[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[batako]

i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><

Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it

It’s not that hard if English is your first language.
It was quite an interesting read for me.

really Oo?

well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector.

By the way, I did not find information about what language will be used in the provision of Advisory services. I believe that this project should be multilingual.

I believe it will be in a later stage.. the scientific language in most health cases is English anyway, so I wouldn't worry about this right now.

Latin is the most popular and most used in medical sphere

Yes, but just to describe a illness or condition by it's latin name, not more. For the rest other languages are used of course.

For health vocabularies it'll be helpful to use google as our assistance. We can find the description even deeper.

[viljy]

i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><

Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it

It’s not that hard if English is your first language.
It was quite an interesting read for me.

really Oo?

well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector.

By the way, I did not find information about what language will be used in the provision of Advisory services. I believe that this project should be multilingual.

I believe it will be in a later stage.. the scientific language in most health cases is English anyway, so I wouldn't worry about this right now.

Latin is the most popular and most used in medical sphere

Yes, but just to describe a illness or condition by it's latin name, not more. For the rest other languages are used of course.

it would be much easier for Team to initially work on a single language platform, replicate its functionalities in new languages according to their deployment in these specific locations, although there is a distinction between the Nationalities of each Council member and the Developer team

I think something like that is happening, but of course I am not sure. But I assume they start with English probably and then go over to give other languages as possible options, which would make sense. You could even implement a google translate function if needed in the first step until there are accurate translations for the cases.

Localization in other languages is necessary, otherwise this platform will simply not be used by those whose language is not represented there. And automatic translation here will not work. Since no double interpretations or translation errors are unacceptable in the field of medicine. Therefore, developers will be forced to make high-quality localization in different languages.

[cevap]

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

[jonnytracker]

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

[king_of_alts]

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

[Axcel-m]

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.

[sambuki]

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.

To find an independent party which make honest ICO's reviews will be so hard. Self research is the best way to be used in this business and we can use as more sources as possible before making the final decision.

[helloal]

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.

To find an independent party which make honest ICO's reviews will be so hard. Self research is the best way to be used in this business and we can use as more sources as possible before making the final decision.

The sooner  people realise that there are no truly independent reviewers, the better. No one is immune to the allure of free money, and all a dev team needs to do is to promise some ‘compensation’ to reviewers in exchange for an extra positive spin.

[Piggy]

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain 

[king_of_alts]

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain 

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

[cantdecide]

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.

Yep, I also would be carful about video reviews. A lot of youtuber promising much but just telling you stuff which is written in the whitepaper or on the website anyways. There are too many selfproclaimed experts out there, hard to find really good ones (still there are some good channels out there, but these are always telling you anyways to research on your own too).

[omwibya]

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain 

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

[saintkamei]

i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><

Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it

It’s not that hard if English is your first language.
It was quite an interesting read for me.

really Oo?

well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector.

By the way, I did not find information about what language will be used in the provision of Advisory services. I believe that this project should be multilingual.

I believe it will be in a later stage.. the scientific language in most health cases is English anyway, so I wouldn't worry about this right now.

Latin is the most popular and most used in medical sphere

Yes, but just to describe a illness or condition by it's latin name, not more. For the rest other languages are used of course.

it would be much easier for Team to initially work on a single language platform, replicate its functionalities in new languages according to their deployment in these specific locations, although there is a distinction between the Nationalities of each Council member and the Developer team

I think something like that is happening, but of course I am not sure. But I assume they start with English probably and then go over to give other languages as possible options, which would make sense. You could even implement a google translate function if needed in the first step until there are accurate translations for the cases.

Localization in other languages is necessary, otherwise this platform will simply not be used by those whose language is not represented there. And automatic translation here will not work. Since no double interpretations or translation errors are unacceptable in the field of medicine. Therefore, developers will be forced to make high-quality localization in different languages.

Usually, with traditional business it is the other way round. Focus on specific market with a specialized product and organically spread from there. To do localization with only proof of concept will stretch the team too far. Let that be the question for much later which can be implemented on a phase by phase basis.

[levyashin]

I don't care an article is paid or not, it can't tell something it is not available.

In crypto, every content is paid. But i always prefer written content in prestigious websites.

[kohanvn]

There are  some advantages of having EHF token.

Time by time, when eHealth First must take strategic decisions regarding the Project operations, the company could bring these decisions to a vote with EHF token holders. A voting process will be installed on EHF-based smart contract.

[Frank37]

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain 

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

Not necessarily, if you have friends, you can also save a lot of work, when you divide the research, because everyone has a slightly different specialization.

[Genesis07]

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain 

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

Not necessarily, if you have friends, you can also save a lot of work, when you divide the research, because everyone has a slightly different specialization.

Well I think peer review and consultations would be an ideal must do strategy before investing in any crypto projects.

people should be generally aware where to invest with their own money in doing their own research on a project. but some people are just dumb and hop on every hype train ><"

[hicaribou]

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain  

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

Not necessarily, if you have friends, you can also save a lot of work, when you divide the research, because everyone has a slightly different specialization.

Well I think peer review and consultations would be an ideal must do strategy before investing in any crypto projects.

people should be generally aware where to invest with their own money in doing their own research on a project. but some people are just dumb and hop on every hype train ><"

If you dont have enough time to do a research but you want to invest your money, just find a professional person to do that for you.
There are a lot of options and ways, you can try to look at Genesis Vision (you can invest your money to be traded by professional trader that you trust).
And also if its about ehfirst whitepaper, if maybe you have a friend who have a lot of experience in this field, you can ask him to read and explain it to you, he can even be interested too.
The thing is just dont do it carelessly.

[areschen]

i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><

Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it

It’s not that hard if English is your first language.
It was quite an interesting read for me.

really Oo?

well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector.

By the way, I did not find information about what language will be used in the provision of Advisory services. I believe that this project should be multilingual.

I believe it will be in a later stage.. the scientific language in most health cases is English anyway, so I wouldn't worry about this right now.

Latin is the most popular and most used in medical sphere

Yes, but just to describe a illness or condition by it's latin name, not more. For the rest other languages are used of course.

it would be much easier for Team to initially work on a single language platform, replicate its functionalities in new languages according to their deployment in these specific locations, although there is a distinction between the Nationalities of each Council member and the Developer team

I think something like that is happening, but of course I am not sure. But I assume they start with English probably and then go over to give other languages as possible options, which would make sense. You could even implement a google translate function if needed in the first step until there are accurate translations for the cases.

Localization in other languages is necessary, otherwise this platform will simply not be used by those whose language is not represented there. And automatic translation here will not work. Since no double interpretations or translation errors are unacceptable in the field of medicine. Therefore, developers will be forced to make high-quality localization in different languages.

Localization in other languages is relatively easy.  but if we want to integrate with some local common used APPs，this is a huge work

[Genesis07]

I don't care an article is paid or not, it can't tell something it is not available.

In crypto, every content is paid. But i always prefer written content in prestigious websites.

i also intend to give credit to unbound known people who are reviewing an ico. like some youtubers like crypto.lark for example.