If that's the StochRSI at the bottom then we are very oversold and it might go up earlier.
|
|
|
Good bye low prices. Just broke through $300 and rising quickly.
TO ALPHA CENTAURIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Nothing is stopping this sinking ship. Holy Shit it must be the reverse Willy doppelganger.
Take a look at the Titanic. It has become more valuable after it hit the bottom
|
|
|
$312
What a precise prediction. Thats when he stops selling
|
|
|
I just dropped $2k on some more bitcoins.
I will be considered greedy and a 1%er down the road and people will say it's not fair.
You have BTC210000 ? That's not fair!!!!
|
|
|
If everyone would listen one "Expert" then we would either all be ponzi-trillionares or broke.
|
|
|
$350 is the lowest...
Its $340 now
|
|
|
I remember when I replaced my windows PC for Linux because of Bitcoin. Bitcoin sure makes you think about your computer security very seriously.
And with the shellshock and heartbleed security issues I would reconsider you choice Why? A fix was available within hours of it becoming public knowledge... with windows publicly known security vulns run rampant for months before anything is done about it. True but how many implement the fix in time. Anyhow the best OS for bitcoin remains an offline one
|
|
|
I remember when I replaced my windows PC for Linux because of Bitcoin. Bitcoin sure makes you think about your computer security very seriously.
And with the shellshock and heartbleed security issues I would reconsider you choice
|
|
|
Dear Warren,
I am sincerely affected by the fact that you have started to show signs of dementia. One of the symptoms is not being able to spell your own surname (Buffett). A second symptom is extreme pessimism and repeatin phrases like a broken record player.
Please use your millions to get professional help!!!
Regards, Wilhelm
|
|
|
"Averaging down" is not a good strategy. Avoiding bitcoin completely is the best strategy. There is zero indication that we will ever reach an ATH again, and in another few weeks, people will likely be wishing that they had sold at $350!
Wrong. It is best to follow a strategy that is not based on emotions. This means buying low and buying high. In the end as long as an ATH is reached again, which it will, you will profit tremendously. HAHAHA DELUSIONS! IT WON'T. Investing is most profitable if you get in before it starts going up. This means you should always get in ahead of the crowd. You will never ever get anywhere because you follow the sheeple or just bitch on people sticking out their neck. You add 0 value to this forum with such comments!!! Truth is that a few of the people that succeed will become millionaires and you will remain a useless troll on a forum!!
|
|
|
As quotes by Rick Ashley himself on Bitcoin Never gonna give them up, never gonna let them go Never gonna run around and desert them Never gonna make me cry, never gonna say goodbye Never gonna exchange for fiat and hurt you
|
|
|
OP is smalltime!!! Buying a Ferrari? F*** wait till you can buy the whole f***ing company.
|
|
|
I can write a similar post for by %s/dogecoin/litecoin/g and yet litecoin is pinned to bitcoin I am almost tempted to switch my savings to ltc. In my opinion Dogecoin is extremely undervalued. You really just need to look at the facts. Don’t invest more than you can afford to lose. Dogecoin *inside cry*
|
|
|
Remember that there is no such thing as “intrinsic value.” BTC and gold and fiat have no intrinsic value. Thats what make them good money. Silver, food and water have intrinsic value.
Intrinsic has to do with properties of the material, system etc. Value is that what people give to it. Value can be determined by many factors of which usability or aesthetics are some. So there IS a thing as "intrinsic value" it just depends on how you read it. A person can give value to the intrinsic property (by desiring it). The intrinsic property does not determine its value (it does not necessarily make it more desirable).
|
|
|
He should invest in English lessons and not Bitcoin
|
|
|
This thread is getting to a point that I don't believe OP anymore.
Inb4 "Today I bought another 600BTC (+4850 before = 5450 total)
|
|
|
..............
My conclusion, based on 45 years of living in the United States and watching just how rapacious it's government is, is that it will happen at some point. I am of the opinion that the bitcoin protocol and community are resilient enough to withstand it, but saying that it cannot happen or even that it's unlikely seems too complacent. But adoption will have to reach larger scales by quite a lot before they feel that threatened. Right now it's a diversion and cause for some concern to them. That can change. We want that to change. But we should NEVER be complacent when dealing with something that can potentially break a 500 plus year stranglehold on monetary exchange.
It's more fun looking at the United States as an outsider I strongly believe that the United States is already working on a plan B and C to kill bitcoin. Plan A is watch it kill itself and never become a currency. Since P2P filesharing is hard to stop I don't think they can ever stop Bitcoin. Trying to stop it now would only make it more interesting. Why kill bitcoin? We all know how the fiat situation of the USA is. Bitcoin would be like having an accounting firm checking your bookkeeping. There is no escape, your can't fake your books. Printing money will no longer be possible and countries (incl. USA) would need to earn their money just like their citizens. Waging war would be a costly business so I also believe that the world might even become a better place. What makes you think it wasn't the US government that launched bitcoin? We need a replacement/backup currency in place for when the US national debt reaches a level that the US dollar begins to collapse. http://www.usdebtclock.org/Rather than passing the global financial leadership position on to the next emerging economic leader you simply change the rules... It has occured to me. The reason I don't think so, though it would be a beautiful "black" op. is that when it comes to monetary policy, the USG has shown a truly remarkable lack of imagination since their great god J.M. Keynes found his "long run". Now I could see one of the "shadow" organizations within the USG doing it on their own, but it just seems a bit too elegant for their type. But again, you can't discount the possibility. Especially since it has a counter effect of destabilizing OTHER fiat currencies to a greater degree (due to scale) than the dollar or Euro. It could actually strengthen the big boys by strangling the small ones. Good point. Bitcoin could hit other economies harder and make more people invest in USD/Euro/BTC. Maybe they we're even expecting China to get hit hard
|
|
|
..............
My conclusion, based on 45 years of living in the United States and watching just how rapacious it's government is, is that it will happen at some point. I am of the opinion that the bitcoin protocol and community are resilient enough to withstand it, but saying that it cannot happen or even that it's unlikely seems too complacent. But adoption will have to reach larger scales by quite a lot before they feel that threatened. Right now it's a diversion and cause for some concern to them. That can change. We want that to change. But we should NEVER be complacent when dealing with something that can potentially break a 500 plus year stranglehold on monetary exchange.
It's more fun looking at the United States as an outsider I strongly believe that the United States is already working on a plan B and C to kill bitcoin. Plan A is watch it kill itself and never become a currency. Since P2P filesharing is hard to stop I don't think they can ever stop Bitcoin. Trying to stop it now would only make it more interesting. Why kill bitcoin? We all know how the fiat situation of the USA is. Bitcoin would be like having an accounting firm checking your bookkeeping. There is no escape, your can't fake your books. Printing money will no longer be possible and countries (incl. USA) would need to earn their money just like their citizens. Waging war would be a costly business so I also believe that the world might even become a better place. What makes you think it wasn't the US government that launched bitcoin? We need a replacement/backup currency in place for when the US national debt reaches a level that the US dollar begins to collapse. http://www.usdebtclock.org/Rather than passing the global financial leadership position on to the next emerging economic leader you simply change the rules... Where am I claiming that the US government launched bitcoin? I'm merely stating that they aren't stopping it. If the US debt reaches a level that the US dollar collapses they will invent a new currency like the US Yen and screw over all debtors. You do realize that the wealth in US and other countries is superficially created? If bitcoin would be the only currency wealth would have to be earned and not printed. Governments would need to be efficient and have less tools to manipulate the economy. If this is a good or bad thing you can decide. Edit: I am pro bitcoin because I believe that governments should be efficient, and it might stop wars and bring peace
|
|
|
..............
My conclusion, based on 45 years of living in the United States and watching just how rapacious it's government is, is that it will happen at some point. I am of the opinion that the bitcoin protocol and community are resilient enough to withstand it, but saying that it cannot happen or even that it's unlikely seems too complacent. But adoption will have to reach larger scales by quite a lot before they feel that threatened. Right now it's a diversion and cause for some concern to them. That can change. We want that to change. But we should NEVER be complacent when dealing with something that can potentially break a 500 plus year stranglehold on monetary exchange.
It's more fun looking at the United States as an outsider I strongly believe that the United States is already working on a plan B and C to kill bitcoin. Plan A is watch it kill itself and never become a currency. Since P2P filesharing is hard to stop I don't think they can ever stop Bitcoin. Trying to stop it now would only make it more interesting. Why kill bitcoin? We all know how the fiat situation of the USA is. Bitcoin would be like having an accounting firm checking your bookkeeping. There is no escape, your can't fake your books. Printing money will no longer be possible and countries (incl. USA) would need to earn their money just like their citizens. Waging war would be a costly business so I also believe that the world might even become a better place.
|
|
|
|