I see. RealSolid just TEMPORARILY needs emergency powers.
And no term limits. Which is a problem since he owns all the trusted nodes.  |
|
|
|
oh shit, burrrrnnnnnnn. Kinda figured though that BEX doxxed the right person, since psy's getting super defensive all of a sudden.
Ye he has the panties in a bunch over something been bitching about how it is not him on the btc-e chat for half an hour now... No, this is me http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001014745149 <<--- Ask me for friendship on facebook and I'll accept you Psy, That's so obvious a spam bot auto accept profile. No interactions with friends, no original post on friends walls or hers, no family listed....nothing but the same posting over and over. It's an auto accept bot, of course it will accept the friend request. It seems that Leandra spams the hell out of Lastmovie.net which is registered to you in addition to omusicawards.com which I am sure you are an affiliate. A letter to Viacom affiliate compliance showing the direct tie to you should suffice a canned affiliate account. Spam is not cool with most affiliate marketing programs. LOL  On the other hand, Anyone who looks at my wall can see I have real person to person two way interaction with people in the SF area, some I went to school with, some are co-workers, my mother, my sister..... and I chatted for an hour with FlipPro. Never mind that Coblee, CryptoXchange and few others from the board are there and have been for a very long time. I also appear in some of my friends photo albums. Like it or not, I'm real. When you come unraveled you go all the way. That thirty minute tirade you threw on BTC-E was funny. No one can figure out why you have totally flipped out, the way you have over the public Myspace pics that was posted, if they are the wrong guy. It's 100% clear to me, everyone here and on BTC-E it WASN'T the wrong guy. Also what was up with you posting as the wrong sock puppet and then deleting it LOL. Starlightbreaker nailed you. Have a nice day loser. ~BCX~ When one team is up by more than 10 runs, the game is called. Winner BCX. |
|
|
|
Nope, he doxxed the wrong person, myspace was notified, they can do whatever they wish with the info.
I don't post pics on the internet you fools.
You seem pretty furious about some random guy who posted pictures on the internet having those pictures reposted here. How on earth could that possibly bother you? P.S. Please tell your dead-beat countrymen that you need pay back all the money you borrowed. |
|
|
|
Not even somebody stuck in the Bay Area with the Raiders and the 49er's would spend time posting during football time! Of course being Portuguese, your national 15 minutes in the spotlight expired around the time of Vasco de Gama was bringing syphilis to the New World, and bringing back an education about things like sailors locked on-board a ship together for 6 months and no women, how to get your ass beaten by indigenous tribes with wooden spears, and how to trade all your decent national sports heroes to other countries, so you probably don't get the whole national pastime thing. What is the national pastime of Portugal anyway? Serving visiting Spaniards bad wine in truck stops? Waiting on English retirees in resorts? Or is it the legal 10 day supply of any hard narcotic that you are permitted to have and use?
You forgot to mention that Portugal is the 'P' in the PIIGS. and the 49ers are 7-1! |
|
|
|
^^ The exact same thing can be said about you... LoupFucker, I never went to azores in my whole life and blasted mechanism sucks, I would kill myself before going to a fuckin island to see them, but whatever... But now I'm wondering? How do you know that other guy went to azores and is a blasted mechanism groupie? You stalkin' him? hahahahaha this really cracks me up, this forum is full of scammers and stalkers. The thing is I am not hiding from anyone either. I have been to two SF Bay area Bitcoin Meetups, I am a member of the Sunnyvale group, met several people and Coblee 100% knows who I am. People are stone cold shocked when they meet me, I always get the same reaction....you're not what I was expecting. Here's a hint, I'm not a he LOL. Yes you are a he, and a ugly one. Judging by the feverish tone of Psy's recent posts, I think the doxing was spot on. If that is the case, I think some  might be in order. |
|
|
|
i've been following it since first day of SC1.
it's just king realscam exceeds my expectation on how he is going to screw other people...er...miners.
Ah I see my opinion could not get any lower of him really so nothing he does surprises me, only thing that would lower it I think would be finding out he diddled little kids, then I would think yup he has hit a new low even for him. If Realsolid had gotten that gig he wanted at Penn State... Too soon? |
|
|
|
johnj, BCX, D&T & Co., we all know you got some kind of passive-agressive crush on Coinhunter, and have some weird fetish for attacking Solidcoin...
You're not as subtle as you think you are.
They are attacking Solidcoin and it's supporters. You attack those who attack Solidcoin. They offer new insights into the "operation" of Solidcoin. You throw the same tired insult over and over. You would have to become more interesting to be a Coinhunter sockpuppet. |
|
|
|
OK, that are different approaches.
Still the last, main question:
Who's the victim?
Please name yourself and tell how did you suffer?
My description:
Sue goes to the Marketplace forums, and says 'I have a 5850 for sale. It's brand new with an aftermarket heat-sink included. Send me 150 BTC and it's yours.'
People then weigh take variables into account before they invest. They weigh their long-term electric cost, initial cost, they are able to weigh how much a 5850 and an aftermarket heatsink are worth to them, before they spend their money.
Now Sue sends instead a 5770 with no heat-sink at all. Though a 5770 is still technically a graphics card, what was received is not what was advertised. Or what if the card was broken? Or what if Sue left out the heatsink? Further, what if any of those things happened and it was proven that Sue had prior knowledge? Or what if Sue used the defense she made a 'decision' she thought was best for you, without your input? Sue would be labeled a scammer for accepting peoples investment and changing the terms of the sale after the fact.
CoinHunter goes to the Cryptocurrency forums, and says 'I have an investment opportunity. If you invest X money (based on your electricity and hardware cost), you'll receive Y (coin reward) over Z period (time it takes to find a block), according to N parameters (design of SC). People then weigh all those variables into account before they invest.
Coinhunter has adjusted and concealed many variables people must weigh in order to make a proper investment. Further, CoinHunter has lied about his own 'earnings', to a tune of holding a whopping ~85% of the current coin supply. Coinhunter has changed the Y reward and N parameters directly, after initial investment was made. The investment made by those people, whether it be through buying on an exchange or contributing hashes to the blockchain, were done under the guise of A terms, but coinhunter executed the investment under B terms, of which B terms are directly beneficial to Coinhunter and directly detrimental to the investor.
Whether it be 1.0 -> 2.0, or 2.0 w/12m 'unspendable -> 2.0 w/12m VERY spendable, or 2.0 32sc/blk -> 2.0 5sc/blk. I'm sure there are other ways to break it down, but at this point if you can't see that SC is a scam... then you're exactly the kind of investor Coinhunter is looking for: gullible. Sue didn't send a 5770, she sent this:  |
|
|
|
As I said in another thread on the subject, SolidCoin is good for Bitcoin, because it's a lightning rod for complete morons. It brings Bitcoin's "idiot factor" down a notch or 6, and that's great for Bitcoin.
This. At this point, arguing the merits of what Solidcoin is and is not is pointless. Solidcoin can be morphed into whatever RealSolid wants it to be. He has utter control over every aspect of the client and block-chain. Any time anyone complains about any feature, one can "promise" that feature will be moderated or mitigated by RealSolid. Why would anyone bother trying to hack the Solidcoin client, just break into RealSolid's development box and take the private keys that control the blockchain. If someone hasn't already. |
|
|
|
"Gravely mistaken"  Do you really think that altcoins of any flavor are important enough to label them "grave"? They are an alternate that is in its infancy. Unluckily for this particular baby, it was born into a village that likes to fuck around with it, with each other, with the rules, with the code, and with the ways to twist a profit out of anything we touch. Your guy created an alt that he, or his vainglorious non-profit Rangeroos can control utterly and completely. I will give credit that his marketing stays on topic- his is maniacal in staying on-message. Unfortunately that message is that his sliced bread is somehow magically better in every conceivable way, and in fact represents a complete re-invention of the concept of bread, and anyone who enjoys bread should immediately flock to his, because it will destroy all other slices in the universe by the very fact of its existence. It is exactly the message and the delivery of that message that turns people off. Some find the misrepresentations about releasing the code to be the issue that drives their criticism, others look to the gross mis-statements about non-centralized control nodes which are in fact exactly the opposite, to be a turn-off. SC has a horrible poster child, and he scares anybody legitimate off. SC will never enjoy any significant market adoption because the self proclaimed messianic goofball who runs it is such a complete and utter failure at interpersonal communication. He is a liar, me is an arrogant braggart, and he is an unrepentant simpleton who thinks that screaming at the world will convince the world that he is right, either in person or through proxies. You choose to be one such proxy- Yay, you! You are a savvy investor who watches and plays the markets closely. Yay, you! You want to preach the gospel of how wrong the rest of the world is because we don't fall into lockstep with you on following the screaming fuck-wit rowing the wrong way on your slave galley of fools. Yay, you, you have found purpose in the world! Dial back the vitriol, muzzle your mouthy little bitch-in-charge and the world might be able to consider SC on it's own merits without a headache from the incessant noise. Many who have taken a look at it have determined that it doesn't fit their needs, and many of those have decided to share their reasoned criticism with the world. Your shilling and pimping is not going to change facts, regardless of how many times you scream "troll" Chicken Lemon. The only sky that is falling is your own credibility for representing a really crappy batch of snake oil.  |
|
|
|
I am just hoping there will be enough cool-aid at the end of Solidcoin.  |
|
|
|
I can't read source code.
I know, otherwise you would never have made such a ludicrous statement. If we are wrong about the trusted nodes, you could prove it by posted filenames and linenumbers of the relevant code. Too bad you can't read the source to know what to post.  |
|
|
|
Well, I didn't but even if I did the focal point is CH's BS replies.
Once again I've noticed that since the release of the source you no longer try to attack many of the previously denied claims but do the only thing you can, try and deflect.
The partial source code release has outted Solidcoin for what it really is.
How is the source code release "partial" It compiles and runs just fine, looks quite complete to me. He didn't release the code for the trusted nodes or the 2.0 release. |
|
|
|
|
I saw pretty pictures! When can I give my money for the pretty picture?
{hops up an down}
|
|
|
|
The "main goal" is plainly apparent, to make CH/RS wealthy and give him total control. He achieved the total control part and thanks to the relentless drive of the people here, he will never hit the wealth he dreamed he was going to make. No one will invest in a chain where one megalomaniac narcissistic dirtbag controls everything.
A few will invest. One can always find a few people to sign on the dotted line. Be glad that those few will not be using Bitcoin when they get scammed. For once the news will read "Beware of things that are *not* Bitcoin" |
|
|
|
[Vapid nonsense followed by] ... and then became doom and gloomers while they moved on to "rape the users" of some other system.
The whole point of a cryptocurrency is that users of the system cannot be raped by a few random people on a message board. Solidcoin does not qualify as a cryptocurrency since a single person can change any aspect of it, at will. Solidcoins can be moderated out of existence as easily as forum posts on the solidcoin forums and that is quite the opposite of what cryptocurrencies stand for. |
|
|
|
Solidcoins at 0.0081 err I mean 0.0059btc!!!
Good thing BTC goes out to 8 decimal places, otherwise Solidcoin would be dead. |
|
|
|
Guys Bitcoins is not licensed by GPL. It is the MIT license.
It allows closed source project.
It allows propretary projects.
It allows derivitve works.
It allows the derivitive to be licensed by any license the author wishes (no copyleft provision).
The ONLY thing it requires is the copyright and notice to be included with any derived distribution.
Somehow RealSolid still managed to figure out how to fuck it up (as well as trying to copyright his stolen work).
RS just wanted to pass the MIT licensed Bitcoin code off as his own work. As a benefit from this, he could attack other chains that copied his ideas for being unauthorized derivative works of SolidCoin. |
|
|
|
|
So now there are two versions of Solidcoin2. One for the pumpers and one for the dumper(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
To answer the title of the thread: changing the block size will have no effect at all.
After all 5/32nds of nothing is also nothing.
I do take some consolation in the fact that this scam will probably not be attributed to Bitcoin by media outlets.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
