Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 05:30:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 [847] 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 »
16921  Economy / Speculation / Re: Just finally fall to $2 so I can get in and you can jump back to $5 on: September 06, 2011, 10:43:34 PM
I'm not sure they would even mine on alt block chains. The prices haven't gone up - there's nothing that's really more profitable than bitcoin right now, after you take into consideration the exchange fees etc.

It's not 100% about profit.

If bitcoin lacks features and bug fixes and price over time there will be a move to alt-chains.

16922  Economy / Speculation / Re: Just finally fall to $2 so I can get in and you can jump back to $5 on: September 06, 2011, 10:31:51 PM
I have to decide my buy in point, I am thinking around $2.00 I will start to buy bitcoins. However, I risk catching a falling knife and even at that price i am worried.

Best would be to wait it out and see the longer term stable price.

It looks like bitcoin is going no-where, at if bitcoin prices start falling, other online currencies may just take its place. I personally would like a currency that has much more bitcoins then 21 million. I think the problem with bitcoin is that they are priced to high individually.

I'm with Edward50 on this. I think bitcoins are in it final descent to $0.50 to $2.00 range. I think that other copies of bitcoin could add more features than bitcoin currently offers.  There is so much concentration of hashing power on this network that if the price became unprofitable for a period of time people mining would be forced to mine on other block chains.

The foreseeable future doesn't appear to have any new interested investors just yet.

EDIT: I unloaded 50% of my bitcoins at $10.60 and the other 50% at $8.40.
16923  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Discussion between SolidCoin Founder and Gavin Andresen on: September 06, 2011, 10:01:40 PM
Given CoinHunter's egotistical behavior on the forums and on IRC, I can't fault ArtForz for attacking SolidCoin to try to put CoinHunter in his place.
That is such a shit argument for defending Art.  I think it is safe to say that there are just two wrongs that have been made and so people don't have to pick sides.   Art got shit on by CoinHunter, and instead of being a bigger person went on and fucked over other people based on one persons actions.

It's a new day. Get over the past and move on.

Thanks!
16924  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Solidcoin Client Fully Open-Source! on: September 06, 2011, 09:52:13 PM
My only question is: With the real possibility of a viable open-source SC client with good peeps helping the dev movement, should we hang on to our Solidcoins or dump them like Smoothie advised?

I've already unloaded all of mine. I am sure there will be alternative block chains in the near future that have much more to offer than solidcoin has.
16925  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Solidcoin Client Fully Open-Source! on: September 06, 2011, 09:43:07 PM
I'm not sure why you are defending CH/RS so much on these forums. It just seems like you are his minion or something OR that you get some benefit for doing it.

Did ArtForz hurt a lot of people's coins? Yes. But those were speculators speculating on a risky currency. They knew what they got into or should have known. The fact that it's risky is because the new currency is untested. With the code CH/RS put into it, you can't be sure it's not full of bugs. And they obviously had no idea that CH/RS will self destruct like that. So live and learn.

I actually believe that what ArtForz did was best for SolidCoin. It showed what kind of person CH/RS really is. It made a lot of people wise up and sell their SolidCoins before it was too late. If ArtForz did not expose SolidCoin's vulnerability *and* CH/RS's real self, SolidCoin's would have lasted a bit longer. More people would have bought in and be invested in this coin. All this (vulnerabilities and CH/RS's incompetence in fixing issues and his behavior) will inevitably come out at a later point. And when that happens, more people would have been hurt.

I am defending Solidcoin as a viable alternative.  Public statements made by Coinhunter should not have been made, I don't denounce that, to me it's a non-issue because he IS doing good work outside of that and that is all I care about.  MORE-SO are the dumb asses out here who vilified him even before they had reason to (Smoothie-in-his-ass, wolftaurd, King Douchebag, the whole lot of them)... this is the part that makes me sick you guys are letting those guys run the show out here when you should be just as often letting them know that they are fucked up one side and down the other as well.

And here's the kicker and the ultimate point I am trying to make, I don't care if Artforz "revealed his real self", what Artforz did was f'ing dispicable ... he should be banned from these forums at a very minimum and Gavin as the de-facto head around here should denounce his actions.  Above all else I'll shut up completely as soon as I see as many posts out here complaining about Coinhunter also complaining about Artforz and calling the scum sucker to be banned from these forums and as much public association with Bitcoin as possible.  He hurt innocent bystanders directly, it wasn't just a bug gone wrong it would have been criminal if cryptocurrency was in fact legally recognized currency, for that at least and unfortunately we probably can't bring him up on charges.  And to note... I didn't loose anything because of the scum sucker, but he did something far worse than Coinhunter ever did.

So please explain to me how I "vilified" him? The guy was a dick from the start. Any comments that disagreed with him or sometimes even agreed with him he would talk down to and belittle.

Once again please take your whining and crying to your precious solidcointalk.org site. We don't need anymore babies on this forum that can't handle hearing the truth.

thanks for coming.
16926  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Solidcoin Client Fully Open-Source! on: September 06, 2011, 09:38:50 PM
Please do us all a favor and take your crying elsewhere. Thank you very much.

Not crying just trying to ensure people see how stupid the douche trio is in this mess ... Artforz, smoothie and wolftaurd that is ... I'm not even defending Coinhunter per se.  But to leave him to follow you lot is like overthrowing Richard the Lionheart (not a very well liked guy but he was a leader) and following the f'ing court jesters.

What exactly did I do? Did i speak my mind and piss you off?

Sorry free speech is allowed here.
16927  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solidcoin Design Contest - 3300 SOLID COIN BOUNTY! on: September 06, 2011, 09:37:27 PM
I am surprised to see the bounty FlipPro is now offering is 300% his original. Wow 3000 solidcoins!

Good luck to the winner!

And remember the winner owes me 1050 solidcoins. j/k lol Cheesy
16928  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 09:35:24 PM
Obviously FlipPro can't admit that he did not see the negative sign in my post and is now trying to make me look like I lied about my original posting.

This is the type of community members solidcoin has currently. Liars and assholes.

I'm not trying to troll but if you're going to make me out as a liar then I will call you on it.
I am 99% sure that you had a positive number there when I saw the post.

However, if for some reason I made a mistake, I apologize...

Regardless you are out of the bounty now! Smiley

Cheers

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.
16929  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 09:34:40 PM
Obviously FlipPro can't admit that he did not see the negative sign in my post and is now trying to make me look like I lied about my original posting.

This is the type of community members solidcoin has currently. Liars and assholes.

I'm not trying to troll but if you're going to make me out as a liar then I will call you on it.

LOOK AT ME!!  I NEED ATTENTION! *DOES SOME CARTWHEELS* MY NAME IS SMOOTHIE!  LOOK AT ME!! LOL

Looks like someone doesnt have anything better to do.
16930  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 09:30:26 PM
Just to let you guys know smoothie edited his post. At first he originally matched the initial bounty of 1050 SLC, but as soon as I put his name on the list, he immediately changed it to have a ( - ) in front of the number. I did not take a screenshot of this (because honestly I never thought anyone would be that immature), but we can verify that he did in fact edit his post.

We will just go ahead and remove him from the bounty, since any more drama or commotion is not needed at the moment.

Okay here is the post right after mine like a minute later which holds the NEGATIVE sign in it. So you are saying that you added me to the list, I changed the post, then someone quotes me within the same 60 seconds?

thats BS!

I PLEDGE A BOUNTY OF -1050 SC TO THIS EFFORT.

Win.


I might have to sign up over there to get my submission considered by the big players.

Is there actually a shortage of BS coming from CoinHunter's supporters?

Guess not. It appears that the more times goes on the true colors of the solidcoin community keeps coming out.
16931  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 09:27:26 PM
Obviously FlipPro can't admit that he did not see the negative sign in my post and is now trying to make me look like I lied about my original posting.

This is the type of community members solidcoin has currently. Liars and assholes.

I'm not trying to troll but if you're going to make me out as a liar then I will call you on it.
16932  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 09:25:18 PM
Just to let you guys know smoothie edited his post. At first he originally matched the initial bounty of 1050 SLC, but as soon as I put his name on the list, he immediately changed it to have a ( - ) in front of the number. I did not take a screenshot of this (because honestly I never thought anyone would be that immature), but we can verify that he did in fact edit his post.

We will just go ahead and remove him from the bounty, since any more drama or commotion is not needed at the moment.

Okay here is the post right after mine like a minute later which holds the NEGATIVE sign in it. So you are saying that you added me to the list, I changed the post, then someone quotes me within the same 60 seconds?

thats BS!

I PLEDGE A BOUNTY OF -1050 SC TO THIS EFFORT.

Win.


I might have to sign up over there to get my submission considered by the big players.
16933  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 09:21:20 PM
Just to let you guys know smoothie edited his post. At first he originally matched the initial bounty of 1050 SLC, but as soon as I put his name on the list, he immediately changed it to have a ( - ) in front of the number. I did not take a screenshot of this (because honestly I never thought anyone would be that immature), but we can verify that he did in fact edit his post.

We will just go ahead and remove him from the bounty, since any more drama or commotion is not needed at the moment.

Uhh no... Wow...

Why would I ever put a bounty on that piece of trash?

Okay well should I expect any less than you are showing me now? Sure looks like I shouldnt be surprised.
16934  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Solidcoin Client Fully Open-Source! on: September 06, 2011, 08:46:59 PM
SC/RS should really learn from Gavin instead of criticizing him for being a hacker supporter. When ArtForz approached SC/RS with the vulnerabilities in SolidCoin, he was basically told to get lost. So ArtForz got upset and did a fairly nice attack on the SolidCoin chain to prove his point. He sent these large transactions one at a time, which slowed down the network and actually showed another vulnerability in both Bitcoin and SolidCoin. He could have done a lot worse if he released a ton of these huge transactions at the same time. If he did that, it would have likely killed all the clients.

I assume ArtForz approached Gavin with this out of space vulnerability in Bitcoin. And instead of telling ArtForz to get lost, Gavin worked with him to fix the vulnerability. That's how a mature and competent lead on a big open source project is supposed to act. If someone is nice enough to come to you to tell you about a potential vulnerability, you work with him to fix it instead of pissing him off so that he would actually try to attack your chain with that vulnerability.

The unintended consequences of king douche bag's attack is though that he hurt a lot of people beyond Coinhunter even.  Thats where the ass hat looses 100% respect and credibility.  He also apparently know about other underlying bugs in the cryptocurrency systems which inadvertently killed peoples nodes (also from Bitcoin).  Yet the scum out here champions him as some great Hero of douche bag ville....  says a lot about this community.....

Please do us all a favor and take your crying elsewhere. Thank you very much.
16935  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solidcoin Design Contest - 2100 SOLID COIN BOUNTY! on: September 06, 2011, 08:43:55 PM
Please give me my bounty....



+1 Haha
16936  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 08:40:52 PM
LOL I SAID "DOLL HAIRS" LOL Tongue

LOL i remember that from Dumb and Dumberer.
16937  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 08:35:59 PM
You, my Friend, are an Idiot.

Yeah I guess people not knowing how to read correctly makes me an idiot.

The next time I fuck up I'll blame you and call you an idiot okay?

Awesome!
16938  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / [ALERT] SOLIDCOIN DESIGN CONTEST on: September 06, 2011, 08:31:38 PM
Just so I am absolutely clear with everyone here, if you read my pledge correctly under the design contest thread you will notice I pledged NEGATIVE 1050 solidcoins. Meaning whomever wins the contest will pay me 1050 SC. As of today this miscommunication has made its way to the solidcointalk.org site as well.

As I stated my pledge of NEGATIVE 1050 SC still stands.  Cheesy

Thanks!
16939  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Mooncoin - Solidcoin/Namecoin to BTC Exchange on: September 06, 2011, 08:13:35 PM
for anyone who does not know mooncoin skims coins when you do withdrawals... you can only withdraw 2 digits after the decimal place. so if you balance is 3.236578... you can only withdraw 3.23, the 0.006578 stays in your account with them... once you close your account.... its theirs... I call that thievery.

@ Mr. Moon - The above quote states a fair fix in your exchange site. Users should be able to withdraw all coins to every decimal place.  Roll Eyes
16940  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Discussion between SolidCoin Founder and Gavin Andresen on: September 06, 2011, 03:02:15 PM
That's wrong, the same attack (and others artforz is aware of) are possible with Bitcoin, at relatively little expense. The reason artforz decided to attack SolidCoin was due to his own ego, dislike for me and the project and the fact he is malicious in nature. Artforz "warning" me is also a bit of a joke, he sent me about 5 lines of text, mainly talking about 51% attacks. I simply said the "extra" 51% attacks are irrelevant because at 51% you're dead anyhow. This somehow get's translated into me "fobbing him off" and "not listening" . It's a bit of a joke.

The big joke is you seem to think ArtForz has no reason to dislike you that much.

The big joke is you seem to make about 1000 posts in a day and they are 100% shit.

Seems you, him, and I do the same thing.
Pages: « 1 ... 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 [847] 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!