The only reason why Biden is still the acting President is - like in the Trump case - that the legal people are twisting words and concepts and word-meanings all out of proportion, just to keep trials and investigations going. Meanwhile, the whole country is suffering at the hands of the corrupt Dem, Deep State, cabal that is wrecking the lives of all Americans. Turley: New Evidence May Destroy Biden's Defense In His Classified Documents Case
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/turley-new-evidence-may-destroy-bidens-defense-his-classified-documents-caseUnlike his counterpart, Special Counsel Jack Smith, who has been aggressively prosecuting former president Donald Trump, Hur has virtually disappeared since his appointment to investigate President Joe Biden. Hur surfaced to interview Biden over his possession of classified documents, including some that go back to his time as a U.S. senator. I have referred to Hur as a "neutron prosecutor" — a special counsel with no possible charge, under Justice Department policy barring the indictment of a sitting president. If that was not enough of a problem, Hur may have growing evidence that accounts offered by the White House over the discovery of the documents are false. The new evidence could prove transformative, not only for the criminal but the impeachment investigation of the president. This week, the House Oversight Committee released a new timeline on the discovery of classified documents in various locations associated with Biden. From the outset, many of us flagged problems with the account that had been given by Biden, who insisted that he had no knowledge or involvement in the removal or use of the documents. The most glaring problem is that, after they were removed at the end of his term as vice president, the documents were repeatedly moved and divided up. Some were found in the Penn Center office used by Biden in Washington, D.C. Others were found in his garage and reportedly in his library. Biden made clear from the beginning that he expected the investigation to be perfunctory and brief. He publicly declared that he has "no regrets" over his own conduct and told the public that the documents investigation would soon peter out when it determined that "there is no 'there' there." ...
 I hope the DNC runs some ads highlighting the differences in how Biden and Trump handle being investigated. **Narrated by Morgan Freeman** Do you want a president that spends half of every speech crying "Witch Hunt" over and over again like a little confused baby while refusing to cooperate and blatantly obstructing the independent council that was appointed by his own party?  Or do you want a president that's too focused on America to do anything other than cooperate with the investigators. The results speak for themself: Stock market record high. (Higher than Trumps) Unemployment record lows. (Lower than Trumps) Record breaking new job creation. (More than Trumps) GDP growth in his first 2 years more than double the previous 4 years combined.  Biden 2024 Finish the Job |
|
|
|
Why aren't there any shills promoting your service?
In BTT it's forbidden. No it's not. Unless you suck at it, you really should be shilling your own shilling service. Give us a little free sample of what you are capable of and that you're not a fraudulent shill. LoL, oh yeah you think it's smart to share projects whom were shilled? 100% no, because no one wants to be tracked as shill is not respectable, of course I can share some of them, that was promoted in 2019-2020, but not active projects. No, I'm saying you should demonstrate your capabilities by shilling for yourself in this thread. |
|
|
|
Though, with all this mess going on in the middle east, noone will talk about elections until things cool down.
Oh someones still talking about it... Trump Blames Israel-Hamas War on ‘Rigged’ 2020 Election
Donald Trump has used the Israel-Hamas conflict — which has claimed hundreds of lives on both sides — to push his false claims that the 2020 election was rigged against him. While delivering a speech to his supporters at a club event Wednesday in West Palm Beach, Florida, Trump claimed that “if the election wasn’t rigged, there would be nobody even thinking about going into Israel.” He added, “The election was rigged, very sadly rigged.” Also fun new Magatard theory going around that Hamas is infiltrating the United States through the Southern Border because Biden is so bad at presidenting. |
|
|
|
Still capable of sending bullets. But it's always a wartime president that people like to vote. Joe Biden however is not that kind since the time he was seated, he hasn't really made sure he'd win a war. All he wants is to send taxpayers' funds elsewhere.
Then how do you explain the infrastructure bill, or the chips act? The main goal of the chips act is to build the chip manufacturing industry in America that would otherwise continue to exist in other countries. And then there's the inflation reduction act, which basically does the same thing but for renewable energy. And have you forgotten about all the crying you did when he sent taxpayer funds (not as much as Trump did, but pretty close) directly to taxpayers via the stimulus package? All of this accounts for trillions of dollars, but less than 100 billion goes to fighting Russia and "All he wants is to send taxpayers' funds elsewhere." Seems like Biden derangement syndrome is a real thing. |
|
|
|
I do not how much of it, but obviously it is more narcissism than any president of the United States is supposed to have, so they can direct their republic to a good future.
If you asked me, Trump with his peace-making speech is not only trying to appeal to people living in other countries or leaders of other nations, the way he uses this speech is order to try tk convince those who are not in favor of using tax money to fund wars, while at home there are people do cannot afford to pay for shelter and suffer in the winters, or those who cannot afford some medicine to take care of themselves.
It is a left wing speech, but twisted to bring people to vote for a man who obviously has nothing to do with left wing policies. It is a good strategy, and will stay as an strategy, since it is obvious Trump won't use that funding to pay for medicine, though.
I dislike Trump as much as the next guy and I think Biden is a much better president and on top of that I think they both should not be the president and someone younger and more fierce should get the job. However, even I have to admit that Trump was the most anti-war president they had in a long time, everyone else constantly attacked everywhere, even the Nobel Peace prize winner Obama (how the hell did that happened is still beyond me) was bombing kids in Afghanistan while making his speech, that is the corruption of the world, Biden bombed places in the first 100 days of his presidency, he was quick to trigger as well. Trump is a terrible human, I would not want to be in the same room as him, and he makes me want to vomit whenever he speaks, he is definitely evil to the core, but one good quality about him is that he doesn't want war, and he tries to make peace and that is a VERY important thing in our world, that would definitely be helpful at this moment. You must have forgotten when we were on the brink of war with Iran and Trump had to be talked down by generals early in his term. Or when he was tweeting direct threats about how his "big red button" was so big to North Korea. He's also campaigned on attacking Mexico if elected. |
|
|
|
Why aren't there any shills promoting your service?
In BTT it's forbidden. No it's not. Unless you suck at it, you really should be shilling your own shilling service. Give us a little free sample of what you are capable of and that you're not a fraudulent shill. |
|
|
|
Fact checking claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6Facts First: The Speaker of the House is not in charge of Capitol security. That’s the responsibility of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the US Capitol Police and approves requests for National Guard assistance.
Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the US Capitol Historical Society, told CNN that “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”
Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.
And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.
His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony. case closed. Could you make me a favor and confirm whether this theory of Pelosi's guilt for what happened in the US Capitol has been repeated on Fox? I wonder why it has became such an prevalent talking point in the political right there in the USA. I am aware Trump suggested wrongdoing by Pelosi in some of his speeches, telling attendees he ordered officers and supporting agents to be there but someway the speaker of the house blocked all of it. I know that Trump suggesting such a thing is enough for it to become an important theory among half of population, I just want to know whether Fox helped to spread it or not. Trump said it, republican members of congress repeated it, and so did right wing media, including fox. The claims have been that she denied a request for the National Guard and also the Capital Police on Jan 6. But I can't find any evidence that the speaker of the house has any authority over either other than post Jan 6 right wing sources. Basically anyone that's not a right wing partisan and qualified to speak on Capital security say it's nonsense. The speaker of the house does not have authority over either. https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/republicans-shaky-no-evidence-attempt-to-cast-blame-on-pelosi-for-jan-6/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/28/false-gop-claim-that-pelosi-turned-down-national-guard-before-jan-6-attack/And the fucked up thing about it all is the same people that are trying to blame Pelosi are the ones that are responsible for organizing the attack/fueling the anger with the lies about the election, that stood to benefit from the election being over turned,that have downplayed the attack ever since ("they were just site seeing" or "legitimate political protest!"), and defend the violent "patriots" that are now convicted felons in prison. |
|
|
|
Fact checking claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6Facts First: The Speaker of the House is not in charge of Capitol security. That’s the responsibility of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the US Capitol Police and approves requests for National Guard assistance.
Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the US Capitol Historical Society, told CNN that “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”
Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.
And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.
His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony. case closed.
|
|
|
|
A big reason why sovereign citizens lose is that the term 'sovereign citizen' is contradictory in itself, on its face. If one is a sovereign, he can't be a citizen, because citizens belong to governments, as property (at least to some extent), and aren't sovereign. Somebody using that term has lost by their own ignorance.
No, it's because they make idiotic arguments like this one: This brings up a most important question. The question: "How many persons are you?"
The 4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Wait a minute. The word "persons" is plural. How many people are you? Oh, that's right. Persons are the contracts and agreements you make and have signed with your mark or signature. You have and keep copies in your house - which is not necessarily a residence, BTW. It's these copies with your signature on them that are your persons.
So, let's examine the indictment against you. It has your name and address on it, and possibly other information that identifies you. What is the one important thing that it doesn't have? It doesn't have your signature on it. Why not? Because it isn't one of your persons. Rather, it's a made-up person, that simply looks like it is one of your persons.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that was fun.
See everyone in 3 months.
|
|
|
|
This brings up a most important question. The question: "How many persons are you?" The 4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Wait a minute. The word "person s" is plural. How many people are you? Oh, that's right. Persons are the contracts and agreements you make and have signed with your mark or signature. You have and keep copies in your house - which is not necessarily a residence, BTW. It's these copies with your signature on them that are your persons. So, let's examine the indictment against you. It has your name and address on it, and possibly other information that identifies you. What is the one important thing that it doesn't have? It doesn't have your signature on it. Why not? Because it isn't one of your persons. Rather, it's a made-up person, that simply looks like it is one of your persons. Somebody sneaked into your property, and fraudulently made up a 'person' that looks like it is one of your persons, and tried to claim that it referred to you. They unlawfully 'searched' your property and tried to trick you into accepting that their fictional person is one of your persons, or better (if they can get away with it), that their person IS you, and not just a person belonging to you. "Acceptance" is a legal term. You do not have to accept their person in any way. Furthermore, since they came onto your property and messed with your persons - as evidenced by the identification information on their indictment - you have a right to sue these perpetrators for breaching their Oath of Office against you (not upholding the Constitution 4th Amendment as they swore to do)... or any other trespass that they have done to you by improperly using your persons without permission from you (your signature does not appear on their indictment accepting it as one of your persons). But, you don't have to sue them if you don't want. And you are certainly able to accept the indictment, thereby accepting that the person on the indictment is one of your persons. And you can also lie, and say that the indictment person IS you (It isn't. It's simply ink on paper.). They aren't going to charge you with lying or with inappropriate acceptance. That's what they want you to do, lie or accept. Why? Because they are more corrupt than you could ever think of being. Note that the above was the way things were in America 200 years ago. Over the decades, people have forgotten the difference between 'persons' and 'people'. And that's what the attorneys and judges wanted all along, so that they can rule you as a master rules a slave. One of the greatest promoters of the ignorance of common people was the TV program "Perry Mason."  To truly appreciate what BADecker is saying here, I recommend people go down the Sovereign Citizen (SovCit) rabbit hole. There's some really incredible stuff and tons of videos out there of people actually attempting the things he likes to advocate for in real life and failing spectacularly. Wikipedia does a good job explaining what SovCit is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movementAnd here's a few videos to get you started (I think that might actually be BADecker in the first one. At least that's exactly how I imagined him even before seeing the video): Defiant Sovereign Citizen Gets Owned By Police https://youtu.be/NYfdTazjybk?t=26Top 5 Sovereign Citizen FAILS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKQNXY-9wD8SovCit Karen gets pulled over: https://youtu.be/BgEx4JZ5svA?t=175There's also a decently active subreddit that's a good follow: https://www.reddit.com/r/Sovereigncitizen/ |
|
|
|
At the same time, we are free to participate in government laws and policies to the extent that we want. And we are free to change our mind on our previous decisions any time we want. Actually we have a criminal justice system.  If you break law (and get caught), you could be arrested and charged with a crime.  If you're found guilty at a trial, you could be sentenced to prison.  That means you aren't free anymore.  |
|
|
|
Granted, Trump doesn't understand the basics of law in the US.
Ignorance is no defense for breaking the law. If it were, his chances would be much better in his 4 criminal trials where he's been charged with 91 state and federal felonies including Racketeering, Defrauding the United States and Violating the Espionage act. I have a feeling Jack Smith has many surprises like this one that we will get to learn about during Trumps criminal trial(s). Trump Said to Have Revealed Nuclear Submarine Secrets to Australian BusinessmanShortly after he left office, former President Donald J. Trump shared apparently classified information about American nuclear submarines with an Australian businessman during an evening of conversation at Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Florida, according to two people familiar with the matter. The businessman, Anthony Pratt, a billionaire member of Mar-a-Lago who runs one of the world’s largest cardboard companies, went on to share the sensitive details about the submarines with several others, the people said. Mr. Trump’s disclosures, they said, potentially endangered the U.S. nuclear fleet. Federal prosecutors working for the special counsel, Jack Smith, learned about Mr. Trump’s disclosures of the secrets to Mr. Pratt, which were first revealed by ABC News, and interviewed him as part of their investigation into the former president’s handling of classified documents, the people said. According to another person familiar with the matter, Mr. Pratt is now among more than 80 people whom prosecutors have identified as possible witnesses who could testify against Mr. Trump at the classified documents trial, which is scheduled to start in May in Federal District Court in Fort Pierce, Fla. During his talk with Mr. Pratt, Mr. Trump revealed at least two pieces of critical information about the U.S. submarines’ tactical capacities, according to the people familiar with the matter. Those included how many nuclear warheads the vessels carried and how close they could get to their Russian counterparts without being detected.  Mr. Trump has been known to share classified information verbally on other occasions. During an Oval Office meeting in 2017 shortly after he fired the F.B.I. director James B. Comey, Mr. Trump revealed sensitive classified intelligence to two Russian officials, according to people briefed on the matter. Well into his presidency, he also posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, a classified photo of an Iranian launch site. The indictment in the documents case also accused Mr. Trump of showing a classified battle plan to attack Iran to a group of visitors to his club in Bedminster, N.J. Prosecutors claim that a recording of the meeting with the visitors depicts Mr. Trump as describing the document he brandished as “secret.” Mr. Trump has not had access to more updated U.S. intelligence since leaving the presidency; President Biden cut off the briefings that former presidents traditionally get when Mr. Trump left office in the wake of Mr. Trump’s efforts to overturn the election and the attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, 2021. “I just think that there is no need for him to have the intelligence briefings,” Mr. Biden said at the time. “What value is giving him an intelligence briefing?” he said. “What impact does he have at all, other than the fact he might slip and say something?” Mr. Trump’s interactions with Mr. Pratt appear to fit a pattern of the former president’s collapsing his public office and its secrets into his private interests. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/05/us/politics/trump-nuclear-submarine-classified-documents.html |
|
|
|
I did not receive any registration bonus.
I dont think Rollbit offer registration bonus so in your case it will be the level up bonus. Rollbit has been nuking few accounts in the past that abused the level up bonus by wagering 1.01 odds on sportsbook. You could check like 5-10 pages from the current page of this thread that there are some people that claimed their account was locked as well their withdrawal was halt after abusing wagering at low odds then claiming those bonuses Probably your friend's account has nothing to even do with your account getting terminated, its probably only because you kept wagering on low odds then constantly make profit from those level up bonus I didn't know this was bonus abuse. I was earning some pocket money by playing with odds of 1.01. If so, let them take my current accumulated bonus and give me back my current balance. thieves . I constantly write to live support and they ignore me. If all you got were the standard vip bonuses (calendars, daily, weekly, etc.) then the issue isn't bonus abuse and there's a misunderstanding or something else going on. How long have you been waiting for a response? |
|
|
|
While not about the trials, it seems that Forbes does no longer consider Trump as one of the 400 richest persons in the US, mostly due about the massive devaluation of the "Truth" platform that he owns at 90%. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/article/the-definitive-networth-of-donaldtrump/He’s nowhere near as rich as he boasts, nor as poor as some critics claim. Donald Trump’s real net worth? $2.6 billion, according to our most recent tally, conducted in September 2023. Below, Forbes offers an asset-by-asset breakdown of the former (and possibly future) president’s fortune. I wonder if he ever gives a honest figure, but the point is that the penalty of 250 million is not a small thing for Trump, and the removal of the license to do business in NY is probably worth as much as that, I will be following and reporting on the consequences of it. The 250m would be a big deal today. But before this case is through appeals, in about 15 months from now, Trump will either be on his way to prison or the entire federal government including the military will be run by the most loyal magatards reporting directly to him. I don't think it's too dramatic to say the judges and prosecutors in each of his cases will likely flee the country and live in exile. |
|
|
|
'Part of the authoritarian playbook': Trump’s courthouse rant slammed by fascism scholars
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/part-of-the-authoritarian-playbook-trump-s-courthouse-rant-slammed-by-fascism-scholars/ar-AA1hAgl0Trump told reporters Monday the New York fraud case “is a continuation of the single greatest witch hunt of all time.” He described Justice Arthur Engoron as a “rogue judge” and Attorney General James as a “racist attorney general” and a “horror show,” and the case against him “a scam” and “a sham.” Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a New York University professor of history and Italian studies, responded to Trump’s remarks, saying “the witch hunt/victimhood rhetoric is part of the authoritarian playbook and was/is used by the following corrupt leaders: Mussolini, Hitler, Berlusconi, Erdogan. If extended to the whole country being victimized, add Putin, Xi, and more.” Donald Trump Isn’t Even Trying to Hide His Authoritarian Plans for a Second Term...
|
|
|
|
If Trump is only smart enough to put into play some of the strategies of Kari Lake's team
Ahh yes. And then Trump would be as successful as Kari Lake... Her campaign circulated testimonials from supporters who claimed to have been disenfranchised by technical problems with voting machines, but a New York Times review found that most of them had been able to vote. She filed a lawsuit in December alleging deliberate misconduct by election officials — though she did not provide evidence of that, or of any unintentional disenfranchisement. A judge rejected her claims later that month.
In February, when she said she was considering running for Senate, she was still claiming to be the rightful governor and raising money for lawsuits. The Arizona Supreme Court refused to hear her case in March, sending one part of her lawsuit back to a trial court for review. In May, a lower-court judge threw out a challenge she had filed over the verification of signatures for mail-in ballots.
During her campaign, she followed Mr. Trump in both style and substance, using the news media as a foil after working for years as a local television anchor in Phoenix. She repeatedly promoted Mr. Trump’s election lies, won his endorsement and in the Republican primary, defeated Karrin Taylor Robson, a rival supported by the state’s G.O.P. establishment. |
|
|
|
|
Oh no, he's off his meds again.
Daniel stay strong. You're playing this exactly right.
|
|
|
|
So if the Republican party showed actual evidence of corruption and wrongdoing (I am quite skeptical of it). When are we supposed to see Joe "Crooked" Biden impeached and thrown into jail?
Because when you come up with such serious allegations against a president, there are no middle grounds. Either he gets empeached or this hearing was one of the biggest shams pulled off by the Republican party and the pro Trump faction in a long time.
So, when is it going to happen? Less than 6 months ?
His 53 year old recovering (?) drug addict son is the one they have evidence of doing something wrong. He went around making money using his dads name, and occasionally got Joe to get on the phone and say "hi, nice weather huh?". Even the witnesses Republicans called to testify thought it was stupid to open the inquiry with only what they have. A little bit off topic, but stuff like this makes me wonder how the personal relationship between the president and his son is. I could argue that since Hunter has been nothing but PR problems for the Democrat party and his father, their relationship must be a quite complex one. The first thing many Republicans did when cocaine was found around the White House was to leverage on the reputation of Hunter to try to further discredit the whole administration. Also, why you imply he may be not actually a recovering addict?
Stress causes recovering addicts to relapse. I think we can all agree at least the last couple years have been pretty bad ones for Hunter - from his Rudy getting hold of his personal laptop and sharing all those dick pics and crack pipes, plus every american mouth breather has been programmed to hate his guts, plus there has to be some deep guilt over all the problems he's causing his father. And things could get even worse. Trump literally suggested he deserved the death penalty. And there's a very real possibility that Trump is re-elected. And if he is, it wouldn't be unreasonable to say the Trump won because Hunter is a fuck up. And all of this while never deciding to become a public figure. He wrote a book, and painted some art, but it's not like you see him on the news or twitter talking shit like Trumps sons. He fucked up and should be held accountable for the decisions he's made, but he doesn't deserve to be treated the way he is. Literally a member of congress in the capital while in session (and I think they made up the whole prostitute and how he paid her thing...not that it couldn't be true):  |
|
|
|
So if the Republican party showed actual evidence of corruption and wrongdoing (I am quite skeptical of it). When are we supposed to see Joe "Crooked" Biden impeached and thrown into jail?
Because when you come up with such serious allegations against a president, there are no middle grounds. Either he gets empeached or this hearing was one of the biggest shams pulled off by the Republican party and the pro Trump faction in a long time.
So, when is it going to happen? Less than 6 months ?
His 53 year old recovering (?) drug addict son is the one they have evidence of doing something wrong. He went around making money using his dads name, and occasionally got Joe to get on the phone and say "hi, nice weather huh?". Even the witnesses Republicans called to testify thought it was stupid to open the inquiry with only what they have. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
