How about Jr. Member goodbed? He's trying to get Merit and his posts contain a lot of generic blabla:

I noticed him when he "answered" my post on the tech board with generic blabla:

This guy looks like an AI chatbot spammer.

Ext4 can be mounted on Windows. I was more thinking about encrypting the entire filesystem to avoid accessing it.

I've never seen the word "proprietary" used for an open source filesystem.

Even worse, according to mempoo.space 23.2 sat/vbyte is the purging limit. Take a look at Johoe's graph: it looks like the 300 MB mempool is almost completely filled with 23 sat/vbyte transactions, and if you zoom out a bit, you'll see most of them are most likely all created by Ordinal spammers. So you can choose: pay a bit above 23.2 sat/vbyte, or wait weeks.

Of course they know, they just don't care. And even if they use different passwords, chances are they're very alike anyway. Password1234 and Password4321 for instance. It would be more useful to promote a password manager, because most people have more accounts than they can remember.
And even if they use different passwords, chances are they forget which one belongs to which site. To enter, they "try" all passwords they know, thereby compromising all of them

With this setup, malware installed on Windows can still access your Linux partition. I have no idea how likely this is (but I wouldn't want Windows to ever touch my partitions).

It's funny how you mention 3 centrally controlled shitcoins and then say I'm the one with issues. Is that the best argument you have?

Wouldn't it be more likely for all privacy minded users to abandon Wasabi entirely? Even if the current bad reputation isn't enough, that will end the moment it's bought by a blockchain analysis company.

From now on, I'll delete posts from Newbies who ask to whitelist accounts. If you don't read the OP, there's no point responding.

Dude!

None of that is relevant. When it comes to handling passwords, it comes to trusting the forum owner does what he says he does. Your "evidence" is a link to your own site, that doesn't prove anything. And it's impossible to prove.

You're turning a serious thing into something ridiculous. Is that to distract the reader?

I've seen it many times: wannabe scammers respond to serious concerns with name calling. Honest people would do all they can to convince readers with facts.

Of course it's suspicious! Just like altcoins, ICOs, NFTs, DeFi and Ordinals, your forum is also created to make money for the creator. And like many others, you need Bitcointalk to promote your little scheme.
Let's try the other way: the fact that I don't like your forum doesn't mean it should be trusted.

Why? Are you assuming your users are that dumb? Everyone knows by now not to reuse passwords, and reading it again won't make the people who do it change their ways.

Revenue without needing the money. Right.

I know I'm not the average forum user But I also know I wouldn't join a forum just to earn money. When I joined Bitcointalk I didn't even know signature campaigns exist.

In this scenario there's a bigger problem: Bitcointalk's mission is "to be as free as possible". If the forum loses more and more of it's freedom, it may be time to move on to a place that's closer to this mission again.

On second thought: doesn't the anticipation speed up the pattern? If enough people start buying Bitcoin because they expect it to go up, it will go up. But then they'll expect it to drop eventually, so they'll start selling. They don't want to be too late, so they'll sell earlier and earlier each bull run until eventually the increased scarcity from the halving is completely included in the price before the halving even happens.

I ignored your PM because that's not how this topic works. But even if you post here, clearly you didn't read the OP:
You have 2 Activity and 0 Merit. You can't vouch for anyone.

Thanks again for your flawless timing! My delay is because of the kids, they're both ill and needed attention. Lots of virusses going around schools lately.

That doesn't mean anything. If the site owner wants, he can store all passwords and the users won't know about it.

OP got banned, his "arguments" were based on his own lack of knowledge, so there's really nothing left to post here. I'd say stop bumping this topic. If anyone has anything to say about me later, please do it in LoyceV's reputation thread

I was already surprised the previous ATH was "round" instead of a very steep increase followed by a hard collapse.

As much as I expect a new ATH after the halving, there comes a day it won't happen.

Neutral tags aren't the problem, the problem is they should get banned.

So you're saying I can get a high-ranking shitcointalk account and sell it?

Sure they can, but who's going to pay a bunch of ugly guys for nudes?

That is a pity indeed

Let's be realistic: that's not going to happen.

And even for much smaller amounts: if it would be possible for any random forum on the planet to get more users by having them advertise on their own, thousands of forums would have done it by now.