It's funny how fast a new function in a miner generates requests for features which were sleeping for years :-)
I've opened an SSL port as well:
ssl://zec.suprnova.cc:2242
can be used for Claymore 9 and you'll have a fully encrypted mining connection to suprnova as well.
|
|
|
What pool is best for zcash???
Was using Nanopool but seemed to be losing alot of H/s on average compared to what my miner was doing even after the fee. Switched to Flypool H/s moved alot closer on average but still less than average with fee & bad share's which is never much, Also the the hashrate on there graph is wildly unstable, anythg from 700-1050 h/s, averaging about 900 from 960 on my miner....
Also cheers 2 Claymore, another increase on my cards.....
There are quite a few pools now, you might want to try https://zec.suprnova.cc for a while too shameless plug there ocminer! jk suprnova are good pools to mine at Well.. why not Thanks for your compliment
|
|
|
What pool is best for zcash???
Was using Nanopool but seemed to be losing alot of H/s on average compared to what my miner was doing even after the fee. Switched to Flypool H/s moved alot closer on average but still less than average with fee & bad share's which is never much, Also the the hashrate on there graph is wildly unstable, anythg from 700-1050 h/s, averaging about 900 from 960 on my miner....
Also cheers 2 Claymore, another increase on my cards.....
There are quite a few pools now, you might want to try https://zec.suprnova.cc for a while too
|
|
|
EWBF behave totaly different ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better Your setting ? . 120 core 55 tdp 400 mem on pool side the earning is not right, are e sure the dev fee is 2% only? I see hashrate in miner 1:1 on suprnova yeah the hash is right but not the final earning On Nanopool the hashrate and profit is also in line with the miner for me - using 6 hour averages. This is great work! Thanks! EWBF! what's your exact result, mine is 1500 sol only 0.017 zcash(0.0155 + 0.0015 in round earnings) in 3.5 hours...should have been 0.02 already You cannot reliably count that over 3 hours on prop pools, wait at least 24h to get luck variance out.
|
|
|
Is your PSU okay ? I had such problems with an "el-cheapo" PSU which was overloaded once the cards where working optimized and under full load
|
|
|
Sapphire Nitro Rx480 8gb 255h/s . You are the best Claymore.
how do you get 255 ? I get 222 on sapphire nitro 480.. Do you have bios mod ?
|
|
|
EWBF behave totaly different ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better Your setting ? . 120 core 55 tdp 400 mem on pool side the earning is not right, are e sure the dev fee is 2% only? I see hashrate in miner 1:1 on suprnova
|
|
|
Hi ocminer,
somthing is wrong account, lastblock in Transaction list is 23488, but a lot of more blocks was found. Las Block that was found 23508...
Acount ID: 229537 / BigMcRat
Hmm, did you had some submitted and valid shares after that block ? usually for all blocks you've submitted shares for you'll be credited.
|
|
|
ocminer is there some problem, pool reporting 95% invalid shares with ewbf just now?
miner say all ok, 5min ago had 2% bad shares
No problems here, running fine on 1060 and 970 here on zec.suprnova.cc
|
|
|
Could you add a .bat for suprnova as well ?
It's very simple:
miner.exe --server zec.suprnova.cc --user suprnova.1 --pass x --port 2142 --cuda_devices 0 1 2 3
Thanks
bump, please add .bat for suprnova
|
|
|
Just stick to this thread, no need to move over anyway
|
|
|
Could you add a .bat for suprnova as well ?
It's very simple:
miner.exe --server zec.suprnova.cc --user suprnova.1 --pass x --port 2142 --cuda_devices 0 1 2 3
Thanks
Working fine on suprnova
|
|
|
New Nvidia miner has been launched, claims to make: - 1070 @ 250 1080 @ 300
I cant check as only have AMD but thought there may be people in this thread that are interested
Where ? Whoops sorry, forgot to include the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1707546.0I see it, thanks
|
|
|
Could you add a .bat for suprnova as well ?
It's very simple:
miner.exe --server zec.suprnova.cc --user suprnova.1 --pass x --port 2142 --cuda_devices 0 1 2 3
Thanks
|
|
|
I'd like to have a Windows version
|
|
|
|