Is the Earth DISINTEGRATING? Massive hole opens up in Earth's ozone layer!

This is the sort of lunacy that results when people who know nothing about science try to report on it. The corona is a layer of the sun's atmosphere. The corona is not the sun itself. Any idiot with a dictionary should be able to figure that one out. Though to be fair, it's clear from declining editorial standards that nobody involved in news publication actually owns a dictionary (the Inquisitr article even somehow managed to misspell "corona" as "cornea").

Quoted for posterity. Just out of curiosity, do you have any theories as to why the alleged censors are so impotent they can't just remove the video completely, and the worst they can do is delay it for a few seconds? Seriously, if this is what "jeehad" looks like, I don't think there's any danger.

Obviously fake article. Besides the obvious bullshit (what has factoring integers got to do with AES? or Fibonacci sequences to do with anything related to cryptography?) and the fact that it's only being published on tinfoil-hat conspiracy sites, the article specifically cites a press release from the University of Toronto as its source, which is trivially easy to verify. The University of Toronto has issued no such press release. And if the press release is a fabrication, so is the whole story, since there's literally nothing else backing it.

It's embarrassing that people actually fall for these hoaxes.

Wait, what? The only change is that ECDSA needs to be replaced with something quantum-resistant, and I thought that new signature algorithms were a soft fork? (And that SegWit makes such updates easier, but that's another topic.)

Because he possesses both the inexplicable ability to see the future and the irrepressible urge to state the opposite of what he sees. The source of kwukduck's unique gift is truly a mystery for the ages, and all us mortals can do is be grateful for his inspired anti-guidance.

Dare not write him off as troll, as a stopped clock is right twice a day, but kwukduck never is. Behold, the Opposite Oracle has spoken.

That's what they want you to think. (They're too embarrassed to admit it was COBOL.)

He's selling Christianity. Badly.

It's not absurd at all. Stop thinking like a reasonable person and start thinking like a preacher. If you can convince people that atheists don't really exist and that anyone who claims to be one is a liar and not to be trusted, they'll be less likely to leave your church. The truth or even logical consistency of your arguments is irrelevant to your goal.

But BADecker's no preacher (or if he is, he's one of the worst I've seen). A preacher knows he can't convert an atheist by calling him a liar to his face, and employs somewhat less stupid arguments. But the brainwashed masses don't know that. They just repeat the same lines they heard in church then wonder why nobody takes them seriously.

Correct.

You're wrong. I can't see Him in the machinery of nature, science tells me not, and I don't feel Him in my heart. Believing He doesn't exist requires no concerted attempt on my part. Why would you even presume to know what other people can see and feel? Doesn't make a lick of sense.

It's because they've been brainwashed into believing that all atheists are sinners, thieves, adulterers, rapists, or worse. They are literally incapable of imagining a person being good with God. Therefore anyone who claims to be an atheist but is actually a good person must clearly be lying or deluded. No other explanation will satisfy those trapped in this way of thinking.

Religious leaders perform this brainwashing because the very idea that morality can come from somewhere other than religion is a threat to their business. People would leave religion in droves if they found out the truth.

That question doesn't make sense. Bitcoin and credit cards are entirely separate things. It's like asking how to accept cash or gold for purchases (via customer credit card). Do you mean you wish customers to continue paying by credit card, but have the funds converted to Bitcoin instead of deposited into your bank account? No such service currently exists (and probably won't ever due to chargeback fraud), though if one did accepting credit card payments though it would be no different from any other payment processor. Banks would necessarily still be involved, since you can't have credit card transactions without them.

Very probably. Expect US$3,000 at least, possibly much higher.

1) Yes. Just be patient and wait for it to finish.
2) No.
3) No.

If you randomly guess the answer to this question, what is the probability that you would be correct?

a) 25%
b) 33%
c) 50%
d) 25%

Well, women have to keep this sort of thing on the down-low due the outrageous double standard that exists. If a woman walks a man on a leash in public, nobody bats an eyelid, but if a man walks a woman on a leash, people get all offended for some reason and even get physically violent. I am deeply disappointed that this sort of sexism can exist in a modern society.

There's nothing unusual about that delay. A fee that low (BTC0.00022883/kB) normally takes a couple of hours. What software or service did you use to create that transaction?

It won't confirm because it is dependant on a long chain of unconfirmed transactions, starting with this one which pays an extremely low fee (BTC0.00001857/kB) and will therefore take forever to confirm, and none of its child transactions can confirm until it does. Whatever software or service you used to create your transaction is defective.

Bingo.

Some say the moderators on this forum go too far. I disagree. I say they don't go too far enough.

You mean the Black House? That was just Anton LaVey's home, and was so called because, in keeping with Satanic aesthetics, he painted it black. It was occasionally used for meetings, but only in the same way that the leader of any other organisation would sometimes hold meetings in his/her home. It didn't have really have any more significance than that and was eventually demolished after LaVey's death.

Individuality means being able to think for yourself and make your own decisions in life. I'd say it's a shame not everyone has this ability, but if you really think you'd be evil and hateful if left to your own devices, perhaps we're all better off if you don't.

I'm sorry you failed so miserably, then.

I can read it, I just don't understand it. Here in the real world equivalence is transitive. That means if two things are the same as a third thing, the two things must be the same as each other. If A = B, and B = C, then A = C. Yet the doctrine of the Trinity requires that this not be true. How can God be the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit if the Father is not the Son and not the Holy Spirit? Explain how that works without calling it a "divine mystery". Mystery is the opposite of explanation, and doctrine must be explained if it is to be taken seriously.

If you think that, you may be interested to learn how Anton LaVey came to conclude that humans are animals and God doesn't help. A musician by profession, he played the organ at both a church and a brothel, and saw the same men in both places. The hypocrisy of not just Christianity, but all spiritual religions, denying humans their true nature is what ultimately led him to found a religion based on carnality.