Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:40:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 342 »
1721  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Blockchain.info / Sofort wallet deposit hasn't worked? on: December 20, 2012, 11:22:36 AM
Thanks for your help with this. I have a few questions:

1) I placed the order to be deposited to my wallet. How do the coins end up in a wallet controlled by someone else?
2) How did he get the coins sent to an address that he controlsm, given that this was MY order?
3) How can this be prevented?

I'm not hugely optmistic about getting my coins back...

They are likely to tell you why the coins got sent to that other wallet.
If they'll say it's their or your error and therefore loss, who knows.

If what you posted was all they said it doesn't look like they're giving it much importance.
1722  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Blockchain.info / Sofort wallet deposit hasn't worked? on: December 20, 2012, 11:08:50 AM
Sorry to say, but your coins just moved Embarrassed

No they didn't, he spent 0.06BTC but sent the change back to the same address.

0.06 less lol

I don't understand how my bitcoins 'just moved'? Do I have any recourse apart from trying to contact this guy? He's a student in Edinburgh from what I can tell...my chances look minimal!

How can I get my bitcoins?!!!

It's very simple: He got the coins sent to an address which he controls, he can move them all he wants.

Contact him. Just remember to be polite. These matters of funds sent by mistake usually don't end well when one of the parties involved starts to act like a dick, and one of them starting to act like a dick is all it takes for things to escalate, so, don't be the that guy Wink
1723  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Blockchain.info / Sofort wallet deposit hasn't worked? on: December 20, 2012, 11:01:01 AM
Sorry to say, but your coins just moved Embarrassed
1724  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Blockchain.info / Sofort wallet deposit hasn't worked? on: December 20, 2012, 10:55:38 AM
The order was for 5.597 btc.

The owner of this address got them and still has them:
http://blockchain.info/address/12owF5JsvH3h6DhMa5xDPsMrSwiF2g49dd

Contact him trough his twitter account, maybe he can help you, if he's a nice guy. Before someone else does it for you! Tongue Because if blockchain.info did send him the coins, there's no way they can get them back if he doesn't give them voluntarily.
https://twitter.com/slimeball2006/statuses/269882570353819648
1725  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Bitchain.info / Sofort wallet deposit hasn't worked? on: December 20, 2012, 10:45:47 AM
Sorry, blockchain.info

I didn't send my bitcoins to either of those addresses. They should have gone here:

395a326d-5308-9641-19d0-1fac7a9cc056

Have I been done?

That's not a bitcoin address, that's a blockchain.info wallet identifier.

Let me ask the question differentely: How many BTC did you buy? 5.59747276 BTC or 32.88236267?
1726  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Bitchain.info / Sofort wallet deposit hasn't worked? on: December 20, 2012, 10:36:05 AM
this is blockchain.info right? or something new

Blockchain.info. Some people are just... Lips sealed
1727  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Bitchain.info / Sofort wallet deposit hasn't worked? on: December 20, 2012, 10:32:39 AM
Is this one 1Mq1gv48WhBXkMGUop8tbuAqptrCwxuu8b the address where you sent the coins or was it this one 12owF5JsvH3h6DhMa5xDPsMrSwiF2g49dd ?

If it was the 2nd address, do you know this dude https://twitter.com/slimeball2006/statuses/269882570353819648 ?
1728  Economy / Exchanges / Re: [ANN] Bitcoinica Consultancy abandons customers. Bitcoinica to enter Liquidation on: December 20, 2012, 10:15:51 AM
That paste has since been deleted. Anyone have copies?

If you let me lick your toes. 

One'd refuse very butch lumberjacks at her peril.

http://polimedia.us/dtng/c/src/13559978937.jpg

Enjoy.

Holy Mother of God! No sleep for 10 days!  Thanks a lot...  Cry

1729  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MemoryDealers.com founder Roger Ver abuses admin access at Blockchain.info on: December 20, 2012, 09:58:20 AM
This is the Internet, there is no 3rd-party provided privacy and whoever thinks there is sure is mistaken and living in a dreamworld
In the Internet, privacy is a DIY thing, almost like in real life, you know...
If you don't want your neighbours to see your johnson you don't go around the house naked with the windows open, do you?
1730  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MemoryDealers.com founder Roger Ver abuses admin access at Blockchain.info on: December 20, 2012, 09:14:38 AM
This thread is full of spineless morons who would just sit tight while some greek dude rips them off instead of leveraging all the means they can to fuck with the scammer.
Almost gives me a desire to scam you all, just to see your reaction.
1731  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: WARNING - Blockchain.info is NOT SAFE on: December 19, 2012, 06:02:03 PM
To be clear, I agree with Roger that the dude deserves the scammer tag.  It's not his money...

bulanula got it, so should this dude.
1732  Other / Off-topic / Re: Silk Road compromised? on: December 19, 2012, 05:57:09 PM
Their "weird" image system is to store images as base64 encoded strings on the database, which isn't weird at all.

well they use some tick to have the images not dwl from TOR, no?
the hacker took advantage of this system, maybe.

No, they do get downloaded, at least their base64 binary data does, but they get the whole page in only 1 request to the DB and it can be sent to the browser in 1 operation, which saves a lot of time.
1733  Other / Off-topic / Re: Silk Road compromised? on: December 19, 2012, 05:24:42 PM
Their "weird" image system is to store images as base64 encoded strings on the database, which isn't weird at all.
1734  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Please help - New to Bitcoin, lost passphrase! on: December 19, 2012, 04:43:44 PM
Hi psy thanks for your reply. I seem to have the exact problem you mention as I am in my wallet and I can see the 2 incoming transactions of 1 and 9 bitcoin from when i set up my bitcoin wallet. This is correct as somebody transferred 10 bitcoins to me originally in that exact format, 1 bitcoin as a test I had it setup ok and could receive bitcoin, then sent me the other 9 once i confirmed everything was ok.
Like you say though I had made a transaction since that outgoing but it is showing as the full 9 bitcoin had been transferred out when I only transferred 4!
Is it that this 5 bitcoin is permanently lost now? I have a copy of my encrypted wallet.dat that I do not know passphrase for. Is it possible me to brute force exploit/crack this in any way as I know roughly what letters and numbers I used when i set the passphrase just cannot remember correct combination. Have tried so many times. Sad
I know it seems a lot of hassle over 5 bitcoin (£40), it is just I do not like to lose money (of any currency)!  

You sent 4 Bitcoins to one address, but if your client chose the 9BTC transaction to send those 4 it would then send the remaining 5 BTC to one of your change addresses, which unfortunately for you, only exist on the encrypted wallet
1735  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Please help - New to Bitcoin, lost passphrase! on: December 19, 2012, 04:02:37 PM
With the backup wallet restored, go to the debug window RPC console, type -rescan and press enter.
See if any bitcoins show up.

If the wallet.dat backup is old you may have a problem, as encryption of the file will flush your change addresses pool and create new addresses, so, any transaction you sent after the encryption, and that transaction had change, the change won't be on that backup for sure.
1736  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Used Panties on: December 19, 2012, 03:54:59 PM
It's civilized that there are no pictures posted in this thread!

It may be civilized, but it sure cuts down on excitement.
1737  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Used Panties on: December 19, 2012, 02:30:19 PM
BTW, got pics?
1738  Other / Archival / Re: Bitcoinstore.com has encountered our first scammer. on: December 19, 2012, 02:28:10 PM
And so it started, the shitstorm: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=131608
1739  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Used Panties on: December 19, 2012, 12:25:43 PM
PantyCoin anyone?
The first cryptocurrency ever to be backed by something real: dirty panties.
1740  Other / Archival / Re: Bitcoinstore.com has encountered our first scammer. on: December 19, 2012, 12:14:13 PM
I hope that action above was covered in your terms of use and privacy policy.
There was a discussion between some of my friends recently about releasing personal information by e-shop owner and most of them disagree with this kind of "revenge".
It may bring negative attention.

He could try doing it the easy way and equal for everyone.
Publish a public list of persons who for some reason owe the company money and are late with payments.
No need to call them scammers, just a debtors list Wink
Don't know about the US, but I know some brick and mortar shops already did this(publish debtor lists) in Portugal and there was no problem at all, quite the opposite, they even made it to the press/TV.
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 342 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!