 More garbage bites the dust. Crazy to imagine that this was "valued" @ $600m+. Source. |
|
|
|
The problem with most of these ICO projects is that they develop project that no one is interested to use, this is becoming a trend in the space that people think they can create a solution and then problem will arise. If all the research works were to be developed for enterprise then how do you think the world would be. This project to me seems like another money grab ICOs, I will SEC knock on their door soon.
Stop posting lies; that isn't well received around here. The project stands a fair chance. |
|
|
|
I personally talked with Ansaldo (Italy) contacts and they have NO IDEA who these guys are.
Sounds plausible.  |
|
|
|
 This is allegedly one of the Telegram admins from this project and his message from earlier this year. No wonder the money ran out.  |
|
|
|
|
"Good project sir, lambo soon". Maybe this will teach you to stop investing in worthless utility garbage.
|
|
|
|
What would be some good ideas to develop a database and rank how much time it is needed to sync given a certain setup? Someone needs to do this.
Nobody literally needs to do that. What nonsense are you blabbing about? |
|
|
|
Lol, there is no value that should be decided by the community. I know that you are full of hatred against deeponion, it is difficult to make a fair answer! But still thank you! @lauda
Monkeys can not produce value. Try again. Need detailed details to be convincing! Time can prove everything, there is no absolute truth. No one can believe in everything. Investment is our personal business and requires technical analysis! If you don't have this ability analysis technology, I can understand. There is nothing impossible in this world. Seriously stop shitposting. |
|
|
|
Lol, there is no value that should be decided by the community. I know that you are full of hatred against deeponion, it is difficult to make a fair answer! But still thank you! @lauda
Monkeys can not produce value. Try again. |
|
|
|
|
No, just no. Please close down your thread.
|
|
|
|
But it raises a question for me, why is syncing so hard on the HD? Blockchain is about 250G, that's only a few minutes for a SATA6 drive
You're not transferring data, you're downloading and validating it. The later being very resource heavy. When I look at the system performance it seems the HD is the bottleneck. CPU is only at 15%, RAM 3.9G/8G, Ethernet below 5%, but the HD is 100% flat.
You seem to have room for a large dbcache, that should help. Try setting it to 2 or 3 GB. So maybe SDD will improve sync, I will try that.
In most cases the HDD is the most limiting factor in sync speed, yes. |
|
|
|
Say what you want, but Segwit was a good thing for bitcoin. If it was not for Segwit, we would be paying higher fees today, and the network would be slower. Just imagine the network of 2015-2016 with the adoption of today, it would clog up.
And this is coming from someone who keeps most of his stash in legacy addresses, so no partisanship here.
Native Segwit is absurdly superior to the system that we had in place before. It's not even a debate. |
|
|
|
2. What we are discussing now is the privacy level of deepsend. If it can protect privacy very well, I think he has investment value. The current market value of deeponion is very low, and the price is about 0.2 USD.
It's irrelevant and valueless. Use Dash or Monero. |
|
|
|
Actually it's as Lauda says. The Segregated Witness thingy basically alters the transaction format so that certain (most) cryptographic proofs (the "witness") are not on the main blockchain (they're "segregated"). That's why space can be saved: segwit transactions can be stored more efficiently because some data can be discarded. This is why fees are significantly lower.
This is also incorrect. The signatures get stored in the chain as before, they just aren't counted towards the classic block size limit due to the segregation that you have mentioned. Space isn't saved, the chain size is growing much faster than ever. The ignorant/uneducated/bamboozled folk that said 'too little too late' were completely wrong; even this "little" increase is starting to become a mild issue. I'm not sure about this, maybe you are right.
In these matters, it's usually unwise to doubt my answer (if anything, it's usually just oddly written rather than incorrect).  |
|
|
|
another bcash idiot for my ignore list
saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
Saying that is actually wrong. You are mixing up SegWit and LN. LN is another layer. SegWit is part of Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
I remember that you said that deeponion developers can't make deepsend. From the perspective of two years, no scammer has managed to manage a project so much. Most of the ICO projects are basically dead, and airdrop project developers such as bitsend have given up. I am very confused, what kind of project is valuable? If deeponion is a scam, 99.9% of the projects are scams. Is there a project that does not lose money?
You don't need an 'if' in that part. Buy Bitcoin and stop giving your money to frauds. |
|
|
|
Am sure quater 4 will see wpp token in a new price, by then the tokens must have been tied to the product.
The tokens are already tied to the products; i.e. they got tied the minute partial payments for purchases were allowed in them. You might be referring to the planned peg as is written in the paper.
Latest information regarding exchange considerations were Bithump and Binance DEX, where I'm much more in favour of the former (otherwise WPP would have to issue a BEP2 token too). |
|
|
|
Transactions can be dropped out of the mempool without being confirmed.
For example if RBF is enabled.
He can trivially bypass that by double-checking the database entries periodically until there are multiple confirmations. Conflicts are marked accordingly by the software anyway. Hence: Not entirely true, but yes.
Huh oh. So if I will pick up the transaction from the mempool and update the balance in my DB. Then if due to RBF, I will pick up another transaction with a higher fee. The hash of that transaction will be different (since fee is kept inside the transaction). But how I will determine if this new transaction should replace the prior one so instead of increasing the balance in my DB I would just keep it as it is? You check whether each transactions have any confirmations after X time. The replaced transaction will not have any. |
|
|
|
WPP VORAX pricing begins at over 500k USD and up to over $30m. Add-on steam power generation packages for Waste To Energy are an extra cost
Delivery times vary from 3 months and up depending on the particular Vorax model ordered
Whooops ! That is a huge amount of money ... Can't really imagine how the half of $30m purchase made with wpp tokens .. i'm sure the market will sweep the sell orders up to $1 easily while you blinking. Impossible at current price and available market/market conditions, but will be possible later once they peg it as planned. There's a reason why it is 'up to 50%'. |
|
|
|
Garbage built on garbage chain. What's next? dang extra 50mill really  scam artist at its best  i knew nwex/nash/trash bs since the beginning....0.20cents incoming!!! Nash began with 20 million coins (sold at ICO) and now the coins in circulation almost doubled 36 million! No word about that from the team. Le'ts not forget this project is in development for 2 years, yet they have nothing to show. The CEO is acting arrogantly and makes huge promises that he can't live up to. He said that they are x100 better than binance and nash will crush them. Binance dex is live for 3 months and has 8m daily volume, whereas nash is still in Alpha, no ETA for exchange launch, huge delays. The team is just doing presentations around the world and hyping. I guess they need time to milk the investors, they must be busy dumping 18m tokens, not to mention they received 20 million dollars from the ICO. Also, there is no word about the "licenses". To me this project is turning into exit scam, too many red flags to ignore. Is this information 100% correct? If so, anyone who invested in the ICO can create a 2nd or 3rd type red flag on them and I'd support it (as well as neg. rating them of course). Contact me if you've been affected by this as an ICO investor. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
