|
Sha-256 Contracts have been increased. No Price changes!
If you had a 100 Gh/s contract before, it is now 250 Gh/s. If you had a 1 Th/s contract, it is now 2.5 Th/s.
We are also giving you credit for the time used on your old contract. 60% of the time you have already used in your existing contract will be appended to the expiration date of your contract.
This means if you have had your contract for 30 days already, then 18 more days will be added to the end of your contract to extend it's expiration date.
|
|
|
|
|
I sent your issue to the head of the support team hoping to have it resolved for you shortly. Sorry for the delay.
|
|
|
|
any mining calculator can i use if i buy contract in Minsty ? now iam use bitcoincloudservice and cloudminr.io  I typically use coinwarz which shows me alt coins that I can use my hash on |
|
|
|
Sha-256 Contracts have been increased. No Price changes.
If you had a 100 Gh/s contract before, it is now 250 Gh/s. If you had a 1 Th/s contract, it is now 2.5 Th/s.
We are also giving you credit for the time used on your old contract. 60% of the time you have already used in your existing contract will be appended to the expiration date of your contract.
This means if you have had your contract for 30 days already, then 18 more days will be added to the end of your contract to extend it's expiration date.
Thank you very much  I am guessing that made a bunch of folks day! |
|
|
|
|
Sha-256 Contracts have been increased. No Price changes.
If you had a 100 Gh/s contract before, it is now 250 Gh/s. If you had a 1 Th/s contract, it is now 2.5 Th/s.
We are also giving you credit for the time used on your old contract. 60% of the time you have already used in your existing contract will be appended to the expiration date of your contract.
This means if you have had your contract for 30 days already, then 18 more days will be added to the end of your contract to extend it's expiration date.
|
|
|
|
|
Sha-256 Contracts have been increased. No Price changes.
If you had a 100 Gh/s contract before, it is now 250 Gh/s. If you had a 1 Th/s contract, it is now 2.5 Th/s.
We are also giving you credit for the time used on your old contract. 60% of the time you have already used in your existing contract will be appended to the expiration date of your contract.
This means if you have had your contract for 30 days already, then 18 more days will be added to the end of your contract to extend it's expiration date.
|
|
|
|
I've got a question regarding pointing my own gear here. I have 6 S3s that are updated with the latest firmware and xnsub patched cgminer binaries. My primary pool is MRR, secondary is mintsy.co. On MRR, I have configured my miners to point to mintsy.co when they are not rented. They absolutely refuse to connect and hash here when they are not rented on MRR. However, if I just set them to mine here directly (by changing up the pool config in the S3 configuration), they work fine. Has anyone else experienced this problem? S3 -> MRR -> mintsy = fail S3 -> mintsy = success Do I need to I cannot put the #xnsub in the URL in my MRR pool config like this:  I've got it directly in the S3 config...  Maybe that's what I'm missing? Unfortunately I can't test yet because my gear is currently rented on MRR...By the way, the 3 month SHA256 contract I purchased is doing just fine... makes me keep my eyes on the alt coins... maybe I'll spread some of it to the other coins and see if I can get some good trade prices on cryptsy... EDIT: MRR does not allow you to put the #xnsub in the pool config... it throws an error when you try to save the pool configuration Is MRR subscribing to extranonce? If not it will not work properly. |
|
|
|
Cryptsy is notorious for delay in deposits when a coin is dumped in other exchanges. They halt the deposit citing bullshit reason. They pump and dump dead coins. They were the first altcoin exchange but for unknown reason they are not interested to upgrade their software. Before mintpal, bittrex they were the monopoly and controlled all the pumps. The only good thing is they do not drop the dead coins easily even when there is no volume.
The number one reason we get bad exposure on deposit times is the way our security algorithm works. You'll find that old timers and verified customers rarely complain where a brand new account with no history will have delays... ...Best reason to use Cryptsy were here to stay great security and great people working here. If you tried us before give us a try again. If you dont like the security delays get verified its fast and free gives you FIAT markets etc. Are the delays due to the risk of double spending attempts? Since the transactions take place on the blockchain which is publicly verifiable, that's the only difference I can think of between old/verified accounts and brand new ones. -We do not need entirely new backend and UI, we need new frontend and UI, now it looks like website from 20th century. sorry.
Isn't the UI part of the front end though? As far as criticism of Cryptsy goes, their UI has never really bothered me. I've personally never had a problem using Cryptsy.. apart from their API. That sucks.
Otherwise.. they are reliable. Their trading engine just works. Deposits and withdrawals can occasionally have delays but it's to be expected with the vast number of sh*tcoin wallets that they try to accommodate.
As to the original question, I'm not sure why they get so much hate. I think early on the site was incredibly slow, and this probably contributed.
It's probably more down to this though..
They were the biggest exchange for a long time, and every new coin they added was pumped almost instantly, then dumped just as quickly, and this is what mostly gave them the bad rep. Nowadays, without the altcoin flash and crash it's a very stable exchange.
I've always wondered why Cryptsy never seems to delist coins that virtually everyone else has forgotten. Many of the old scrypt clones from the animal coin craze last year are still there despite having very little to no trading activity. Because that is someones investment..... Just because its not the hot thing. Delisting coins because they have lost volume should not be decided in a week.... Maybe once a year or three... |
|
|
|
|
At this point I feel I have put my best effort forward on the Prime Controller issue, hopefully I answered some questions for you.
We will announce the decision in this thread when it is made.
I appreciate the candid conversation and look forward to the next one. Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
Why did Cryptsy implement a XPY/USD market weeks?months?, not sure how long ago i'd have to dig into it, when any reasonable person would have concluded XPY was dying? Who made that decision and why? Mr. Homero "Scam Muggle" Garbanzo had nothing to do with that?
We generally add a USD pairing to any coin that appears to be able to hold 1k volume if you look at the other pairing that is generally obvious. Just curious, in which states is Cryptsy licensed as a MTB? So not my lane and it gets a bit confusing but most of the US exchanges Cryptsy, Coinbase etc are identically licensed. Some states don't require it others have very vague open ended rules. So though that doesn't answer your question its not a cut and dry process as you can see reflected throughout the space. really ? “I’m willing to share,” said Ehrsam. His company has more than $100 million in venture capital and is one of the most heavily capitalized companies in bitcoin. He said it took Coinbase two years and $2 million to be compliant with half the states. http://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2015/04/24/fred-wilson-silicon-valley-next-wall-street.html?page=allCoinbase essentially took exactly how we operate its nearly identical, and yes it took about 2 years and $2 million sounds about right. They make wondrous claims of FDIC insured deposits as well.....By that logic ours are as well but that is true for any US bank deposit. so, not really your lane, but Coinbase copied you. ok. got it. /s We were licensed before them...... well before. However copy is probably the wrong word your correct. All US exchanges basically operate the same to my knowledge. |
|
|
|
Why did Cryptsy implement a XPY/USD market weeks?months?, not sure how long ago i'd have to dig into it, when any reasonable person would have concluded XPY was dying? Who made that decision and why? Mr. Homero "Scam Muggle" Garbanzo had nothing to do with that?
We generally add a USD pairing to any coin that appears to be able to hold 1k volume if you look at the other pairing that is generally obvious. I guess I will have to dig deeper into the numbers then but by my recollection it was added as the XPY volume was consistently falling day by day. I think it was around the time that Homero's latest Mineral sham was introduced? Someone will speak up with exact dates and numbers I am sure. Just seems like an odd business decision. Very few coins had a USD market at the time and when it comes to XPY you thought, "Hey, that coin launched by an illiterate fraud that is surrounded in controversy and being investigated by the SEC, the coin that is falling in price and volume consistently, how about we give that coin a new market!" It was added nearly the day it was listed. Feel free its the internet.... I assume anything I post is here for eternity. Let me get you the exact date. MOTHER FUCKING LIE!!!!!! Bold face lie, total horse shit. Archiving and taking a screenshot. Market added Dec 18th USD pairing the 22nd https://twitter.com/cryptsy for your archive. |
|
|
|
Why did Cryptsy implement a XPY/USD market weeks?months?, not sure how long ago i'd have to dig into it, when any reasonable person would have concluded XPY was dying? Who made that decision and why? Mr. Homero "Scam Muggle" Garbanzo had nothing to do with that?
We generally add a USD pairing to any coin that appears to be able to hold 1k volume if you look at the other pairing that is generally obvious. Just curious, in which states is Cryptsy licensed as a MTB? So not my lane and it gets a bit confusing but most of the US exchanges Cryptsy, Coinbase etc are identically licensed. Some states don't require it others have very vague open ended rules. So though that doesn't answer your question its not a cut and dry process as you can see reflected throughout the space. really ? “I’m willing to share,” said Ehrsam. His company has more than $100 million in venture capital and is one of the most heavily capitalized companies in bitcoin. He said it took Coinbase two years and $2 million to be compliant with half the states. http://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2015/04/24/fred-wilson-silicon-valley-next-wall-street.html?page=allCoinbase essentially took exactly how we operate its nearly identical, and yes it took about 2 years and $2 million sounds about right. They make wondrous claims of FDIC insured deposits as well.....By that logic ours are as well but that is true for any US bank deposit. |
|
|
|
Why did Cryptsy implement a XPY/USD market weeks?months?, not sure how long ago i'd have to dig into it, when any reasonable person would have concluded XPY was dying? Who made that decision and why? Mr. Homero "Scam Muggle" Garbanzo had nothing to do with that?
We generally add a USD pairing to any coin that appears to be able to hold 1k volume if you look at the other pairing that is generally obvious. I guess I will have to dig deeper into the numbers then but by my recollection it was added as the XPY volume was consistently falling day by day. I think it was around the time that Homero's latest Mineral sham was introduced? Someone will speak up with exact dates and numbers I am sure. Just seems like an odd business decision. Very few coins had a USD market at the time and when it comes to XPY you thought, "Hey, that coin launched by an illiterate fraud that is surrounded in controversy and being investigated by the SEC, the coin that is falling in price and volume consistently, how about we give that coin a new market!" It was added nearly the day it was listed. |
|
|
|
Why did Cryptsy implement a XPY/USD market weeks?months?, not sure how long ago i'd have to dig into it, when any reasonable person would have concluded XPY was dying? Who made that decision and why? Mr. Homero "Scam Muggle" Garbanzo had nothing to do with that?
We generally add a USD pairing to any coin that appears to be able to hold 1k volume if you look at the other pairing that is generally obvious. Just curious, in which states is Cryptsy licensed as a MTB? So not my lane and it gets a bit confusing but most of the US exchanges Cryptsy, Coinbase etc are identically licensed. Some states don't require it others have very vague open ended rules. So though that doesn't answer your question its not a cut and dry process as you can see reflected throughout the space. |
|
|
|
Why did Cryptsy implement a XPY/USD market weeks?months?, not sure how long ago i'd have to dig into it, when any reasonable person would have concluded XPY was dying? Who made that decision and why? Mr. Homero "Scam Muggle" Garbanzo had nothing to do with that?
We generally add a USD pairing to any coin that appears to be able to hold 1k volume if you look at the other pairing that is generally obvious. |
|
|
|
Honestly the big issue here is that Cryptsy is supporting XPY more than any other exchange by owning a PC. Obviously XPY was a scam from the start, but I do not blame you guys for profiting from it like GAW did. Suckers get taken in some way or another...that is just how it works. Cryptsy should at a minimum ditch the PC and carry on. We all know that you will not de-list a coin that makes you profit (regardless of it being a scam or not). BitJohn - You do handle being trolled very well  As of the moment its either going to be daily payouts to active users every 24 hours like our rebate program, or we will destroy it. The destroy option is in discussion as to if it can be done without just giving it back. Told you I like a good trolling lol. |
|
|
|
Cryptsy is collaborating with a criminal and can not be trusted anymore. No they are not like I have stated previously what we could do in this matter we have done as far as the legal side of it. You need to say you're not dealing with a criminal for legal reasons. How can you not read through highlights of that email dump and see him to be anything but a perpetrator of frauds and a mile long trail of broken promises ? How can you morally and ethically support this ? Defend it ? Profit from it ? I have already denounced his alleged actions and stated that the actions alleged disgust me. The current XPY chain is not in his control which is when we took possession of the prime node. For anyone on here involved in financial law they will totally understand why we cannot disclose any actions we could take, and if we did it would be unlawful to disclose. Well the joke is on Cryptsy. I love your usage of "alleged" as if the email dumps and everything else surrounding GAW and XPY havn't been enough proof. The bullshit approach of innocent until proven guilty even with the current overwhelming evidence stink of Crypty greed. So I can only assume if you know a pedophile lived next door and he/she is not prosecuted yet or have an ongoing legal case meanwhile knowing full well of the crimes committed you would have no issue with the pedophile around your children until proven guilty in court? This mentality just shows how deep up Garza's ass cryptsy really is. Trust me if you guys dont wake the fuck up over at cryptsy and continue on with this XPY scam, you will end up in a thread longer than this one regarding GAW. There is no good end for any scam driven business in the crypto space anymore even if we have to make sure of it by keeping threads like this alive. Dig your own grave, I dont give a shit anymore. I say alleged because in this capacity its appropriate... If I wasn't representing Cryptsy in this capacity then I could probably choose other words. But like you said there are plenty of facts out there and we have all formed an opinion on those. |
|
|
|
XPY is still substantially Garzacoin. He still controls a lot of coins. Do you have any idea how many coins are controlled by Garza?
I have no clue how many he holds. I do stand by the fact its probably best he doesn't control more than 51% |
|
|
|
1. Why do you think it is the job of your exchange to keep this coin's network 'secure', as opposed to any other coin? If you really think about it exchanges already do this on every other PoS coin in many cases well more than 51%. This is true for Cryptsy on numerous coins, BTC-e and Bittrex probably one or two others do the same. Did I mention we all talk? If you read my post history you will find numerous statements on that topic. 2. What does your exchange owning 1, 2, or even 3 'Prime Controllers' have to do with keeping this coin's network 'secure'? Obviously we have an interest in ensuring the network is stable to avoid "issues". 3. Why is it worth more to your fully-licensed and legitimate exchange to associate itself with this altcoin even more at this time, thereby lending it a degree of credibility it does not warrant and risking your entire operation and client funds being seized by an alphabet agency deciding that you're worth investigating further due to your unusual decision to associate with Garza back in October and since? We don't back Garza never have. The selection of XPY is no different than the zillion other coins selection. |
|
|
|
Cryptsy and Homero already stuffed their pockets with the illegal coins all thats left are the premined shit coins. The trolls are at your gates and they are hungry precious.
Still getting a quote to build the eye of Mordor on the building. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
