When enraged, you made the same grammatical errors and used the same insulting language the Coinhunter account used. A telling lapse, but not proof.

Purportedly Microcash will have mechanisms built in to enrich the largest SoiledCoin accounts (currently controlled by Coinhunter) at the expense of others. Of course, it does not yet exist so any discussion of what it is would be a waste of time. If Microcash broke cleaning from the SoiledCoin chain, it would cease to be a scam. Then we would have to wait until it was implemented and the source released before passing judgement.

As is, Microcash is just a vehicle to preserve and extend the ill gotten gains of SoiledCoin and it's tyrant nodes.

I felt a great disturbance in the forums, as if millions of posts cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.   

/approve.

The thread seems to be in both forums. Maybe it is self-replicating! 

Technically true. Since Microcash consists entirely of posts on message boards and in search engine caches, the only way to get rid of it would be to shut down the internet.
To stop SoiledCoin, all you need do is hack Coinhunters box or seize it with a warrant. Then you have the passwords and private keys of the tyrant nodes. With that, you could stop the block chain, or spend every single SoiledCoin, or both.

So that is a firm yes, you are going to offer merged mining for Microcash? 

It looks like all the worthless picture posts by the SoiledCoin Astroturf Brigade have been culled.
Thanks to the mods, its a lot easier to read the thread now.

When they can attach their own names to their work with a digital signature (like say Gavin does), I will start taking the SoiledCoin folks more seriously.
Right now all wild unsubstantiated claims, astro-turfing and skulking about under aliases reminds me of James Arthur Ray or Frank Kern.

I was surprised to see Viper attaching his name to posts again. Last we saw of him he was madly deleting accounts fleeing the dox.

LTC and NMC were not and are still not ridiculed.
Your post at the start of the thread is marketing material. We have been asking for the math and implementation of the math behind the claims.

For instance, you make the claim that Microcash is a "Peer-to-peer decentralized crypto-currency with currency creation reward based on energy used to create the currency (real value)". Where is the proof that it is both peer to peer and decentralized? Solidcoin 2.0 made both of those claims and it turned out it was just 10 tyrant nodes acting as half the network. That is not peer to peer, since nobody is a peer with a tyrant node and they make half the blocks. Nor is it decentralized, since the block chain cannot move forward without the 10 tyrant nodes (e.g. if you stop paying the electric bill for them).

You also claim that no blockchain download is required. So who does download the blockchain and makes sure the transactions are valid? More central servers? Or is Microcash divided into nodes and users (servers and clients instead of peer to peer)?

You do lay out the values for a standard bitcoin clone at the start. But why a 0.005MC fee for a transaction instead of 0.01MC or 0.004MC? Without any insight into why you chose these particular values it is hard to decide if they make sense without working from first principles. This is a significant investment of time and effort that nobody is willing to make at this point in time for two reasons:
  1) Historically those values have fluctuated over the course of your previous attempts at a currency
  2) SoiledCoin does not take input from the user community.

The one thing that you are right about is not posting the source or the math to Microcash. The only hope for SoiledCoin 3.0 is hype, not substance.

Edit: thanks for admitting you are Coinhunter. Most people would sign their posts and be proud of what they created, unless they knew they would have to run once the gig was up.

Don't leave your Microcash in an exchange account over night! Trade trade trade or it will disappear!! 

No matter how thick the sock is on the puppet, you can always smell the Coinhunter inside once the rage starts to boil.
We can add astroturfing to the list of things Coinhunter has failed at. 

At the moment, the only content being created about Microcash is here in this forum.
Since this content is very negative and you are creating more of it, you are ruining the SEO for microcash.
Should be pretty hilarious on launch day when people google it for the first time and find this.

P.S. You are even worse at doxing than you are at SEO. That pic of me is still the only one you can find?
My face is literally plastered all over the web. Come friend me on facebook or something, I don't have to hide
from people on the internet since I don't scam. 

We know. That is why we keep these threads bumped. 

True. You Coinhunter clones are pretty brazen these days.

The pictures are for two reasons:
1) The target audience of Microcash cannot read, thus images and word of mouth are the only mediums which can reach them
2) The idea behind Microcash (enrichment of CH through the fleecing of the unwary) cannot withstand the light of day, thus no papers or source code.

And yes, we knew you were Coinhunter.

Thats a lucky coincidence, since it doesn't have any. 

Citation please?
Google with no cookies says the Rippoff report was found 2 hours earlier than this post.
Any can verify this by creating a new chrome profile and searching "microcash.org" with it.

Search for "microcash.org" on Bing + fresh profile + last 24 hours and you only get the ripoff report and no mention of bitcointalk.org.

That is not how Google indexes things. It indexes in parallel and graphs their relationships. Unless you are claiming that Google had never indexed the ripoff report domain before. Are you claiming that?
Also, the zero cookie, last 24 hours, advanced search for "microcash.org" showed the ripoff report higher in the rankings and having occurred before this bitcointalk. That implies the inverse of what you are claiming.

I put "microcash.org" and "fraud" into my google bar and the ripoff report came up second. The bitcoin talk page came up first, but that is probably because the session I have hits the bitcointalk page a lot.

Then I opened a chrome window with a different profile (one that has no cookies or sessions and never retains data) that I use for testing stuff. There the ripoff report was the first item returned by "microcash.org" and "fraud". It was also the first result in advanced search "last 24 hours" for just "microcash.org".

Never assume that Google search returns the same thing for two different people. The results are highly customized in a number of dimensions.

At this point Microcash is probably just a wrapper for malware. Coinhunter will charge up some stolen credit cards and call it a day.