This must be a valid reasoning, never got chances to think this way. I am also always looking for no KYC casinos but not because of afraid about the reason you have mentioned here but to ensure without having any problem in my gambling activities. I am not sure about enforcing KYC is how much helpful for gambling houses but from a gamblers' perspective it is really frustrating.

To ensure no KYC always then you need to check for the registration details of a casino as only where a casino got registered must influence their stand on KYC requirements. If their government never bother on collecting details then I guess a casino may remain no KYC until government change their stand.

Before I sell my assets, I always have plans of what I’m going to be doing with the money that I am getting from it.
I have other businesses that I am doing, so any money that I’m getting from selling my cryptocurrencies are either going into that business or maybe an important expenses that I have to make: but I hardly sell my crypto currencies when is just an expenses that I want to make with the money, because I can easily just use my Fiat to settle whatever expenses that I’m having and not touching my cryptocurrencies.

Anyone who is selling their cryptocurrency should know for a fact that they are no longer in possession of it, once you sell it, it is gone for good.

As for my country, I would say that a lot of people here wants to make money, but they are afraid to take the risk that are involved. A lot of people are always afraid of stepping out of their comfort zone, because they are afraid of what would happen, they're afraid that they're going to lose, which might be the case sometimes.

But, for you to move forward you always have to take risk, and when I mean risk, I mean taking the right risk and not doing the wrong things just because of money. It’s good to have money, but when you are doing the wrong things because of money, that’s when it gets bad. Here in my country nobody sees investments as a bad thing, It is just that they are afraid of it.

I think if you still compare the both of them on a long term basis, Litecoin is going to be better than this Litecoin cash. Just because this one is having a short term increase in price doesn’t mean that it is now better than the main Litecoin. Let’s hope that this is not just a short term breakout. If I’m choosing any coin I prefer to choose coins that are going to benefit me on a long term and not just fora short term. Because if you should invest in a coin that is going to only last for the short term, you are not really going to benefit from it especially when you invest in it at the time when it is late.

I believe pancake and uniswap have the biggest road to glory right now. They are definitely not utilized enough for the token itself, it is utilized more for the swaps and that is going to eventually get it to a higher level. Of course this may take a while, maybe it will be the next bull run in few years, maybe after the next bitcoin halving, but I believe that both of them have easy 10x written all over them. What we need to do right now is just buy and hold, if you get scared and sell them the moment they have a small drop then you are not going to be making any profit from them at all.

I personally hope that we will do a lot better, it will not be today so people will not believe me. However in few years, when the price of uni token is 300-400 dollars and cake reaches 200 dollars, people will say "I wish I invested earlier" and I will be making bank at the time.

Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=128443
Current amount of posts (including this one): 2126
How much merit have you earned in the last 120 days: 18
SegWit BTC Address for Payouts:  bc1qk433zfr078qxjf300k4eva9unahql5w59eyaqy

I wouldn't bet on apeswap being huge in the future, they are looking like another failed project to me. I am not some wizard with orb to see the future, I am just predicting like any other person. However, when the market returned to ATH levels once again and a token is still 80% down compared to their ATH 5 months ago, that tells me maybe they are not doing that great. All in all they could have been doing better, maybe not reach the ATH level but at least reach to a level where it is definitely a good 10-15% down and that would be fine.

Looking at how people are staying away from it, and there is no more hype around it, and projects are staying away from their router, I would say that it is highly unlikely that they would recover. This is only my guess though, I do not know the future so I might be wrong. Wait.. we are on chips.gg topic, how did I got into talking about ape lol . Back into topic, adding ANY coin/token is great for casino, because there is no downside, at worst people will not play with it and that's it.

The worst part is that we have to do something like that in order to withdraw our money. I had some ETH in here back in the day, it was a very very small amount, like 9 dollars or something like that I believe, and I couldn't withdraw it because it was under the minimum withdrawal threshold and that's why I had to keep gambling with it and obviously I ended up losing it all.

That is a proof that we need to have some lesser minimum withdrawal level and a lower fee, or at least help it with some swaps so that we could turn it into something else and make a profit there. In any other case I would be supporting the casino to not have an exchange because they are not forced to, however these days the fees of moving money in and out is a lot, so an exchange could be awesome, it would allow people to do whatever they would like to without fear of losing it.

James Bond is something that is an agent, I understand that we have seen stuff like Marvel and DC that fights things that are basically otherworldly at the best case, we literally had alternative parallel universes type of situation with Marvel very recently. Hell even Fast and Furious is fighting people who are much tougher than what James Bond is fighting.

However you do not have to fight that type of stuff to actually be a good movie, you need to be "cool" in order to be James Bond and if you are a good cool fighter that end up with doing something like ladies man and epitome of realistic agent that could destroy evil at the same time, then you are James bond and that's good enough.

I didn't know that we could start a second account but not using the old one seems like a good idea. That way you actually do own one account, after all the old account is not getting any new action and you are not using it which means that it is a dormant and useless account that you do not use. However even if it is Hhampuz and we trust him a lot, I would still prefer if Roobet actually responded to something like this themselves, that way we would be assured that nothing would happen.

Above all of that we would need Roobet to be answering to these questions themselves because they are a casino and whenever there is a good case that we are in a situation where support/staff is not answering to a question that a person has. This is not acceptable in a casino, if there is a question that people are asking then the casino needs to reply to that question and give a decent answer.

It does have some income attributed to it as well right? It says "profit sharing from all revenue generated by a portfolio of new Rollbot-themed games," and also "access to an exclusive Rollbot Lottery, where Rollbot holders perpetually earn tickets for our weekly draws," as well. These two makes me consider the fact that there is money to be made from this in the future as well. It is definitely very important because it has VIP status type of situation going on. But, it is also very important to realize that we are in a situation where it is also bringing income. Axie was the first NFT with income that got famous, and we saw how high it got, which means that people do care about the income part a lot, this could be getting all the attention because it offers income option as well.

Messi did come and started scoring in the champions league and not in the ligue 1 which is a weird thing but that is fine as well, as long as he plays on the important games because there are 2 teams fighting for UCL like crazy right now, psg and city, messi is needed more on UCL then Ligue, he could not even play at ligue 1 and they will still be champions anyway, he plays in ligue 1 literally just so he could be getting better during the UCL games.

All in all I would say that he is doing great and he was a great idea and I hope that he will stay like that if he keeps going like this and it would be good idea to get him, BUT if mbappe leaves because of something related to messi then it will be one of the worst ideas they had.

Do you know what is the lowest price SOL has been in the past 3 months? 25 dollars. Do you know what the highest was? It was 217 dollars. That is nearly 10x increase within the same 90 days period. If you are not sure about what Solana could do and how volatile it is, then just check what the price has been. Right now, it is at 157 dollars as well, dropped as low as 130 after reaching the peak as well. So, within 90 days it moved from 25 dollars to 217 dollars to 130 dollars and back to 160 dollars.

This is why I would not be saying solana is a bullish coin alone, it is both bullish and bearish at the same time. That scares me as a SOL investor, but I could see SOL go above 200+ dollars and can see it go under 100 dollars at the same time. I am not sure which one it will do, but I am sure that it will be volatile, that is the part I am definitely certain about.

Unfortunately it does matter for some people. If you could invest into something on the very early minutes and then you make a 55500% return or something for an hour and then sell it and get out, then they will care about it. What APY you are getting in a shitcoin doesn't matter only in the long term.

I prefer stuff like uniswap and cake where I could invest into not only the stablecoins yield farming like busd-usdt type of liquidity mining, but we are also making a good profit based on the other good tokens like bnb and so forth as well. However, just because I like to invest into something that makes sense doesn't mean that I do not understand the ones who invest into a little more silly stuff because they are looking for a profit in the very short term.

I believe that FUD happens by manmade and not organically and that is the problem. If we are seeing 10+ news from different places saying how horrible crypto seems to be doing and then we end up seeing how there is a ban, or a bad news or basically something crashed and so forth, then along the same time we are getting a lot of people selling all at once with the price crashing then we are going to end up with something horrible because that is manmade and people are going to realize that they are getting screwed by all those manipulators but they are always too late to realize that now.

I hope that people will realize soon enough that they are being manipulated and not allow whales to do this anymore.

It is obvious that there would have been some sort of hype around something like this because it already had some people interested in it. Think about it this way, we all know that cryptopunks is a very popular NFT collection right? What did they had before all of this? Did we had anything that was super famous from them before they did cryptopunks? I do not remember something like that happening and they got super famous.

This is why I believe that this place had a chance of having hype and selling everything they had because we are talking about some place that also had hype before it even started because of the casino. So, now we are seeing the NFT collection stuff and they are also doing it with utility as well that means that when you have something like that you also get something that is a very profitable thing and even without selling it as well. Hence I believe it was always obvious for me.

I would say that lower fees are the least important things about the eth 2.0, the most important part is the miners and the constant selling pressure. If we are going to not have miners selling constantly to pay the bills then it is going to be clearly a lot more profitable to hold ethereum even if you do not have 32 eth. There are also stakepools which means that you could have as little as 0.1 ethereum and you are going to make a profit from it.

This is why I believe that there is a good chance ethereum could increase a little before and during the eth 2.0 process but the reality is that we are going to see the bigger increase in the longer term as well. The gas fee will drop a ton as well obvious and there is a good chance that we will not going to have any trouble with these type of gas fee increases ever again and that is the real key here, not the drop but the situation not getting worse again.

The list is not that bad but it is lacking some coins as well, not like you could have a list with 5000+ coins so it is understandable. However not having Cake there is a weird one, I mean you would at least have that one, cake is a very very famous token and it is the main token for pancakeswap and you should be accepting that it is something people invest into. I make a passive income from that as well which is why I believe that it is something that is very profitable since it doesn't only go up and make me richer, but it is also giving me income as well by staking it.

I also reinvest that staking profit as well so I keep making more and more profit as well. It is a very great situation to be in if you want to make a profit while still having an income. You could literally pay the bills with it if you want to, which is the greatest part of it, it is totally long term for me.

Anyone who says that doge "makes more sense logically" than bitcoin should either not have any investments in the world, or they should all-in to doge so that we would see them realize how wrong they were. It just doesn't make any sense for me to see people who think dogecoin is a proper coin and should be invested. I have never invested into doge and I believe that I would never invest into it neither.

It is weird to see these people who believe that it is a good investment, sure it hyped and went up a lot this year, but the reality is that Elon Musk made that happen for you, if he stops talking about it then it is going to be horrible and you will keep losing money over time as well. Learn the difference between what a hype is and what fundamentally good one is. I believe that anything that is fundamentally good and never into something just because it is hyped.

You could change it, you could 2fa disable as well, you could change password as well. I am saying this because I had to do it recently. It was KYC helpful because I used my KYC and sent again and changed my mail as well.

I had another mail and I got into a newer mail, I had to do that for many stuff and it was horrible, the exchanges were the hardest because they are working overtime to make sure that you do not get hacked and that wasn't easy. Casinos were easy, sometimes even quite easier to anything, I just changed and confirmed from the both sides and then it was fine and nobody really cared about it. This place asked my KYC again but that was it, it worked well in the end.