Damn LoyceV, You did not notice the plagiarism here. Sorry, I missed this one. That explains why he posted " he needs 15 more". I thought referring to himself as "he" was just his lack of English skills. |
|
|
|
We kindly ask the following users to correct their early comments/notes in view of the current state of the service: @LoyceV My feedback was accurate, and my neutral feedback on your profile stays. There's nothing to "correct". You're in the trust business. You lied, I'll never trust you. |
|
|
|
Suggestion: in the image generated in "local to btc", there should be a small line underneath, saying the day/time that the value was updated. But that doesn't make sense, because every new load makes a printout of the current value. I like the suggestion. Updates can fail for many reason, including browser cache. It would only make sense if you kept the page open without refreshing, and that sounds useless. I do this all the time  The main point of the tool was to quote the value of BTC whenever a page is loaded Here's another idea: make the price-image an animated GIF. First, show the current price. After 10 minutes, show "price expired" (and keeep that frame for 10 years). |
|
|
|
How do I know the the fee set by my wallet? Any decent wallet would show you the transaction fee before sending. You should stop using Trust wallet and switch to for instance Electrum. I have the $6 in my wallet and haven't made any transaction before in that wallet just a newly created wallet Using dollars ("$6") doesn't mean anything for on-chain Bitcoin transactions. Think in Bitcoin  In Bitcoin, it's currently impossible to send such small amounts. For further reading, I created a topic about small inputs years ago: [Nov 2023] Fees are high, wait for opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs. The moment transaction fees required to send your input are higher than the input itself, your input is basically worthless. Don't give up on it though, just wait for fees to get lower again. I think I have stated it already in my topic that it's trust wallet The name of that wallet is so generic, it's easy to overlook you actually mean a wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks again for your flawless timing!
|
|
|
|
A special note: I am now concerned about the BPIP project. He owns this project. BPIP ownership was transfered to ibminer and suchmoon years ago. Can anyone tell confidently that he did not put a simple code and storing everyone browsing information including the IPs? Ibminer can probably tell you this. The default of any web server is keep access logs (for a while). What guarantee we have that your, mine and others who used BPIP, our browsing history are not going to be used against us? None. Use Tor if you're worried about your browsing history. |
|
|
|
Has anyone tried Xfce? I've always used this environment, it is the one used by the super lightweight distros, should be the less fancier and thus snappier one. I didn't like Xfce much. I like a menu bar at the full bottom of my screen, some shortcut icons on the left, active programs in the middle, and some status icons on the right. I had to check what I'm currently using: Marco (MATE) window manager, with Clearlooks Appearance (and some customizations). I want my active window to have a clear different color from anything on the background (which is rare nowadays). After disabling all animations, I don't think it's very resource demanding (and my laptop is quite old). |
|
|
|
I was asking that question in regards to Vod's claim of mismanagement/embezzlement of forum donations. I wasn't around when the old members made their (now enormous) donations to bitcointalk, so I didn't know if Theymos or whoever was soliciting those donations said that the funds were going to be used for any specific purpose. There's this: I have pledged to invest all after-expenses BTC-denominated forum profit back into the forum or the community. |
|
|
|
But I think this is a communicated reasons which I don't understand. Since the occurrence of this issue their have not been any transaction history on my trust wallet. My balance on trust wallet still intact, but if I go through the trust wallet check explorer I can see the details of the transaction. And I noticed not quite long that the transaction have been confirmed but my balance on trust wallet is still intact which I tried to send the bitcoin to the suppose address I wanted to send it to and it went through. It sounds like you need to stop using "Trust wallet" and start using a wallet that doesn't do unexplainable things. And since you've copied your seed phrase into 3 different wallets already, it's probably better to create a new wallet and move your funds there. |
|
|
|
I might do that, unless you or someone else can give me some real arguments and examples how current DT system is making positive changes in forum. I don't really see the need to convince you. I'm okay with the current system, it's not perfect, and I sometimes don't like that my own Trust view is different from DT, but it works (more or less). If it doesn't work for you, that's totally fine too. |
|
|
|
You have my curiosity (and my encrypted Protonmail). Can I get your explicit promise you will not share the info? It will contain the raw unedited data, including the agent's name and email tracking info. Sure, I won't share it. But you'll need to use your own Protonmail email to send to mine to enable end-to-end encryption. |
|
|
|
This story is targeted at promoting Binance. CZ is using the story to showcase Binance as the protector of customers' funds by claiming that they can trace and recover stolen funds. He is showing that his platforms is an option because they can recover stolen funds when he said that stolen funds can only be frozen if they are send to centralized platforms. What he doesn't say, is that he can freeze your own funds for any reason too. If you want to keep dollars, just keep them on a bank instead of using a company in the Cayman Islands. At least the bank is regulated in your own country. |
|
|
|
You can just install Xfce on Ubuntu and still get 5 years LTS, right? The few GB size difference for having some unused software on your system shouldn't matter compared to the size of the blockchain. |
|
|
|
Let me be perfectly honest and say that current DT system is creating more problems than doing anything good.
Prove me wrong. In that case: just exclude DefaultTrust and set your Trust depth to 0. You'll only see feedback from the users on your own Trust list ( which is currently empty). |
|
|
|
LoyceV - your name is mentioned in the emails. I trust you enough to send it to you if you wish. You have my curiosity (and my encrypted Protonmail). |
|
|
|
Perhaps they are the same.? Unfortunately, this happens a lot nowadays. It makes it harder to distinguish between real and fake help requests. I had a problem with my wallet and password. So you lied. If you're dumb enough to buy a fake Bitcoin Core wallet.dat online, how about you waste your own time instead of everyone else's time? |
|
|
|
If you're a football enthusiast I'm not much into football. read my timeline Your what?  Just post links to some good posts, make it easy on me |
|
|
|
I assume the Merits are still counted on Ratimov's account. Is there any way we can check that precisely? No. Theymos' Merit data dump only covers the last 120 days. I assume the Merit wasn't deleted though: that just doesn't happen when a post gets deleted. And restoring as Guest probably didn't change anything either. |
|
|
|
@Royse777: you can't just empty your Trust list and then complain about incorrect negative feedback. The proper way to handle this, is by excluding him from your own Trust list. That's how the Trust system works. Having anyone in my trust list either trusted or distrusted does not effect in the DT voting because I volunteered to blacklist myself from DT1 voting. What I said still applies. DT1 is (trying to be) a democracy. You can't step out of the democracy and still expect it to work. @Timelord2067 (below): try to stay on-topic. |
|
|
|
This "offer" still stands: I've been slacking (and ill), and my source sMerits keep building up. I'm planning to do this: If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down. I don't think I'll drop 50 sMerits on a random Newbie, higher ranks are welcome too. So far, only one taker. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
