001% adoption?
|
|
|
the purpose of bitcoin is decentralized money and bitcoin have achieved just that. all these altcoins ideas/add-on smart contracts, smart ledger, crypto 2.0, crypto 9.0, the never ending ideas, manipulations, hypes are just delusional scam ideas, simple as that.
these delusional scam ideas can be build around decentralized crypto bitcoin. the get rich scammers chose not to do so, most are just rather make ipo/ico/premined get rich quick then disappeared, yes, the dumb morons are fall for it everytimes!
ah, the adoption! the scam altcoins have 0.00000000001% adoption when it come to real world.
try to use your useless filled with water brain and never easily giving your hard earn money to the scammers. is your skull thick enough to hold some water?
|
|
|
your scam idea is delusional. the purpose of bitcoin is decentralized money and bitcoin have achieved just that. all this crap scam ideas/add-on smart contracts, smart ledger, crypto 2.0, crypto 9.0 are just delusional scam idea, simple as that.
|
|
|
IOTA is actualy not a coin and wont have utility until people start using IOT enabled devices
I am fed up of this bullshit innovative 2.0 projects. We just need a plain and simple alt to fix BTC mistakes like block size and fungibility. Like Monero with dynamic block size and unlinkability
the devices we're talking about here = scam idea for the dumb morons
|
|
|
another get rich quick coin after anothers there are still dumb morons out there
|
|
|
Interesting. What does this mean, can someone explain how this differs from having a blockchain?
You don't need to know about the details, just remember this formula: SUPER FAST TRANSACTIONS + FREE TRANSACTIONS (0 FEES) + SUPER LIGHT WALLETS + 0% INFLATION + TALENTED TEAM BEHIND + 1ST MOVER ADVANTAGE = BUY = IOTA = KABOOOOOOM ROI then the coin and hype die out when the team withdrawing all the free bitcoins
|
|
|
i see a bagholder is crying for help. get over it, it's over! learn not to fall for scam coin.
|
|
|
Is there a thread for this coin? What are its major features? what is the algo? You should really have a thread with all the info regarding this coin.
same ol' same ol' copy/paste get rich quick then disappeared tactic, expecting nothing different from others ten of thousands get rich quick coins. it's a hit or miss of getting ten or even thousands of btc. this one coin died then go creating another one. so, don't expecting much. oh, chance this thread will getting deleted.
|
|
|
Thats the thing, why would I seek market based information from a forum full of words when there are exchanges that display performance in the form of NUMBERS. Do you know why they say "talk is cheap," ? Because i can sit here all day typing nonsense untill im blue in the face, and it wont cost me a penny. BUT when it comes to moving a market, you need mula. Money talks and big bank always takes little bank So i never seek the opinion of forum posters that just rattle off and regurgitate common clichès. I simply judge every coin on how much genuine volume the dev can deliver out of his own pocket. People here bitch about premines because thats the ongoing clichè. Little do they know, if the dev doesnt make any money - then neither do they. Its the coins without premines that should be avoided But, people dont think. They just repeat and regurgitate. Then they log into some alternate account and start trolling in some engrish typing pattern . . This place is a gift and a curse... depending on your perspective coin should be judge by innovations and techs, not from fake volume and/or fake buy walls by scam dev. 100% chance is when this scam dev made btc from his fake volume he's moving on to creating another scam. it's easy and simple to understand this concept. you sound just like one of the scam dev running dry.
|
|
|
I'd suggest you take a look at Bytecent (BYC) too. It's worth investing in there IMO.
bytecent = constant fake volumes when the dumb bagholder/s tired and realized this scam is worth nothing then stop the fake volume, the time this coin is worth nothing Totally agree with fake vol good job! so there are still people out there who can read fake volume and fake buy walls like me
|
|
|
I'd suggest you take a look at Bytecent (BYC) too. It's worth investing in there IMO.
bytecent = constant fake volumes when the dumb bagholder/s tired and realized this scam is worth nothing then stop the fake volume, the time this coin is worth nothing
|
|
|
Ok, lets say you want to invest to something else beside Bitcoin. Let me explain my strategy first. Of course you can buy some altcoin with already huge marketcap, but such investment will be low risky and thus with lower potential of so called " mental pump" On the other side if you carefully analyze the situation and buy huge stake in low profile shitcoin with good devs and scarce supply it might be a jackpot! Or complete disater. That's why diversification is very welcome and usefull. Just for the record i will provide 5 tips with reason why to invest. I will also mark today price so we can review in 2016 if my advice was good or complete piece of shit. A, ANONCOIN (ANC) 27434sat/coin* - active development team - full I2P integration - working I2P exchange - almost ready 0.9.6 wallet - very low total amount of coins - once they finish zerocash....boom https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.0B, EXPANSE (EXP) 3286/coin* - ethereum clone - low amount of coins, fair distribution - DAO - honest developer with long term vision https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1173722.0C, AURORACOIN (AUR) 8846sat/coin* - new team working hard on Iceland adoption - premine burned - IS exchange launching - very low amount of coins - support in Iceland government through Pirate party https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1044432.0D, NEXUS (NIRO) 364sat/coin** - one of the most interesting coins - developer extremely smart, write the coin from scratch - dev also created real word companies to utilize the coin functions in the future - unique in every aspect - just listen to Colin: http://youmeandbtc.com/bitcoin-podcast/nexus-creator-colin-cantrell-ymb-podcast-e102/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657601.2840E, FEATHERCOIN (FTC) 782sat/coin** - my favourite - will be pumped just because of the chart - besides it has one of the most interesting wallets packed with functions - i expect very interesting news "soon"TM - http://forum.feathercoin.com/If you gain or loose on my advice ... I do not care. You should not listen to me at all, I am mental loser who is going from one defeat to another. Right? * Today's Cryptsy price ** Today's Bittrex price never heard of these scams nexus or expanse before
|
|
|
Ive been looking at buying into an altcoin in the fear that bitcoins blocksize fucks things up for it but im unsure which one i should go for, The 3 that are on my list are litecoin,dash and etherium but im not sure if these are worth buyingto or if the money would just be better spent on getting some more bicoin?
I already had about 10 dash that ive now either formatted or is hiding away in one of my hdd, but id be interested to hear what the community thinks.
none at this point, btc is still a safe heaven
|
|
|
|