Even if all the 55nm do is act as proof we got something working and get some hashing power to generate some coin and are the proof of concept for the 28s would be a positive.
This is no different than Ken buying hashrate from CEX.IO - pointless waste of money to fool you into thinking shit is happening. If not an outright lie, the 55nm chip has nothing to do with Ken besides his money. It is another guy's failed project - perhaps successful technically, but way too late to market to be profitable. That's why Ken got to buy it. Other companies aren't stupid, if there was money to be made on those chips, who in his right mind would sell? Maybe he didn't have the capital to see it through? |
|
|
|
|
Even if all the 55nm do is act as proof we got something working and get some hashing power to generate some coin and are the proof of concept for the 28s would be a positive.
|
|
|
|
 This should kill a few hours.... I love how these jerk-offs start randomly pointing and smiling at people in crowds like they have friends... "Hey!! You're here!" Boner looks darker than Obama. |
|
|
|
Of course your contributions to the topic were way more informative and more helpful for the community. I hope you still profit like a MF from the current situation...
If you have 0BTC interests He stated that he has an open short position... I just found out why Gox has put out no comms lately..... Wouldn't he love to know what that means for his position.....  Well.. tell us what it is. |
|
|
|
Is there no longer any way to get data from BTCT.co?
BTCT does not have an update book of asset holders. Bitfunder does until our shares go on the exchange excluding the >100 sold on Cryptotrade you can get your data from BTCT.co if you have your API key that you were emailed around the middle of this month. see this post for how to obtain your data - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325431.msg4723937#msg4723937Wasn't emailed anything. I think my email was still set to Lavabit, and we all know lavabit was destroyed. BTCT's asset list is out of date is what I am saying. None of the shares on there are valid if they were transferred over to Bitfunder, because no one knows if you sold them or bought more by looking at the BTCT asset list. the Bitfunder asset list is the only thing I'd like to have both. |
|
|
|
Is there no longer any way to get data from BTCT.co?
BTCT does not have an update book of asset holders. Bitfunder does until our shares go on the exchange excluding the >100 sold on Cryptotrade you can get your data from BTCT.co if you have your API key that you were emailed around the middle of this month. see this post for how to obtain your data - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325431.msg4723937#msg4723937Wasn't emailed anything. I think my email was still set to Lavabit, and we all know lavabit was destroyed. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk™ Where nerds believe that upholding politically correct male-female quality jargon and their bitcoin riches will one day get them laid.
15 years later....
Bitcointalk™ Where nerds who lost their bitcoin fortunes to their divorce settlement with their lusting ex-wives hang out and reminisce on the 'good ole days'.
|
|
|
|
Its generally true. Its why women flip their moods so often and are never satisfied. Its why they say "you can never win an argument with a women" - because she is never arguing logic and facts.
Oh come on, kind of generalising here, methinks - please don't scare whatever females might still be bothering to check in here away...? Hence, the use of the phrase "Its generally true". For most women in most situations this is true, but in professional situations women are generally able to pull it together. |
|
|
|
Does anyone have a fucking clue wtf these women are talking about?
where is the cute asian girl from the foundation, I need something to watch.
I kind of like what Annie Wilkes suggested. She said the government should just have the public sign-off that they are aware of the nature and risks of crypto-currencies and leave it at that. The problem though with women, is that when you involve them in anything they take that as validation that they know what they are talking about and start spouting-off all sorts of firm but nonsensical positions and ideas. True. I'm not so sure it is true, but I did find it funny. Its generally true. Its why women flip their moods so often and are never satisfied. Its why they say "you can never win an argument with a women" - because she is never arguing logic and facts. |
|
|
|
Does anyone have a fucking clue wtf these women are talking about?
where is the cute asian girl from the foundation, I need something to watch.
I kind of like what Annie Wilkes suggested. She said the government should just have the public sign-off that they are aware of the nature and risks of crypto-currencies and leave it at that. The problem though with women, is that when you involve them in anything they take that as validation that they know what they are talking about and start spouting-off all sorts of firm but nonsensical positions and ideas. True. |
|
|
|
|
Is there no longer any way to get data from BTCT.co?
|
|
|
|
|
There are too many people with speetz impedimenths in the bitcoin space.
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have a fucking clue wtf these women are talking about?
where is the cute asian girl from the foundation, I need something to watch.
I kind of like what Annie Wilkes suggested. She said the government should just have the public sign-off that they are aware of the nature and risks of crypto-currencies and leave it at that. The problem though with women, is that when you involve them in anything they take that as validation that they know what they are talking about and start spouting-off all sorts of firm but nonsensical positions and ideas. |
|
|
|
We have no idea what you are talking about. |
|
|
|
|
"Prophylactic regulation"
|
|
|
|
|
What this panel is not making clear to these people is that it is not possible for government to regulate mining or p2p transfer to begin with. The only possible thing they can regulate are the money transfer businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
Highlander was just quoted.
|
|
|
|
|
This hearing means nothing...
I'm not seeing how some of you are saying the Chair is pro-bitcoin... the dude obviously wants to regulate it somehow, he just doesn't know how yet. He claimed that stopping a few money launderers was more important than technological innovation for society. Really? This guy is an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
Why were the Twinklevoss Tiwins invited?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
