 Protect your assets from electromagnetic fields FaradayCageCoin |
|
|
|
|
We could rename the coin to FaradayCageCoin (FC2)
|
|
|
|
 Some people have no sense of humor, I swear. The point is you are a scammer trying to leech of the Feathercoin name when this fork is not backed by the Feathercoin dev. You should have called it Hazardcoin, but then you couldn't ride on the back of Bushstars hard work. I hope people realize what's going on here, but I doubt it. "ooh another coin pump and dump lets get in early" You're too stupid to see that it's an obvious parody of recent altcoin releases. Carry on. |
|
|
|
int64 nSubsidy = ((1 + (diff / 24)) * COIN) / (1 + (nHeight / 194400));
...
Would someone kindly tell me what is the nHeight variable and how does it change over time (or whatever that may change it)? Thanks.  Its equal to the # of blocks. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't take Hazard seriously seeing how he doesn't respect other people around here and how he's clueless about programming yet he makes topics about code issues, commenting on basic code constructs he doesn't understand (source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=204829.0 ) I'm sure many people are still running the 1000000 client. And it's hilarious that crap like this even gets pushed out. This guy has no idea what he's doing in the code. He's just editing random variables and hoping they do what he wants. You do realize it is >> right? higher >> means a lower number. Perhaps I phrased that poorly. Or in a way that you did not understand. Anyway... Allow me to rephrase it another way. By using an example. On bitcoin testnet, that variable in particular is decreased in order to reduce the minimum difficulty. You, however, decided to increase it from it's starting value of 20, to an insane value of 1000000. You are in for some nasty difficulty spikes because of this. LOL, I wonder if you actually know programming. It was shifted right. Bitops. SHIFTING IT RIGHT DOES NOT INCREASE IT, IT DECREASES IT. False. That variable is in place to stop the difficulty from ever getting too low. It serves as the floor for difficulty, basically. There is enough documentation online to prove this. You have increased that floor from 20 to 1000000. Ergo, you have INCREASED difficulty by an insane amount. You've already proven yourself to be incompetent. Don't even act like you know a damn thing about how bitcoin works, or coin creation in general. Just so you finally understand Hazard, a >> shift by 1000000* in this case is essentially the same as dividing by 2^1000000 which would result in an incredibly small number which a computer wouldn't be able to reproduce anyway, hence you can consider it 0. Source: I'm a programmer, relevant programming 101 guide for you: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/510681/in-c-programming-can-i-use-multiply-and-divide-to-shift-bits* Note that I'm not sure why a shift by 1000000 was put in the code in the first place, that's wrong for other reasons which I'm sure the OP has discovered by now and has since fixed.I'm aware. I'm tired of explaining this. This has to be at least the 10th time I've done soon. You don't ever want that value to that high. The default value for the shift in bitcoin is 35. In litecoin, it is 20. I don't need a explanation on how bitshifting works. My entire point is that by setting that value to 1000000, he is setting up the difficulty retargets to be absolutely ridiculous. |
|
|
|
No matter what you say or do your basicly just a greedy twat who ruins releases of other people.
Plain simpel
Your atrocious grammar makes it hard to take you seriously. Milkshake ruined his own release by trying to premine some 1360 blocks. Why are we still having this discussion? I did you guys a favor by exposing what was going on. Don't kill the whistleblower. I did not premine any blocks you fuckwit, either you or the other guy I gave it to premined. If I premined, why would I post that I premined? That leaves either you or him as the preminer. And I'm leaning towards you, since he had an alibi.  |
|
|
|
Sorry but is the only point of this that's it's possible to launch something with windows binaries ?
One of many points. |
|
|
|
It looks like sabotage..  Nah it's just that there's no more buyers. All the investers/speculators have moved on. And yet, we're sitting at 290MHash network speed... Something big is in the works. http://rlcpool.erundook.net/I think that's wishful thinking. When the next real altcoin shows up, it will be dumped without a second thought. A few days to a week, max. Just speculating ofcourse  That already happened... Hash rate dropped as low as 60MH I believe. And its been steadily increasing ever since. |
|
|
|
Some people have no sense of humor, I swear. |
|
|
|
It looks like sabotage.. Nah it's just that there's no more buyers. All the investers/speculators have moved on. And yet, we're sitting at 290MHash network speed... Something big is in the works. http://rlcpool.erundook.net/ |
|
|
|
Holy shit guys. 248MH network speed! seems like were on board  website/logo? i was saying ican throw together a quick bootstrap website. Go for it. |
|
|
|
Feathercoin has a stalled blocked chain.
Feathercoin2 does not.
Feathercoin2 is the clear winner here!
FTC is not stalled, I am still mining it happily. There is a fork of FTC planned to change the difficulty computation, all you have done with this fork is created confusion which doesn't help FTC at all. I did not choose FTC in particular, it just happened to be the only source I had on my HD at the time I decided developing a sillycoin would be a good idea. |
|
|
|
|
If you are having issues with p2pool payout, generate an address that starts with '6' instead of '7'.
rikku's p2pool is only paying out to addresses that start with '6', currently.
|
|
|
|
Holy shit guys. 248MH network speed! |
|
|
|
I know that there is a beta exchange that has it listed. Still also hearing rumors that others are waiting out the CNC FTC storm
ye i heard one too Oh? That's the first time i've heard that. I'd imagine an exchange like btc-e would be in that position, but how about bter? They seem pretty happy to adopt anything that is popular enough, do you think we could get them to post RYC? Send them emails asking them to add it. With the big hashrate this coin has (currently 277MH), for a week old coin, that's very high. Something big is in the works, I think... |
|
|
|
hazard. you should try giving some of that away to muster alittle more popularity for fc2
It's all I have left. I didn't mine very much of it. The guy who set up the amazon servers probably has the lion's share of FC2. |
|
|
|
No matter what you say or do your basicly just a greedy twat who ruins releases of other people.
Plain simpel
Your atrocious grammar makes it hard to take you seriously. Milkshake ruined his own release by trying to premine some 1360 blocks. Why are we still having this discussion? I did you guys a favor by exposing what was going on. Don't kill the whistleblower. |
|
|
|
|
FC2 was intended as a parody of sorts of current altcoin releases. If people wish to mine it, more power to them. It has had a surprisingly smooth launch, though, I will say.
HazardCoin (name subject to change), should I decide to develop it, will be a big departure from current altcoin releases, and will attempt to fix the problems we've seen with recent coins. It won't be a copypaste job.
|
|
|
|
pm offers |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
