Ok my transaction stucked because I payed low fees at the time of transaction it was 0.08 USD worth Bitcoin just 0.02 USD less in 0.1 USD so that doesn't mean that my transaction should not be processed.
On the contrary, that's exactly what it means. If your transaction fee is even slightly less than the cost of including your transaction in a block, miners have absolutely no incentive to do so, and your transaction will probably never be confirmed. That it why it is so important to pay the correct fee. If someone paying $0.1 as fees and his transaction processed within half an our or 1 to 2 hours maximum than I paid just 0.02 less so my transaction should be processed within 8-10 hours but its almost 24 hours passed and no signal confirmation yet. what do say about this?
I say you're a cheapskate. I myself don't want to wait even one hour, and pay the maximum rate to ensure my transactions are included in the very next block, which typically costs about 5 cents extra for a grand total of 15 cents per transaction. I don't rightly know why people try to get away with paying less.
|
|
|
Than we should not promote Bitcoin in public saying that Bitcoin transaction charge lowest fees than it is false information we are spreading between users.
How is this false information? 10 cents is the lowest fee for an international payment system. If you find a cheaper system then use it, cheapskate.
|
|
|
Yesterday I sent some Bitcoin though the amount of Bitcoin fee is small
FTFY. If you can't afford to spend 10 cents on fees, maybe Bitcoin isn't for you.
|
|
|
1. China GDP jumps to 8 per cent growth and the Shanghai share index doubles to more than 5,000 2. Federal Reserve follows Bank of Japan and locks in 1.5 per cent 10-year bond rates 3. A quarter of high-yield corporate debt defaults as interest rates surge globally 4. Brexit never happens as EU concessions convince the UK Government to Bremain 5. Copper prices plunge back to their 2009 financial crisis low of $US1.25 per pound 6. Bitcoin triples in value to above $US2,000 as cryptocurrencies become a US dollar alternative 7. US healthcare reform to cut spending sends health stocks plunging 50 per cent 8. Mexican peso bounces back after traders realise Trump is not so bad for trade 9. Italian banks the world's best performing shares as Deutsche Bank woes trigger EU bank bailout 10. EU stimulates growth by issuing multi-national bonds to fund Keynesian stimulus program
As it does every year, Saxo Bank's analysts have nominated their top ten "outrageous predictions", which highlight some of the unlikely events that might play out on markets this year.
"This is a deck of black swans," Saxo's global macro strategist Kay Van-Petersen told me, while out in Australia late last year. "The idea is none of these are supposed to be real forecasts, even though, as an example, last year we did have two that did play out."
Indeed, Mr Van-Petersen's own personal outrageous prediction - that Bitcoin could triple in value over 2017 - is off to a good start. When I spoke to him during his Australian visit in mid-December, one Bitcoin was hovering between $US700-800. By January 5, a Bitcoin had jumped to $US1,136, before plunging back to just under $US900 by January 9. Mr Van-Petersen's prediction for surging crypto currency values rests on the adoption of them by one or more nation states - potentially financially or politically troubled nations such as Zimbabwe or Syria - as a form of official tender. Such a move would add some legitimacy to crypto currencies at a time when people are searching for alternatives, as illustrated by the popularity of Bitcoin in China at the moment through a combination of speculation and as a means to escape Government capital controls.
"The combination of a much stronger US dollar, geopolitical tensions and dislocations, people being tired of being wedded to the US dollar - which implicitly means you're wedded to US monetary policy as well as US political policy," Mr Van-Petersen explained as the other factors behind his Bitcoin prediction.
www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-09/saxo-bank-outrageous-predictions-2017/8171084EDIT:Typo
|
|
|
it seemed like a good idea at the time.
You did something while drunk and decided after sobering up to post it on the Internet. Exactly what time was it that made any part of that seem like a good idea?
|
|
|
Ill tell you what happened I set a trap, it went off bang like it had been hit by the Predator,
Mantraps are highly illegal; if the government was really after you, they would arrest you for that alone. I'm going out to leave out a few other things
Good advice. It's never a good idea to discuss your criminal activities on a public forum.
|
|
|
It wouldn't surprise me if he was behind some of the bots predicting 'doomsday' in that section.
It would surprise me. Kwukduck isn't a mindless troll; he's something else. Though I'm not entirely sure what.
|
|
|
This one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1724444While it's true that kwukduck's threads are difficult to distinguish from FUD, he's so often wrong that he's invaluable as a contrarian indicator. He's like the Nostradamus of Falsity. We need his unique insights. I don't know what we'll do without him.
|
|
|
The whole point of not reusing passwords is that if one site leaks your password, it doesn't matter how good your password is. Hackers are just as good as you are at copy-pasting your long password into every site they can think of.
|
|
|
The only possible conclusion is he's a secret Atheist that's pretending to be Muslim.
That's not the only possible conclusion. He could be a Muslim heretic who believes one doesn't have to be a believer to be a Muslim. I just hope he lives in a free country; there are places where saying such things would cost you your head.
|
|
|
it couldn't find anything I had in common with other wallet.dat files.... You couldn't find that wallets are all Berkeley Database files? $ file foo foo: Berkeley DB (Btree, version 9, native byte-order) And that's just doing it manually. Keep in mind that most digital forensics software not only allows searching for specific types of files this way, but also automatic highlighting of files whose contents don't match the extension. You're not fooling anybody.
|
|
|
@valley365 Sorry I thought my question was clear that I am creating the message on my own based on the documentation not with any software or library out there. And that example in OP is the message I have generated with my own code.
Your question was perfectly clear; he's just posting nonsense for his sig campaign. I already reported it.
|
|
|
Would you do me the honour of cremating me Foxpup?
No. You need air to do that, too. RING DING DING DA DINGDA DING!!!!!!! WAAAAHHH PAA PAA PAA PAPAPA!!!!!!!
You just invited me to get naked and sacrifice a small goat. (Though to be fair, we foxes don't often talk about much else, and our language reflects that.)
|
|
|
I mean there's no gravity helping you, but then there's no air pressure.
With no air (and the lack of external pressure means you can't hold your breath, either) you'll be dead before you even get your pants off. Your corpse will lack muscle control and therefore have no great difficulty taking a "giant stanky dump", though since you're no longer able to benefit from the relief, I don't think that counts.
|
|
|
Probably a bought/farmed account. The following post stands out. All his other posts are one liners and then there's this that seems like an extract of another and looks like it could be copy and pasted but can't find anything: Formally, Bitcoin can be broken, but this is unlikely, because the transaction in the virtual currency Bitcoin does not require the disclosure of personal data, as a system of two keys: a public key and private. The first (outdoor) is open to anyone who knows the address number of your purse, the second (personal) - is known only to you.
That's almost certainly created by an automatic thesaurus to break plagiarism detection.
|
|
|
Reminds me of the incident where chemist George de Hevesy helped his fellow scientists hide their Nobel prizes from the Nazis by dissolving them in acid, then reconstituting them after the war. The indestructibility of gold is one of the main reasons it's used as currency in the first place. Are people really this dumb?
|
|
|
Why Swiss witches in particular? I mean, I already know you're an unrepentant racist, but that's a new one for you.
|
|
|
So if I see someone failing over and over, and I can clearly see the reason why, I can't tell them?
Well, you can, but you know as well as anyone else that it won't do any good.
|
|
|
hahah breaking the number one rule would be in case I was in this.... movement. This isn't my "troubles" so I don't think it's applied here, the third one is considered for home. :p They don't apply here at all, xhomerx is just being an idiot. Rules 1 and 2 are pretty much entirely negated by this being a forum, ie, a place where people do ask for opinions and advice and want to hear each other's troubles. Rule 3, this forum belongs to the admins, so you have to follow their rules. Rule 4, the banhammer awaits those who violate rule 3. Rule 11 doesn't apply since this isn't open territory and you have no right to be here (see rule 3); if people are bothering you here, you're welcome to leave. That's not the original church of satan.
Yes, it is. The original church disbanded long ago - that one is a copy-cat church of LeVayan wannabes.
You've got it backwards. The "disbanding" of 1974 was LaVey himself kicking out those he saw as trying to suck up to him. Many of them went on to set up their own "Satanic" churches while espousing very un-Satanic views. Anyway, according to Anton, Satanists are born, not made so there is no joining.
Yes. The founder of the church said there is no joining his church. He was really into Zen; that's why he shaved his head, too.
|
|
|
Sounds like common sense to me. Where do I sign up? Right here: churchofsatan.com/join-the-cos.phpWhere do I sign up for a decentralized, anarchist movement...
Somewhere else, obviously, since the Church of Satan has a hierarchical leadership structure with a central office in New York and is politically neutral. I can see it's not for you.
|
|
|
|