You're guess iswrong. I said Friday/Saturday (PST) is when I will merge the forks.

Be patient, everything is on time according to my original time schedule. It all depends on the timing of my "associates".



But back on topic, it certainly appears as if Coinhunter was right about the need for 51% protection being built in.


~BCX~

Can we see more statement like that more ?
Gavin's statement make litecoin drop to 0.005 yesterday.
Price is too fucking high now, I need more cheap coins.

Fake statement is fine too, a staff can come in and confirm that he's been invited to see the Amazon book in progress 

Gox would crash.

For Christ's sake...... YOU are one of IT's Disciples. You know exactly what I am talking about.

IT teasing CoinHunter, in regards to the SC community putting up their end (of the proposed 1,000 BTC) rather than Him, himself. RING A BELL NOW ?
(someone made the mistake of using a 'WE' where an "I" should have been used to accept the challenge....?)

OH..and as far as 2,500 BTC NOT being enough to entice IT ? I recall 1,000 BTC being enough for IT's Solidcoin Challenge that IT proposed ITself.

smoothie..... funny mate

I agree



the market remains unchanged
you lose

Just make sure all of the FINE PRINT requisites in my challenge are met.

Every piece of BULLSHIT out of IT's mouth (well, typed) needs to be confirmed and proven.

By my estimates, the BlowHardEXpress FORKED Blockchain has been running for 30+ hours, with enough hash power to bring the Litecoin Network to it's knees.

I will offer 2500 BTC for ACTUAL PROOF that it exists and meets EVERY SINGLE threat as set forth by DooshNoZZleXpress.

I want to offer a small token of my appreciation to IT for IT's hard work...I simply WANT PROOF and am willing to pay for the privilege.

~YourNewFuckingNightMare~

We were wondering about your thoughts on this:

Suddenly raising the difficulty or causing a massive reorg sweep would cause the network to spit out a new blockchain.
Difficulty would be higher than the parent with a training period of one week.
To reduce the difficulty within that week, trading must begin.
Based on the level of trading, interactions, and initial network shape, the network will set fixed parameters for retarget time, maximum coins minted, halving time, and block reward.
If the chain is not retrained in the alloted time it dies.

Telltale signs of 51% attacks would naturally lead to more blockchains.

Questions?

no bit can escape crypto-blackhole

That makes sense. If you think BCX will succeed and are immoral, then the way to profit at the exchange's expense is transfer a lot of LTC in to an exchange and sell them for BTC during the fork.

If the attack is successful then the LTC deposit is rolled back and you can sell them again. Assuming there is somebody still willing to buy them.

In any case, lots of buying before the attack then lots of selling while the fork is being created is the pattern I would expect to see. Of course, that is the same pattern as a plain pump-and-dump scheme...

I'll help. Should I bring the checken or the bbq sauce? :p

Thank you for your support.