I wouldn't say it is equally dangerous as ICO's because they are different type of deals. I do not mean that NFT's are not dangerous neither, I just mean that they are different. ICO's were invested because people believed that some tokens could be worth something but it depended on the project to keep going strong as well.

So, let's assume that you invested into a brand new token and then the project creators went AWOL and they did not improved the project at all, or stole the sale profits and run away with it, then you would be certain that people would be losing money because of it. However with NFT, the creator just creates and sells it, afterwards all depends on the community and you do not need to have it keep going forever, if cryptopunks creator already gave away all 10k and has no ownership anymore, then what could he do to make it go down? Nothing. This is the difference.

I do see Dogecoin as a risk, but then isn’t all cryptocurrencies similar in this way? They’re usually all about investments and risk, there will always be those who will lose their money when it happens. But, I do feel like Doge coin is more dangerous to invest in than, let’s say Bitcoin itself, but if the community should grow like as we have in Bitcoin I think it’s going to be hard for it to fluctuate that much. Then the problem we’re having right now is that there are few whales who hold the largest portion of this coin, if they should decide to dump it in the market then it’s going to affect Dogecoin seriously ‘cause it’s going to lose a lot of value.

And when such things happen people are going to be discouraged and a lot of people will leave the market. A lot of them are now hoping for the $1 increase which they don’t even know if it’s going to happen or not, because if we check years back it really took Dogecoin a lot of time before it started to um trained like this.

Every project in the cryptocurrency market is always looking for a way to improve. Polygon is good, it just depends on what the developers really want, but you can’t compare Polygon to BinanceSmart Chain which has over sevenhundreds of projects on it, whilePolygon is around hundred (the last time I checked I think it’s around 150 projects). And that doesn’t mean BSC has a plan to just end it there, they also want to improve and be better than it is today.

I also know Polygon has that thought as well, so it's something that will have to do with the developers and the choice they are going to make when they want to create a new project. Before now I’ve even seen people that make statements that Polygon is going to be better than Ethereum, which I don’t really think is going to happen.

All those team tokens never really made any sense to me. Can someone explain to me the idea of the team tokens?

What are they giving you? I mean aside from owning them for being a fan, what else could be the reason to buy something like that?

Sure it could be limited and then you could say that you own a limited token from your favorite club but that limit is not really that low neither, they go for a lot of money and usually do not get that much interest neither. If it was something like own a part of the club type of "share" logic then I would understand but you are just buying a token that has the name and it has nothing else going for it.

I personally believe that we should not be really getting involved all that much, I never owned any teams token so far and I am not planning on investing in any neither, maybe if I have some excess money one day and became rich, then I could do it for fun but never for profit making reasons.

Even if everyone talks about this, the fees are fees and there is not much that roobet can do. I could understand if the problem was the fact that they charge a lot more than what the regular fee should be, but they are really not charging that much more, they are always charging around the same number as the other places as well.

Only thing they could ever do would be letting people withdraw for free if they wagered over a certain amount in a single month, and even in that case it would be just paying out of pocket for them and it wouldn't affect too many people that are gambling, all of us that gamble a lot less than what whales do would have to still pay.

People are throwing shade at FIA for picking Qatar. I do not know where you are from, but from a foreigner that is looking outside in, Qatar looks like a horrible place to do this, and a horrible place in general. It is said that thousands of people died while working in inhumane conditions for world cup, they are basically using slave workshops that pays just enough to eat for a meal, thousands of people literally dead because of their working conditions. Certainly it may have been swept under rug but even world cup was in danger of getting cancelled before everyone assured nothing bad would happen.

It just feels like that time when Hitler and Nazis organized Olympics, he was a bad person at the time as well and we just didn't know it fully yet, and they had Olympics, where the whole world saw how everything was "alright" there, and then we know what happened. FIA should have considered this move as dangerous from the start.

If ADA and SOL manages to build their smart contract part properly and get attention from projects then we could talk about how they could be super high next year. Since it will not be something that happens overnight I assume that even if they start properly this year, it will only have an impact next year.

I know they are already high, but they do not even have too many good projects under their blockchain, actually they technically have none. Sure there are some "studies" for the test purposes but it is not really as good as it could be. Obviously crypto is not a surefire thing and we will never know what would be profitable for these coins but if they could build smart contract into their blockchains and get a ton of projects starting up, that could definitely be something that increases the price of these two and they could be even more.

OMG, EOS, QTUM, IOST. These are the four coins that have a lot more volume and liquidity than their places when ranked, they rank higher on volume and liquidity than they rank on marketcap. Which means that there is interest towards them (or at least for now) but the ranking doesn't show it yet. I still would prefer to keep my money in known stuff, going for a 50x return is a silly move that nobody should aim at without being careful with their money.

However, if you really want to risk your money, then these four definitely punch higher than what they worth, by the way I do not shill any of them, I would actually advice you to stay away from them, they are just what looks like you wanted and that is the only reason I am writing them.

Updates or even upgrades at this point, do not take a day to handle, even if they are %100 done, they take a while to test and see how they work. You may get a "finished" product from the developers, and then it goes to testing stage, and you test it with as many people and as many computers/phones as you can, when you find something then you send it back to developers and they fix it or change it or whatever which sometimes takes days.

I remember it took me 5 days to change a link once, a very very very simple copy and paste situation, you delete the old link and paste the new link, however it didn't accept it and gave an error, I had to find what caused the error when I changed the link, which wasn't an easy task. So, I would assume that it is not really a simple thing to do a huge update, if there are errors then it may take longer than it should, if it took me 5 days to figure out the error that caused me to not do something as simple as a link change, then I get why casino update may take months.

I would assume that people would be crazy over this. Think about it, just because something is limited to 10k numbers and there are very rare ones, people ended up buying them like crazy, and I mean like crazy, millions of dollars. If people hear about how they can make a profit from the rarity of it? That should be something 10x more exciting. Rollbit needs to really spend a ton of money on marketing this project, we are talking about something that would be quite wanted by the investors.

I can't speak on behalf of everyone and as someone who is out of the NFT world, I am not really involved with how they think or why they spend that money at all. However I am just assuming that since it is something that looks like a profitable business idea, I would assume that it would definitely be a profitable thing to buy if they are willing to spend on others.

Isn't it sad that people are now asking if windice is legit or not, when it was one of the top places that people played just a year or two ago? When this place first started it started out with a bang, it got so much attention, nowadays it is not getting that attention at all.

For @dunfida, yes this place is legit and has been legit for over 2 years now, they have been around for a long time and considering what they have achieved during this period, I would say that they are doing quite fine as well.

I know that we are not used to seeing windice being calm like this while having some gamblers anyway, but that is mainly because they stopped promotions here but they already did it and got some gamblers from before, hence why they are not super active here but have gamblers on their website. It is basically a legacy thing that they managed to keep all those people, I remember seeing 1k+ people all the time.

All these central bank digital currencies, I do see them as a joke. Banks were talking bad about cryptocurrencies that are decentralized, now they are rushing to create their own cryptocurrencies and force people to make use of it.

Digital currencies that are being created by banks are still the same thing with the Fiat currencies that we are making use of; So what is the need of having it?

Or do they have plans to stop releasing paper money once they have released the digital currencies? They know very well that it is not going to be possible for us to stop making use of paper money, because there are people who are not interested in Internet or whatever that has to do with digital money.

People still like paper money , and I don’t think all these digital currencies by central banks are going to be able to defeat decentralized cryptocurrencies, bitcoin and other decentralized cryptocurrencies are stronger than whatever the central banks are dishing out.

Honestly there are so many games that would be weird but could happen if the favorites loses. Marseille, west ham, Lazio, Napoli, Leicester, Lyon all should win. Betting on those games would mean around 6+ odds and they are by far the clear favorites for these games as well, not like 2.10 to 2.30 type neither, other side always has like 5+ odds which means it is unlikely for the other side to win.

Underdogs could always upset people, look at what happened to Real Madrid the other day, it is obvious that in football anything could happen and this was one of those matches. However if you wager on these matches, then I would assume that there is a good chance you could win something in return.

If people do not realize that staff of official pages will not directly contact the customer, that should be plastered everywhere. I mean this is not just true about duelbits but it is true about every single place. I feel like there is a good chance that we may have never seen a place reach out to someone without them first writing to the casino.

All in all be careful, if anyone asks you about anything secret (password or phrase or whatever you are using that is suppose to stay only with you) then you will need to stay away. Also if you could control yourself and do not lose too much when you get a losing streak and not get a head rush, that is quite great and should be supported, not many can do that.

Norris is a very very young racer, he is only 21 years old. Dude never won a race before and he saw Hamilton not pitting when he was asked, which means he assumed Hamilton would not pit and he was basically asked "would you like to lose your first position now, come back as second with fresh ints and try to overtake Hamilton with that?" and obviously the answer to that would be no at that point. What happened aftewards is not really fully on him, he should have been insisted to come pit as soon as Hamilton did it as well.

In any case, obviously he was wrong, and obviously he should have pitted, but dude is 21 years old trying to keep Hamilton behind to his first victory, it is expected of him to make these mistakes early on. What I believe he got was growing pains, you learn like this, many racers made a lot of mistakes when they were young and they learn and they do not repeat it.

I never really liked futures trading anyway, I always predicted it would be the reason why we would have crash drops as well. All in all spot trading is simple, it is not really complicated and it does bring a lot of profit as well. Do you know what I like the most about it? Nothing is limited and finite, you do not have to stop at all when the price goes down.

In futures trading when it goes the other direction you get liquidated and you lose your money, whereas in spot trading if it goes down then you can just wait until it goes back up, would be slow but at least it would happen instead of losing it all, hell even if it doesn't and you want to get out, it is not all of it and only some of it is lost. So I would say that spot trading is by far the best way to trade and the only way of trading I ever do, of course I still have most in long term investment too.

When talking about Barcelona not being as good as they used to be because of all the players they lost this season, we need to realize that they are actually unbeaten right now. They got 3 wins and 3 draws and that makes it 12 points so the totals is not as good as it could be. However we are still talking about unbeaten team here. So far there are only 4 teams who are unebeaten in the league right now, leaders Madrid, then Sevilla which is third in rankings and then Barcelona (we also have villareal the latest europa champions).

So, when we are saying Barcelona is not as good as they used to be, that still doesn't mean that they are not better than most because they are actually better than most in the league even when they are worse.

Well they have already taken the decision, going back on it now wouldn’t be a good thing for them to do.
Rather they should look for a way to improve things in that country. That there is a less percentage of internet users doesn’t mean that bitcoin cannot function there, it can function there and people can make use of it for transaction as long as they have what it takes to make use of it.

As for those who don’t have it yet, they can continue to make use of Fiat. Making bitcoin a legal tender is not really necessary, and personally I don’t see any much impact that’s going to make at all, it can just be a legal asset that anyone can be free to use and nothing much here.

Best way to do that would be to betting it at all-in games. So, let's say you want to quit, and you have 20 bucks left, then just wager 20 bucks one something and you will most likely quit after you lose that, if you win then just keep repeating that until you have an amount that you are willing to take out and that way you could quit. Similar thing happened to me on a sportsbook once, I wanted to quit and I wagered 60 bucks on a bet and got 710 bucks in return, I imagined I wouldn't guess all the games correct but I somehow managed to do it so I stopped because I wanted to take out that 710 bucks out of there.

Of course, a few months later I started again on another place but at least it helped me for a while. If you have too much money then it should feel a lot easier to take it all out, if you have a lot less just wager it all away and stop.

What you are about to do is what is called dollar cost averaging. It is a good method that is being used by a lot of people these days to be timing their investment. You see, I do see people who complain that the price of bitcoin is high and because of that they can’t be investing in it because they can’t afford to invest that much, and whenever I see I just laugh it off. Why? Because, I am also the same level with them and I still invested my money despite the price of bitcoin and I made profit.

Most of these people are waiting for when they will have money to buy one full bitcoin, which is not going to work, because before you know it, by next four or five years the price of one Bitcoin might be worth up to a hundred thousand dollars and they still wouldn’t b able to afford it by then. But if they invest now, the little investment they have made will still fetch them some profit by then. That’s why my investments in bitcoin are mostly long term and I use dollar cost averaging. Apart from that I also invest in cheap altcoins that will bring me good profit.