@Ocminer, Please exercise timestamp honesty. If you have grudge with the original pascal please do not bring it here. Your block 16472 with timestamp: 1489997320 = Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:08:40 GMT but look at my logfile with payload removed, your blocks came with 2 minutes 20 seconds late. Please fix your time and do not do whatever is that you are doing in pascal lite. 20/03/2017 08:10:46.516 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:46.516 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997444 nonce:638370917
20/03/2017 08:10:58.646 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:58.647 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997455 nonce:3071193822
20/03/2017 08:10:59.586 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:59.586 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997454 nonce:2724550670
20/03/2017 08:11:00.805 TID:00000A90 [Update] <TPCOperationsComp> New block height:16472 nOnce:2028982788 timestamp:1489997320 Operations:0 Fee:0 SafeBoxBalance:8236500000=8236500000 PoW:00000000000004AD156B527EFC0D33B1481119AA5DEB757540AF1D9B42FB82D1 Operations previous Safe Box hash:912B0CED40D4BB5C92D33B79D2A1051185B603460D0AF57EC1CD748995BD2A3C Future old Safe Box hash for next block:BE19AC69E08A69E2EC361589234F4DA0B2821565338E88CA3DBE08B92BB45639
20/03/2017 08:11:00.807 TID:00000668 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 16472: block (16472) is not new position (16473)
20/03/2017 08:11:00.807 TID:00000D6C [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 16472: block (16472) is not new position (16473)
20/03/2017 08:11:01.155 TID:00000668 [Info] <GetNewBlockChainFromClient> My blockchain is ok! Need to download new blocks starting at 16473
20/03/2017 08:11:08.715 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 16473: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:11:08.715 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997465 nonce:2921113476
20/03/2017 08:11:26.850 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TPCOperationsComp> Invalid new block 16473: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:11:26.850 TID:00000CB4 [Error] <TJSONRPCTcpIpClient> Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997484 nonce:1180994566
Timestamp on the server is okay, it's synchronized via NTP every 24h - so that can't be the problem. I'm simply hashing and sending what comes from the miner, i'll check if maybe some miner sends an invalid timestamp but I should already be checking for that in my stratum server - so i'm unsure what the problem could be here. |
|
|
|
Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !
So far how do you find pascal lite? IMHO Pascal Lite is much better (now) than the original PascalCoin since it has active dev(s) and most important: the devs actually know what they're doing  Also the Account Trading Platform is nice. However due to the bad codebase of the original coin during launch this coin got raped instantly and the instamine was enormous, unfortunately this isn't fixable. When dev xiphon fixed the code, we are only at block 7k, around 300k coins. At launch ofcourse, since codebase is similar to original pascal, the weakness was taken advantage of. There were only a few bad actors(me included) and the amount they got is very small compared to the total amount now and would be lesser and lesser as the coin grew. We can only say thank you to them for highlighting those bugs that need fixing. I only point 3 gpu on this and most complaint came from guys like me who put few gpus. I dont think it is that bad. Edit: what's the hashrate on your testpool? You keep finding blocks.  Pool works fine, I don't see any orphans or reorganization yet like in the other chain.. Seems stable. I'll test for another 24h and then we'll see. Thanks for the pool, will you be sending out accounts for free like in pasc ? Yes, of course. Give me 24h to test network stability, I don't want to run into the same problems here like with the other fork. Suprnova drift 2 mins. 20/03/2017 21:20:16.009 TID:000004D4 [Update] <TPCOperationsComp> New block height:16433 nOnce:-598997493 timestamp:1489958296 Operations:0 Fee:0 SafeBoxBalance:8217000000=8217000000
Timestamp 1489958296 = Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:18:16 GMT
2mins difference but as long as not holding that's fine. Hmm, no drift on my side: 19 Mar 22:40:43 ntpdate[19722]: adjust time server 192.53.103.108 offset -0.003074 sec |
|
|
|
Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !
So far how do you find pascal lite? IMHO Pascal Lite is much better (now) than the original PascalCoin since it has active dev(s) and most important: the devs actually know what they're doing Also the Account Trading Platform is nice. However due to the bad codebase of the original coin during launch this coin got raped instantly and the instamine was enormous, unfortunately this isn't fixable. When dev xiphon fixed the code, we are only at block 7k, around 300k coins. At launch ofcourse, since codebase is similar to original pascal, the weakness was taken advantage of. There were only a few bad actors(me included) and the amount they got is very small compared to the total amount now and would be lesser and lesser as the coin grew. We can only say thank you to them for highlighting those bugs that need fixing. I only point 3 gpu on this and most complaint came from guys like me who put few gpus. I dont think it is that bad. Edit: what's the hashrate on your testpool? You keep finding blocks. Pool works fine, I don't see any orphans or reorganization yet like in the other chain.. Seems stable. I'll test for another 24h and then we'll see. Thanks for the pool, will you be sending out accounts for free like in pasc ? Yes, of course. Give me 24h to test network stability, I don't want to run into the same problems here like with the other fork. |
|
|
|
Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !
So far how do you find pascal lite? IMHO Pascal Lite is much better (now) than the original PascalCoin since it has active dev(s) and most important: the devs actually know what they're doing Also the Account Trading Platform is nice. However due to the bad codebase of the original coin during launch this coin got raped instantly and the instamine was enormous, unfortunately this isn't fixable. When dev xiphon fixed the code, we are only at block 7k, around 300k coins. At launch ofcourse, since codebase is similar to original pascal, the weakness was taken advantage of. There were only a few bad actors(me included) and the amount they got is very small compared to the total amount now and would be lesser and lesser as the coin grew. We can only say thank you to them for highlighting those bugs that need fixing. I only point 3 gpu on this and most complaint came from guys like me who put few gpus. I dont think it is that bad. Edit: what's the hashrate on your testpool? You keep finding blocks. Pool works fine, I don't see any orphans or reorganization yet like in the other chain.. Seems stable. I'll test for another 24h and then we'll see. |
|
|
|
Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !
So far how do you find pascal lite? IMHO Pascal Lite is much better (now) than the original PascalCoin since it has active dev(s) and most important: the devs actually know what they're doing Also the Account Trading Platform is nice. However due to the bad codebase of the original coin during launch this coin got raped instantly and the instamine was enormous, unfortunately this isn't fixable. |
|
|
|
|
Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !
|
|
|
|
Hello. I have two issues and maybe someone can help me with it.
First about Suprnova Komodo mining pool. It is not working now and I have some balances there. What's wrong with it?
And second issue about coinexchange.io. I made an KMD withdrawal transaction from it to Cryptopia exchange. But this transaction is still without txid and in pending status already one hour.
The suprnova pool was unfortunately on a fork for a few hundred blocks. Once the wallet is resynched I'll enable withdrawals, however, there seem to be other forks as well so you better wait until everything is resolved |
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling that there might be a fork, what is the current working block explorer on the right chain ?
|
|
|
|
Can someone post a valid blockhash of the latest block ?
komodo-cli getblockhash 241783 0e6e01994b79da0904657a77369b0e94c06d65172f309f280590004f8406fa53 Thx, same on https://kmd.suprnova.cc - so we're all good |
|
|
|
|
Can someone post a valid blockhash of the latest block ?
|
|
|
|
You're trying to mine with CPU on the GPU Port... Use Port 1598 |
|
|
|
still no nvidia miner for this? ocminer can you provide one? if it only only to change the parameters shouldn't be that hard
Nope, not that easy as the kernel needs to be modified as well. |
|
|
|
3 fast blocks is highly unlikely, but real.
All 100% Shares have one User - UNREAL
Three times in a row - UNREAL * UNREAL * UNREAL = Unrealistic in the third degree
I'll look into it, but I have no idea how a user could or should submit a certain "lucky" share at a certain time shortly after a block was found to gain more of that block... |
|
|
|
Why on xzc.suprnova.ccl statisctic not correct?
From xzc.suprnova.cc:
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool) 20 minutes 15 seconds
Blocks found Last 24 Hours 33
Count the number of blocks per day:
24hours / 20 minutes 15 seconds = (24 *60) / 20.25 = 71.11 Blocks
71 not equal 33
Again.. The statistics are not correct, please use whattomine and if you don't like the pool, you can choose any other pool, I've explained it several times already EDIT: Oh and your calculation example there would imply that the pool would find EVERY block, but only 40% of the nethash is on the pool so 33 blocks in 24h is perfectly fine  EDIT2: And looking at your post history it looks like that account was specially made for trolling me/suprnova ... Thanks for the effort, I feel flattened. No, i not trolling you. I want to understand why a xzc.suprnova.cc only pays 50%. Last 4 hour somebody on your pools stole 3 blocks: 25546, 25550, 25576 Usally for finding Block need tens of millions Shares. Block 25576 Actual Shares 6Block 25550 Actual Shares 22Block 25546 Actual Shares 26The probability of such events tends to zero. But xzc.suprnova.cc it happened three times in the last 3 hours. That is absolutely incredible - all of the balls in these blocks belong to one account.Pool Workers: 863 (xzc.suprnova.cc) But Block 25576 got one worker 'anonymous' all 100% shares But Block 25550 got one worker 'mintallica' all 100% shares But Block 25546 got one worker 'anonymous' all 100% shares All 3 Block got one worker of the 863 workers!!! IT's ImpossibleALL DATA FROM POOL xzc.suprnova.ccSOMEONE STOLE THESE BLOCKS. IF YOU PROTECT A THIEF MEANS YOU ARE A THIEF.At first you troll about all the blocks found on the network, then about the estimates and now about three lucky blocks in a row ?! There is nothing special about those blocks or shares, just the block times are very close to each other which is already pretty unlikely but you can easily verify from the block explorer. The "shares" you see is actually the accumulated difficulty of shares in that round, so if a round usually takes 15-30 minutes and this round only 2 minutes it's really very close and very unlikely to happen but it happened.. Again, you're welcome to mine at every other pool. |
|
|
|
Mined 3 days. I earned less than I should have all 3 days based on what to mine
Estimates should be pretty close, my testrig with 2x480 is pretty much on par with whattomine, maybe 5% less some days but also plus 5% other days |
|
|
|
ZOIN has a big bug where anyone can create as many coins as he wants through a special modified wallet and no dev is here to fix it - the bug has been heavily used already, so consider it dead |
|
|
|
Why on xzc.suprnova.ccl statisctic not correct?
From xzc.suprnova.cc:
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool) 20 minutes 15 seconds
Blocks found Last 24 Hours 33
Count the number of blocks per day:
24hours / 20 minutes 15 seconds = (24 *60) / 20.25 = 71.11 Blocks
71 not equal 33
Again.. The statistics are not correct, please use whattomine and if you don't like the pool, you can choose any other pool, I've explained it several times already EDIT: Oh and your calculation example there would imply that the pool would find EVERY block, but only 40% of the nethash is on the pool so 33 blocks in 24h is perfectly fine EDIT2: And looking at your post history it looks like that account was specially made for trolling me/suprnova ... Thanks for the effort, I feel flattened. |
|
|
|
Where is normal pools for XZC?
Now i mine xzc.suprnova.cc but get little coins.
My hash - 4250 kH/s
Whattomine
4250 kH/s -> 2.202512 XZC/Day
But real on xzc.suprnova.cc
4250 kH/s -> 1.3 XZC/Day (REAL Pool Efficiency 60%)
And ? Whattomine write what they want, they are not official... and they prefer to write bullshit to make sensations. Everybody know that. Ok. Let's calculate manual. Pool Hash: 5691.03 MH/s (from xzc.suprnova.cc) My Hash: 4.25 MH/s Block rewards: 40XZC Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool) 19 minutes 55 seconds (from xzc.suprnova.cc) The percentage of my participation = 4.25/5691.03=0.00747689 (0,747689% wy work) Total Blocks per day on pool = 24*60/(19+55/60)=72,301255 Total XZC on pool per day = 72,301255 * 40 = 2892,0502 XZC My XZC = 2892,0502 * 0.00747689 = 2.1597 XZC/Day Whattomine 4250 kH/s -> 2.190921 XZC/Day But real on xzc.suprnova.cc 4250 kH/s -> 1.3 XZC/Day (REAL Pool Efficiency 60%) xzc.suprnova.cc is BULLSHIT!!! Not whattomine!!!You cant trust Whattomine or other. On suprnova you can check all stats by all blocks what you mining. And lust week difficulty geting up to 40-50k. You can calculate and get calculate only at big period of time and if average difficulty will be stable +-10% but not +-100% like now. And suprnova is best because you can see all stats. But he is right, there is something definitely wrong, it is maybe the miner I dont know, but the profits are really 60% (maybe even 50%) compared to calculations. Ive tested this on two rigs for three days. Maybe there are some miners who may have found some exploit to submit fake shares and are stealing from other miners ? This has happened in the past for some coins... Nope, not possible on suprnova. It's just the luck guys, simply check the stats. Luck was bad for the last 24h but it will get better.. Like in real life and at some point then back to bad again.. Mine for a few days and at the end end you'll see the outcome is the same... |
|
|
|
we already said if somebody not want to swap coin than no problem just 15 days more after new chain launched all heaters will shut their mouth .
heaters ? oil or water ? these:  ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
