Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 07:04:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 214 »
1641  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Spondoolies SP35. 6 TH/s miner Brand new. 15.5 BTC + shipping or offer. on: December 17, 2014, 07:46:24 PM
Semi interested if price is negotiable. Is it possible to run it in the US? (Power draw question)
1642  Economy / Goods / Re: FREE FOR ALL BITCOIN LOVERS on: December 17, 2014, 06:17:27 PM
Your compliance label has a typo in the word "physician"
1643  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] Casascius 2013 Silver Single MS-66 - Starts @ 1BTC on: December 17, 2014, 05:55:26 AM
Chain of possession for this coin
Casascius sold it to Nubbins who sold it to me who sold it to Blazedout

Lets see if I can win it back  Wink

1.1BTC (ok now everyone stop bidding)

That is not the coin you traded me Smiley - If you win I am willing to send it though...same grade.

Ah my bad, I'm going to change my strategy.From here on out, I'm going to win the auction. 1.25BTC (shakes fist at fellow bidders)
1644  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] Casascius 2013 Silver Single MS-66 - Starts @ 1BTC on: December 17, 2014, 05:02:48 AM
Chain of possession for this coin
Casascius sold it to Nubbins who sold it to me who sold it to Blazedout

Lets see if I can win it back  Wink

1.1BTC (ok now everyone stop bidding)
1645  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Closed] Legendaries review party of Spondoolies-Tech's SP20 on: December 17, 2014, 03:35:26 AM
My review has been left here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=896134

Big thanks to Spondoolie.
1646  Bitcoin / Hardware / [Review 4] Spondoolies SP20 on: December 17, 2014, 03:27:20 AM
Intro:   Hey guys, as part of the Spondoolies SP20 legendary promotion, I was sent a SP20 unit free of charge, with the agreement that I would write a review about my experience with the machine.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887807.0

this is a link to the photos in the thread, if you want to see them larger: http://imgur.com/bi0Q12Z,1iHRoCp,izPBwI8,VMRGqDO,aLl5ugr,iZes4YJ,MYWvQ5r

As a general mention, I will note, my feedback is completely accurate to my experience with the machine and in no way biased. While I am pleased to have received my test unit, I will do my best to explain various features that I have experienced. In the end, Spondoolies wants customer to buy their hardware, but they don't want people purchasing units that they won't be completely satisfied with. Having unhappy customers is worse than having no customers. I hope to provide potential buyers with the information that they are looking for so they will know with complete confidence whether Spondoolie products and by extension Mining, is for them.

I have never been a big miner, but my introduction was with GPU mining. In addition, I have used every generation of Asic from various companies. As far as my total mining experience goes, I'd say I am proficient in setting up and operating mining equipment. I have operated various Antminer, Asicminer, Zeusminer, and BFL Asics, but no more than a few machines at a time in the past.


Shipping/Packing:
  Shipping straight from their Israel location to the East Coast US, I received my SP20 in 3 shipping days. The packing was impeccable, very sturdy yet it didn't require a plasma cutter to open it.




The Setup Process Overview:
1) Obtain and Jump your power supply by connecting the green and black wires of your 20 or 24 pin Mobo connector. This allows the power supply to supply power via its PCIE 6pin Molex connectors without being connected to a standard computer Motherboard.

2) Plug in four 6 pin PCIE connectors into the Asic (Shown in pictures below)
3) Plug in your ethernet cable to both the Asic and your router
4) Turn the power supply(s) on and let the juice flow! ITS ALIVEEEEEE!
5) Log into the Miner's Web UI by typing myminer.io into your browser
6) Navigate to "Go To Miner"
7) You are in, tinker around with settings as desired.


Hardware Setup
  It took me 3 minutes and 46 seconds to Open the box, Pull out the Miner, hook it up to a wireless router that I had prepared prior to receiving the unit, unpack two Corsair 850W PSUs (I will mention this in a moment) plug everything in, and access the UI interface.











Software Setup/Results
  After everything is connected, you can enter myminer.io into any browser which redirects you to a Web UI list of all of the Spondoolie miners on your local network.



After clicking on "Go To Miner" you are brought to your miner's overview which shows your miner's current status.



The User interface is incredibly handy, giving the owner a huge amount of customization options to fit their needs.



Noise:   One of the most important features now a days when considering the purchase of an Asic, is the noise. Unless you have a data center, you don't want to be kept awake at night or irritated during daily activities by a box of roaring metal and chips. The place I chose to place the SP20 is my utility room. It is approximately a 10x12 foot room right off of my living room. I took a series of measurements to read exactly how loud the unit was. The measurements that I read are for a SP20 that has been running stable for a few hours, at 80% stock fan speed.

From a distance of one foot away, I read 59 dB
From six feet, I read 55 dB
From 8 feet (the doorway of my utility room) 50 dB
From 8 feet away with the door closed 35 dB
And my house's ambient noise was 31dB
And as a comparison, I measured the volume of my Television from 8 feet on medium low volume 41dB

My Experience and Notes:

So here is what I'm sure you really wanted to see, my opinions, and individual experience setting the SP20 up. As I mentioned, shipping time and quality of packaging is unmatched. Setup time was quick, taking only 3 minutes and 46 seconds. Something I will mention however, is that tinkering with the settings is mandatory. Its not difficult, but straight from the box, minor tweaking (no pun intended) is needed. When I first hooked the miner up, I used two Corsair 850W PSUs (overkill I know) with completely stock settings. I was getting 1.6-1.8+ Thash, however it was unstable, shutting down every hour or so which required a hard reset. While I can't be completely sure it wasn't one of my PSUs misbehaving, I believe it had more to do with overheating. Stock settings are set at a maximum of 288W per PCIE, 80% fan speed, .69 min Volts and .75 Max. When I changed it to 250W max per PCIE and switched in my Corsair 1250W PSU, stability improved incredibly. I have maintained a constant 1.6 THash hash rate at 1000W (slightly underclocked) for 12+ hours. As far as the noise goes, it is bearable. I am currently about 15 feet away from it with the door to my utility room closed, and it is almost unnoticeable. I would not recommend putting it in your bedroom or living spaces, but if you have a little space to tuck it away, it is very doable inside of a home.

Overall I'm very pleased with the SP20, a small profile with very reasonable hashrate and powerdraw, while it does require a bit of tinkering to get it working to its best potential, the very clean UI and ease of Over/Underclocking  makes it a very versatile machine. If you have that data center or an isolated basement where noise isn't an issue, overclock away. If you need to keep it close to your habitation areas, you can keep it stock or underclock it to keep the noise and power draw down. I'm glad that I was given an opportunity to test the SP20, and can safely say it is the overall nicest Asic that I have used so far. I am currently considering purchasing another  Grin

If you have any questions at all, I'd be happy to answer.
1647  Other / Meta / Re: Stop the scammers on BCT on: December 16, 2014, 05:21:48 AM
Orrrrrrrr before people throw money into a coin, they could actually read and see if its stupid and non innovative or worth evaluating further as a possible candidate for investment. There is no such thing as a scam coin (with the exception of viruses which are banned here). If the dev is incompetent, or the coin is nothing special and doesn't have a future, DONT BUY IT! [sarcasm on/]We should also disallow threads having to do with Bitcoins because people could potentially lose their money with it. [/sarcasm of]

Take a bit of self responsibility, and invest smarter. If you have some primal urge to waste your money you could invest in my happiness and send all of your coins to me  Grin

I'll do one better, if you invest in me, I'll even send you a pm saying thank you. That's more than you will get with a sinking coin!
1648  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Closed] Legendaries review party of Spondoolies-Tech's SP20 on: December 16, 2014, 03:22:18 AM
Got mine as well, took me 3 minutes and 46 seconds to set it up, including unboxing, unpackaging PSUs, jumping them, configuring the miner status, and then running. Pretty happy with that so far. I didn't do anything with IP/Mac Addresses, I just plugged it in and went to myminer.io

edit* about as loud as a low powered vacuum cleaner. However I haven't tinkered with the fan settings or anything else yet, its just been running at 80% fan. Like most asics I suppose at stock settings, its fine if you have a basement or a room out of the way, but I probably wouldn't put it in a living space.

I could not expect less from ishmael Smiley after some nuclear power plants study, this is "vacation time".

Hehe, its been a while hasn't it? I only dabble with nuclear plants nowadays since DHS shut down my last one.

Something to note, I was having major stability issues with 2 Corsair 850 PSUs (overkill I know) I swapped those out and went with a single Corsair 1250W and my hashrate has stayed completely stable for a few hours now, The SP20 UI is showing a bit under 1.6THash, but Eligius has been reading it as 1.8 Thash consistently. 80% feed capped at 1000W max.
1649  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Script Zesuminer and SHA ASICs on: December 15, 2014, 08:13:25 PM
Warning: Impersonator is PMing people.

Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=403210

Proof:


Haha, thats pretty funny. I dont see why people even try that? Anyway, I believe that all of the asics are sold. I have reached an agreement with a buyer and just waiting on finalizing details. I'm going to close the thread.
1650  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Closed] Legendaries review party of Spondoolies-Tech's SP20 on: December 15, 2014, 07:19:35 PM
Got mine as well, took me 3 minutes and 46 seconds to set it up, including unboxing, unpackaging PSUs, jumping them, configuring the miner status, and then running. Pretty happy with that so far. I didn't do anything with IP/Mac Addresses, I just plugged it in and went to myminer.io

edit* about as loud as a low powered vacuum cleaner. However I haven't tinkered with the fan settings or anything else yet, its just been running at 80% fan. Like most asics I suppose at stock settings, its fine if you have a basement or a room out of the way, but I probably wouldn't put it in a living space.
1651  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Script Zesuminer and SHA ASICs on: December 14, 2014, 05:08:34 AM
If the deal falls through I will buy the FailFast board (I have a cooler already). As an FYI they use at least 1W per GH so with cooler my guess 825, but not sure those VMC boards do. They are very finicky in general (I have some BabyJets currently hashing).

Thanks for the info. I'll contact everyone who has shown interest when I know one way or another.
1652  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Script Zesuminer and SHA ASICs on: December 14, 2014, 04:40:43 AM
Just an update, I have a pending offer for everything. I believe the shipping costs out of the country to be prohibitive, so I doubt the deal will go through, but that is up to the buyer to decide I suppose. I will contact everyone who has made an offer or submitted a question when I know for certain.

i will buy VMC card do u to Egypt and what i need to run it PC ?

How much power do the VMC cards use?

I would highly advise against the VMC Asics if you aren't an experienced Asic user. (This coming from the seller must mean something  Grin ) If shipping anything out of the country is feasible, it would be the VMC card, as it weighs about 1 lb itself. As far as how much power they use, the box rates them @ .70-.99 Watts per GHash, so between 525 and 750 Watts. These being rare asics I can't say for certain, so I'm marketing them at 750 Watts to be safe.
1653  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove CanaryInTheMine from DefaultTrust on: December 14, 2014, 03:14:09 AM
Canary is staking their reputation on the people they add. If there is an issue with the people they add, its on Canary to handle. Self interest is the best motivator to keep a corruptible system honest, and every system is corruptible.
I think you are mistaken here. There are no limits as to how many people he can add to his trust list (which puts them on default trust list). There is no limit as to how many accounts he can have.

There is nothing to stop him from making 1,000 accounts, putting them all on default trust list, giving each-other positive/green trust then giving him trust.

Being on default trust essentially makes it impossible to make it appear to an outsider that you have a bad reputation. His reputation may be negatively affected but only by people who regularly follow the politics of bitcointalk.org, for people who do not follow (probably most of the user base) will have no idea other then his trust rating that is available without clicking on any trust details.

He essentially is doing what I described in my 2nd paragraph, except with ~200 people as opposed to 1,000. From what I can tell many/most people who have green trust that are on his trust list have received trust feedback from others that are on his trust list alone; and have given him positive trust feedback as well

He would be removed from default trust. I just want to make sure we are still talking hypothetical, we can't prosecute a guy for something he could possibly do. Theymos could make 50 accounts, give himself fake trust, and then scam someone out of free dancing lessons, but I'm not asking to remove Theymos from default trust yet.
1654  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Script Zesuminer and SHA ASICs on: December 14, 2014, 03:12:01 AM
the price include shipping

Shipping is not included in the cost of the hardware, I can calculate that on a case by case basis if interested.
1655  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove CanaryInTheMine from DefaultTrust on: December 14, 2014, 12:36:46 AM
I think what the staff is telling everyone here is, the key is to lie to them and everyone else and just PRETEND you think the individual you negative is a scammer rather than being honest of why the feedback was left for various other reasons  (like prominent people on the default trust do almost daily). Going around "scambusting" is a nice cover for throwing in a few personal enemies into the grinder as well. In the end the staff care about one thing, THEIR PAYCHECK, and they don't have any other interest while getting involved with disputes. Why should they care if you were ripped off, harassed, or otherwise slandered?

You are correct about one thing, the staff not caring to get involved in disputes. We aren't the government out to protect bank account balances or to tell people to play nice, we are pretty much here just to keep things organized and to step in when there are major issues ie death threats, etc. This is a public forum, you can come here to chat with other people of similar ideology or that are interested in similar technologies. We aren't interested in babysitting or problem solving, if adults can't solve their own problems, then thats on them. If people don't like Default Trust, remove it from your trust lists, if you don't like CanaryInTheMine's trust picks, remove CanaryInTheMine from your trust list, no one is helpless.

I haven't reviewed the people on CanaryInTheMine's list, nor do I care to. Because as above, its not really my problem, people can work out any issues with other parties involved. But I agree with their above post to an extent.
yep, we've dealt with inaccurate or blatant abuses before and will continue to do so as necessary.  most people are not evil and if they flip, we can resolve disputes.

Canary is staking their reputation on the people they add. If there is an issue with the people they add, its on Canary to handle. Self interest is the best motivator to keep a corruptible system honest, and every system is corruptible.
1656  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Script Zesuminer and SHA ASICs on: December 13, 2014, 05:45:31 PM
price dropped on everything.
1657  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 13, 2014, 06:32:55 AM
...Default trust isn't perfect and incorruptible, but a trust list run by someone else (and let's be real here, if default trust didn't exist, someone would make a "default" that everyone would end up using anyway) would be much more corruptible...

This is quite an assumption to make. The forum itself is earning income and interacting with users of the forum. The moderators are paid, and that income comes from ads sold. There is a DIRECT FINANCIAL INTEREST in keeping this trust list under control of the people who are the primary beneficiaries of this (mods, any paid staff).

Even assuming that you are all 100% honest at your word, that alone is enough to influence your actions drastically regarding how you moderate the default trust. This is why a distributed solution to this is the only solution. Will it ever be exploited? Yes probably, but so is the current system. At least a distributed system has the ability to react and shift reputation to individuals who deserve it and remove it from those who don't THEMSELVES, not from a central position of a small group of otherwise disinterested financial beneficiaries.

But as you said, those with a direct interest have reason to keep the default trust list under control. Thats fine and dandy for a "Default" Trust group. I honestly think that for new members joining the forums, Default Trust isn't a bad way to start off. By the time they are no longer newbies and can gauge the community, they can build their own trust groups. There is nothing stopping a decentralized trust network from starting in tandem with Default trust. If people are too lazy to switch from default trust to their own systems, that would be the case regardless of whether Default Trust was in play or not. By the time you are around a while, you realize trusted trust and untrusted trust don't make a difference, you find yourself looking for specific names as references rather than green letters. For example Mabsark under CanaryInTheMine. I don't care if they are on default trust, I had no idea who they were before this thread, so I'm not going to value their feedback anymore than someone else I dont know. I'm looking for feedback from longtime members and businesspeople before I trade with someone.
1658  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 13, 2014, 03:14:04 AM
I see your point. You actually touched another vital one - multiple accounts, which IMO shouldn't be allowed. People with multiple accounts are already using them to push their opinions, scam signature campaigns and so on. Not allowing newbies and juniors to leave trust ratings wouldn't be a problem, because it would discourage the most obvious spammers, those too lazy to even write a couple of posts.

You're right that it could be abused by people with multiple accounts, but allowing 1 rating per user should be fairly easy. It would only require the software to block multiple ratings by the same user. You should really consider this, even if you're not planning to change the default trust in any way.

As for the people on default trust, I'm not completely sure if people are responsible with their ratings. Just take Mr. CanaryInTheMine. He gave positive trust to a lot of people, who participated in his group buy, so in a way by buying something from him they also bought trust. The trust list is also rarely moderated. Mark Karpeles was on the list for months after his exchange imploded.


@malaimult I've seen some of these plants who bash certain mining companies while pushing their own through paid or unpaid signatures. A common practice these days Wink

Having multiple accounts is something we can't enforce, so it would be irresponsible to say that its disallowed. The number next to someone's name is pretty irrelevant, if anyone is using the trust system solely by the green or red number, thats their fault. Its like Ebay feedback, before you buy a yacht from someone with 100 positive feedback for purchases, you should probably check and see what that feedback is for. Allowing people to leave more than one rating really isn't a big deal. I haven't seen any issue with people spamming feedback. Giving someone positive feedback does not mean that they are on the default trust list, I have done many deals with people, but if you check my sent feedback it accurately describes the transaction so that people can gauge what my feedback means for themselves. I have added four people to the default trustlist and left probably 50 different positive feedbacks. Mr. CanaryInTheMine gave positive feedback to people he had a positive transaction with, not a problem. That goes back to the point of reading what someone has gained feedback for and the Ebay example. If someone has 50 positive trust for buying things from group buys, that doesnt mean they are trustworthy to sell you something. The feedback system is a tool, there is no preventing it from people that use it wrong. The default trust system just means that someone in the line trusts that they will give others accurate feedback. If not, changes are made.
1659  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 13, 2014, 12:13:33 AM

People who are "accepted" by the owner of the forum should not be in any way promoted and be able to tag other people's profiles.
What matters now is not how many transactions the account is involved in or how many people left a trust rating but if these people are among the privileged.

If you have a better solution please speak up. As it is the current system is the most stable that we have had. Find a plan for forum trust that can't be exploited, or has a lower risk of being exploited, and I'm sure it will be adopted.

Every system can be exploited, just like the current one is. What I'd propose is:
Remove the default trust and make all comments equal. Rate the profile by the number of positive/negative votes.
Allow only 1 vote per account and don't allow newbies and jr. members to leave comments to prevent spam.

What I find strange at the moment are people leaving multiple trust ratings with the same purpose. Why doesn't the staff ban trust spammers or allow only 1 rating per person?

People with multiple accounts would then have greater weight. With your proposed system, you just make 100 accounts, age them, and then become very trusted, and start scamming, or ruin/build up other's trust. That would also give people a free pass to scam newbies and jr.members because they couldn't voice their opinions. As it is now, the trust system is not moderated. Allowing staff to alter trust in any way would leave it completely useless. Staff members could then be influenced to do shady things for others or themselves.

As it is now, the people on the default trust list have a vested interest in the forum. First Theymos, those he picked, and from there those that the 2nd layer has picked, etc. If someone does something wrong with the trust system while on the default trust list, it effects the person above them, discouraging abuse, and encouraging those in a position to add others to the trustlist to think carefully about who they add, and act quickly to fix any situation that comes about. If you don't like the default trust system, individuals can remove the Default Trust list from their own account preferences, and replace it with people they personally trust.
1660  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting theymos to remove Mabsark from DefaultTrust on: December 12, 2014, 11:36:15 PM

People who are "accepted" by the owner of the forum should not be in any way promoted and be able to tag other people's profiles.
What matters now is not how many transactions the account is involved in or how many people left a trust rating but if these people are among the privileged.

If you have a better solution please speak up. As it is the current system is the most stable that we have had. Find a plan for forum trust that can't be exploited, or has a lower risk of being exploited, and I'm sure it will be adopted.
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 214 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!