it's perfectly okay, and, most of the time, necessary. nobody can send you btc without knowing your address.

FYI reputation loans without collateral is very frowned upon here. 

13 October 12:40 PM. to be exact.

here's the list of activity periods for your future reference -> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12saLhlUoqIdairxzuSPu6EYGrt7FN2lOstO1yDjCEbA

edit:
LMAO I just noticed that you made 2 posts asking this. and snipie posted an answer literally 4 seconds before I did.  

maybe people have realized that imagination alone won't get us anywhere.

not reaching $10k doesn't mean that bitcoin have failed. heck, most people won't consider btc failed even if it never reach that amount.

I would ask badbear before doing that if I were you. getting caught evading a ban might mean nothing to your ban duration if you're permabanned, but it might make it harder for you to get yourself (yourself, not your account) unbanned later.

since this is probably isn't going to happen, you can try ignoring the topic starters of signature campaign threads. it's not perfect but at least you can filter them out.

it's enough. just leave a comment explaining whatever you think needs some clarification.

IMO posting about this kind of thing is not needed unless the matter require further discussion. but maybe that's just me.

$200-$300. at this point I don't think the price can go past that.
though I gotta say $100 range is pretty wide.

edit:
whoops. accidentally voted $300-$400.

collateral is a must here because:

didn't you try checking those tx IDs?

edit:
or are those addresses?

that's your current limit.
you can only get 14 activity for every biweekly period that you posted in.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=237597.0

people that honestly believe that bitcoin is MLM or any kind of ponzi should reconstruct their brain. how bitcoin works is nowhere near those.

yeah. 

it can be used for proving your ownership of an account. I thought you already understood that.

to prove ownership, we encrypt a message using our private key. all people that have your public key can verify it.
to communicate in absolute privacy, we encrypt message using other party's public key. they're the only ones who can decrypt it.

privacy (PGP). you can exchange the public key with someone and then just encrypt every messages so that no one can know what you two are talking about.

that's a public key, the one we used to verify message, not a message.

this should explain it.
www.pgpi.org/doc/pgpintro/

we can verify it because we know the public* key (the one you're supposed to post).

* added.

IIRC (not entirely sure if it was that exact thread) I reported that thread months ago saying exactly this:


as a result, my accuracy went down. 

high forum rank means you've been here for a long time. high reputation means [some] people likes your posts. both means something and can be bought.

I guess both can be abused. but why should we create a new feature for something that can be done with an already existing feature?
in short: I don't think the reputation system is needed. that is unless it have other benefits.

yes. but at least the abusers have to pay. or wait if they decide to farm accounts.