|
In a society of people who are all mentally ill in the perception of game-protect, are they truly mentally ill... or perhaps, is this a mere act of indignance from an ostracized member, cast out from society's status quo?
Is this an analogue to the great episode, Eye of the Beholder, originally aired back in the early 60's? Perhaps it is... and game-protect is truly correct: we are all mentally unwell and they are the only ones that are truly sane. Left in a world of insanity, doomed to create their own fucking lottery that contradicts what they call a scam.
What license does your lottery page operate under? Is it an unlicensed gambling site?
|
|
|
|
So if i understand correctly, one piece to hhampuz and one to Big Dick Buck? 👍 you got it chief |
|
|
|
0 for me, random for Hhampuz. Txid coming later this evening.  2a68283c1405bcf5106c09cb341df3ac8fcdd04964a5ab187d3f2253ad6f0a9c I did not see this :O THANK YOU actmyname! Let's share the price, if LC is alright with that, you pick if you want the rifle or the guy fawkes mask (I'm fine with either, really) Thanks for great raffle LC! Can I redirect my pick to Mr. Buck "Sukmai" Rogers? Gesture much-appreciated but I still want to share the silver. |
|
|
|
Kinda makes me feel like a bought/hacked account although I cannot prove that either.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this? It's hearsay evidence if you choose to keep the negative. That's insubstantial, in my opinion, and thus the negative should be revoked until further evidence proves otherwise. As for the bought/hacked account part... that's a (weak) circumstantial argument, only further weakened by the fact that the prose has remained in tact throughout the years. |
|
|
|
The feedback's nearly two years old and it was on the basis of an open scam accusation.
There is nothing that actively connects lixer to any wrongdoing especially considering they only had one post on the thread. Neg should be removed. |
|
|
|
Also, about plagiarism. I don't have time for now, for looking into theymos quotes where he says that if someone net positive he can be unbaned. If whole community supporting someone, doesn't that means that this person is very net positive? Who is banned and supported by the whole community ? I am not aware of such a case here. See: ChiBitCTyThough, since then, ban appeals for "positive community contributions" have come by much faster. |
|
|
|
Still have this address in play? ragRP8RounvM1iRLt7eCMSSpzr4qesx89C (ripple) https://archive.is/ySBGJ#selection-2607.0-2607.34
You don't have to sign it if it's an exchange one... as long as you can show the link between the address and yourself with sound enough evidence. |
|
|
|
Off topic but how do you show up those options? Whenever I click report it just comes with text box where I have to write the reason? This is a script by suchmoon. Thread here. |
|
|
|
But that is not what happens because nobody on the face of the planet actually needs any imaginary digital scamcoin because they aren't resources. You mean I can't sell my YeCoin? |
|
|
|
Who did my lottery scam and for how much? No idea, but since you've put all websites with casinos that operate under the 8084/JAZ Curacao license in a scam list, then they must be scams according to you. Which includes your website.
If you want to refute the fact that the license is 8084/JAZ then you should be able to show us the real license. If there's anything worse than a Curacao license, it's no license at all! If you're trying to refute anything else, just remember that you're arguing against yourself. |
|
|
|
Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer? In support tickets and emails. I don't see those keywords in your example. Typically, when people provide examples, they are used to support their argument rather than detract thereof but perhaps you are taking an avant-garde approach to defending yourself. I support your modern twisting of the orthodox but I don't think that we should deviate from the classics, especially on a forum like this one. After all, the ancestral roots have cemented themselves because they brought forth a strong foundation from which we have grown, and because of that, the basics and fundamentals are truly the most crucial part of the process. All modern twists are rooted in the originals and their development is fueled because of it. It would be rash to completely ignore them and plant a completely new tree: even quite disrespectful at that. |
|
|
|
Over the years several victims wrote in the support tickets or emails that they read on bitcointalk.org negative things like Game Protect is a scammer or blackmailer and based on this they did not give the order to enforce its claims!
Here is a support ticket example:
"We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect (he refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here.
bye" cat post | grep (scammer|blackmailer) yielded no results. Even in your own examples they don't align with what you're saying. Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer? Your secondary remark about "high-risk" feedback relies on the first. |
|
|
|
You quote mentally ill nonsense brain wash shit from Initscri claiming it is my own word?  Your words: "Casinos claiming to operate under the 1668/JAZ, 365/JAZ, 5536/JAZ, or 8084/JAZ Curacao license scam operate illegal!" Your website: lottery.game-protect.com Your license: 8084/JAZ Curacao Your lottery is a scam. QED. Like I said, your words... not mine.
They say that projection is a common tool for those that are ashamed of themselves. |
|
|
|
buckrogers takes lucky #6 Now that big dick buck entered, we've lost.  |
|
|
|
I still don't understand why people even shitpost for bounties anymore, it's completely not worth it. It seems like anyone involved in bounty campaigns is 12 years old... and then they are surprised when the "value" disappears, as if it wasn't made up out of thin air to begin with. Like are people still actually serious with this bounty bullshit, I thought after the countless examples of failure, some would catch on? Account farmers cast a wide net. Moreover, you have social media based programmes within the bounties which can be gamed by Newbies. Even if 90% of the bounties fail, those that participate in Twitter/Facebook campaigns will still get something since they are just hitting every single bounty available to them. In the case of signatures, you have individuals that use multiple accounts in order to maximize the variety of tokens they can get. However, the post quality is hit hard because of the extra load (though it's unlikely that they would have posted good content regardless). TL;DR: We need KYC. /s |
|
|
|
what spam  our community is giving honest opinions about the project ! is that becomes spam these days ?? thanks Your community of brand-new spambot accounts, huh? Sorry, mate. |
|
|
|
I think we all know that most of us would likely take $200 a week to shitpost on a forum. It's not that hard to understand. A lot of times I see people bashing others like this and the next week they're wearing this same signature. Probably a lot of it comes from jealously, hell I would want a sweat signature deal, who doesn't? I don't really think you should question ethics here, people will scam you out of $4 if they have the chance, at least this isn't outright scamming. Certainly, most would. It's a simple task, repeatable and low-effort. You can churn out hundreds of replies a week if you find the right threads. You can start training yourself to create generalized and padded posts across your multiple accounts. You can make the forum a worse place for the sake of money.But a lot of users don't want that. You'll find that most of the spam is generated by poor monitoring of campaign participants, especially in the altcoin/bounty department. Nearly everyone who dons an altcoin signature is a spammer, full stop. You will find, however, in the case of ChipMixer, many participants have ample opportunity to shitpost/mask-post their way up to 50/week. A significant percentage do not. Personally, I don't like the idea of lowering my post quality just to make a couple extra dollars. Honestly, I'm far stricter than DS_ on his QA with posts. There's been a few times that I thought the post count should have been lowered. (explains why my reporting accuracy isn't as high... there are a few "bad" reports for posts that I thought should have been deleted) Speaking of, if you're reading this post to this point, @DarkStar_, just don't mark this one. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
