Mark Karpeles
achso, wenn dem seine fraktionierten Reserven ausgehn, tjo... Das ist kein normaler Mensch sondern abgefahrener Humor. Der wollte damit was sagen.
könnte auch Humor von der Wall St sein, um uns allen mal zu zeigen, was das für Peanuts für die sind. |
|
|
|
|
Ich glaub das mit Kim, MEGA und Bitcoin wird ein wenig überbewertet. Ein paar Reseller schön und gut, aber nur für ein paar vereinzelte Warez-Gruppen interessant. Den Massen reichen die kostenlosen 50 GB. Und seriöse Firmen nehmen 'nen dann auch andere seriösere Cloud-Anbieter.
"Mark selbst"? Den Zuck meinste? Wie kommste auf den?
|
|
|
|
Korean-nuclear
I thought Armageddon-land is Israel?  |
|
|
|
looks like the coins are used to gamble on SatoshiDICE  |
|
|
|
First I'm French.
and von Mises was Austrian. Still he has his greatest following in the US. Which in turn could have had too much influence on someone in France. Second, historical precedence doesn't validate an action or ideal.
I meant that in the context that most socio-economic theories, like the "anarcho"-"capitalistic", have never been tried in practice. In Spain some were, and worked well. But the issue with anarchism is that the rule is that there is no rule. It's kind of an oxymoron. Anarcho-socialism only makes it more obvious.
your fallacy is an absolutistic interpretation of socialism. First, when general assemblies were held, the results were recommendations, not coercive. There was no executive branch or the like. Second, there were independent "individualists" who lived rather self-sufficiently on the land and essentially bartered with the collectives. They were a minority though, humans usually seem to voluntarily choose to be part of a larger collective. Third, there were many different regions were people lived out many different flavors of anarchism and tried out different things. Lots of choices. Fourth, what is a collective after all. A voluntary group that shares resources and risk, much like a cooperative or company if you will. In markets such principles of redistribution exist as well, in the form of insurances for example. |
|
|
|
Anarcho-socialism is a disturbing yet clever example of such difference, even if the concept makes no sense.
That's typical US-American brainwash. Social libertarianism has more historical precedence than market libertarianism. Watch this docu: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH43YHaUGyQ |
|
|
|
First. Hoarding itself is not such a bad thing if prices and wages immediately drop as money supply decrease. The problem arises when prices and wages are not dynamic enough to clear to market changes. In this case a drop in money supply will lead to a drop in consumption.
This. In a legacy economic system like today's, things like wages, rents, insurance fees, etc just don't adapt and drop fast enough. |
|
|
|
Has anyone ever calculated how much energy would be needed to simulate a universe to see if it's even remotely credible?
the simulations we'll run will be less complex than our world, at least in the beginning. as above, so below, so the world that simulates us is more complex than ours.  |
|
|
|
|
As long as there is government, debt-free "Vollgeld" or "plain money" is surely better than what we have today.
|
|
|
|
Excuse my crude oafness, but why should deflation/inflation have any effect on the economy?
because corporations, large land owners, banks and insurances rather get bailed out before they'd even think of lowering nominal wages, rents, interest rates and fees. |
|
|
|
One word: Simulation argument. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race. It is then possible to argue that, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that we are likely among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones. Therefore, if we don’t think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears.
---Nick Bostrom, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford University In my admittedly limited understanding, I would guess that Quantum Mechanics ties in well will the simulation argument: Wave function collapse? ⇒ Game engine rendering at work. Schrödinger's cat? ⇒ Lazy evaluation. Quantum entanglement? ⇒ Pointers to the same object in the machine's memory.  |
|
|
|
Schlaflose Nächte hab ich deswegen jetzt auch nicht.
wie, kein wecker, der bei genügend großen kursschwankungen getriggert wird? ich glaub ein paar hatten/haben das wirklich. |
|
|
|
'Ayn Rand' sagt mir überhaupt nichts.
ja, eben, sag ich doch OWS
mit Occupy hat der Seeder bestimmt auch nix am hut |
|
|
|
naja jetz geht's aber endgültig zu schnell
ich bin aber deswegen weder nervös noch diskordianer  |
|
|
|
Als Kollektivist würd ich ihn nicht bezeichnen, eher dem individualistischen Anarchismus nahe, in der Tradition eines Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Der hatte damals auch schon so eine ähnliche Idee mit den Tauschbanken. |
|
|
|
you can inflate gold (and bitcoins) easily if you kill, say, half of the population. we don't trust our governments these days do we  |
|
|
|
wodurch hat sich Atlas eigentlich 'vertreiben' lassen? Er ist schon über 3 Monate, zumindest unter 'Atlas' nicht mehr aktiv. jagt nach Atlaslöl, Seeder, jo, der deutsche (rumänische?) Atlas, da bin ich noch gar nicht drauf gekommen. Sogar bezüglich ein paar anderen Aspekten gibt's Gemeinsamkeiten, nur die olle Ayn Rand hat der gute Seeder (zum Glück) noch nicht all zu viel gelesen. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
