Huh, that's weird. I don't recall ever having changed the fee amount in my wallet settings.  Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
What paycoin pools are there?
|
|
|
|
Problem with wallet.
I am using version: v0.8.7.3-g9288c29-beta And it says that I am up to date but it says current block is 209,238 but I think the current block as of now is 209,839.
Are there any nodes that I need to add to get it syncing properly?
I am on Windows 7 64 bit but only seen a 32 bit wallet.
Thanks
you have an old wallet and need to update ASAP to not lose any coins. make sure you backup your wallet.dat file before you update. https://vertcoin.org/wp/urgent-update-your-wallets/Thanks so much. The OP should really be updated. The OP cannot update due to Vertcoin user was banned, Please help us send email to banappeals-w6pquw43@theymos.e4ward.com to remove the ban on the account. Why was the account banned, out of curiosity? |
|
|
|
LTCMAXMYR - ok, 702mh/s is still massive in comparison.
Have you tried my pool since we have adjusted. Just for statistical purposes I'd be interested to know.
i tried over ten minutes, it still wrong,the speed shows 2,458,958 kh/s,it is impossible,indeed 702M +-10M i don't know what's wrong, Something is very strange, you've only found 4 blocks. You should be finding a lot more than that. i think it is the pool's block discovery problem. proxy monitor shows finding many blocks,but the pool shows to other name. you can check the founded blocks,it is about average 3 block in 10 blocks, network hashrate is 3.7G,that means the pool hashrate is about 3.7*3/10=1.1G if remove my 700M hashpower,the pool remains 300M, do you think 300M can find 3/10 blocks vs networks 3.7G? here are the last found 5 blocks alswedi is 10M miner,do you think a 10M miner is so lucky to find 4 blocks in half an hour? 209749 98 left alswedi 12/15/2014 12:02:10 124.9829 50.00 4,095,441 4,251,962 103.82 209748 97 left alswedi 12/15/2014 11:52:33 125.1265 50.00 4,100,145 8,377,720 204.33 209743 92 left alswedi 12/15/2014 11:32:46 125.4437 50.01 4,110,538 4,291,726 104.41 209739 88 left alswedi 12/15/2014 11:22:30 125.4849 50.00 4,111,891 2,553,170 62.09 209738 87 left MBonev 12/15/2014 11:16:25 127.3790 50.02 Ah, I see. That's really strange. Hopefully the pool operator will shed some light. |
|
|
|
LTCMAXMYR - ok, 702mh/s is still massive in comparison.
Have you tried my pool since we have adjusted. Just for statistical purposes I'd be interested to know.
i tried over ten minutes, it still wrong,the speed shows 2,458,958 kh/s,it is impossible,indeed 702M +-10M i don't know what's wrong, Something is very strange, you've only found 4 blocks. You should be finding a lot more than that. |
|
|
|
LTCMAXMYR - ok, 702mh/s is still massive in comparison.
Have you tried my pool since we have adjusted. Just for statistical purposes I'd be interested to know.
You made changes? Mine are still showing double.  |
|
|
|
Ah, I see. Here's my info:
Actual averages:
.test: 2.017MH/s
.office: 3.447MH/s
.1: 6.007MH/s
.2: 6.776MH/s
.3: 6.597MH/s
.4: 5.705MH/s
.5: 3.561MH/s
So as you can see, it's way off.
Are they AMD or nVidia miners? Pretty fast. Test 1 and 2 are 7970/280x and the rest are 290s. No nvidia hardware in my farm so far. |
|
|
|
Why is Verters pool reporting much higher hashrate than it should? What are other good/working Lyra2RE pools? Wish OP would get updated.
Its reporting it because the diff adjustment for lyra2re is different to scrypt-n. So I had to add in a multiplier to the stats. The multiplier is currently 1024 - and I've requested feedback from miners as to what they see on the site for their hashrate as compared to what they get on the mining console. What is your real hashrate compared to what it shows? Ah, I see. Here's my info:  Actual averages: .test: 2.017MH/s .office: 3.447MH/s .1: 6.007MH/s .2: 6.776MH/s .3: 6.597MH/s .4: 5.705MH/s .5: 3.561MH/s So as you can see, it's way off. |
|
|
|
|
Why is Verters pool reporting much higher hashrate than it should? What are other good/working Lyra2RE pools? Wish OP would get updated.
|
|
|
|
My vote goes to the Terminators. Well very simple none since they don't exist and only a work of fiction.
 |
|
|
|
Nope. Not selling a single GPU / rig. There will be another *boom* one of these days. History tends to repeat itself. I'll be ready this time  I'm also holding on to some, but by the time that happens (if..) our top end GPUs might not be worth it anymore. |
|
|
|
|
3930k 12T @ 4.2GHz AVX = 47Kh/s
5960x 16T @ 4.2GHz AVX2 = 75.2 Kh/s
Using Spexx's latest package found in first post.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a miner with support for more than 12 threads? Or will I have to run 2 instances on my 5960x?
Edit: Never mind, minerd works with 16 threads. I was under the impression it would only work with 12.
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I was using Private Internet Access but i don't like them tbh. Was just wondering if anyone has some other alternatives and more so, Trust them. Do they delete logs etc etc
Cheers
Why don't you like them? I've never had any issues. |
|
|
|
|
You must be a hit with the ladies.
|
|
|
|
After taking a careful visual examination, I would say that 7 out of the 10 pairs are medically enhanced with plastic surgery and the remaining three are natural. Needs to be sure. So I want to do a physical examination as well.
I would say the opposite: only three are medically enhanced, but I'm no breast expert. I am, and I agree with you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
