Good job on diverting the thread btw. Sterling work.
It's not diverted; it's related to your motivations on why you make predictions, and why you give out malicious and dishonest opinions. Very much on topic.  I will be propagating the flag elsewhere, especially since you agree with it which makes it even more legitimate. I'll also be participating in this thread in order to reduce harm to any potential readers. Cheers. Do FortuneJack pay you per post? Looks wholesome that site, gambling *and* altcoins! You are so bitcoin it hurts. I assume you are making sure not to advertise to people that live in territories where gambling is illegal?
Look at me being concerned for other people's well being. so scam. wow.
Now this is called proper diversion, against the forum rules and poisoning the well while at it. Good job. |
|
|
|
Big guns are out! I must have a compelling case  Lets make it crystal clear what is going on here: Any newbies (or in fact anyone) reading this, please don't trade based on anything I post.To that end, I've added support for your flag warning others. You'll note *my posts are not investment advice* in my signature . (You know that place where most people link to some pump and dump coin or ICO scam!) Such scammer. Wow. 1) Unless that is added to every post and on every page that is useless. 2) Many people don't read the signature or have the element disabled. 3) It still influences them even if they read that warning, especially the highly susceptible ones. Such non-advice advice is very dangerous. |
|
|
|
I'm actually glad that I'm not near winning this one.  5100 Lauda Wtf for a bear are you, actually that was quiet bullish at that time  I thought I was actually being rather generous with that one. I'm absolutely not bearish and believe that every Bitcoin bear is either dishonest (e.g. invested elsewhere and spreading malicious propaganda), ignorant or outright stupid (or a combination of those three). Those three classifications are enough to cover every Bitcoin bear that you've ever met. I wasn't expecting all the positive unforeseen developments to happen before this summer (a full year before the halving). Well there's still 16 days to go guys While it would make absolutely no sense for Bitcoin to break below USD 6000,- until then, Bitcoin's market behaviour rarely ever makes sense. It's been making more sense lately and less likely to make a dramatic swing in either direction due to bad/good news.
I must not forget to insert this every once in a while. I'm like a witness. |
|
|
|
You have a man who has been successful in the field of games like Alfred, this is a good step to plan ahead, Alfred's presence will help develop Ecomi
You'll be surprised at what's coming in the near future. People who aren't in the Telegram channel aren't probably familiar with what has been going on since I've posted this thread. |
|
|
|
Masterluc posted a 3-month head and shoulder chart without any comment but a laugh.
On that chart, we're at the top of the right shoulder.
Most head and shoulder charts are scam. Some get it right by pure coincidence (1mil predictions, 1 bound to be right). Ignore. |
|
|
|
Will keep expanding list. That's why I will be forever grateful to Roger Ver: he basically gave me some of his BTC for free.
Bitcoin Gold is far better. Less scammy and decent return if you sold them at the right time (4-5%). |
|
|
|
Or maybe BTC would have had the full combined price and maybe even more?
I don't think those shitcoins has any effect in bitcoins prize. I am talking about the time when the fork happened on August 2017. It is a valid theory that BCH "extracted" some value (price wise) from BTC even if that was hard to notice due to the exponentially price increase it was happening. It was the right time to deploy it; if it was started in a bear market it would be dead and there would be no BSV either. |
|
|
|
The first 2 flags don't have a broken contract. (That's why theymos opposed them) I think you should re-create those flags. Who gives a duck what theymos thinks. If he wants to protect scammers and enable them to further scam it is his choice. I shall not. Now go away/stop following me - by harassing me you are committing implied direct contractual harm to me. |
|
|
|
Cryptocurrency, like any other asset, is valued based on mass shared belief Stop with the "belief" bullshit. Might wanna get your story straight guys. You might want to stop conning newbies idiot. Flag support for warning of danger (based on the reference link from Maxwell): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=103 |
|
|
|
May be you will win some BTC. It's only 0.002BTC to join.
This only might be a lot of money in the future. I'd rather not. |
|
|
|
It's very simple PoW > the rest. For the altcoins you might want to ask for input in the altcoin section. However, you are very likely just going to receive shill responses by bagholders. DYOR. Unproven and lacks incentives. It's way overhyped to the point that I'd almost call it worthless. |
|
|
|
here's why "climate change" should never become humanity's focus ... imagine exhausting the global economy and killing off significant proportions of populations in the name of "the environment" ... and then god shows up to roll the dice on humans?? https://www.colorado.edu/today/2019/06/05/superflareshumanity has bigger problems to exhaust our known available energies and resources against than preserving a fictiously 'pristine', unobtainable environment nirvana. So that's the good reason to go on shitting where we eat, because a solar flare or an asteroid or something might show up and make the whole thing moot? ... smh It isn't. Humans, as they are living today, are the cancer to the planet. They should strive to remain effective while maximizing efficiency - just like Bitcoin Core is doing for Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
What sgbett either fails to understand, or is just completely lost on him, is that it does not matter if BSV or some other fork portends to be "closer to Satoshi's vision", or has a savior named CSW, or whatever blah blah blah.
Cryptocurrency, like any other asset, is valued based on mass shared belief. Meaning it is a belief-driven personality contest among the masses, with the spoils going to the victor. The users vote with their fiat, the merchants vote with their support of selling goods for it, the brokers vote with their support, the investors vote with their investment fiat, the miners vote with how much machine mining power they are willing to devote to it. BitcoinTM is the clear winner of this widespread support in the ecosystem.
In the court of public opinion, BSV and all the other Bitcoin forks have already been evaluated, judged, and summarily discarded. BSV is regarded as dubious at best, and a complete scam at worst. CSW has only made that image worse, because he is a complete fraud and a Narcissistic snake oil salesman. And it gets worse by the day, every single time he opens his mouth. Same with Bitcoin Cash and Roger Ver. Two sides of the same "coin", so to speak.
It's not like the masses are going to suddenly have some kind of magical "aha!" eureka moment and go, "Oh yeah, it was BSV all along that is the one true Bitcoin! My my, how we were fooled for so long!" Ain't going to happen, that moment took the mass public all of about 3 seconds to evaluate and come to the conclusion that BCash and BSV are both bullshit scams.
There is no reversing that conclusion. That ship has sailed.
This forum has attracted many idiots who don't understand this. The market cap evaluation of BSV or Bcash or whatever is irrelevant, they are fraudulent copy-cat coins. Price, hashrate, nor anything can nor will change this.
Note to public: Do not listen to sgbett or you will get burned. BSV has absolutely zero merit from a technical basis. This is cryptography, i.e. math, not a religion. Stop with the "belief" bullshit. |
|
|
|
I'm actually glad that I'm not near winning this one. |
|
|
|
Time to attack $9k again?  soon TMbut need to wait, though when we do $10k is not so far behind as 8 was from 7 and closer than 9 will be to 8. Properly breaching $10k will be lovely, but hopefully not the same as breaching $9k was. |
|
|
|
Time to attack $9k again? Indeed Your hat has made Vegeta temporarily weak I'm afraid. You must train harder. |
|
|
|
Time to attack $9k again? |
|
|
|
What we can do now with flags and abusers...? Do are they candidates for flags? Which one? Still very busy day here to changing home. I need to fully understand the new system.
You can't flag any alt ring with any flag-type without violations. If the alt-ring has successfully abused at least 1 bounty, then you can use flag type 1 which is basically worthless (nobody cares about any "#" symbols nor yellow warnings). Enjoy. |
|
|
|
The selective enforcement part is confusing the hell out of me because you seem to be supporting Tecshare's claim from that thread from years ago linked earlier, yet you don't support the argument he made. I don't know much about what you are talking about with EFS, so unless its very relevant to your point, I'll skip it. If its important, I'll look up some threads about it.
I support his claim that there is selective enforcement, not his particular instance. I haven't gone in depth into that thread to be able to support the particular claim. Meriting =/= support. You can leave negative feedback just as you've always done. You can't flag him though. Flag = Help! I've been scammed! Negative feedback = Watch out, this guy is shady! I'm not sure why you are under the impression that you have no recourse against scammers now just because there is now a distinct warning and alarm system. If you haven't been scammed, you post a warning. If you have been scammed, you signal the alarm.
This is completely wrong. You forget that: 1) There is no trust score. 2) There is no bold red - it is now orange. Orange is not a colour of danger nor warning. 3) There is no warning written on someone with negative ratings. Every single scammer ever has been let loose. You seem to actively fight this fact (cognitive dissonance makes accepting this hard, which in return further strengthens the scammers' positions). The flags are for "I"ve been scammed!" and misrepresenting your feedback is the only thing that counts as trust abuse in my eyes anyway.
Fun. I suggest we add QS next to DT1. Maybe his pal TF too. Where's the contract violation? Clown-forum.
You can stop responding to me and discuss it with others. Claiming that we have a warning system when there is actually no warning written after someone received a negative tag is just factually wrong. The rest you can debate ad-naseum; re: who is right/wrong. I am no longer interested in this particular discussion. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
