That means their transaction size is around 1000 bytes. If that's all there is, creating a new transaction for CPFP could work. Current fees are rising again, you'll need to pay more than 100 sat/vbyte on average to get it confirmed any time soon. That means paying about 0.001 BTC in fees from one of the outputs of this transaction could work, but you'll need to count all unconfirmed bytes in your transaction chain to get a more accurate number.
If the sender has many more unconfirmed parents, it can get much more expensive.

Maybe. Maybe not. I haven't tried.

It doesn't look like 15 sat/vbyte is going to be enough any time soon.

I'm not thinking in TBs on a 100 year time scale. Since this heavy IBM disk, we went up 1 order of magnitude in storage capacity per decade, and lost (almost) 1 order of magnitude per decade in weight. Give it a few more decades and we're counting in PB instead of TB.

I'm happily married and have healthy kids

Maybe because nobody knows whether or not I'm bored enough to look at IP in my server's logs.

Congratulations, you've discovered https://bitcointalk.org/myips.php!

LoyceV privilage

---

---

If you're looking for mud to throw, at least try to find something that doesn't make you look ridiculous

That's not true. Both Timelord2067 and Ratimov were (brutally) removed from DT lately. All you need is convincing evidence, and it helps if the victim isn't a shitposting spammer.

It depends on the transaction size. Miners look at relative fees (in sat/vbyte), and the highest ones have priority. Feel free to PM me the txid, but know that it's bad for your privacy.

What fee (in sat/vbyte) did they use?

Which wallet are you using? Electrum for instance would show the transaction, but I think you'd see "-1" confirmations to emphasize it has unconfirmed parents.

Your next action depends on details of your current transaction: if your incoming transaction is small (in bytes) and doesn't have unconfirmed parents, you could use CPFP by sending a transaction with higher fee. That's easiest if your wallet A still has a change output.
On the other hand, if your incoming transaction has many unconfirmed parents, it's going to be very expensive to get confirmed. Current fees are quite high. I'd ask for your TXID, but that's bad for your privacy. So look it up yourself, for instance on mempool.space through Tor browser.

Be careful believing the PMs you may receive.

If I'd receive large amounts of money from the Middle East, I'll get a whole bunch of other questions and it's going to be a lot more difficult to explain the origin of the funds.

The bolded part is the problem. I know it's the kind of problem you're hoping for, but if Bitcoin goes up enough and you're rich in Bitcoins, it sucks not being able to use it.

And if Bitcoin goes to the moon, you won't be able to use it to buy anything big. That's the risk of not paying taxes, you'll end up with black money.

It's not accidental: if Shishir99 would have had a custom Trust list, the link would have worked.

That's the thing: I don't expect the traffic to work that way. If users only join to earn money, you'll miss the basis that made Bitcointalk a valuable place to advertise in the first place.

You mean a wealth tax? We've had that for years, and this year, it's above 2% for the first time. That means, every year again, you'll pay a percentage of your wealth to taxes.
So to break even, your assets need to increase enough in value to make up for inflation and taxes. That was almost impossible in the past years, which is why there are still ongoing lawsuits against these taxes.

Wealth taxes, like most taxes, are only for "the middle class". The poor don't pay them, the rich don't pay them, but anyone in between is not rich enough to move to another country just to avoid taxes.

What's the point of complaining instead of voting? See how the Trust system works, and create your own Trust list.

In 1956, a 3.75 MB hard drive (literally) weighed a ton. That shows it's pointless to worry about data storage limitations a century from now.

Sucking up didn't work: I reported that topic yesterday, the report is marked Good and the topic locked. I also reported this post, in which he's only rephrasing what I posted here. That report was marked Bad. I Ignored him yesterday.

3 year bump for this moment:

That could work, but it makes it easy to take things out of context. See what's left if you remove the strike through text here.

I wouldn't know how to create a bot that handled text without being able to read the text.

Hey, I've seen this one before:
And that is exactly what happened. It's less than 3 days since you removed your signature, and your weekly post count is already down from 121 to 79.

If it includes proving something, that would be very, very cool! It could be as simple as a checksum somewhere on the forum, like bitcointalk.org/pm.php?action=10924810. All it needs is to show a checksum. But that won't work once the PM is deleted.

An upper limit means each node would have to keep track of all previous replacements, and not every note may have seen all of them. So it won't work.