Bitcoin Forum
June 05, 2024, 03:21:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 »
1861  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER CPU/GPU miner overclock monitor fanspeed in C linux/windows/osx 2.0.7 on: October 17, 2011, 05:45:00 PM
bummer Tongue well I still give props to anyone trying to run OS/2 in 2011 Smiley
1862  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER CPU/GPU miner overclock monitor fanspeed in C linux/windows/osx 2.0.7 on: October 17, 2011, 05:10:35 PM
XP? what happened to OS/2???

 Smiley
1863  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 17, 2011, 10:54:11 AM
pennytrader: I dont think so... The way it looks is he does not have enough time to complete recoding the pool to integrate NMC stats/payouts before he goes on vacation.

Luke-JR: Basically you have two options, either (a) give someone you know and trust ssh access to the pool and access to the pools namecoin wallet, and user addresses and the equation you are using to pay out. or (b) [the most likely option] just hope for the best and pay everyone out when you get back and maybe offer some kind of bonus - an incentive for people to have faith and keep mining for nmc for 10 days without payment.

Either way is fine with me, I don't mind waiting 10 days, however the other side of that is 10 days is a long time in the Bitcoin world and most anything could happen. One thing that I worry about as well is that now you have gone public with you plans to be away for 10 days you are almost certain to be the target of an attack (this exact same thing happened to slush if you remember around spring time)

I know the last thing you (or your family) wants to do is be worrying about your pool while on vacation but If you have the means to monitor remotely and also have means to reboot remotely from smart phone etc that would be helpful...
 
thats my two-cents Smiley

1864  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 17, 2011, 01:08:47 AM
There are not any risks to not using a registration system. If anything it is more secure than a pool that uses a registration system, no one can get your password and get into your account and change your wallet address. It puts the responsibility on you. Whatever wallet address you use as a username that's where the money goes. If you ask me having a registered account is quite unnecessary and the other pools that use systems like that have had to institute additional security precautions like email confirmation and white-listed IP addresses because that system is so insecure.

A perfect example is the several pools that have had their sql databases compromised and the worst part of that being a lot of people use the same password for everything, what a security nightmare, some script kiddie does a mysql injection attack and owns pushpool-x's database, now passwords and email addresses are leaked that probably work all over the place, gmail accounts, forum accounts, mtgox accounts, dwolla accounts it goes on and on.

Pools that have registration are much much more riskier than the system Luke-Jr uses.




1865  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: At what pricepoint is bitcoin dead? on: October 17, 2011, 12:56:37 AM
I appreciate and support the service you are offering cryptoexchange, and this is really not a jab but a curiosity and maybe you can remedy my ignorance... I do not quite understand why it is a selling point to be "Australian owned and operated" heheh

thanks Smiley
1866  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Win Free Jewlery Gift Certificates Just for Voting in the Mining Rig Contest! on: October 17, 2011, 12:53:40 AM
your complaint makes little sense. CoinConnect is meant to be a social networking site to connect Bitcoin with everyone and everything else. It would be an extreme dis-service to censor content to Bitcoin only related stuff.

CoinConnect is a open social networking platform that is available for anyone to do anything with as long as it is not offensive. If that prevents you from participation than I apologize for allowing my social networking site to be open and free and I hope you have better luck finding one that is more restrictive. Wink
1867  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: At what pricepoint is bitcoin dead? on: October 16, 2011, 09:50:34 PM
As some have already said Bitcoin is in it's infancy. There have been a lot of growing pains a long the way but it is still growing and I personally believe that we can only go up from here. Bitcoin needs a breakthrough and I have a feeling something will come along soon that will change our trajectory.

I started mining when Bitcoins were 0.85 cents, and I watched them grow to $30+ and watched MTGox get hacked and go from pennies to $17 and watched scandal after scandal and scam after scam and mis management after mis management and now we are stuck in this current rut.

The good news is a lot of people (myself included) still fundamentally believe in this thing, and (I hate to say it but) I thank god for SilkRoad because of it and other functions like it Bitcoin will weather this storm until we reach that break through that we need.
1868  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Win Free Jewlery Gift Certificates Just for Voting in the Mining Rig Contest! on: October 16, 2011, 06:44:00 PM
*bump*
1869  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 16, 2011, 01:53:19 AM
Probably by hand once every 2-3 days until I get the new system done. Retroactive NMC address registrations will only apply until that initial "week" is over, after which registrations will only affect future mining.

thanks for the update Luke-Jr keep doing what you do Smiley
1870  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 15, 2011, 10:47:35 PM
Well yesterday he paid out NMC by hand I believe.

Still waiting on a payment today.
 
He is probably very busy working on the NMC payment system I imagine, but it would be very helpful if he gave us miners an official statement on the matter so we knew what to expect when it comes to NMC payments.

that was the best prompt I could give without flat out asking again Smiley

What do you say Luke-Jr: any thoughts?
1871  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 15, 2011, 06:16:22 PM
Luke-JR: are you going to do NMC payments again today? Just curious how this is going to work , is it going to be like once a day kind of thing ?

thanks
1872  Other / Off-topic / Occupy Hollywood on: October 15, 2011, 01:34:13 PM
citation: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/10/copyright-czar-cozies-up/

U.S. Copyright Czar Cozied Up to Content Industry, E-Mails Show

    By David Kravets Email Author
    October 14, 2011  |
    6:30 am  |
    Categories: intellectual property, politics

Victoria Espinel, U.S. copyright czar

Top-ranking Obama administration officials, including the U.S. copyright czar, played an active role in secret negotiations between Hollywood, the recording industry and ISPs to disrupt internet access for users suspected of violating copyright law, according to internal White House e-mails.

The e-mails, obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, (.pdf) show the administration’s cozy relationship with Hollywood and the music industry’s lobbying arms and its early support for the copyright-violation crackdown system publicly announced in July.

One top official even used her personal e-mail account at least once in the course of communicating during the negotiations with executives and lobbyists from companies ranging from AT&T to Universal Music.

Internet security and privacy researcher Christopher Soghoian obtained the e-mails via a government sunshine request for them filed in June, and provided them to Wired. The e-mails are embedded at the end of this story.

The records show the government clearly had a voice in the closed-door negotiations, though it was not a signatory to the historic accord, which isn’t an actual government policy.

The agreement includes participation by the U.S.’s largest consumer internet providers including AT&T, Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner and Verizon. It requires internet service providers, for the first time, to punish residential internet-service customers who media companies suspect are violating copyright rules by downloading copyrighted movies or music from peer-to-peer networks.

Those so-called “mitigation measures” lobbied for by the record labels and Hollywood include reducing internet speeds and redirecting a subscriber’s service to an “educational” landing page for customers accused of copyright infringement. Internet providers may eliminate service altogether for people repeatedly accused of copyright infringement under what the deal calls “graduated response.”

The e-mails do not entail much detail of the discussions between the administration and industry — as any substantive text in the e-mails (.pdf) was blacked out before being released to Soghoian.

But the communications show that a wide range of officials — from Vice President Joe Biden’s deputy chief of staff Alan Hoffman, the Justice Department’s criminal chief Lanny Breuer to copyright czar Victoria Espinel — were in the loop well ahead of the accord’s unveiling.

“These kind of backroom voluntary deals are quite scary, particularly because they are not subject to judicial review. I wanted to find out what role the White House has played in the negotiation, but unfortunately, the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) withheld key documents that would shed further light on it,” Soghoian said when asked why he sought the documents. He is appealing to OMB to disclose more e-mails.

The e-mails, some of which had the subject line “counteroffer,” show off what seems to be a cordial and friendly two-way relationship between industry and the administration.

Alec French, NBC’s top lobbyist, sent Espinel an e-mail from his Blackberry in January of last year, asking if she was “available for call this am?”

She promptly replied: “Btw, i only check my gmail intermittently now so much quicker to reach me on omb email,” referrring to her work e-mail address provided by the Office of Management and Budget. Espinel, whose title officially is intellectually property enforcement coordinator, replied she was available for a call. Her personal e-mail address was redacted in the documents.

Espinel, whose position was created in 2008 as part of intellectual property reform legislation, declined in an e-mail to Wired to comment for this story. Instead, the President Barack Obama appointee whom the Senate confirmed in 2009 referred Wired to the OMB press office. That office neither responded for comment nor replied to a follow-up e-mail before this story was published.

After the story came out, Moira Mack, an OMB spokeswoman, messaged back to Wired that the communications show that Espinel is just doing her job:

    These e-mails show Victoria Espinel implementing precisely the work outlined in the administration’s 2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement. In order to effectively serve as the intellectual property enforcement coordinator, Espinel communicates with a wide range of federal, state and local officials, with Congress, and with a wide variety of stakeholders including consumer and public interest advocates, labor unions, academics, and the private sector. The office has effectively brought diverse groups together to discuss voluntary actions to reduce intellectual property theft that costs American jobs, hurts the nation’s economy and in some cases threatens the health and safety of the American public.

Neil Turkewitz, the Recording Industry Association of America vice president, routinely sent messages advocating stringent piracy crackdown measures to dozens of government officials from a wide range of agencies, including the Commerce, Treasury, State, Justice and Homeland Security departments.

Digital rights groups were barely visible in the messages the government provided to Soghoian, an issue that was not lost on Espinel. In a December 2010 e-mail to Cary Sherman, the RIAA’s president, the copyright czar asks, “How are things going on putting together a rollout plan?”

She adds: “I was at Brookings this morning and CDT came up to ask me to please not have the graduated response announcement be a complete surprise but to have some outreach to stakeholders in advance,” the e-mail to Sherman said.

CDT is the Center for Democracy and Technology, a centrist digital rights group based in D.C.. David Sohn, CDT’s senior policy counsel, said in a telephone interview that the group participated in a “couple of meetings.”

“We weren’t there during the whole negotiating process,” Sohn said. “We did have an opportunity to provide some feedback.”

Months after the e-mail to Sherman, Espinel organized a meeting with CDT and Public Knowledge, another digital rights group. One of the required attendees was Aneesh Chopra, the government’s chief technology officer.

Art Brodsky, a spokesman for Public Knowledge, the only other consumer group believed to have had any input on the agreement, said in a telephone interview, “We were sort of consulted at the end.”

“But we were not an integral part of the process,” he added.

When the deal was announced, the public interest groups put out a joint statement, saying: “We believe it would be wrong for any ISP to cut off subscribers, even temporarily, based on allegations that have not been tested in court.”

All the while, the administration was sensitive that the existence of the accord remain out of public purview.

One e-mail showed that Biden’s office was concerned that CNET’s Greg Sandoval had broken the news of the deal weeks before it was publicly announced.

“So what is the plan? Monitor and respond if need be. We can be ready to move at a moment’s notice,” Hoffman, Biden’s deputy chief of staff, wrote to Espinel and Sherman in a June e-mail. The subject was “the leaked story.”

The RIAA’s Sherman promptly replied to Hoffman’s concerns: “That’s the plan exactly. Thanks for being prepared to move quickly if necessary.”

All in all, the e-mails — which contain redacted draft copies of the deal marked “Privileged and Confidential” — show that the government was on top of the negotiations, and actively sought input from industry.

In a December 2009 e-mail, Espinel thanked DeDe Lea, a Viacom vice president, for forwarding the talking points of Michael Lynton, the Sony Pictures chairman. (The talking points were redacted out.)

“Ok – thanks. And look forward to hearing back from you on that,” Espinel wrote Lea.

In August of last year, in an e-mail to Randal Milch, Verizon’s lead counsel, Espinel said she and Hoffman “were hoping we could meet sometime this week or next,” to discuss the plan.

Milch replied: “Next week would be doable, I hope.”

Espinel had organized a meeting last year between Hoffman, Sherman, herself, NBC general counsel Rick Cotton and Michael O’Leary, the Motion Picture Association of America’s top lobbyist, according to a September 2010 e-mail. Next to O’Leary’s name on the e-mail invite was “Today is his birthday” in parenthesis.

Terms of the brokered deal include: On an internet subscriber’s first reported copyright offense, internet subscribers will receive an e-mail “alert” from their ISP saying the account “may have been” misused for online content theft. On the second reported offense, the alert might contain an “educational message” about the legalities of online file sharing.

On the third and fourth reported infractions, the subscriber will likely receive a pop-up notice “asking the subscriber to acknowledge receipt of the alert.”

After four alerts, according to the program, “mitigation measures” may commence. They include “temporary reductions of internet speeds, redirection to a landing page until the subscriber contacts the ISP to discuss the matter or reviews and responds to some educational information about copyright, or other measures (as specified in published policies) that the ISP may deem necessary to help resolve the matter.”

The content industry monitors peer-to-peer networks for infringement and informs ISPs of the IP addresses of alleged copyright scofflaws. ISPs then check which subscriber account the IP address was assigned to at the time of the alleged infringement and sends a notice of the allegation to the account holder.

An internet subscriber could get such notices without having engaged in illegal downloading if others have used their connection or if the monitoring company makes a mistake.

The RIAA, which includes Universal Music Group Recordings, Warner Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment and EMI Music North America, kicked off the negotiations with ISPs in December 2008, when it abruptly stopped a litigation campaign which included some 30,000 lawsuits targeting individual file sharers. The RIAA and the MPAA wanted ISPs to monitor Americans’ internet usage for copyright infringement, but the agreement does not include any provisions for that.

One Turkewitz e-mail was addressed to about 50 government employees. It appeared to pirate a blog post from Canadian lawyer Barry Sookman, who had analyzed an Irish court decision on internet piracy. The entire 3,200 word article is included in the e-mail.

Turkewitz, the RIAA vice president, told Wired he “had Barry’s permission to forward his piece.”

Sookman did not respond to a request for comment.

White House E-mail
1873  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1800 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fees, LP, SSL, API, 8 Decimal Payouts and more! on: October 14, 2011, 11:19:03 PM
We'd love to have some extra miners while the issues here get resolved. 

sorry but that was lame.  Grin Grin
1874  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Win Free Jewlery Gift Certificates Just for Voting in the Mining Rig Contest! on: October 14, 2011, 10:21:27 PM
WE NEED YOUR VOTES!

The CoinConnect / GuildMiners Bitcoin Mining Rig Builders Competition Needs Your Votes
and to get some people voting I am going to give away three gift certificates to this awesome artisan jewelry website called SheDoesLove.com

(1) 12 BTC
(1) 8 BTC
(1) 5 BTC

These gift certificates were generously given away by our friends at SheDoesLove.com to help support the competition. So we are going to give them away randomly to three lucky voters!

just go to CoinConnect here:

http://btcnetwork.com/coinconnect/polls/all

and vote on both the Best Rig and the Most Ghetto Rig, and you could win one of the three certificates!
Winners will be announced on October 31st - Good Luck!!!


1875  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 14, 2011, 10:14:31 PM
ahh well 10 nmc is still pretty cheap though if you ask me Smiley - thats only like .20 btc
1876  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 14, 2011, 10:04:10 PM
wow, buying a domain name with NMC only costs .01 if you do it yourself. Pretty cool Smiley
1877  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 14, 2011, 04:49:37 PM
so whats the current exchange rate for NMC > BTC?
1878  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 14, 2011, 04:45:35 PM
confirmed. I received 68 and some change. Awesome job Luke-jr Smiley eligius is definitely my pool of choice now
1879  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 14, 2011, 12:47:12 AM
Anyone have a working 0.5.0 release for OSX ? Can't get mine to compile Sad Can't seem to find miniupnpc/* even though I've copied it into the source tree. Dunno whats up with that.
If you can undefine USE_UPNP, it doesn't need miniupnp at all. Not sure how you'd do that on Mac, but on *nix it's: make USE_UPNP= bitcoind
If you manage to get binaries built, I'm sure other Mac users would appreciate it if you could share it Smiley

I dont mean to be a pain Luke, but I see other pools are already paying out NMC, do you think you could give us a rough estimate as to when we might see NMC payouts start?
So far, there's a lot more registrations than originally anticipated based on the poll... and presumably more to come as Windows/Mac/MtGox miners register. I could split it proportionally fairly easily, I expect, but I'd like to try to meet the full PPS (even though many of the valid-on-Bitcoin shares were probably stale on Namecoin) if possible-- but to do that, payouts need to wait until we're sure everyone interested has registered, or else there might not be enough to give them their fair share. That's why I set the maximum time limit of a week on registration.

I've just finished adding a patched Bitcoin-Qt with message signing functionality to the registration page, including a Windows binary. Hopefully this will take care of the Windows users. Working with MagicalTux to get a signmessage function added to MtGox for those users. Mac users will probably have to fend for themselves, as I have no idea at all how I'd do a Mac build. :/

interesting,

Never realized you had people mining directly into MTGOX, but then again I never really mined much here until recently. Some how your pool has managed to stay small enough to stay under the DDOS radar yet big enough to mine blocks effectively, and thats what led me here. I do like your interface as well very slick coding.

Well I will hang out and mine with ya brother. Never had any Namecoins before, very interested to get some.

thanks.
1880  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: October 13, 2011, 11:13:25 PM
I dont mean to be a pain Luke, but I see other pools are already paying out NMC, do you think you could give us a rough estimate as to when we might see NMC payouts start?

thanks!
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!