In any case, you will be required to verify your identity before proceeding with the withdrawal process. Therefore, since you will submit it sooner or later, it is best to do it now.

We will hear a lot of noise about this matter in the coming days, but we cannot confirm the news because it is the season of rumors.

So far this news is closest to the truth.


---> Source



You can check the link and steps in this document ---> https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/FTX/Home-DownloadPDF?id1=MTU0MTE4MQ==&id2=-1

This sounds exciting, but in this case the meta-address must be shared between the two parties after the first one derives a single-use private key, so how will it be shared? Will it be through the application or will an additional encryption layer be provided to exchange meta-address/secret?

It's true that this will enhance privacy but other data like transaction fees and transaction broadcasts are shared publicly so without solutions like Ring Signatures, and RingCT I don't think you'll get good privacy.

But AFAIK, I do not think that there is a wallet that applies the concept of Stealth addresses.


If you were to use Stealth addresses here, this would add additional complexity, as the user would need to download your application. Otherwise, anyone can receive Bitcoin, they just need to generate a Bitcoin address in any way.



I see that you are trying to apply Vitalik Ethereum concepts to Bitcoin wallet. Social recovery is one of the solutions proposed by Vitalik Buterin^[1], although I am not convinced that it is implemented well.

Perhaps developing an open source Android app might help us a little in trying it out.


[1] https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/01/11/recovery.html

I noticed that instead of responding to the accusations, he cleaned his trust list by deleting DT negative trust, in general

I was hope this problem to be solved, although I believe that such behavior indicates a scammer with limited capabilities.


Are there any updates about this? Or will someone else create the flag?

This is not true. Please stop spamming the forum using Bitget. I searched your account and the last 20 replies contained the word Bitget in more than 10 different topics.

Bitget has opened an office in downtown Dubai and plans to hire employees and explore a way to obtain a license, but there is no news about them obtaining a license, and all that is being talked about are plans and there are no clear confirmations.
For citizens in the Emirates, their best option is still what I mentioned above or peer-to-peer trading (I do not recommend it for amounts larger than 10,000 dirhams or 3,000 dollars).


https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/07/20/crypto-exchange-bitget-opens-dubai-office-plans-middle-east-expansion/

My sincere condolences to the Moroccan people, I am affected by the staggering number of deaths.

This is a beautiful gesture from CZ, but in return it will be paid by BNB and will be financed from the customers’ money and not from CZ pocket or Binance. In short, he did not pay anything and the price of the currency may be affected by the decline because he printed 3 million BNB.
It is true that users can withdraw them into Bitcoin, but he is trying to kill two birds with one stone, the media coverage of this issue, the increase in the number of Moroccan users and the failure to pay anything, as this offer will only lead to a temporary decrease in the price.


As a reminder, Binance owns ~343k worth of Bitcoin in the form of BNB & BUSD while it has ~618k worth of Bitcoin according to the Proof of Reserves^[1] issued by them. In other words, about half of the bitcoins available at Binance in form of BNB & BUSD printed without any proof of their value.

[1] https://www.binance.com/en/proof-of-reserves

If you search in ----> https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php you will notice that there is a difference between nuke and ban they both ban the user but nuke is for newbies where some members ask Patrollers + mods can nuke this the accounts.

You can find newbies' posts here ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=recent;patrol

Yes, but this is an ideal system for scammers. They will get their money and the blame will fall on you. In the stage of gaining customer trust, when the user will not be able to recover his money, he will stop using the service and all the negative reviews will be yours.

I remember a while ago, scammers used auto-sell links to scam beginners, so your service could easily be misused and all the blame would fall on you.


Does this mean that you intentionally provide false data to gain trust?

I used to see such attacks on the Ethereum blockchain, where they exploit a loophole that allows sending zero transactions from your wallet, but such attacks can be solved at the level of explorer or the wallet, either by hiding dust transactions or preventing spending from them, although I suspected that these attacks would be random to this degree due to the need for extra resources in brute force.

Moving this topic to Beginners & Help would be better.

This is the price of WBTC versus the price of Bitcoin during the last year. Do you think that this currency is really locking Bitcoin 1:1, or is it closer to being a stablecoin whose price is linked to Bitcoin, but the difference here is that in the case of the dollar, there is a difference of a few cents, and it was at the level of 30 thousand $ is not noticeable but the difference of .001 Bitcoin would be significant.


All of these currencies will end up closer to what happened with Luna, so no one knows what will happen when the price of Bitcoin rises and everyone wants to sell. your best options currently are CEXs and we have a good list ----> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5461920.0

I can understand the teaching of bitcoin as something different from the modern economy of SWIFT and banking systems and a central economy based on the dollar as a global reserve currency and trust in central banks that save gold and dollars and print papers in return that promise to have value but USDT are they serious? USDT is a representation of trust in banks, in addition to the trust that there is $1 for every USDT printed, and this is completely wrong.
Teaching children that USDT is real and has value is not good and you should talk to them to stop.

If I understand what you mean, in the multi-signature wallet we have a limited number of keys, and let us assume that it is 3 out of 8, so the calculations are as follows:
The total number of N keys is 8
The number required to spend F 3
Losing one of the keys we have
N^ = 8-1=7
F^=3-1=2
Thus, the spending probability becomes p=f^/N^=2/7
The probability of not being able to spend is 1-p
Then you can replace N and F according to the NofM values and thus obtain a general equation.

The forum allows you the freedom to share your ideas as long as you respect others and do not conflict with bitcointalk rules. So unless the story is completely fictional, you are allowed to share it.
The problem lies in lying and trying to fabricate stories to attract, arouse sympathy, or obtain donations or merits, and sometimes this may be to complete paid posts.
I understand that such posts are not good, but trying to ban them will require us to fully verify them, and sometimes that is difficult, such as the stories that I built my house with Bitcoin or bought my first phone or computer with my posts in this forum.

Just click on ignore and people will stop when no one intract with them

I remember cryptotalk was running a spam campaign in 2020 but that didn't last long. The domain name is fine but most importantly it's still down, it took me about a minute before the site stopped working.

As an idea, it is good, but if you can, through the news, build a measure by which you can evaluate the impact of the news on the price of Bitcoin using keywords, it will be useful.
Adding a mechanism to display and arrange topics is the most important, as we all get lazy after the first 3 links

I do not think that a person like VITALIK would forget to perform a simple setting such as two-factor authentication, and I do not think that his tweets indicate that there is another person managing that account, and therefore such hackers may be a social attack or due to the lack of Twitter staff or someone trying to send him a message.
What surprises me is that if accounts are so easily hacked, how do they protect their data? That is to say, we have not heard of any famous person’s data being leaked or even a report of the loss of currencies, so the matter is a little confusing as it is either a lack of interest on their part or a problem with all social media applications.

A good attempt to get merits, but unfortunately if the beginner has access to this topic, he will most likely know how to search for topics and then he will learn all these things.
Try to help the people in your local board, and after a while  collect all your distinguished contributions and I will rate them for you. If you speak English, try to share new information away from signature campaigns.

I have always read books and articles that talk about the golden rules of success or the secrets and keys to wealth, and all of them are a specific set of advice that if you adhere to, you will become wealthy, and all of them are wrong. There are no fixed rules for success, but there are fixed rules for failure, or things that if you do, your money will be lost or your investments will collapse.
Therefore, there is no fixed recipe for success and wealth. You must be creative and love what you do. There are recipes here that are ready for failure, including:

 - You spend all your money and don't save.
 - Do not think about investing, but rather about buying luxuries.
 -  Unbalanced mentally or physically.

I did not like those games, but in my opinion the principle is the same. Instead of watching advertisements or the complications of adding a bank account to withdraw your profits from the games, users can now buy and sell gems using Bitcoin, although I do not know how the licenses for creating such systems or the judicial complications will be ignored. I hope that they will succeed and that they will not use the word Bitcoin just to attract customers’ attention, but rather as a real application for payments without the need for banking systems.

The support team responded with inaccurate information, but from what I mentioned, the reason is the gambling site. I do not think that binance has a similar policy, but in any case, and to avoid this happening in the future, try to break the link between the last withdrawal/deposit process and your wallet with several intermediate wallets, meaning that you send money to several wallets you manage them Before depositing or withdrawing, it is true that twill cost you more fees but it is rare for these sites to go through a chain analysis of longer than 3 transactions. You can also use mixing services.

Even this reason will end in a few years. I remember that when I joined the forum, I settled in for several months to learn that there were signature campaigns, and after that it was easy to collect 1 Bitcoin within several months. Today, it is more difficult to collect it within a year, and if the average price of Bitcoin rises to above 70k There is no logical reason for someone who collected 10 Bitcoins from the forum in 2014-2017 to continue signature campaigns.

It is easy to say that there will be less activity on the accounts from 2012-2014, and after two years we will notice the disappearance of members from 2014-2017. However, if you continue to post to get payments only, you will certainly continue until signature campaigns are banned.

If someone told me to touch the fire, it does not burn, why I would risk touching it to prove that he is wrong? All evidence indicates that you are a scammer and you are asking users to try the service?

Go on and take a shot.
I know scammers who are willing to scam you out of a dollar let alone 0.002BTC.


Instead of wasting your time and ours, you did not provide any evidence explaining how to achieve profits. If the system is based on donations, leave the option to the user to get free money and then decide whether to donate to the system or not.

I do not advise anyone to deposit a single satoshi to this site, and I will not remove the negative trust from your account.