As far as I am aware, those are a group of people who claim to have insider information in the cryptocurrency market, which they use to gain a significant amount of profit in terms of trading and investing. They also claim to inform you whenever there is a significant movement in the market, which is similar to how trading signals work.
Perhaps the reason why other members said that buying their service is "immoral" is because what they are offering is too good to be true, and relying on signals and insider trading does not make you a good trader. Trading, you see, is an art form in and of itself, and it is being harnessed on a daily basis not only by newcomers but also by those who make a living from daytrading.
Most people here are also opposed to trading signals in any form because they provide no benefit. Selling trading signals is a popular way to get money out of people's pockets these days.
|
|
|
His basic course for newbies and the Bitcoin course is the same as the courses you can find everywhere.
Do you still think his video courses make sense? I mean, is it worthwhile to keep up with the Butterfly Effect and his new uploads? So far, I've finished watching his origin courses, including The Futures of Trading, and his channel has the most comprehensive and step-by-step walkthrough in terms of learning the art of T.A. out of all T.A courses on YouTube. They migght even be idea copied from more popular traders like Twitter’s @EmperorBTC and @Bloodgood, who are best friends and have made millions together.
I'm familiar with @EmperorBTC, and I even downloaded his trading manual to see which T.A has the same concept and which one makes a lot more sense. I never expected T.A to be so broad, and it appears that it will take me years before I can apply it in the real market?
|
|
|
As much as possible, I'd like to avoid the Binance Telegram channel or any other telegram group offered by large trading platforms. Usually, these groups are crawling with scammers and wannabe traders who are just posting their PnL without showing any proof of T.A, trading plan, etc. It's not only a bad trading community, but it's also not good for newbie traders who are just starting out -- which includes me! Another option is to start a mega thread for your short/quick questions. Probably keep it self-moderated and set some rules so discussion/s would be much easier to follow.
I pretty much like this idea instead of disturbing Cyrus for creating another channel solely for trading. Another issue is that he has been working hard to build the Bitcointalk YouTube channel, and I don't want to bother those people, especially when it comes to moderating the channel. Thank you for the suggestion @Potato Chips
|
|
|
Heya!
Does bitcointalk members have trading community chatroom (e.g, Dicord, Telegram)? I tried searching about this but it never gave me any useful results. Also, I don't want to spam the trading board for frequently asking short questions.
Thank you everyone!
|
|
|
I believe this kind of treatment will always be appreciated by the players and it will help Roobet to build its name a bit up.
They've been developing their marketing strategy for years, beginning with their signature campaign, promo codes on Twitter, social media giveaways, and monthly (?) art contests. Roobet also organizes games for the bitcointalk community, which can be found in the Games and Round section. And, as far as I know, they've gained traction from Twitch Streamers. It's also not surprising that so many people are drawn to play alongside Roobet. I've also not encountered any issues on their end in terms of receiving their art contest rewards.
|
|
|
Here's mine! - I purchased my Ledger Nano S on May 13, 2020, during the first year of quarantine, and the product was delivered after 9 days of waiting :'(due to some restrictions that caused the courier's delay. @Lucius posted this thread Ledger Nano S - Get 50% off! in which I took advantage of the sale. - I originally purchased the Trezor One to store all of my Axies/NFT because the Axie Infinity does not support Ledger products, which I believe is understandable given the Ledger hacking fiasco. I ordered it on October 26, 2021 from an authorized reseller in our area, and it arrived three days later. I also do not unplug the cable on the Trezor One because I use it on a daily basis and I feel that unplugging the cable repeatedly can break the hardware wallet . So far, after using both products after a year and for months, I have not found any hardware issues, with the exception of Ledger's latest firmware upgrade, which causes the overall storage to drop dramatically.
|
|
|
It's funny to think that everyone else is trying to better theirselves, learn from their mistakes, become discipline and such while I am here trying to figure out if I could try getting my feet wet again on gambling especially in terms of options trading established by that one particular casino. LOL
Even though, I am planning to gamble once again, learning and understanding your financial capacity is probably the most important thing to consider before making such move in this space. You don't wanna mess with your mental and financial state at the start of the year!
|
|
|
I made a post on this guy a year ago, and I was all pleased of myself for promoting his courses on this forum without realizing that he treated his community members like dirt when there was someone in his discord spewing some dishonesty about cottoncandy. Despite the fact that I continue to watch his free YouTube courses, I still take them with a grain of salt and only watch them when I have some spare time. He even had an argument with another trader who claimed cotton had stolen someone's work [1] and that he had completely reverse engineered it. Unfortunately, there is no information about that person/trader on the internet, and his courses appear to be relatively hidden. [1] https://twitter.com/c0tt0nc4ndyTA/status/1397718121931100163?s=20Until now, his channel contains the courses that are once being paid by his members including the Butterfly effect as well the new ones like FOT remastered and trading strategies.
|
|
|
Please accept my apologies for derailing the discussion; I simply want to clarify some things with @Timelord2067. As far as I know, I have removed TYM and Silent26 on week 77 and 106 respectively. The reason being is TYM committed a loan default not only on @DireWolfM14 but also to me [1][2]. Furthermore, I continue to trust crwth and finaleshot to this day since I believe they are 2 different people who are not alts of a notorious scammer in the Philippine Section. Those are also the same people who assisted me when get started in cryptocurrency journey particularly in this forum. Reading the entire thread in which cabalism13 is implicated in the mishandling of charity funds is particularly surprising and is something I did not expect. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233790.msg54061366#msg54061366[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233790.msg54104002#msg54104002Again sorry for derailing the topic
|
|
|
FORTUNE JACK LOGO ENTRY
BLUE VERSION
YELLOW VERSION
|
|
|
Reserved! I hope I can submit before 6:59 AM
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1289002Current amount of posts (including this one): 1748 bech32 BTC Address: bc1qwzgv54m20c0ty2vavm8kdnumcrnen4gnjhatmf BSC BEP20 Address for the NFT: 0xD81859b509343cd8DBe84C106BC8c16BAD0Fc931 Earned merit in the last 120 days: 24
|
|
|
ROOBET SANTA ROO
.ADOBE PHOTOSHOP CC | DIGITAL PAINTING
F R E E H A N D D R A W I N G
PROCESS- Concept / Rough sketch
- Defining Light and Shadow
- Tonal Value
- Coloring
- Blending Mode
- Finalizing
WORK IN PROGRESS
.FINAL DRAWING
All of the images drawn or the concept is originally created by me. This piece is entirely DIGITALLY PAINTED from scratch with no photo manipulation nor editing.
Roobet username: M4u5
|
|
|
OP's analysis isn't far from the truth, though I was a lot skeptical clicking on the links in their post. I hate clickbaits. However, I agree with them that Bitcoin will witness a tremendous spike (it's already happening) this month. For me, Bitcoin's bullishness is likely to end the way that of 2017 ended in December.
My TA inlines with your analysis as well. I've computed the %change of the monthly to yearly markets and the hype and popularity really just feels the same as what happens back in 2017. The bullish market can really be compared on that year plus how the trendline forms from low time frame to huge ones are just expectable and amazing. The only thing that might challenge the BTC price action is if scams would be a common thing or the FUDs win. But if analyzed with fundamental analysis as well, then we really are expecting an ATH of 100k this year. (hopefully)
|
|
|
The OP is talking about making others bet for him with his information and money (or probably your money as well) and is subject to match fixing - in which already a redflag not only on his behalf but also on the company/business he claims to be part of. I see that you only scheme the main topic without further looking forward on what the discussion is all about. But for now, the OP isn't really replying on the accusations thrown to his claims and is already a solid description of a scam.
I think it's better that op didn't reply. It could be a scam and the interested partner could be in serious trouble since op didn't reply and op didn't take to provide answers. Also didn't provide any proof that op have infos about a match. Indeed. It will just be a defensive attitude if the OP will keep replying despite the fact of him losing each and every accusations. But what bothers me somehow is that if he fails his modus in here, he can still do it on other platform or groups that doesn't really verifies information first or to those that are greedy to make money hasle-free in gambling, hence would spark a little chain to match-fixing schemes and fixers always wins... Besides, who even does have a "private information" and still relies on the bet accounts of others He just literally foreshadowed the fact that his "matches" never really won nor exist at all.
|
|
|
This is a short version of our story, but if you're interested, you can read the full version here. ~ It is a common knowledge that Apple Company really has issues with implementing/publishing third party applications from companies they might not find profitable to their sight. Since you've just boomed in their platform, they know that they can either stop you from making profits on their platform just by banning your application, or they could just sue you for things that they claim written in their TOS. Your experience reminds me on why Apple also banned Flappy Bird for the same money reasons. This really defines the fact that Apple's platform really isn't business/developers friendly. Just a normal and bad merchant, once a fisher got a lot of fishes, the merchant tends to do everything to get the fishers fishes or make money from him.
|
|
|
|