this user as in me? lol i have no idea what youre saying. i had this auction for 3-4 times now. I gave up and came back. Yeah, you had the auction multiple times because you tried to start the bids too high. Now that you know the market price of the coin (even after LC's generous offers) you realize that you aren't satisfied with the result... and now you want to quit out. Considering the fact that you only had two bids (initial bid and 1.05) it would be smart to try and push it higher. But unfortunately there was 0 demand... so you pull out. Plausible story? I usually sell on ebay after it doesnt sell here. lol And it seems like nobody wanted it on eBay either. im seriously done talking. k |
|
|
|
Why are you relaying their messages? Why can't the auction winner post it themselves?
Also this is a weird part: "This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity." And right after this auction started, too...  |
|
|
|
|
2 - a.
Thanks! This is wicked.
|
|
|
|
That shit software won't scale beyond 50,000 users, let alone the millions on this forum. Average page views per day: 1356466.59 Average registrations per day: 404.19 Average posts per day: 7420.06 [?]Doesn't look like the forum is too resource-intensive. 
We might have 2.6 million users but how many of those are actually active? Considering we have sub-10K posts per day, it doesn't seem like a lot. It's a 0.3% ratio of members to posts/day. |
|
|
|
|
Might I add...
If you are repeating the same thing that has already been said ten times over in the same thread, every five replies... that is spam.
If you are quoting a post and "agree" replying to it... that is spam.
You add nothing to the discussion? You regurgitate ideas? That is spam. Whether it is on-topic or not.
Saying "bitcoin is now $x" is meaningless.
Saying "yes i agree with your post and [paraphrasing quoted post]" is meaningless.
Adding new thoughts, new ideas... what's so hard about that?
|
|
|
|
Well I appealed several times but didn't get any response. I get that rules are rules and must be obeyed. Would you please vouch for me to get unbanned? I dedicated a lot of time interacting with the users here. Why do you deserve to be unbanned? Even someone like Chi wasn't unbanned until several pages of outlining his contributions... and even then there was a signature ban. Are you comfortable with that? Do you have enough contributions to show that you're a valuable forum member, that you are worth keeping around despite plagiarizing work? |
|
|
|
If you want to check out my personal hit list... Use this as a lookup table for the profiles.
523| Vinaa77
177| Fredomago
127| goaldigger
113| bobby1776
111| partysaurus
90 | judeafante
82 | Pamadar
79 | Ranly123
79 | bitcoin31
73 | Muzika
61 | Congyang
61 | alian17
60 | Pffrt
57 | wahyu wida
55 | mrkavasaki
54 | cribusen
53 | Starfranko
51 | ardentvolcanoes
45 | trickyriky
44 | thirdlight
44 | kkaroul4
44 | immortal4now
43 | okala
43 | Bagaji
42 | Kay94
41 | RondoAnyar
41 | betty11
40 | anume123
39 | mbluxs
38 | avarnet
36 | xabre
36 | senyorito123
36 | muhhentuhhen
36 | jhonjhon
36 | bandungan
35 | Bitcoin Seller
33 | perla
31 | Hypnosis00
31 | bitcon
30 | ethereumhunter
29 | Successmaniac4
28 | zidanw
28 | awik p
26 | ukboss
26 | Ayiranorea
25 | poldanmig
25 | jackflag
25 | arifteguhr
25 | ahmed04
24 | xenxen
24 | NotoriousHodler
24 | Fluxtorrence9
23 | pungopete468
22 | celot
21 | tiptravel
21 | PDAngel
21 | logitechwow
21 | Kiweikoo
20 | omegasoldier
20 | Nkblix
20 | Gab20
20 | Babylon
20 | Aivaryamal
19 | jony35490
19 | emmybd
19 | bivaetjetakoe
18 | xSkylarx
18 | udidrone
18 | iMark
18 | fauzan Ichsan
16 | lizaangel321
15 | Finestream
14 | hahay
14 | FlightyPouch
13 | semobo
13 | jalxyx
13 | automaticmoney
12 | viceking1
12 | tthomas5839
12 | Spaffin
12 | Rufsilf
12 | Noilee
12 | Irvinn
12 | Cherylstar86
11 | zhekinsp
11 | Wolfwar
11 | Wellyan
11 | ufaiz50
11 | Mame89
11 | jjbanks994
11 | ioanbtc
11 | breathlessz
10 | shoreno
10 | reality18
10 | Nellayar
10 | NathanJB
10 | mirawantirinjana
10 | max6575
10 | horrifiedx1
10 | Arkham Knight
10 | abeecrypto Alternative link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5164260.msg51789561#msg51789561
These users are not limited to any particular board. They may post in Speculation, Bitcoin Discussion, Economics, Altcoin Discussion, Gambling discussion, etc. The list of names that Loyce had posted (in the first link) include everyone of which I have had at least one good report towards. |
|
|
|
Oh, hello. I remember you. bobby1776: 113 good reports.
I want you to know exactly why you got banned. June 26: 63 of your posts were reported and deleted. July 18: 48 of your posts were reported and deleted. You made no effort to post higher-quality replies after the initial warning. Note: I did not "hunt" your profile. I merely happened upon it when purging a spam megathread and found many similar insubstantial replies.
The 7-day ban is a heavy warning. Post. Better. I'm tired of the "I don't know English" argument. If you don't know, then you shouldn't be posting in an English board! Or at the very least, you should be making efforts to better yourself. But the English is not the problem. The posts were reported for being extremely vague, repetitive (i.e. repeating the same thing that's already been said in the thread 20 times) or completely nonsensical and irrelevant. They weren't reported for having poor English. |
|
|
|
Possibilities: you have some victims due to unmonitored scams because the forum doesn't do anything about it, or Possibilities: you have some victims due to unmonitored scams because anything that isn't a "scam" seems like it was approved by the forum, or Possibilities: you have some victims due to unmonitored scams because DT doesn't do anything about it, or Possibilities: you have some victims due to unmonitored scams because the administrative system has not seen it.
Pick your poison. Both are basically the same result (in terms of prospective command and consequences) but the DT system gives a wider scope and more power to forum users rather than hand-picked moderators. |
|
|
|
|
I'll take it for 1.2 pence
|
|
|
|
No, the good thing is that many trustworthy institutions will run enough infrastructure for anyone in the world, and hobby guys can still run btc raspi shit.
If that's the future you wish for then we may as well go full Libra. At least they're serious, competent and well funded. I'd choose Libra over a small group of psychopaths any day of the week. I cannot believe that u really got mixed up the setups for Bitcoin, where all can be part of, - sure u need enough money to buy miners, and Libra where Zucky might want to allow u to buy in.
I want you to reread what you have written in both quotes. I want you to keep reading until you see the faults in your ways. You will not come to understand anything unless you undergo this introspection because otherwise you are never going to seriously think about what you're spouting. |
|
|
|
I couldn't find any server that is related to this giveway or fake exchange.They just made a bot to send messages to random people they find on Discord projects servers therefore I couldn't find anything concrete about the thread creator/author of this scam sorry. I thought MEE6 was native to the server: it couldn't message just anyone. It seems like that was a welcome message from one of the servers you joined. Could be wrong, not too familiar with Discord. |
|
|
|
Is using automation of removing or adding feedback against fourm rules? If there is a script for this I would love it if you guys shared it. But I don't think it's "fair" if an automated tool was used for posting/editting/removing trust. How so? It depends on what you're using it for. Neither adding nor removing trust would be erroneous provided that you have enough restrictions therein as well as QA afterwards. I especially don't see the harm in automating the removal of feedback. If there was a tool for reporting spam to moderator I think that is borderline depending on how many errors it makes If you reported every post in Altcoin Discussion your reporting accuracy would be above 90%. I have no doubts about that. |
|
|
|
You have pages and pages and pages of sent feedback, you are telling me you went through all of it and removed all of the negatives you left for shitposters How long did they take you? Without automation, it would take quite a bit of time. You can't delete sent feedback from your own profile and have to navigate to each individual account. Assume that it takes 6 to 8 seconds per account (page load and finding your feedback). I believe The Pharmacist and I had hundreds of sent feedback related to spam. Considering the amount of spam that you could find in those days (as well as currently) it could have easily surpassed 500 different accounts. Which is equivalent to 50 minutes of purely going through your sent feedback. |
|
|
|
Bear market? No. People just used to see BTC nowadays going up. People use terminology as they see fit. Consecutive green: "bull market! moon! hodl!" Consecutive red: "bear market! crash! gtfo!" But you know don't think of it too much. We need this price dip to make rooms for another buy and to strengthen the foundation around given support established at a lower level. Get it out of the way so we can finally see the fireworks. |
|
|
|
Let me answer to both statements made above:
Since we are not able to perform KYC to absolutely all users, we can't be certain that suspicious activity will not be manifested on the accounts that have avoided the verification. Wait, you're not able to perform KYC to all users? Why not? Do the rules only apply for so many people, to which thereafter it becomes a cesspool of money-laundering? Loyce's point made sense: you have no way of telling whether the user who deposited the funds is the user who will later withdraw the funds. You should have KYC apropos to linking the two cryptographic identities: it's the reasonable thing to do when considering cryptocurrencies. Either that or get rid of bullshit KYC |
|
|
|
|
This boils down to:
"I want my friend, who might be trustworthy (so it seems) to hold onto my assets. I give them full access to do as they like to it and I have no control. I will have little recourse if my friend decides to leave. This is because I might mess up if I hold onto my assets myself."
Makes no sense. You have so little trust in yourself that you're willing to trust a third-party service?
|
|
|
|
I suppose so but there's thousands of scammer accounts out there... I'm not wasting my time dealing with such low level / banned / inactive accounts The reason I stress my point is because there have already been incidents in which an account is shady (or even affiliated with scams) to which feedback was not given out of inconsequentialism. The account would later do some bullshit farming in Games & rounds or Off-topic and then sidestep back into the light to scam some Newbies.
I have the same opinion here as I do with spam: the more you fight, the easier it will get. |
|
|
|
In addition, many of these accounts haven't been active since 2015, and only have a dozen posts or less under their belt. Seems like an unnecessary clog of information, but whatever. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Do we just ignore low-post or inactive accounts? Because "age" carries weight to it and Bitcointalk is rife with scams, there is no telling when the account might reactivate. Better to be proactive regardless of the user. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
