BSV and BTC have the same old history - true so far
But the crime actions (incl altering protocol to more allow such) stay on BTC - so what is your point? I guess even criminals stay away from BSV. I wonder why.
Hey, isn't changing the block size altering Bitcoin? When do you stop? 1 TB? 1 EB? How big do you want your blocks to be? Heck, why not just absolve the whole concept of a blockchain and just have a single block? |
|
|
|
They had a live game that was 6 decks and the rules were OK. Hit on soft 17, can only split once, and double down on any two cards even after the split. However, the deck penetration was only less about 50%. Slow dealers = horrible for counting. You want a high count of hands/hour if you want to make anything decent. Assuming 3:2 payout, doubling on any and being unable to hit aces after splitting, that's 0.66895% edge. Best case scenario (hitting aces post-split) that drops down to 0.48409%. If you have surrender, then that's even better. Evolution Gaming holds a 0.6072% edge, but it's 8 decks rather than 6. The results after counting would probably be equivalent between the two, though if you're able to secure an entire table on Betonline.ag you might be able to make it more profitable. A team scenario.  |
|
|
|
It isn't mentioned because nobody uses BSV, besides a few cultists. Is the end of cash money also set, since it is also used in drugs deals?
BTC use case 1 is money laundering 2 ponzi hodl, sell to greater fool 3 alter protocol so that s no longer Bitcoin Hm not really a glance Since BSV is a fork of BTC, it carries all the history of BTC. Including that of the illegal dealings. 
Hey, also... how do we prevent any currency from being used in one particular transaction? Certainly, you can use third-party regulatory terms to create a preventative measure as an external form of limitations... but in the underlying protocol, how do you honestly stop it from being used inappropriately? Only in the case of total centralization would you be able to stop certain transactions. Anything but that would still allow others to use it for their own means. |
|
|
|
I'm not quite sure, but I think it has some sort of report queueing on the background I used this and changed some configurations in order to queue a large number of reports. I believe that at one point, I've had over 30 pages of reports all going through the automated system. I would recommend, if necessary, to add some custom buttons (either to target multiple posts or to target specific types of issues) |
|
|
|
|
#1 @ 0.001
#2 @ 0.001
#3 @ 0.001
#4 @ 0.001
#5 @ 0.001
#6 @ 0.001
#7 @ 0.001
#8 @ 0.001
#10 @ 0.001
|
|
|
|
Member: 10 but must get at least 1 merit for each 100 activity points to maintain the rank, if not, user will drop to Jr. Member
Full Member: 75 but must get 5 merits for each 200 activity points to maintain the rank, if not, user will drop to Member
Sr. Member: 150 but must but must get 10 for each 400 activity points to maintain the rank, if not, user will drop to Full Member
Hero Member: 450 but must get 50 for each 800 activity points to maintain the rank, if not, user will drop to Senior Member
Legendary: 750 but must get 100 for each 1000-1200 activity points to maintain the rank, if not, user will drop to Hero Member Users will then delete previous posts if they do not want to rank down. Easily circumvented. |
|
|
|
AFAIK modlog goes back 7 days.
Yeah, it's by some day-based period. Just checked to see that the modlog covers over 10K entries. I remember it being a month some time ago, though. :/ Seclog maybe. |
|
|
|
"Re: Shit eaters Lauda and Pharmacist- Ban need to executed on these people" didn't show up in the mod log. He is lying. Mod logs can get filled pretty quickly. Especially with lots of deleted replies. I do know that about 1500 reports were sorted out between now and yesterday. |
|
|
|
Are you aware that you can click the date of a quote and it links you to the thread? Your post wasn't removed this morning so if a mod deleted it it should show up in the mod log. Delete reply: Re: ▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ in topic #5103988 by member #2061615 is the only one in the recent logs. |
|
|
|
you base your conclusions on one message, which is long gone. The testing of merit did not require any new posts, never mind a plagiarized post. Deleting the result doesn't delete the action. Modlog also went way past your posts, though we have this: Posts deleted by moderators: 5
What about your other account's plagiarism ban? |
|
|
|
|
If you consider someone trusted even if they were to stop being your friend, then that is what they are.
|
|
|
|
I'm not negotiating my friend. Like i said i'm happy with my life. Do happy people constantly spout about how happy they are? |
|
|
|
Buying some bitcoin with buying your house is best thing but buying a house with bitcoin now a day is not good. It is time when we will have to plan for buying some more bitcoin and later on you will be able to buy with profit.
No comment. |
|
|
|
|
If you read a post and you think, "nothing has been gained or truly said from this post," then it may well be spam.
|
|
|
|
|
1 to 5
55ed2ecbc940d9d40b6354f81e37d7500b2385f62552455f3bd39e95727ba4ce
|
|
|
|
Every exchange does something sketchy, Im not sure why you guys think livecoin is so special. Binance has their own shitcoin scam project going.
People need money to survive, its not like it is any worse than advertising a casino. "Not as bad as" "No true scotsman" "Two wrongs make a right" "It is the status quo" |
|
|
|
|
And thus chaos begins anew.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
