Hi, zawawa! Are you still fighting with windmills? I repeat my old question. When are you going to release competitive miner for any card or algo?
Please come back after you carefully study the latest version of GGS. can you publish some speed results, e.g. for sapphire nitro+ rx480 8gb samsung or reference vega64 or vega56. Let's say ... for cryptonight v7 and cryptonight heavy. Or maybe some other algos you feel GGS is doing good
|
|
|
Hi, zawawa! Are you still fighting with windmills? I repeat my old question. When are you going to release competitive miner for any card or algo?
|
|
|
i switched about 90% of my hashpower yesterday from ETH to CryptonightV7 (via Nicehash) since it's so profitable.
reasons for using nicehash instead of monero directly.
1. simplicity is valuable to me, no need to manually trade 2. I try to only deal in coins supported by coinbase/GDAX. Since I'm US based, they're really the only exchange i trust. 3. NH pays me in BTC, which I trade straight to ETH for HODLing. 4. NH is still paying significantly more than mining ETH straight 5* (Bonus for everyone on cryptonightV7) Power use is about 30% lower than ETH! lower electric cost and lower heat all around
you can certainly make more mining Monero straight if you dont mind trading on second tier exchanges (IMO), and the little bit of extra work. Personally I'm more interested in the long term prospects of ETH so that's what im focused on holding and putting my efforts towards.
So you are supporting ETH - the coin that is going to leave gpu miners alone with asics and pos centralization. Rich become more rich ))
|
|
|
There are a lot cryptonight miners around that a much better than Claymore's. So if he doesn't want to continue development - leave 0% fee and exit is a right move!
Name it. xmr stak cast xmr sgminer-gm 5-5-5 SRBminer
|
|
|
@heavyarms1912
do you use the same soft_pp mod for your vega 64s (if u have 64s ofc)? Or do you have a different one for 64s? If so can u post that one too?
Yes. Although mine's a Vega 56 BIOS modded to V64. EDIT: Got better results on xmr-stak for crytonight-heavy. Now get 1500 H/s at 1408/1100 clocks and 160w power from wall https://imgur.com/a/fT38Lso this is even if you disable enable the vegas, uploaded the reg mod, (basically the standard way)? didnt know the hashrate dropped that much, I thought you should be getting 2kh/s just like before the fork you won't get similar performance before the fork. The algorithm isn't cryptonight anymore it's cryptonight-heavy (more memory intensive). Hello what miner settings you are using ? Thanks
Check few pages back. I posted my views. New results. I have been testing on 18.3.4drivers and get 1460 H/s @ 1485/1100 clocks @ 906mV so what kind of hashrate am i expecting from a vega 64 or 56 flashed to 64? 1.7-1.8k ? In my tests my ref vega56 flashed to vega64 and running 1408/1150 was doing 1500-1540h/s on cryptonight heavy. But with original vega64 aio I cannot get more than 1450h/s. And all this have stability issues and hashrate drops when running together in a rig, not one by one. Very weird ((
|
|
|
Someone sells SPmod of x16r???
find miner z-enemy, it's faster and more stable than the one that supposedly offers SP this is especially noticeable on cards 1080ti and he only takes 2% of dev Free unlike miner JV for which you pay for the purchase, so inside and 2% of its screwed enemy's miner has only 1% fee, not 2%
|
|
|
That's a nice HBM clock you have there! With Stak-XMR set intensity to 1008/904, worksize 4 or 8, strided index 2, mem chunk 8 or 16. Should get you over 1500H/s https://www.upload.ee/image/8299205/memchunk16.PNGOr use SRBminer, really easy to set up and only 0,85% dev fee. Dual threads and intensity 60 nets also 1500H/s https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3167363.0Weird thing with my Vega is that I have to restart the miner several times until the first hashrate reports are above 1500, then it stays like that... Thanks for reply! Are you on latest drivers? With aug23 blockchain drivers I got very weird results ...
|
|
|
There are a lot cryptonight miners around that a much better than Claymore's. So if he doesn't want to continue development - leave 0% fee and exit is a right move!
|
|
|
heya i´v been looking for alternative for cryptonight for my vegas and i found Claymore´s neosrypt miner in which vega can hit 2,2 mhrate any1 using it ? seems like more profitable atm
It will take 250-280 watt per properly downvolted card to achieve this speed. Not good at all ((
|
|
|
cannot get more than 1400h/s from my vega64 1408/1150 ((
|
|
|
For the long run starting price of the device doesn't matter to much. Only efficiency (hash per watt) counts. At this sense bitmain e3 is no better than current gpu rigs.
|
|
|
12 hours ago Monero hardforked. Only 39 blocks have been found vs 360 blocks in the old POW algo. (10.8%) 90% of the network was asic's and botnet's!!
9/10 of the miners are gone, so in a few hours/days you can multiply the monero profit with 10. The fastest nvidia miner is the sp-mod and does 600hash/s on the gtx 1060 3gb. (80 watt). I haven't released a monerov7 yet, but might do it later.
a lot of gpu miners didn't re-adjust rigs to new V7 algo, so it is not only asics who dropped the hash And the diff is still rising (don't know why) - so it is very unprofitable to mine xmr now
|
|
|
I think you forgot some not very profitable but interesting way - some crowdfunding to release your miner opensourced ))
|
|
|
Something is very strange, on fairpool i still using CASTXMR ... CASTXMR support this fork for now or not ? because i submitting shares without any problem ... i think that i must switch to xmr-stak, but seems that is not need it.....
Yes, for some reason fairpool accepts old miner shares - std cryptonight. Hashvault rejects old miner shares and accepts only new xmr-stack with sumokoin option. I think it is a reason why all is not going good with sumokoin mining ATM ... Its an issue with fairpool, in the past fairpool showed cryptonight-lite shares accepted while mining a standard cryptonight coin, of course you were not receiving any rewards. Mining of cryptonight-heavy is just fine afaik For testing purposes I leave my old gtx750 minining classic cryptonight connected to fairpool's sumokoin stratum. It shows correct speed on web-ui and adds some small reward to my balance. So this is obvious a problem. Some miners send correct "heavy" shares but some easy "classic" shares and all are paid. So "honest heavy" miners get much less than expected.
|
|
|
Something is very strange, on fairpool i still using CASTXMR ... CASTXMR support this fork for now or not ? because i submitting shares without any problem ... i think that i must switch to xmr-stak, but seems that is not need it.....
Yes, for some reason fairpool accepts old miner shares - std cryptonight. Hashvault rejects old miner shares and accepts only new xmr-stack with sumokoin option. I think it is a reason why all is not going good with sumokoin mining ATM ...
|
|
|
I've put alot of hours in my mod. 32 algos 80bit / 64bit. I don't want to spread my hard work, and let you copy my shit and spread it for free.
What do you mean by 32 algos? Take a look to the ccminer x16r code @ github and you will see ...
|
|
|
My latest mod is 20% faster. Go back to ethereum mining please. I will harvest all your raven profit... new enemy 1.04 is much faster so shut up your scam ))) Please provide the link for the enemyminer 1.04? yep.where do you find this version? Nowhere to find. enemy 1.04 is in the same situation as raven_sp_mod. Nobody can find it but it exists ))
|
|
|
@rednoW
Did you end up switching over to 18.3.4? I'm adding a card to an existing rig and thinking about trying it out tonight. Seems like people are jumping on 18.3.4 and Cast.
I'm still on Stak 2.3 with blockchain drivers. I generally prefer what I can compile.
Not yet, this rig is rather old and stable and I don't wanna mess with it. I'm thinking about adding some new non-refs to my ryzen-based rig, if I do I'll try new drivers.
|
|
|
So which one is the best x16r miner so far? everyday more and more are being released...
opensourced suprnova miner is good and actively developed
|
|
|
One more question - does it have dual bios?
|
|
|
|