As far as I know there's no subscription on Cryptoflix, you'll only pay when you watch something (video on demand model)
then the price has to be really low for it to compete with Netflix. Unless we're talking higher prices for newer releases. I really want to know the estimated price, for example how much it will cost to stream "Forrest Gump" ? They will provide some old movies right? Maybe you pay the time you watched in cryptoflix. For example 10 hours monthly for 1.99 usd or else. With this you cant prioritize the movies old or new etc. And people just pay what they wanted. It is difficult to maintain the fixed price in USD, considering, especially what was mentioned above, about starting in South American Countries. It is necessary to evaluate the values to be charged separately, without losing the notion of what they will pay monthly in that particular Country, especially now as many Countries aiming at the Regulation of the Crypto |
|
|
|
A voting system for ehf token holder can be a good system I think, community always like to be listened, and the sucess of a crypto currencies is also due to the community behind it. EHF can build something around that I think.
What kind of votes do you want to let the community participate here? A voting system like NXT, if you check out NXT wallet they have a voting system built in the wallet. It cost NXT to make votes Yes, but for what purpose? For what do you want to vote in this project? I don't really see a use for community votings here. I've seen NAV community vote to successfully reduce the staking rewards from 5% to 4% so that the saved amount can be used for other critical purpose beneficial to the project. This works. EHF community can also vote on certain strategic matters that will directly affect the stakeholders - this helps the community feel involved and give opportunities for the devs to get things done without too much fuss from the community. sounds like a pretty nice idea. i've also heard of other projects doing that now too. would be great to also see that on ehf! Well it would be ideal to have a consensus among the EFH community on any major decision that will affect the project. Imho. Any and all voting system related to the project will always bring the Community closer to the Project, show them its importance next to it, and make decision making much more fair, regardless of what is voted for |
|
|
|
As far as I know there's no subscription on Cryptoflix, you'll only pay when you watch something (video on demand model)
then the price has to be really low for it to compete with Netflix. Unless we're talking higher prices for newer releases. I really want to know the estimated price, for example how much it will cost to stream "Forrest Gump" ? They will provide some old movies right? I would assume it might be lower compared to a subscription model where we can compute the average hours of streaming a customer consumes. Do you mean the Platform has an accountant to control its Users? This would be really good for everyone, less problems with limits, since each would be responsible for their own available time to use |
|
|
|
So, this is not like Datum, Ethos projects? They will be analize data and than give to other projects like Datum, Ethos for sell?  no is not exactly the same, you can have a look under use cases in the website to see the main differences We are also preparing a use case blog, so stay posted for that. Anxious for this, the more material available, the more sympathetic the project will have and the more they will recognize its value, some institutional videos to be shared would also add much value to the project and knowledge to the Community |
|
|
|
hardly a demo, they will release it later in Q2 or Q3
They should have made that demo before. The demo will be available after ico and it won't help the sales in ico. I think it is a mistiming, unfortunately. they should've pushed the ICO date and not have it now. but business decisions are just that. They could still do that, couldn't they? The roadmap is already a bit off anyway. Many projects have postponed an ICO for different reasons such as network congestions or general market situation. Their roadmap is also still haven't updated, the pre-ICO in January and ICO in February-March. Many people want to see the demo before the ICO, but we dont about their (repu team) plan, maybe theyre just focusing on the marketing for now. Yes, we can only speculate at the moment. Maybe the demo is close to being ready. That would help the upcoming ICO. All we can do is wait. The initial prediction of a demo is Q2, but I believe there could be changes in your script, we go through a few moments of crypto and some legal adaptations can be made, but it would be great to see them comply with the script without hindrance |
|
|
|
Do you have a cap on private investors round or you can ge I would like to know if Biotron has processes in place to prevent users from faking their own data. If the endresult is users selling their data directly to interested parties, i can imagine some users who will try to fake some data to appear more valuable to the interested parties.
similarly to the KYC process the data you provide will need to be verified before entering the system i assume, otherwise the whole concept fall. I don't think they will use kyc similar thing for their system. It probably limits their joiners. I never would make a KYC. Big companies already have too much data from me. To connect the data with my person would be the end of privacy. also I read in the wp: Pseudonymisationalso takes place. It is a procedure whereby any identifying characteristics of data are replaced with a value which prevents the individual from being directly identified. But I have to read more to fully understand this part of the project ... like people previously stated. -every ico need now kyc to secure their place if some legal issues are upcoming later -find friends to invest in a group, then only 1 person has to kyc -go to exchange and buy after the tokens hit on it -join bounties  if there are any and or, hope for airdrop Especially for this project a KYC is ok for me. It is nothin illegal or an anonymous token. And today there are nearly no ICOs without KYC KYC has already bothered me a lot in past projects, simply because I did not know at the time its form of application and utility, but I see that it is a necessary discomfort for Investors for greater control and success of the Team and project |
|
|
|
The Demo, the beta demo will starts after ICO and investors can participate in the beta testing.
that is going to be available at some point after March, it said Q2 Very good that Repu already has something to present in Q2, is the most requested so far, will be a differential and so much for the project, and certainly something that will help eliminate many doubts about the functionality of the Platform and its possibilities of application I would've hoped that they have a beta before the ICO to advertise better, but I'll take what I can get. Agreed, beta before ICO will be better and not after it. Imo, when investors able to see something before investing their money is the most affordable thing in ICO's projects. I always have a hard time to understand why teams would decide to not first build the beta and then go for the ICO, unless funds from the ICO might be critical to the development of the beta. Usually if you have a great product you should be better off having the beta ready during the ICO. Sometimes there are more disadvantages to publish a beta or a klick dummy. If it is a realy complex product and a development with low effort is not possible it does not makes sense. The investors wont be happy about the result. There is a lot of potential in the Work Team, they are struggling to reach partners who help them in their development, but the complexity of some features and the legal implications that can occur are really something to surpass |
|
|
|
|
The problem with the potential partnerships we have indicated for successful and promising projects like Cryptoflix is that people do not always see the same potential as us investors, and when some potential partners realize that value, they just try to hitchhike their success and draw good things for you
|
|
|
|
I don't care an article is paid or not, it can't tell something it is not available.
In crypto, every content is paid. But i always prefer written content in prestigious websites.
i also intend to give credit to unbound known people who are reviewing an ico. like some youtubers like crypto.lark for example. We can still count on credible articles and evaluations nowadays, unfortunately there are people trying to profit from our need for information, and some profit on the laziness of many, who do not do their own review. Every user should have their own evaluation of each project and extract complements from certain other work |
|
|
|
i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><
Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it It’s not that hard if English is your first language. It was quite an interesting read for me. really Oo? well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector. By the way, I did not find information about what language will be used in the provision of Advisory services. I believe that this project should be multilingual. I believe it will be in a later stage.. the scientific language in most health cases is English anyway, so I wouldn't worry about this right now. Latin is the most popular and most used in medical sphere Yes, but just to describe a illness or condition by it's latin name, not more. For the rest other languages are used of course. it would be much easier for Team to initially work on a single language platform, replicate its functionalities in new languages according to their deployment in these specific locations, although there is a distinction between the Nationalities of each Council member and the Developer team |
|
|
|
I think it will need a code ass that can only be used when on uses the platform, then when a recorder of some kind is used, the video go with the watermark, when is legit, it is hidden from the screen, but is there, so there is no way around it, but to have the code, soi can think how that ca work using the blockchain.
Is something like this even possible? And what about someone is using the platform legally but make a video capture of the fullscreen video. In this case it would produce a new video file from a screen capture. No way you can be protected from this, but in case somebody will really decide to record from another screen, the picture is probably no good and sound is even worse. Viewers nowadays are quite picky. Where is the problem? You take a direct capture of the screen. If you watch it in 1080p or so the capture is also in that quality, isn't it? Yeah you are right, you CAN actually record the tv itself from the outside, there is no way somebody could avoid doing that, though the quality will always be less than the original, you could use a high-resolution camera and a studio microphone, but there is not much one can do with just sound an images, while the original file has way more data than just that,still, we will know that is a pirate, so that can be denounce. I am not talking about a camera... There is software to capture videos from your screen directly. The team has already quoted something like the watermark, which would give the assurance that it would not be pirated with facilities, for the recordings directly from the screen is more complicated, but the tip is valid for Time to work on it, it would be even better to have legal means in the future. |
|
|
|
I'm confident that this project's transparency feature would get the attention of big data companies such as Google and Facebook. Maybe it could affect on how they do data analytics in the future. Imho. Well i'd rather that Biotron is not taken over by one of them. Best to let old dinosaurs like Google and Facebook die out and let a fresh company with new ideas take it's place. Google will not die out and i am sure you would be jumping up of joy if they would partner up with Biotron since that would mean a huge price boost of their token. Haha, well, partnering is something different of course and yes i would jump with joy then  But i think you'd be surprised about how fast a company who dominates a sector can lose that. Just like Yahoo used to be one of the biggest search engines. Yeah, in such IT spheres there is no time for relaxing at all. Firstly you are a king of the world, next you are cleaning toilets The IT spheres are really ruthless, many developers and people who have designed big things were once mastered and today can not even be recognized, although there is great potential for continuous work in Biotron, and that makes all the difference. |
|
|
|
|
It was a good choice for Time to set up a reference program and call it an airdrop, it will surely bring a lot of people to the community, new fans, admirers and more potential investors for the project.
|
|
|
|
Meet the faces and experience behind our personal data analtics platform and ICO!  great ! I would love this, it will bring your coin to many people Thanks for this, Team starts the project in an exceptional way by interacting extensively with the community and making all possible information accessible |
|
|
|
I like the idea that tokens holders can invest in the offered film projects with the returns and conditions offered in a term sheet. Maybe we can create a own Serie when the ico collect enough If for example I had enough tokens then I invested some on a film project, that will be a new experience to me. The thing that till today is just a dream for me. Thanks to cryptoflix for offering such good stuff. Yes, investing in a film project you are convinced of and hopefully making good profit sounds just amazing. Had not thought on this side, really, after the platform delivered and working, we have the possibility to invest in the production of certain films and profit from its success? It is really something that will take the team to a continuous work, and its investors to many profits even after the initial phase |
|
|
|
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment. That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves. Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do. that may be, but I'm sure word travels around and maybe a rating system will be in place. so you don't have to go to a bad doctor. also, second opinions will be possible right? Of course second opinions can differ from the first one, when human factor involved in any situation, errors should be considered on every step. By concentrating efforts on what they have already planned, it is certainly the best decision to make, since the Team has drawn up a long roadmap, and to divert its ways now, would really be detrimental to the project |
|
|
|
Reputation is the cornerstone of power. With its help you can rise, stand out in a crowd.  It can be really useful in certain businesses, corporate industries need these services for many purposes and once people tend to trust a system, everyone follows. You are right, it can be useful but also harmful to some innocent people, people who have bad faith can throw some dirt on innocent people. There is a delicate balance in there. There are several possibilities of Repu Usage currently in the Social scope, but some of them may lead to Repu a responsibility perhaps greater and more rigorous than the one that the Time thought for its future, I see an incredible rise ahead for this after the test and launch of your platform |
|
|
|
|
Cryptoflix has the opportunity to revolutionize the segment and bring many users to crypto, but it is a commitment to continue with a continuous work, because it will certainly be a pioneer
|
|
|
|
The Demo, the beta demo will starts after ICO and investors can participate in the beta testing.
that is going to be available at some point after March, it said Q2 Very good that Repu already has something to present in Q2, is the most requested so far, will be a differential and so much for the project, and certainly something that will help eliminate many doubts about the functionality of the Platform and its possibilities of application |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
