|
Owners of machines may not come to these forums. For example, the first customers could be Ken, his family, and/or engineers working on the boards/chips.
|
|
|
|
|
^I got ya... I'm just saying that Ken did not necessarily go back to the drawing board. Ken may have just altered the plans a bit. What if the prototype chips worked fine?
|
|
|
|
If eASIC is legit and the deal was legit, we already received sample chips. Why can't we see a picture of them?
We wouldn't want Cointerra or KNC to copy our design. We need to keep the secret of our success hidden. KNC full custom 28nm ASIC: 100+ GH/s per chip, proven design and proven suppliers. Now working on their 20nm chip which will likely be 750+ GH/s per chip Cointerra full custom 28nm ASIC: 500+ GH/s per chip, taped out, tested, assembled and miners being shipped. Compare to: ActM FPGA ported semi-custom 28nm ASIC: 20GH/s per over clocked chip. No proven hashing samples, no timeline, one 'back-to-the-drawing board already. Why in the hell would Cointerra or KNC want to copy our cheap-ass, out-of-date, unproven design? It doesn't mean we went back to the drawing board. There are other possibilities. |
|
|
|
I am assuming that Ken is working with Stilwell Baker to make the boards? That company seems legit.
What makes you think they are involved? Because Ken knows the Sales Director there. Ken was endorsed by him for his knowledge of Web Applications. Its just a guess. Electronics Engineering and Manufacturinghttp://www.stilwellbaker.com/Since 1993, Stilwell Baker has helped companies develop highly reliable electronic devices, systems, and controls. For our customers, we are a primary source for product development, manufacturing, and supply chain management. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Bulls -> "Price will go up to $10,000 and beyond without making serious corrections downward on its way there."
Bitcoin Bears -> "Price is currently a bit too high and is due for a major correction. We will eventually get to $10,000 but we aren't going there soon."
|
|
|
|
|
I am assuming that Ken is working with Stilwell Baker to make the boards? That company seems legit.
|
|
|
|
If eASIC is legit and the deal was legit, we already received sample chips. Why can't we see a picture of them?
We wouldn't want Cointerra or KNC to copy our design. We need to keep the secret of our success hidden. CanadianGuy, I thought you claimed to be hashing with VMC machines? |
|
|
|
|
If eASIC is legit and the deal was legit, we already received sample chips. Why can't we see a picture of them?
|
|
|
|
keep up the cheerleading you faggot
Everything I say on here is based on, or is, fact. That isn't cheerleading, it's reporting. Most homophobes I've seen have a low IQ so the lack of originality in your train of thought is not a surprise. Have a great day. What facts do you have? What of anything do you have besides cheering for this vaporware company? So sorry for the "homophobic" gesture friend. Half my family/friends are gay and I'm certainly no homophobe. I just like to use those words in a derogatory manner, sorry if that offends you so much But this is really offtopic and its saturday, so im gonna go have some fun. I dont normally get involved in stupid forum shit but I'm a little peeved at the lack of communication from this company and all these dumbass cheerleaders that are running over this thread. ALL CONCERNED SHAREHOLDERS PLEASE CALL KEN AT (855) 663-2482 DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS AND ADDRESS HIM YOUR CONCERNSThats crazy, what are the odds? There must be some genetic disaster in your family. |
|
|
|
|
I am working with Boeing to perform aerodynamic analysis to make their products the best in the world. (But I haven't been hired yet or even contacted for an interview - I only submitted a resume)
|
|
|
|
btw: Weekly Update 12/18/13
Crypto-Trade:
I have all of the legal issues worked out, and I am programming them into the verification site.
VMC:
We are working with eASIC and our engineers to get our chip and boards in full production.
We have stock piled all the hardware to build the miners and we are per-assembling the miners.
so what's the fucken deal?+1 |
|
|
|
Provide an image.
I'm absolutely certain that would be a restricted image under the NDA. 100% sure. Edit - thefunkybits reported. Why? The chips will eventually be delivered to customers who can take pictures. Once the delivery takes place the NDA is over. They had to have delivered something if they didn't screw up - show a picture. Does anyone know who programmed the initial FPGA hashing algorithm that eASIC used? Does Ken know how to program FPGAs with hashing algorithms? |
|
|
|
|
Some kind of chip (working or not) had to have been delivered by now. Provide an image. Even if these initial chips didn't work with fasthash they work without it even rather poorly, lets see how well it is working. If this whole thing is for real there has to be something hashing right now form the initial batch, even if it is gimped.
|
|
|
|
Has anything actually happened to prompt this latest bout of complaints or is this just business as usual?
Business as usual. I think it is dawning on us that there isn't much left to hold on to. There is no way to prove any shares are ours, there is no way to prove a shareholder agreement exists, we can't trade, we don't know where the chips are or how far they are from being delivered, and the days keep rolling by. |
|
|
|
I recall the post but it didn't say eASIC engineers it said 'our engineers'. Well the post I read said that anyway.
Well if that is the case then cool. That would mean we have boards and real in the flesh eASIC chips! It's a downer they don't work but it's a step further than I thought we were. But he deleted it - not sure when. Even if the chips were a failure, there has to be a sample chip sitting around. eASIC had to have delivered something by now. Why can't we get a picture of a chip? |
|
|
|
|
Falling asleep right when Bitcoin hit $455 on Gox was the worst mistake I made. Haven't bought back since.
|
|
|
|
|
Even if this whole thing is a big scam I would at least like to have an eASIC chip as a souvenir. I deserve that. Show me a chip - there has to be something. Either absolutely no chips have been delivered yet (not even samples) or the chips are being hidden. If they haven't been delivered then either eASIC screwed-up or the design was flawed.
Does anyone recall the comment from Ken that he was working with eASIC engineers to get the chips and boards working? That comment has been deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming that the chip delivery timeline started on the day of the announcement, we are in week 17. That means we should be on the verge of full-scale production. Of course this does not include the delays. It would be nice if we could at least get an estimate.
|
|
|
|
|
What happened to the statement in one of Ken's updates where he said: "We are working with eASIC engineers to get the chips on our boards"?
Ken, provide us with a real update that specifies what our timeline is and what is going on with the shares.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
