I will rephrase you sentence a bit - kids not just not have to follow parents footsteps (even though parents would love to see that), but must live their own life with their own experience, make their own mistakes. First of all they must choose the life they want to have, not that we dream about and want to see.

Even if we are a totally addicted gambling junkies, and we realize how addictive gambling is, how it might change or destroy lives, we should not hide the fact that we gamble, we must only explain all the negative and positive effects of gambling. Maybe we have to explain it now one, not twice, maybe even 100 times. Also we have to give reasons why we gamble, and let them make a decision if they want to gamble also or not.

I mean what is the point of being so much overprotective parent, when at 18 the kid will be free to do anything and we have no rights to to interfere. Let him be prepared for adult life with his experience and skill tree maxed

Right said betting company owners do not bet his main task is to supervise all the responsibilities of the company and what is happening to them. The casino environment is maintained and controlled by the casino owner if the casino environment is not good then no one will be able to bet. It is his responsibility to make the environment of the casino beautiful so the owner of the betting company has to control everything well and take care of the gambling so that there is no problem in betting. Maybe he doesn't have time to bet on these duties.

Yes it depends on the trading skills to get the best out of the training. So if the op doesn't have good trading skills then he won't be able to trade well. And if he is not able to profit from the trade, his dream of holding bitcoins will not be fulfilled and if this dream is not fulfilled, he will not be able to fulfill his dream of building a house.  So he should leave the trading plan and invest directly in Bitcoin according to his ability.  And to continue this investment. Investing $10-20 a week would be a good DCA. And thus he can fulfill his dream of building a house if he continues his investment for just a few years

When the general public talks about Cryptocurrency, what comes to their mind is Bitcoin. Alternative cryptocurrencies are not competitors to Bitcoin, their founders have no intention of creating alternative coins as competitors to Bitcoin because they are very aware that they will never be able to surpass Bitcoin's popularity. As the prime mover or first Cryptocurrency ever, Bitcoin has advantages over other cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin has the largest network, the most legitimacy in the eyes of retail and institutional investors, investor confidence in Bitcoin because it is built on the most secure database in history.

Nothing will happen to Bitcoin even if it plays a single role because its price is very dependent on supply and demand. Just imagine Bitcoin being able to reach several ATHs even though it is side by side with Altcoins, especially since Bitcoin is the only Cryptocurrency that has ever existed. Even though thousands of other Altcoins have been circulating amidst Bitcoin's popularity, the Bitcoin community firmly believes that altcoins will not replace Bitcoin due to its fair and unchangeable monetary policy, a trait that no technology can fix.

Not exactly for everyone. You can see that the biggest advantage of the rich is that they can make more mistakes than ordinary people; no matter what they do wrong, they can still use money to make up for it in time. Unlike normal people, if you just make a little mistake, where will next month's rent come from when all the money has been invested?

Therefore, future risks cannot be foreseen. Although the probability of it happening is only 1%, when it happens, it will destroy your life 100%. If your resistance is strong enough, you can overcome that storm, and if not, the consequences will be like the mess after the cataclysm.

Does everyone choose to gamble when they have no money?
If that's the case, I think they took the wrong step. When they don't have money or have only a little money and want to get more money not by gambling, but they have to work hard to be able to get more money. if they choose to gamble they will only spend their money in vain, although there is a chance to win but it is not as big as the chance to lose, because gambling itself is created to make money not to give money to the people who play.

I think that is a fact that happens in every gambling. It's hard to beat a casino machine especially when it has been set up by the people in it, of course they set up casino machines that only give small wins to attract players to play more often, and in the end many of them make gambling the main income in their lives. Even the bookie can laugh loudly when the players start to get addicted who can spend a lot of money just to gamble that is not certain of victory.

The truth is, none of us earned money using referral bonuses. Why? One thing is that what we are sharing is a casino, and we know many people are hasty when it comes to casinos or gambling, so it's not easy to attract or refer one. Second, we are not popular. Yes, popularity is one thing that could make you earn referral bonuses. For example, streamers, vloggers, etc. can earn from referrals as many of their viewers could be attracted or tempted to try what they are playing, or simply streamers or vloggers can earn from advertising the casino and using their links.

For us normal people, it's hard for us to attract people to use our referral links. If we can get some, it's not enough to earn a fine profit, but maybe by hard work some can earn from it as there are a lot of ways to advertise now, especially on social media.

Yeah.. it can be challenging for the people who are struggling with gambling addiction to recognize their own condition. Denial is a common defense mechanism that allows them to maintain a sense of normalcy and avoid confronting the negative consequences of their behavior. The presence of supportive people who can identify and address gambling behaviors is crucial in helping addicted people recognize and address their problem.

These people often provide a reality check, helping the gambler to see the impact of their actions and the need for change. The support of others can play a impactful role in helping gamblers break free from addiction. By providing encouragement and guidance, loved ones can empower the gambler to take the necessary steps towards recovery. With the support of others and a commitment to change, gamblers can reclaim their lives and build a healthier future.

But the source of funds thing is sometimes more complicated than it seems. It really depends what money you are using. If you are a normal employee and you are playing with a bigger sum of money relative to your monthly income, the casino can give you a hard time to accept the proof. They have all the leverage against the player and if they decide to make it as complicated as possible, you can quickly find yourself in a situation where it is hard to prove the source. You can say you saved up that money, but essentially that would be like the casino just asking whether you have a job or not. But it becomes tough when people are self-employed. Most casinos when they have a good reputation will just pay out the winnings unless the winnings are monstrous.

I don't think this is the best investment you can make with your money. Why would you lend your money someone that has no more money and still wants to gamble? First of all, if they lost all their money through gambling then their strategies and risk management is not really the best and the chances are high that they are just going to lose all your money as well. Making a contract and requiring interest is a good thing, this gives you at least some form of protection. However, a contract alone is no guarantee that you actually will get your money back. Let’s look at the worst-case scenario where the gambler loses all your money and still needs to pay you back. What happens if he doesn’t have a job, or only a job that doesn’t pay a lot of money? Even if you go to the courts and ask for your money back, it could take years for you to recover your principal. In my opinion a better approach, if you want to invest in gambling, would be to look for a casino that is looking for a new partner and you could invest your money there. There will always be people trying to sell their shares in casino and if you have enough money, you could buy their shares.

If the casino uses only high volume in transaction to determine if they'll request for KYC, alot of illegal individuals will get away with crimes because they can split their transaction into smaller amounts that will not make the casino suspicious and run as many transaction as they want and get away with their crimes. KYC helps casino to keep eyes on their customers so they can identify them easier when the authorities need to for their investigation. And since the individuals knows the casino has their identity, they'll be careful not to use the casino for illegal activities.

KYC has its advantage and disadvantage but it's not benefiting any individuals that's using cryptocurency to gamble because our purpose for using cryptocurrency is because of its animosity but when KYC is been implemented it takes away that. We have some casino and sportsbooks that don't demand high KYC but just regular ones and we can be using them to help prevent our information from getting into the wrong hands.

That's nothing more than a myth. Your luck cannot be someone else's luck and similarly, you being unlucky cannot make someone else's luck change. So, when you and the other person, both lose the game, it simply means that you both were unlucky at that time, and it doesn't mean that one of you was lucky but lost because the other one who followed their bet was unlucky, that doesn't make any sense at all because luck doesn't see or know such things.

So, these are all misconceptions and myths that people take seriously and either don't let others know about their bets or don't follow others thinking that their luck might affect others' or others' might affect theirs but that's not how things work. If you are destined to lose, nothing can make you win, and if you are destined to win, nothing can make you lose, simple as that.

Yes, it is true that gambling today is very different from gambling in the past because of the advancement of the times, maybe gambling in the past was often done openly without using cellphones and almost everyone who did not gamble knew and was easily identified by the police, And gambling now most people who gamble use cellphones online so it is more difficult to be known by others, but in gambling now most people experience financial losses because gambling is now played by bookies on gambling sites so the impact is very bad to the point that it can damage the household if the gambler already has a wife. . So for those of us who don't gamble, don't try to do something like that because online gambling is addictive. If we are addicted, we will lose a lot because we are played by the bookie, and for people who are currently gambling or addicted, reduce their gambling so that you do not experience losses because there is no history of getting rich by gambling because gambling is just a trick of the bookie. It is not easy for gambling addicts to stop completely, but if you have the intention, you can definitely reduce or stop completely.

I respect Monaco, but playing against PSG at home should not end in a head-to-head match, also not almost like it. I think that PSG will have plenty more chances than Monaco and most likely it will be Mbappe who decides the game. Every opponent from the Ligue 1 needs some luck and one of their best days of the year to win something in Paris. Since PSG players are fully aware of the importance of the next few weeks, it would be unexpected if they now show some signs of bad concentration.

I think every team that participates in the Champions League group stage is a great team that really has the capability to become a winner in the Champions League. There is indeed a difference in level between representatives from small European leagues and teams from the big leagues, but it still does not rule out the possibility that those from the small leagues will become dark horses in this competition.

So I think the competition in Group A is a tough battle for all of these teams, and if in fact, Bayern Munich can win all their matches, it doesn't mean they have an easy opponent to play against, but because they can play with consistent performance while their opponents may be having their own problems which prevents them from playing optimally.