I don't. By that logic I can't show any part of my body in public except my left eyeball. (You don't even want to know what I did with my right one!) Should I wear a burqa and an eyepatch?

They are? I think you're doing it wrong. The sex-related tools are further down.

Of course not. Why would even think otherwise?

Anyone can register a company. The details on file at Companies House are certainly phony - the registered office address is that of a restaurant, for one thing.

To be fair, smoking pot even while asleep requires a level of dedication not typically seen in lazy non-workers.

No, she just switched to other drugs:

No, I just stopped trying after your gay agenda thread.

That's high praise, but I'm afraid you're mistaken. I am not Moloch.

No it isn't. We both commented in your penis size thread, remember?

I'm trying, but moron is a difficult language to learn. The grammar is so inconsistent.

I'm not sure anyone gets what your rants are about. I think you have to re-explain while sober.

It is.

Your formulae are all wrong. The block subsidy (indeed, all bitcoin values) are an integer number of satoshis (hundred millionth parts of a bitcoin), and rounded down when they would be fractional, so column C should be =(FLOOR(C2*100000000/2))/100000000 and you shouldn't be rounding column E at all (and you should show 8 decimal places). Also, 210,000 blocks is slightly less than 4 years; at 10 minutes per block, it is 1,458 days and 8 hours. For reference, a correct table of block subsidies can be found here: en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supply#Projected_Bitcoins_Long_Term

Very probably. Public information is public.

If you have an address that's linked to various "markets" (if I know what you mean), why on Earth would you ever put it in your public profile? Bitcoin isn't anonymous, you know. Don't be surprised if you have LEOs knocking on your door soon.

However much they're paying you, it's too much.

The best method to invest is to focus on industries you understand so that you may use your knowledge to spot the opportunities for profit that others don't. If you're "new in this world of cryptocurrency", you probably shouldn't invest in it just yet.

The best (indeed, only) method to have insured earnings is to get a job and buy income protection insurance. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

I'd hardly call infighting a "war", but mister "trio is an adjective" babadook ought to be shot for insubordination.

Unconfirmed transactions aren't on the blockchain. Any transaction that is on the blockchain has at least one confirmation. That's what confirmation means.

This is such a fundamental concept that I'd stay away from any payment provider that doesn't understand it.

Because no gay person has ever killed themselves because they were ashamed of their desires or what other people think of them or had been brought up to believe that such desires are "wrong". That absolutely never happens and is not a serious issue. </sarcasm>

You've been doing a poor job of it, it must be said.

"...unless they're lesbians." - Leviticus 18:22½

Including you? Are you trying to tell us something?

Sadly, this is true.

Zero chance, unless he goes completely off the rails like dank did.

What do you mean "lately"? He's a certified grade-A kook.

What kind of activity? Making prank videos to fool gullible people such as yourself? Yeah, it's pretty widespread. It's part of joint effort between the Freemasons and the Bavarian Illuminati to distract conspiracy theorists from what they're really up to. This tactic has proven quite successful so far.

Also, my sources inform me that your veggie dog problem is unrelated. The Freemasons deny all involvement and the Illuminati are still annoyed that they didn't think of it first.

Yes, it's absurd. That's what I just said using different words.

I don't think that. I was pointing out that simulated quantum computing is a real thing (contrary to your claim that it's impossible), and that it doesn't do what Vitalik says it does at all. I thought I was clear in my post exactly what it is and isn't a viable approach for.

Short answer: Very slowly. Long answer: Since the wave function of a quantum system is really just an ordinary mathematical function, it can be calculated by traditional methods. This is very useful for designing quantum computers and algorithms, but not useful at all for actually solving quantum-computable problems, due to the aforementioned slowness, which gets exponentially worse the more complex the simulated system is.

It's a pity God didn't tell you to take lessons in English grammar first.