Because I'm not the one making extraordinary claims. You want people to take you seriously, you do the experiment, then show us.

Why should anyone listen to an exposed fraudster?

So? We've got people here who believe in perpetual motion machines; that the world is being controlled by Jews, lizards, and/or Jewish lizards; that aliens walk among us; that humans can survive without food; and IPU knows what other nonsense. The Speculation forum in particular attracts many people who don't understand how financials markets work or even basic economics for that matter. These people are immune to basic logic, and I doubt you'll be able to convince them of anything, though you're of course welcome to try.

I didn't even bother reading the thread you're referring to, as the whole premise is ridiculous on its face and really not worth responding to at all.

If you think that'll help.

I can't speak for the rest of the forum, but I don't think any of those things, except perhaps for the implosion of the dollar. Though I don't think it's going to happen anytime soon, of course, or that it'll be so sudden that nothing can be done about it when it happens.

This is Economics 101. Tell us something we don't already know.

Yet somehow these "errors" don't seem to affect the accuracy of the GPS system, or gravitational lensing, or the orbit of Mercury, or any of the numerous experiments proving relativity. Explain that.

That equation is as nonsense as mass = time. The units are different. Now, if it was watts = volts x some constant that is independent of current, that would at least not be nonsense, but it predicts that heat will be emitted by a circuit in which no current is flowing, which is obviously false. If you wish people to think you are not completely retarded, please provide an actual, working, electric circuit that produces heat without current flowing through it.

The errors in that document are so numerous and elementary that they would embarrass a high-school physics student, which isn't surprising given its source. Are you going to respond to my challenge or not?

While the Generalised Asshole Proportionality Exponent has historically been inversely correlated with price, most experienced traders have found that assholes follow price rather than vice versa, so it is not a very useful indicator.

Then Joule's first law and Maxwell's equations (and hence the entirety of electrodynamics) are wrong. Please present a new set of electrodynamic laws that both:

a) makes accurate predictions about the behaviour of actual electromagnetic systems, which have been studied in detail and found to be consistent with the currently understood laws of physics; and
b) predicts the production of power using voltage without current. Please also present experimental evidence confirming this prediction.

If you are unable to do so, I will be forced to conclude you are either stupid or trolling.

In that case, explain how they work in old radio transmitters (which clearly require electromagnetic effects).

Explain how these radiant shockwaves work.

On second thought, why bother? Voltage without current (or vice versa, as can be achieved with superconductors) means no power, and hence no energy. What good does that do?

Current drops in the same proportion. It is balanced.

Well, I've emailed PiratePoint (the domain registrant), since they're apparently the last people to successfully communicate with them, telling them to relay my messages to them. It's a long shot, but it's literally the only contact information I have. If I don't get a satisfactory response, I think I can safely say I've been scammed.

No, extra volts at the same current means extra power. A Tesla coil (or, indeed, any transformer) reduces current in proportion to the voltage increase, so the output power is exactly equal to the input power minus power lost due to inefficiencies.

No. No, it isn't.

That's ridiculous. By that logic, I've committed bestiality.

Yeah, it's working now. Guess the universe isn't going to be destroyed after all. How disappointing.

Or maybe the universe did get destroyed by my non-existence, and this is a parallel universe in which I do exist. Of course, since we can't interact with the original universe, there's no way to prove this, so people will just have to take me at my word that I destroyed the universe. So the legend goes.

He's 3' 13" tall (4' 1"). At 72 kg, that would make him a morbidly obese dwarf, and therefore unable to wear ordinary clothes.

Obese or not, as a clerk in a butcher shop, he weighs meat.

What is a "serious" error? I was under the impression that an error of any seriousness will cause configure to abort without producing a makefile.

Some file managers do not use the executable flag to determine if a particular file is executable, instead they attempt to determine the file format, which seems to fail on certain types of ELF binaries, with the file manager thinking the executable is instead a shared library, despite the flags. This is a bug which should be reported to developers of the file manager in question (if it isn't already reported).

At the risk of stating the obvious, nobody. The company administering the ETF is not publicly traded, and shares in the ETF are not shares in the company.

That's highly misleading, as those are just the posts that weren't deleted, ie, they're the best of the best. I remember a lot of his single-sentence posts weren't even remotely on-topic, and some were just complete nonsense. I'm surprised he wasn't banned sooner.

Bornil, you fully deserved to be banned and it's no use acting surprised about it.

They are the main indicators you have selected under Settings. Default indicators are moving averages for the past 7 (blue) and 30 (yellow) time intervals.