You could simply provide the evidence to your campaign manager, he'd understand and would count your posts by date of posts, not total count. You're missing the point (no surprise there). This has nothing to do with campaign managers. |
|
|
|
This raise concern that why he preferred to move an English topic to a non-English board [his local of-course] and expected it to be deleted or already deleted. Maybe this is the reason: I personally process reports regardless of the date of the post or topic. |
|
|
|
I am not afraid of Ledger stealing the keys. Stealing will land them in prison, so that's not my biggest worry. But leaking the keys is a real risk. |
|
|
|
Yehey another Ratimov topic! I noticed Ratimov has been deleting content from his own topics, after which he must have reported it and Mods deleted the topics (in that post I linked 58 topics). Speculation is this is to hide traces of his past plagiarism, but I can't know his reasons for sure. The timing is at least peculiar after his DT1-status was questioned again. He now also deleted 6 of my posts from his self-moderated topics, and deleted all other posts from others users too. I find it utterly disrespectful to do this on a forum. It also means I never want to post in any of his self-moderated topics again, so Ratimov is now on my Ignore list. Ratimov - 2 Years on Bitcointalk + Giveaway !!!: 69 posts, 46 Merits earned. 6k Merit Club. When is Legendary ?: 74 posts, 12 Merits earned. I was curious how many Merits he earned in the past for the other topics he's now deleting, so I checked: in those 58 topics, he earned 202 Merits. Apparently users valued those posts a lot more than he values them by himself. No spamSelf-moderated against spam. That's how this feature should be used.Discussion is of course welcome. I will delete insults from digaran. Even better, I'll delete all his posts here. He's on my ignore list for a reason. |
|
|
|
What I say is simple: do not have Ledger Wallet installed on your PC; use Electrum or another wallet to access Ledger; and never do this type of configuration.
This is clear for anyone who wants to continue using their HW Ledger. How safe is that against a thief who steals your Ledger and uses "Recover" to extract your seed phrase from the "secure" element? |
|
|
|
If system is bad it doesn't really matter how many people in the system are ''good'' or ''bad''. This comes to mind: “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.”. First improve DT system, than ask people to join or leave. I've seen several suggestions, and my favourite is still to require more than one DT1-vote to reach DT2, but I doubt there's a perfect solution. |
|
|
|
I guess it has to do with the amount of transactions received by mempool.space's nodes, but why was it so high? Is it just that nodes were rebroadcasting purged transactions? That sounds plausible. Fees were going up, transactions were dropping, and I assume every RBF counts as a new transaction. But still, that would mean each transaction got several fee bumps. |
|
|
|
Additionally, following BIP-39 is better than following a non-standard approach. Most of the time, people who try to implement something unique and non-standard end up losing money. That's why you should always test your backups before funding any wallet. |
|
|
|
the BIP39 encrypted key have been exposed online for almost 7 years now... It's BIP38, not BIP39. I know, because I've made the same mistake in the past.... The password is over a 100 symbols long... Given that $1000 was not enough to crack just 6 characters in 2 years (even after giving hints), this doesn't really prove anything. It's probably easier to "guess" the private key itself than guessing your 100 characters. |
|
|
|
I've said it before: when I read such feedback, filled with name calling, I don't take it seriously. And it tells me a lot about the user who left that feedback. The same feedback left by different users can have a completely different weight, regardless of the personal trust list. Good point. If one person calls someone an idiot, I assume it's just name calling. But if many people call someone an idiot, he may just be an idiot  From the top of my mind I can think of few other members who deserve to be expelled from DT1 for abuse of trust system, but they are still there.
I am really glad I left DT1 on my own, and it will stay like that until I see some real changes, not just cosmetic trim. DT1 is a voting system. If good people leave, only the bad people are left. So leaving the system makes it worse.
Because Ratimov deleted his posts I noticed this: Remove topic: 7ш in topic #5279577 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 67ш in topic #5208524 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 90 in topic #5205419 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 67щ in topic #5262852 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 78щ in topic #5270433 by member #2627711
Remove topic: ш78ш78 in topic #5197199 by member #2627711
Remove topic: ш67 in topic #5271720 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 56о in topic #5275510 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 8з98 in topic #5234373 by member #2627711
Remove topic: з89 in topic #5244445 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 67ш67ш in topic #5264934 by member #2627711
Remove topic: ш in topic #5266039 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 7ш in topic #5268291 by member #2627711
Remove topic: щ8 in topic #5255387 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 67ш in topic #5278723 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 8щ in topic #5276423 by member #2627711
Remove topic: з89з in topic #5279542 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 0 in topic #5282751 by member #2627711
Remove topic: г65 in topic #5274474 by member #2627711
Remove topic: щ8 in topic #5288483 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 8з9 in topic #5291324 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 0 in topic #5291883 by member #2627711
Remove topic: щ87 in topic #5292640 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 9809 in topic #5293116 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 90х in topic #5298542 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 0- in topic #5338763 by member #2627711
Remove topic: щ8 in topic #5343064 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 90х09х in topic #5343600 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 89з in topic #5351935 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 67ш in topic #5356164 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 0== in topic #5359438 by member #2627711
Remove topic: щ7 in topic #5378021 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 89з in topic #5391066 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 67ш67 in topic #5443847 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 909 in topic #5458099 by member #2627711
Remove topic: -0 in topic #5459930 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 4е3 in topic #5346126 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 5е44 in topic #5349539 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 23к in topic #5221142 by member #2627711
Remove topic: н in topic #5251444 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 4 in topic #5251653 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 34е in topic #5252077 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 56576 in topic #5253323 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 54 in topic #5253923 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 23 in topic #5255508 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 45н in topic #5255826 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 54н54 in topic #5257953 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 6677 in topic #5258644 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 345345 in topic #5259217 by member #2627711
Remove topic: е334 in topic #5270643 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 333333333333 in topic #5270845 by member #2627711
Remove topic: --- in topic #5273379 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 34е34 in topic #5266310 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 4н45 in topic #5227237 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 54 in topic #5279300 by member #2627711
Remove topic: ноен in topic #5279333 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 34534 in topic #5279365 by member #2627711
Remove topic: 324 in topic #5279541 by member #2627711 What's up with that? |
|
|
|
Let's read some neutral feedback. I've said it before: when I read such feedback, filled with name calling, I don't take it seriously. And it tells me a lot about the user who left that feedback. If any of these were applied to your feedback page, I am sure you would not mind at all. It's not pretty indeed. |
|
|
|
But don't pay too much attention to my opinion, because I don't really understand the trust system and the long history of this system. Read more, post less, so you can stand by your opinion when you share one. |
|
|
|
Many things are handled by trust system that shouldn't be handled. True. But that doesn't mean I can't advocate the correct use of the Trust system. Someone is pissed, they will leave a neutral note with insults on the trust feedback
Someone thinks the other one is not writing up to the standard posts, they will write these or that guy is a spammer. I don't mind the neutral tags much. But negative (and positive) lose their value if they're often used incorrectly. |
|
|
|
you can easily spend $10,000 to become a reputable member with hundreds of "good" feedbacks. How many scammers have you seen who are willing to spend $10k on their image? By the time they've done that, they have an actual reputation to lose. Anyways I wouldn't trust anonymous individuals with money, no matter what, unless they reveal their ID for the public. An ID from someone in another country won't do you any good.
Let's face it: this idea I posted 4 years ago won't get implemented. |
|
|
|
Can you allow access for Tor browsers? I get this: Error: Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL / from this server. |
|
|
|
Not like website at all. It had login and password much like website. This is slightly confusing.... Something very close to bictoin-core. Bitcoin Core doesn't have a "login", but you can set a password. In this case you'll be looking for a file called wallet.dat, if you don't have it, and don't have a backup, you can't access your Bitcoins. If you could, Bitcoin wouldn't be secure. |
|
|
|
it's hard to convince myself, at least at the moment, that theft -- intellectual theft, in this case -- does not fall under the cases when negative feedback can be used. I'm more pragmatic: plagiarism is dealt with by forum rules, and if something is handled by forum rules, it shouldn't be handled by the Trust system. Sadly, it would be no point in reporting those posts, because they are older than 6 months and reports will get (almost) automatically marked as Bad. I've reported old posts, and as long as it's for the right reasons (so not " We generally do not moderate posts this old for on-topicness, substantiveness, multi-posting, and other "cleanliness" issues."), it gets handled. Why care about Bad reports anyway? I think of Bad reports as "proof" I don't only report the obvious cases, but also report the edge cases where the Mod can decide. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is going up, time to resurrect this topic! Unfortunately, imgur.com stopped working on Bitcointalk, so please use TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk now. Even better if you updated your old post in this topic if the image is no longer working. I may delete all "dead" posts in the future, they make it less fun to scroll through this topic.Allow me to highlight this:
Please only post embedded images (use [ img] URL.jpg[ /img] tags), with a short explanation.
Self-moderated
Please only post embedded images (use img-tags), with a short explanation. If you're a Newbie, you can't post images.
If you don't post an image, I'll delete your post. |
|
|
|
For what it's worth: I haven't excluded Ratimov, but I don't see his feedback by default. The other users on my Trust list take care of it already. For consistency purposes, to say the least, perhaps you could act now like in TL's case? I try to be very conservative with negative feedback and trust exclusions. I think this is part of what got my my "Switzerland" nickname. Timelord's feedback had been off for years. In this case, I still hope both of you will see you're doing it wrong. That includes your latest negative feedback: I think that one should also be neutral. My reviews will soon be added to your profile and will hang there until you provide evidence that I deceived someone, stole something and what my frauds were. Without providing this evidence, you are 100% a trust abuser who is using negative trust to make false accusations that are not supported by evidence. Again: I think this should still be neutral. Ignore each other and move on with your life. Both of you are still doing the exact opposite of what you should be doing: I encourage people to try to "bury the hatchet" and de-escalate rather than trying to use any increased retaliatory power you now have. because of the spineless nature of DT1 there is basically no recourse. Suggestion: ask theymos to undo your own DT1-exclusion and make your Trust list mean something for voting again  it is now clear that he also broke rule 27. Great. Report it. Let the Mods decide. Move on. I'm disappointed that as a non-DT member, DT is increasingly losing credibility with their respective bullshit and reputation fights. That's easy to solve: remove DefaultTrust from your Trust list, and only rely on your personal selection.
If I'd be into playing games, I could come up with something like: "The first one who makes the negative neutral gets on my Trust inclusions list, and the other gets excluded. But, that by itself would be Trust abuse, so I'm not doing that. Either way, this whole thing is still getting out of hand.Which one of you is going to be the bigger man? Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility ( source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement. If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
