No business that you work hard to make money could be considered easy, this one involves risk as well but all of them does which is getting fired. If you are working as an employee somewhere, then you need to be good at your job to earn a lot, but if you are a trader you are your own boss and could make money easily with this.

Like for example FED increasing rates was a known thing beforehand and it was clear that it would drop the price of bitcoin so it was an easy decision to short it, which made a lot of people a good amount of money. If you know what you are doing, it is not any harder work than being a good employee that earns a decent wage.

The problem is not the taxes, it is the high income individuals, there are other states with high taxes and democrats in charge and they do not have this problem. There is a great understanding among the republicans to keep on showing California as a failed state to get votes in other places, but we have seen horrible states managed by republicans and amazing states managed by democrats as well, should we just make deductions based on that?

It's the people that makes a state good or bad, if it's a good person and a republican then they will make it a good state, if it's a good person but a democrat they will make it a good state, look for good people, not policies, republican ideas or democrat ideas, laws of both side, as long as managed by people with good hearts and intentions, could make any state better.

It makes sense because freelancer works for people outside of the nation, gets paid, and then spends that money inside the nation. Let's say you are in a south Asian nation, like Vietnam, you may dislike them because of the history but you end up working for an American, and then when you get paid, 500 bucks is nothing to them, and American pays you 500 dollars, you take it, you pay your landlord, your bills, your food, your fun, everything from there and suddenly Vietnam economy is 500 dollars bigger thanks to that.

If you have millions of people working like that, working to get money from other nations, that would be very very profitable for everyone. Plus it helps drop the unemployment rate as well.

Hype is never a good enough of a reason to invest into something. Doesn't mean that it wouldn't be a good one at the right time, but does it really worth the risk to invest into them right now with the hopes that you would be getting into it at the exact right moment before it takes off?

Other coins that are serious and fundamentally good are supported by the tech it has and the way they are growing, they are literally making it a big thing by working on it, whereas meme ones go up or down based on how much it's hyped or not. That is why I honestly do not believe that it would be a smart decision to invest into them. Staking stablecoins at least has a known future, calculated and can be known.

I agree that there are many different ways that bitcoin could recover as well, and 45k could happen this year, all it depends on is hearing the news and that is going to be a great day for crypto. It could be number of things like you listed, but the important thing is if we are seeing those type of things happen right now or not, and we are not seeing them so far. It just requires a bit of time before we can see them and will it be before the year ends or not? I do not know if it will be before the year ends, but I know that it will happen.

This is why I am investing no matter what, doesn't matter if it is going to happen now or later on. I know that it is not going to be cheerful moments when bitcoin price ends up being low for the rest of the year, but if it goes up super high in 2023 it will be great for everyone.

I still think even that wouldn't be under SEC for sure, it will be done via exchanges like coinbase or crypto.com and that means every move you do is already followed, I do not think that anything more is needed like securities.

XRP was tried as security considering how we are literally paying for them to continue their business, they need people to do transactions to keep the chain going so they can use it to help banks or other financial places to move money around the world and we all know that's SEC business, and even they didn't get any trouble. So, there is absolutely no possible way for ETH to become a security neither, it will go on like usual.

It is that first 10 days isn't it? In the first 10 days you will see if they are fake or not, if they can make you money or cause you to lose money and that is a risk that is not worth taking.

If you are feeling like you could take a little bit of risk with some of your money then you could do it but wouldn't make sense to be fair, I would personally suggest you to not do that, but if you have some excess that you feel like you can take on more risk then you could. In that case, you will see that people would invest into things that are not really that awesome and it would cause people to lose a bit of money but if they win, then they figured out a good addition to their current system.

That is quite true, the low return is something that should be very much in the minds of the people as not so bad though, if they want to stay in the fiat world. Imagine a scenario like this, you are in crypto, bought bitcoin and ethereum, and they went up so much that you imagine they will be eventually down, like bitcoin is at 100k and ETH is at 10k, and you want to get out. What do you do? You either go directly into fiat and cash out, or you go to stablecoins.

In that case, is it better to stake and earn something from them, or do you prefer if they stayed the same? I do not support staking stablecoins as an investment, but as an option, it’s better than just to hold them.

That is the most important information I learned as well. I used to think that the best way to have money was to save it, but then I learned that most rich people do not even have money, they have debt.

Look at all the big companies in the world, they literally have cash and debt together, they could pay for something in cash, they have that much, and they still prefer to get a loan to do that instead of using their cash, because they rather grow their asset size, and to do that, instead of using 100 million dollars to buy 1 thing, they spend 20 million and get 80 million debt, hence they can use that 100 million to get 500 million debt, which means their asset size would grow 5x that way.

You could use it for buying goods, or selling goods, but at the same time we are talking about something that is quite effective on payment method. However, we are talking about something that is about investment and we shouldn't really be worried about the payment part of it.

If you were given a choice to invest into something that never goes up, always goes down in value, and you could never sell to get rid of it, then would you "invest"? That is the question and to be fair everyone would say no. That is why I never try to have fiat as investment, I always invest into other things, I am going to start getting into debt just to get some good assets like these as well eventually.

The both possibilities are bad, and you will end up losing your money one way or another. Signals are basically the way people check indicators and tell you what a crypto "should" do, doesn't mean that it will do what it should, more often than not there are many coins which does what it shouldn't and go to opposite way.

This is why I am not expecting them to really have a difference, it will probably be a group that tries to make their money not via trading but more from the customers that come along the way. Anyone who charges you for indicators will know that it is not a guaranteed income and customers are a better way to make money from since it's steady method.

Those people are waiting for a chance to be right, they have been too late to bitcoin and couldn't make any profit from it like we did, so what they want to see is bitcoin dying so that they could say "I was smart by not investing into bitcoin, you are an idiot for investing into something that died" and every time it goes down they believe such a thing is possible.

But, the reality is that we just had a drop in the prices just like any other market, look at other markets and you will see it too, and that was the main reason why I believe that we have invested into bitcoin because it moves like other markets when it is about direction but the amount it moves is huge.

And that isn't just a singular event neither. We have seen banks and economies of nations collapse all the time, and governments or banks seizing the money of the people until it gets back to okay, basically stealing your money until they can pay it back, has happened in other nations before as well.

Cyprus comes to mind, happened about 10-15 years ago and they were getting everyone's money if they had more than certain sum. So long story short, this happens, it happened before, and it is happening right now, it is just different nations but the fact is that crypto would allow you to have 100% control over your money whereas others do not give that option.

Still though? I mean it is clear that Ronaldo wanted to leave and couldn't, that much is already known and his name has been in talks with so many clubs. But we are beyond half of September now and United already played so many games, do we really think that there is a chance Ronaldo could still leave? If that's the case then Tan Hag is doing a good move because why play someone that will leave eventually, find a way to win without him, and they are doing decently so far, bad start but a good recovery.

However, if the Ronaldo transfer ship is already sailed and he is going to stay, it is better to find a way to put him in the games from the start, they could really use him.

I would guess that the best thing to do would be waiting a bit longer, the price may have gone up already calculating the merge and then when it happened people who bought because of it would end up selling, and the increase that happened before the merge could be attributed to it.

On the other hand, we are talking about a long term solution to ethereum, so why have a short term price increase, I believe that the increase in ethereum price (and in return all crypto) will happen in the long run and that is why we need to wait a little longer. When people see the great benefits of being in proof of stake, they will end up buying more and more, increasing the price to new heights.

That is mainly because they didn't expected it to be this difficult. They thought that they could play their usual style and they would win, but the moment they started to play, they realized that it wasn't so simple here and that caused them to go back on defense.

Champions league and Serie A are very different, you can't just hope that the other team would be easier to beat, you can2t even expect that from teams that are coming from worse leagues, remember that sherrif upset on Real Madrid, the team that won the title? I mean these type of things could happen if you expect to play like a regular season domestic league game for sure.

I agree, Vettel said he is going to retire and he is going to retire for sure. There isn't any "unless...." situation, there will be no reason for him to comeback.

If the situation was about money or team, he would say that he is going to keep on racing if a decent team offered him something but he will no longer race for Aston Martin, that way he could have found himself a spot in one of the middle pact teams, would be hard but could happen. He just wanted to retire for good, not team change, and f1 climate thing could be great for him, he wanted it badly and maybe he could put a lot more emphasis on the ERS and make the teams turn into e-formula a bit more, can't be fully that, but could definitely help increase the value of it.

I still think that people are overrating this Marseille team, I mean they are of course not terrible and of course they can be second, each year we see a different team be a beast and they look like they have the biggest chance to be second.

However, the fact that some people expect them to beat PSG is a bit beyond what they should be capable of. It would be awesome for them if they can achieve it of course, but I do not think that they would be able to achieve such a thing and they would lose the league title if you ask me. However a good progress continentally and being second in the league all equals to a good amount of money, which could be sustained success if they use it well enough.

Altcoins are liked because of the volatility, not because they are expected to be stable. I mean bitcoin is "stable enough" compared to other coins in the crypto world which means that we shouldn't really be focusing on anything else. Just focus on the crypto world and how you could make a profit from it and you would be able to actually pull a profit from the volatile altcoins.

I personally do not prefer that, I do not risk my money with those volatile altcoins but I have seen many people do it and make profits and seen many who lost as well. I believe that the best thing you could do is buy bitcoin as much as you can and hold it as long as you can.

That RRR is not known by most people and to be fair in crypto world it is not clearly indicated neither, you do not really know it. Like when you are stock trading you could look at how much cash they have, what's their revenue to profit ratio, look at the ownership and how much institutional ownership they have, you could look at the debt, and the personal number and many other things.

These data will show you if it is worthy of investment or not and it would show you what would be the risk of something like that. But in reality, crypto doesn't have these and we could have a great news today and end the day with 30k or have a terrible news and end it at 10k, it is wild and volatile.