You say that as a joke, but it's actually true. Binocular vision makes it possible to see around objects by a few degrees; without it, objects physically occlude more of the background, thus appearing larger. That's why 3D porn is so disappointing.

Warn me of what? It's still not at all clear what you're on (about).

So tell your sexual partners(s) that you only want vaginal sex. While vaginal-only sex is a rather weird fetish, many people keep an open mind about such things and are willing to experiment.

It does if you're also a man. It's not a hard concept.

Yes, because women are manufactured goods produced in a factory somewhere, which will stop manufacturing them if nobody wants them.

"Forced"? You know you don't actually have a right to fuck other people. Nobody's "forcing" anything on you by refusing to fuck you.

Why would they want to? At the risk of stating the obvious, gay men want to have sex with other men, and have no interest in your "starfish".

Aw, you poor thing, did your boyfriend leave you for a man? Well, it wasn't me.

Um, you do realise that if most men become gay, that leaves more pussy available for the remaining straight guys, not less? Your rant makes no sense. I mean, none of your rants do, but this one makes especially no sense.

Having a dick in your ass doesn't make you gay. That dick belonging to someone of the same sex does. So unless the dick in question was a lesbian's strap-on dildo, you've got nothing to worry about. Or was that the whole problem? You've become a lesbian, and you're warning men that they won't be able to get pussy if other women follow your lead? Is that it?

My tail is bristling with anticipation! Who will be our next Deflationary Champion?

Probably nobody.


It's very unlikely to ever confirm. Who sent it?

Another Classic move: dismiss the opinions of large stakeholders because they are few in number. After all, they're only a few people, and may just be a single really rich person, so what possible influence could they have? It's not like having an actual stake in the issue gives their opinions any extra merit.

Just a friendly reminder of who's really in charge:

bitcoinocracy.com/arguments/if-non-core-hard-fork-wins-major-holders-will-sell-btc-driving-price-into-the-ground

"You have reported 1760 posts with 100% accuracy"

I actually haven't since he's on my ignore list (and I'm only replying to satisfy my masochistic tendencies), but I did Google the phrase and fail to find anything useful. I'm just going to assume it means "SegWit plus all other Core updates I don't understand or like".

So then what does that mean? The SegWit code has been released ages ago. Do you mean the version of Bitcoin Core that merges the code? It's sure to have a whole bunch of new features completely unrelated to SegWit (mostly bugfixes) and anyway nobody can be sure exactly what features it will have until it is actually released.

"Alternative node implementations"? Is that what we're calling altcoins now?

That's to be expected. SegWit bashers are weird people.

It's a pity the Apostles never thought to hire James Randi the way the Pharaoh did when Moses tried to fool him with his conjuring acts; Christianity might never have happened.

How can I be aware? I've actually never heard the phrase "The SegWit Omnibus Changeset" before your post, and a Google search for that phrase doesn't turn up much either. You say it's "more stuff" than SegWit, but what exactly is it? Who's selling it? Is anyone buying it? You need to define your terms.

So what? SegWit only makes linear verification time possible, it doesn't necessarily implement it. And the reason there's no rush to implement it is because scaling is not the purpose of SegWit! How many times do we have to explain that before people get it? It seems like people have the expectation that when SegWit is "implemented" (a word which seemingly nobody can agree on a definition) blocks will stop "being full" and transaction fees will drop to almost nothing so they can buy their coffee on the blockchain. These people then get inexplicably angry every time someone tries to tell them that this is not actually the case.

First, I'll resolve to lay off the absinthe. Next, I'll ask my dog what the Hell it was drinking to make it forget that it's a fucking carnivore.

I think the sun's disintegration rays are affecting your brain. Next time you go outside, don't forget to put on your hat.

No, Satan does not tolerate fools.

Why do things by half measures? Behold, Bitcoin Classic 1.1.0!

My mistake; it seems I had multiple pages of your post history open in different tabs and I thought they were different users. Your posts are all so similar to each other I thought they were copy-pasted. So... it looks like you were just spamming the same short posts over and over in slight variations. You can't do that either.

His PhD is in theology. There are only two kinds of people who take a degree in theology, priests and conmen, and Craig Wright sure as Hell isn't a priest.

You were spamming by copy-pasting other people's posts, thinking nobody would notice.

The door's that way. Don't let it hit you on the way out.