SO HOW MANY COINS XMG MAGI - MAGICALLY VANISHED DURING THIS - SO CALLED FIXING THE BLOCK CHAIN??? WHAT - WOULD ANYBODY HOLDING ANY OTHER COIN - - HAVING THEM MAGICALLY VANISH??? WHAT DO YOU CALL IT??? A SCAM??? BUSINESS??? OR THE DEVIL JACKING PEOPLE OVER??? SURE YOU PEOPLE THAT DID NOT LOSE COINS SAY IT'S GOOD - - BUT WHAT ABOUT ALL THE REST OF US??? SO WHAT WERE BEING TOLD - IS F US RIGHT???
We're sorry for the fork issues and loss while we must keep one that most of people agree with. Refer to this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg21044020#msg21044020 |
|
|
|
any news joe
I shall update. |
|
|
|
coins getting delisted from Cryptopia.
Click on the deposit button and it will say unavailable due to the coin soon to be delisted
I sent to them a support message and see what they will say. I've been in touch with Bittrex; Bittrex is responding super fast, agreed maintenance mode. |
|
|
|
So far, no fork.
Did you mean listen=0 instead of server=0? I believe you need server=1 to accept RPC mining commands.
Yes, that's listen=0. I corrected the post. |
|
|
|
For me, one possible solution to the flash mining problem is to require that the previous block of each PoW block link is a PoS block.The solution has been encoded in the HBN, and recent updates may be worth a try.It's nice to see all the support there to find a fix and make the coin run well!
That's a potential solution in part and I have thought about too to have mixing PoW / PoS with a fixed pattern; one thing that needs a think is probably the corresponding change to difficulty adjustment. |
|
|
|
i'm Sorry.. what about exchanges?
Once chain stabilizes, we'll make request. ok, but all mining are validate? Yes, all mining on the chain connected to the main node is valid. |
|
|
|
i'm Sorry.. what about exchanges?
Once chain stabilizes, we'll make request. |
|
|
|
i'm Sorry.. what about exchanges?
Forget, while Magi in test state. ============================== Absolutely misunderstand: ... What's wrong? Little confusion here I need to clarify that block value depends on "difficulty(aver)"; the gap between aver-diff and actual diff in mining needs to be improved with an optimized algo. |
|
|
|
Another good idea:
...
I'd agree to a certain extent. |
|
|
|
... I would like an answer from the Magi team, because on their site I found THIS, and I read it before I started mining almost 3 months ago. It was the breaking point to even start mining with my CPUs. Magi is at the first concentrating on the low cost in maintaining its block system, for example, through cost effective mining devices. To this end, Magi, aiming at fairness, cost effective and energy efficiency, strives to make mining be available to everyone, and provides an even playing field for people looking to issue digital coins without expensive equipment. So, is it still valid? If yes, why do you don't deal with people like this person above? If no, then it was a nice ride with you guys and girls, but I'm out, because that's everything but not fairness, cost effective and energy efficiency. IMO, it is as one can look at the total network hashrate here versus elsewhere. We're there that not much hash power is put to run the coin, and one can mine MAGI using devices such as CPU. However, I won't put a 100% random affirmative as the situation you asked, which has been talked, and that's why there comes one of the to-do-list: A scheduled hard fork targeting at improving PoW. Realistically, though, there always comes the situation where people access to huge resources over the remaining parties. And this is almost the consequence when mining opens to the world. It's not about hard rule to rule out these people, but more or less requires some other solutions. Speaking of fairness, it is very much relative and depends, as we can judge that coins divided among different hands equally as being fair; however, it isn't unfair when one investing twice of efforts gets twice of rewards, despite how he acquires investments free or non-free. How can we judge the situation that one puts tens, thousands of efforts? malafaya's example depicts a scene, that 10 XMG sharing among 2Mh/s, versus 1 XMG dominated by 20Mh/s. Overall speaking of the history of mining in years, I do see a tendency that coins go into more hands than few hands, which is towards fairness by a crypto language. |
|
|
|
Joe, i mining solo.. justo 9 XMG today.. is normal? The network hash rate seems getting high which will reduce block rewards; mining rewards can be checked using following command (using the current block value): |
|
|
|
ohh it was just a temporary fix damn
We're on it, bear with us. |
|
|
|
|
I'd mention that the release just posted is a temporary solution to keep the chain and mining going, not a FIX. We'll make efforts on the 2nd step of getting a fix ASAP.
For this reason, I recommend do not ask exchanges to bring up the wallet, and when possible place least tickets regarding the issues. We apologize for the trouble. What I'm saying is that we'd be aware of minimizing exchanges' efforts on this incident, or we end up a high probability of worse situation.
At this point, again I recommend keeping exchange wallet in maintenance mode until a final FIX is out.
|
|
|
|
The blockchain data reuploaded, that you will need. Please download this one (#1451225). Sorry for confusion. http://coinmagi.org/bin/block-chain/Got compilation done, will update source and post links to download wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the timing, allow me a few minutes to complete a final compiling; my laptop is extra slow.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
