|
Litecoin on Coinbase?
It's been coming since 2013.
Only time will tell.
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
That's what is called "Stone Cold Busted" I highly suspect you were eaten by a grue. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
No. I've just provided you with relevant information and wanted to grasp the purpose of this thread.
No what you wanted to do was increase your post count to hide your sig spamming under the guise of being a staff member. Why else have you said the same thing in two separate post on this page alone? ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
Just tell me which coin to short.
And don't let Risto to buy you off this time.
Like I said, just here to see what set Anonymint off. But nonetheless I got about 20 PM's asking the same thing LOL Based on what I can tell from a 30 minute look at ETH Peter Vessenes post seems legit. You might consider ETH ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
My vote is for setting up a crowdfund for getting him to a first world location and paying for good medical doctors, who can offer him the services he needs.
A lot of people want that dude around, I'd hope they'd pitch in.
Dunno, I might just take him off the deep end and turn him to the dark side. An evil Anonymint would be fun to watch. Besides, he probably needs to hit rock bottom and then roll over into a ditch before he gets better. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
Ok so here's the deal....Let's all just pretend I'm a newbie and asking for clarification here. I've been out of the loop. SmoothI thought you would be way too busy still trying to conceive with Fluffypony to set Anonymint off. Relax chump change I'm out the business of auditing code from shit level devs like you but don't push your luck as I might make a special exception for you. What the hell did you guys do to Anonymint? I haven't heard from him since the Monero/Aurocoin wars of early 2014 and all of a sudden I get an email manifesto from him that could have been written by Ted Kaczynski aka Unabomber himself expressing an undying love for Smooth accompanied by 11 pages of mathematical proof for an exploit to the anonymity of several block chains. Seems he would like me to avenge the attack on his honor since his current bout with poverty and frail mental health prevent him from doing so himself. Who the fuck is this HONCHO character fronting his research and offering to pay me for my time? Inquiring minds wanna know LOL. I did glance over his manifesto and it appears interesting as an academic exercise only but I'm not here to brawl with anybody, just effen curious as to what set Anonymint off so bad  AnonymintSection 2.1 has some bad assumptions namely where you state that brute force attacks require complete enumeration and build from there. You didn't take into account indeterminacy for mixed states and randomness as it is related to brute force and the nonsensical assumption of a complete enumeration requirement. Additionally it takes a lot less hash power than you calculate. Step back and look at it again. ETHI would look into Peter Vessenes latest post if I were you. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
He reminded me of BCX (the first person on here I used to like reading when i found this board) although he is not as human and open as anonymint.
Anonymint banned LOL I don't think so. ~BCX~  |
|
|
|
No, it's not okay, the ban will escalate.
For me is really necessary to continue my work because there are at least 100 user under the campaign that I actually manage, and is really important to give them some news during this days (about payment, enrollment, and other things). What can I do? Your major mistake here is that you are wrongfully assuming that you signature campaign management and any of the 100 Sig Spammers mean a rat's ass to the admin of this site. Should have thought about that before spamming. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
You heard the term "Michael Marquardt" in 2014 already (and probably before).
Then again (and that's what you're gonna try to say), you're right, who is Michael Marquardt?
You're right I first heard the term Michael Marquardt Back in 2010 Again for the third time, Who is Michael Marquardt? ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
BitcoinEXpress, I think this accusation is unsubstantiated. Mods do a ton of work that we never get to hear about, Lauda in specific spends a lot of time in this forum, aside of moderating, he's also contributing to discussions by posting. You too have spent enough time in this forum, you know what spam is really well. If you call Lauda's posts spam then I think that you need to reevaluate your standards, either that, or stop being cheesy.
These weren't originally my accusation, I was just asked to flesh then out, which I have. My mission was accomplished. ~BCX~ Locking thread to prevent Sig Spam ROFL |
|
|
|
I think the point of this thread is that Lauda was complaining about making low value posts with a paid signature in the very same post that was a low value post with a signature.
To clarify, many people with paid signatures (apparently including Lauda), tell people to lock their thread "to prevent signature spam" after the OP of a thread says that their issue is resolved, however these posts in themselves are worthless posts as they contribute zero to the conversation and are clearly made in an effort to increase their post count. If a thread should be locked but is not then it should be reported to a moderator and a moderator with appropriate authority can lock it.
Spot on assessment. At any rate, this thread belongs in Rep. I would report it but I'd rather not take chances with my recently gained 99% accuracy  This thread belongs in Meta. It is not about Lauda's repuation of which I have no opinion. It is entirely about posting sig spam which is a Meta Forum post. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
Eh you did not notice him posting in a similar quantity/way while being in the previous campaign(that was on pause until yesterday)? Why the new thread?
Edit: In case its coming, I don't like barking this down every thread I post but I get paid a fixed amount regardless of whether I post.
Sig Spamming is just a fact of life around here. I was actually one of the first back in 2011 to take it on. My main point with Lauda that whining about Sig Spamming, while Sig Spamming is like A chain smoker leading an anti-smoking campaign. Lauda needs to STFU about Sig Spamming until they have no longer wear and engage in sig spamming. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
Hm? This is nothing new, I've been a participant of various signature campaigns (usually by custom deals) for years (since Q4 2013) and I've been actively fighting signature spam and campaigns for quite some time now (I'm not the only example). Did you not notice my (other) signatures before, or are you trying to say that my posts are of inadequate quality? I was going to post/respond to Lauda in the original thread but didn't want to get Lauda all twisted up over some hyper-perceived notion that "off topic" actually matters in this place LOL.
That's just a far fetched dream that, unfortunately, only a few share.
I'm not sure what you think is hypocritical in my case; that I'm fighting signature campaigns while being part of one? I'm not the only example of such.
You're not supposed to let forum members get under your skin like that. But yes, you're repetitious trivial post on every little nit picky hallucinated forum rules violation is definitely giving off the appearance of sig spamming. and yes I agree with you, your sig spamming is nothing new. Just no one has called you out on it. ~BCX~  Response to Lauda updating their post.
Update 1:
My posting habits have not altered during periods in which I was not a participant in comparison to periods in which I was. If you've created this thread with the sole intent to attack me, then I'm sorry to inform you but it won't work and I'll ignore everything after this post.
Cheerio,
~Lauda.
The purpose isn't to attack you per se, it's to call you out on your hypocrisy. and simply ignoring the issue verses intelligent debate is tantamount to a confession. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
|
As someone who was around in the early days but not a member of this forum till 2011
I've always thought that Hal Finney was the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
I think Satoshi died with Hal.
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
I was going to post/respond to Lauda in the original thread but didn't want to get Lauda all twisted up over some hyper-perceived notion that "off topic" actually matters in this place LOL.
So I created a new thread about Sig Spamming which is definitely a Meta related topic .@LaudaSig spam? Are you serious? You with your repeat condescending useless nanny postings ad nauseum concerning the non-existent rules and proper forum etiquette are the definition of sig spamming. But since you're familiar with the definition of "Sig Spamming" I will leave you with another one. ~BCX~ hy·poc·ri·syhəˈpäkrəsē/nounthe practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. synonyms: dissimulation, false virtue, cant, posturing, affectation, speciousness, empty talk, insincerity, falseness, deceit, dishonesty, mendacity, pretense, duplicity
|
|
|
|
Theymos is right on this. Let's see how many of you are crying when some bad ass hacker comes along, gains access and dumps 1,000,000 BTC on the market. It will be welcome to December 2011 all over again But Hey I firmly believe in global purification through nuclear annihilation anyway. ~BCX~  |
|
|
|
Who the hell is "Michael Marquardt?
~BCX~
That's not funny. ~PB~ I wasn't being funny. Who's Michael Marquardt? ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
Do the following as suggested and lock the thread please. These 100 posts were unnecessary (at best).
@LaudaOn a tad bit of a power trip are we? You're kinda of starting to remind me of the Spongebob Squarepants episode where Mrs. Puff made Spongebob a hall monitor LOL (If you're unfamiliar with it ask Saltyspitoon about it)Now so that you don't get all twisted that this post is inefficient or off topic let me add... @cassieheart aka supposed hacker
I really don't care how you acquired it.
Contact me PM and name your price.
I will buy it from you.@SDPYou're suggestion is an excellent start! @Lauda (2nd response) Is answering three different post in a single post efficient enough for ya? Please don't get offended by any of my responses to you as I am just off my meds for a while. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
No prob with you or the OP, bud. Myself, I want PinkiePie unbanned. Who could ever forget the following? (check out the entire thread, for it gets better ) PinkiePie, Oh hell yeah. Looks like I am search of new graffiti! ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
Might I ask which 'Spots' project is a even semi-success story?
From what I understand he did well on several. ~BCX~ I'm sure he did well on all of them. Doing well and being a scammer are not the same thing. ~BCX~ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
