The US doesn't give two ducks about any democracy; they care about the Oil and the Russian/Chinese investments in the country.  Yeah thats the exact reason. Its all about Russian/Chinese Issue. Worldwide politics already divided into two sides. Some Countries having friendship with US and others with Russia/China. In every single issues there always two sides debate. It's usually the US that starts bullshit like this; it's trivial when the majority of your population is well-trimmed sheep like quickseller. |
|
|
|
|
There really needs to be a post/activity limit for users that have zero merit. If you can reach 1k posts without receiving at least 1 merit, then something is wrong.
|
|
|
|
This makes my insides warm and fuzzy. Mother, am I famous enough now?  -snip-
Sorry I can't render more than 480p as the video resolution itself that I use is not that high.
I could help with that if you wanted me to. Those punch lines would be good if I added more, phrase like 'remove my -trust' and usual response of Lauda.
Bonus points for using some of my phrases (although others would probably know better which these are than I would), and even more bonus points for a voice-over by Emilia. Maybe you should ask me her?  |
|
|
|
OK, new limits:
- You can't give more than 5 ratings to a single user.
Excellent. - Your total sent ratings is limited to three times your activity, but at least 1.
Pro: New accounts can't go on insane spam trips. Con: Could hit rating. ~2100*3 = 6300. I'm at ~4k sent now.  - The comment length is limited to 600 characters, but each newline counts as 120 characters.
I believe that this is going to cause some issues with ratings such as: Accounts Connected: flight666 (uuid = 1156381), bravia (uuid = 1153507), uzayli (uuid = 1153499), valley365 (uuid = 150593), Askit2 (uuid = 48373), unois (uuid = 90957), dr1980m (uuid = 164392), anu (uuid = 22383), patts30 (uuid = 1321164), KaraSena (uuid = 1174407), ShapeofMyHeart (uuid = 1192057), Dnagelpen (uuid = 1174541), KisacaYatirimUzmani (uuid = 1191764), OggyBesiktas (uuid = 1174279), Kurabiye1132 (uuid = 1192051), LosPollosHermanos (uuid = 1191745), bexdever (uuid = 1321206), gkyldz (uuid = 1320872), differentsituation (uuid = 1321407), Afterweeks (uuid = 1320859), DC Comics (uuid = 1156610), Solarminer (uuid = 146231), silvestar (uuid = 154828), yuzdeyuzmalt (uuid = 1157441), Peacee (uuid = 1158789), HDIMI (uuid = 1157699), r1011 (uuid = 1156515), Devrialemci (uuid = 1174477), ShadowsComeBut (uuid = 1191779), Telzimba (uuid = 1315529), deebtt (uuid = 1321458), thatsfire (uuid = 1321575), grkms (uuid = 999398), saturn90 (uuid = 1321438), spoiled3 (uuid = 1321522), who should follow (uuid = 1321480), Faithh (uuid = 1191728), marsev2lw (uuid = 1361023), r3muhs (uuid = 1360998), platoon5 (uuid = 1321324), ntlah3 (uuid = 1360946), hudutf3 (uuid = 1321361), emptyforever (uuid = 1321300), earless1 (uuid = 1321153), albud4kfahri (uuid = 1320981), Hardlifeand (uuid = 1321128), getscissors (uuid = 1320920), Far01 (uuid = 1320896), JeffHG (uuid = 1315693), Autlook (uuid = 1315641), BliitzCrank (uuid = 1315682), Muradiye (uuid = 1315605), awesome31312 (uuid = 124001), Grankk (uuid = 1315555), Closing (uuid = 1315548), Smoke06 (uuid = 1159509), DeepOcean21 (uuid = 1160161), WillBeOk (uuid = 1159650), ParaHerif (uuid = 1160081), DeepCoin (uuid = 330235), Coffee06 (uuid = 1159484), Kutup Ayisi (uuid = 1153496).
Abusing signature/bounty campaigns.
This is ~1.7k characters.  Maybe add another step (e.g. after X rank and Y merit increase limit to 4-5k characters). |
|
|
|
This is what the user's reaction reminds me of: Not-safe-for-ears.
Update: theymos removed almost all of it. |
|
|
|
He did; we discovered an unusual case of >2k ratings sent by a single user due to new features introducted to BPIP.
Right. I still don't see a good enough reason for why one needs to give more than 5 legitimate feedbacks, let alone 10. My suggestion of 20 was rather generous, yes. Really? why is that?
I see things going two ways: - The trust mod abuses his power, and until things get resolved, the whole forum would be upside down. - The trust mod does his job, and some people would just create a fucking myriad of accounts , try to defame him in every way possible, and one mod won't be able to handle every single scenario instantaneously,people will start raging. And besides, he'd act based on his opinions, and a lot of people won't like his judgement regardless of the fact that however fair he is in terms of trust moderation. I think what cryptohunter really wants is to make me the lead trust moderator of this forum.  |
|
|
|
After the Ethereum Classic Vision hardfork, it is time of Ethereum Advance hardfork. So, what should we call them all? Both of them are hard-forks from Ethereum or clone-forks? If they are changing existing consensus rules at any point of time, then they are doing a hard fork. For the definition it does not matter whether there is consensus or not. You would say "Ethereum Advance was created by hard forking Ethereum" (or splitting from). |
|
|
|
~snip
I was wondering why you didn't come here to whisper and get me a tag. Still, your tag does not lower the importance of my words. I will keep posting what I think is right and good for the community my personal agenda. FTFY. You can continue to lie all you want as long as everyone is aware that you are dishonest (i.e. using someone else's account). |
|
|
|
The US taxes its citizens' income, and takes approximately 50% of income at the most, but the majority pay much less, and even those who earn a lot can lower this to roughly 28% via simple, legal tax strategies (long term capital gains). Taxes paid in the US more or less goes to providing services for the country as a whole, defending the country or goes to the less well off. Venezuela has seized nearly all income and resource producing assets, and including (hyper)inflation that the government directly causes, taxes its people at an effective rate at over 99%. Tax revenue in Venezuela largely benefits the political elite and well connected.
The exact same thing can be stated for the US; and if you claim otherwise you must be delusional. Do you need more bailouts and golden parachutes to prove otherwise? Can't afford medical care, but can afford to wage war on innocent countries/people. Citizens are free to criticize those in power in the US without consequence from the government, while those in power in Venezuela will see those who criticize (who have influence) arrested on bogus charges, or otherwise are subjected to violence from the government.
The same is mostly correct for Venezuela; stop reading massive media false news made in the US. Start reading independant media; i.e. media that actually has no corporate interests and written by the people that went to Venezuela to check it out. |
|
|
|
-snip-
The current government is doing very bad things to their citizens and anything of value given to the current government will be turned into resources that will help the current government stay in control (and continue starving, arresting without cause, and murdering their citizens).
Have you looked into a mirror recently to figure out which country has been doing this for decades? The US Warmongers need to stay out; if the current regime is to be overthrown, then it should be done without outside intervention. Once democracy is restored, the gold can be released. Obviously, socialism must also be done away with to.
The US doesn't give two ducks about any democracy; they care about the Oil and the Russian/Chinese investments in the country. |
|
|
|
The only reason for which he was not tagged sooner is his rank. Had it been a normal member they would long have been red (all the prior discussed things considered).
No, the only reason I am tagged is that I was trying to warn the community about your shady behavior and way of mutilating the trust system nothing else. It is pretty much clear to everyone that it is an attempt of all of your "cult" members to comment here with shady ways to put me into the worst situation. You are really pushing the boundaries of what is acceptable what is libel. Luckily for you most people are liberal when it comes to that around here (which I am completely against). Qwk has never sided with an opinion of mine just because it is "my opinion", so you can shove your bullshit elsewhere. Go back to the hole that you've crawled out of and try again with another hacked account. -snip-
But the thing is, this thread was here before the DT change. The only difference is that now you've responded to it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The user has been dodging everything ever since they weaseled their way into Meta to spread a false narrative. |
|
|
|
I just hope JusticeforYou can find an old usb drive with the backup for the lost private keys. I'm not sure what to think of the red tag.  -snip- The only reason for which he was not tagged sooner is his rank. Had it been a normal member they would long have been red (all the prior discussed things considered). -snip-
However, I'm not certain IP addresses from years ago mean much since many carriers have dynamic IPs.
Correct; it could be the same area though. However, JusticeForYou could simply claim they moved and thus (conveniently, again) aren't in the same area anymore. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I don’t think there is any argument to say that there is not consensus that lauda should be anywhere near DT based on the very high number of high ranking, trustworthy people that have explicitly excluded lauda from their trust lists. (Plus the number of lesser known people that have also explicitly excluded lauda).
Right, now excluded all those that I have rightfully negged from this list and you're down to what, maybe 10% of the original size? I don’t think there is any argument to say that there is not consensus that lauda should be anywhere near DT based on the very high number of high ranking, trustworthy people that have explicitly excluded lauda from their trust lists. (Plus the number of lesser known people that have also explicitly excluded lauda).
If enough DT1 members exclude Lauda then Lauda won't be in DT1 or even DT2. Your clumsy attempt to redefine consensus on whether someone "should be anywhere near DT" has been duly noted but luckily that's not how it works. There's nothing new to note; he tried this with either his alt gorgon or his main already quite some time ago. |
|
|
|
He only acts upon it in very extreme cases.
Didn't he delete some spam-feedback a while ago? He did; we discovered an unusual case of >2k ratings sent by a single user due to new features introducted to BPIP. |
|
|
|
While we are at it, why not limit the number of negative ratings that one user can give to another? Some sane limit e.g. 20 would be sufficient (AFAIK there has been no case where 10 was legitimately hit let alone more).
Instead of limit, a trust feedback cool down meter can be implemented. You can give only one feedback a day to a specific user. This will help in reducing trust spamming where a user is giving 50 long feedback in a day to a single user. For length, I like the idea of view more, or fix the length of trust feedback and user who like to write more can create a post and link to the feedback. How exactly is this a good idea? Mistakes tend to happen when writing or submitting feedback, thus I sometimes send out a rating to a specific user multiple times in a very small timeframe. -snip- Theymos has explicitly said Trust spam isn't allowed
However there's a lot of spam and very little is being done. He only acts upon it in very extreme cases. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Just cut the bullshit. Nobody is going to believe that, therefore you will remain tagged. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I too think there is an urgent need of forum endorsed guidelines to judge any case or else this is just turning into a total mess.
Which is a lie (neither is there any urgency nor is this place near the state of being a mess of that type); stop pushing false narratives using a hacked account. The end goal is to make account trading non-taggable again, and that is not going to happen. Your lies have really become tiring to read. |
|
|
|
|
While we are at it, why not limit the number of negative ratings that one user can give to another? Some sane limit e.g. 20 would be sufficient (AFAIK there has been no case where 10 was legitimately hit let alone more).
|
|
|
|
As promised, I have removed my false trust and replaced it with correct trust. You're welcome. Bad little foxy, bad!  -snip-
I haven't spoken to blazed in over a year and there are 5 other posters on DT that I communicate with more regularly than those above.
Blazed must be so busy supporting all of us that he barely has any time to talk to us. |
|
|
|
-snip- But hey, Lauda is the abuser  Depending on who you ask, some might say that there is obviously nothing wrong going on in that thread as it does not include a pro-Lauda statements.  I do kindly ask you to refer to me as if I were in my true form: As I was initiated into a cryptic cult with rites of the goddess Hecate, the renowned paranormal researcher William Blake caught this photograph of Lauda shapeshifted to the form of a flying catbat:  The witch LAUDAIdentified Flying Object (IFO)
(Better than a UFO. Much better than an ICO.) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
