Is the "free" upgrade to Teramining automatical? Or do I have to do anything? If so, I don't find anything in the settings?  |
|
|
|
hab beim letzten onlineshop folgende nachricht im mitteilungsfeld bei der bestellung hinterlassen: --- Bitte zukünftig Bitcoin unterstützen, eine freie und offene (open source) Währung und Zahlungssystem. http://www.bitcoin.org Damit geht die Überweisung * quasi sofort (im Gegensatz zu Banken) * praktisch ohne Gebühren (im Gegensatz zu Paypal) Außerdem ist Bitcoin für Händler * ohne Chargeback-Risiko (im Gegensatz zu Kreditkarten) * technisch sehr einfach, unbürokratisch und theoretisch kostenlos auf der Website zu implementieren (im Gegensatz zu allen anderen) * datenschutzfreundlich, da keine Daten bei Dritten gespeichert werden (im Gegensatz zu allen andern) http://go-bitcoin.com/seite/bitcoin-vorteile Dankeschön! --- das ziel wär so eine mischung aus unbekümmert/"unprofessionell" (schließlich will man ja nich wie ein drücker oder sowas aussehn) aber trotzdem informativ, wo alles wichtige gleich drin ist (was soll dieses bitcoin für vorteile haben? was bringt es MIR, dem händler?) |
|
|
|
Ah, danke.
Wenn ich andersrum 1 Bitcoin erhalte, dann meine Festplatte kaputt geht und mein Backup nicht up-to-date ist, wo ist dieser 1 Bitcoin dann hin?
Der Bitcoin wäre dann für immer verloren.
Das ist so nicht ganz richtig, in dem Fall hat er höchstwahrscheinlich Glück. Für die gleiche Adresse ist der Bitcoin auf jeden Fall dann wieder da, und auch wenn er seit dem Backup neue Adressen angelegt und darauf Bitcoins empfangen hat, werden sie da sein, weil BitcoinQT und wohl auch andere Wallets 'nen Haufen Adressen vorgenerieren. |
|
|
|
|
yeah, they have this vShare thing going, which might be a pyramid scam (I haven't looked into it).
but their Zen currency is something different and new, they just trade it 1:1. Like Liberty Reserve etc essentially.
|
|
|
|
fängt's also endlich richtig an, das "guilty by association"-spielchen. ...then they attack you...  |
|
|
|
|
isn't necessarily a pyramid scheme, but it's centrally issued and managed.
|
|
|
|
Ich meinte das in Bezug auf die Befürchtung, dass durch eine nicht gewährleistete Stromversorgung (Zu wenig Strom wird gefördert, die Netze können die Kapazitäten nicht in den Süden transportieren usw.) unsere Wirtschaft zusammenbricht. Irgendein Wirtschaftsbund hat da mal vor gewarnt.
wird ausnahmeregelungen geben für die "systemrelevanten" konzerne. |
|
|
|
Auch die deutsche "Energiewende" ist eine Gefahr für die Industrie, die Wirtschaft und für das Internet.
es ist zwar ganz schön off-topic, aber könntest du mal erklären was du damit meinst? "Internet" gibt's dann nur noch täglich von 9-11 morgens, wa? kost halt einfach zu viel strom das ding |
|
|
|
It says: "Building up the networks which would allow fractional reserve banking requries a transmission system which is nearly impossible to develop for bitcoin-like products, because it relies on adoption." Again: Ripple. |
|
|
|
that is how apple does it and lately I heard an amusing story of complaint, since Apple acted in a security request and delivered the data from Apple imessage or how it is called. Of course, encrypted. And said "We don't have the means to encrypt this, but as you asked, here is the data you requested." "We can't read this." "Neither can we."
since when is apple with the cool kids again? they'll order them to remove encryption or provide a special key, simple as that. |
|
|
|
Tja... das macht sie ja gleich noch viel sympathischer.  Martin! der Maulwurf? |
|
|
|
|
zeig mir eine funktion aus dem code und ich versuch dir zu erklären wofür man sie braucht und was sie macht.
|
|
|
|
Das bringt mich ja fast dazu eines ihrer Produkte zu kaufen und nicht wie früher...naja...ähmm....  Sei vorsichtig was du hier sagst, Bitcoin ist anscheinend nicht so anonym wie viele denken  |
|
|
|
Fractional reserve doesn't seem possible with BTC, no way you could lend btc you didn't have. But it would be possible to create a system that lent $ (or some other fiat) based on holdings of BTC. I don't see why anyone would, but thats a different question.
I would have agreed a while ago. There was just no infrastructure imaginable for Bitcoin IOUs (essentially just MtGox codes or the like) to become popular. However, then Ripple came along. If it gains mass acceptance, it will make handling IOUs a lot easier, maybe even easier for most people than to deal with Bitcoin directly. And gateways like Bitstamp (and MtGox probably soon) will theoretically indeed be able to issue more IOUs than they actually have. |
|
|
|
|
either way, if Bitcoin is a secret Japanese gov stealth operation, that wouldn't explain the apparent disinterest of unsuspecting Japanese cool tech kids either.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the question has been asked before here, and afai remember some have speculated that the Japanese culture is somewhat more hierarchical and authoritarian.
|
|
|
|
I took the phrase "legal backing" to be a euphemism for enforcement. i apologize if i misunderstood. Specifically what did you mean by this statement?
Let's just say some kind of legal framework in whatever form. There are several variations out there afaik, but I mean approaches in general that people like Hoppe, Tom Woods or Walter Block describe and that seem to be necessary to protect property. Libertarians take the concept of property granted somewhat as said, but this concept is debatable as there are other (more collectivist) points of view out there, but let's keep that discussion out of this thread. And in that event, it is entirely within my rights to kick you out of my house, or take back my gold bar. I can exclude you from the use of my property, whereas I cannot exclude you from the use of the randomly generated private key.
Ok, the "but you can copy digital stuff" argument. However, let's assume private keys would never be "randomly generated", as laid out before (laws of the universe etc), but rather in almost all cases would be taken by force or by trespassing, where it plays no role whether it's digital or physical trespassing. If you sneak in and steal jewelry out of my drawer, I might or might not have a chance to catch you red-handed. Same with Bitcoin wallets really. I can also prevent you from spending my bitcoins if I catch you in time. How, you ask? Well I can tell you but that means I'd have to kill you. :·> A bitcoin wallet can be protected with due diligence at limited cost, but catching a thief is expensive.
The cost argument is a good one and might be a good explanation of why Bitcoin rather fits Stirner's philosophy. A question left to ask might be if it would always remain that way, or if there'll be scaling up libertarian cyber police brigades one day.  Protecting your house against outside attacks is different; someone with a tank platoon can take control of it on a whim because he happens to be passing by. If you use the Max Stirner stance from the OP on houses, what keeps your next warlord from just taking it?
That sounds a bit like the Mad Max argument against anarchism. I haven't looked deep enough into Stirner's philosophies yet to figure out what his stance on this would be. However, the power of the might and concentration of power in any form (be it sheer force, capital, or social engineering) is a threat to any society and might be the very reason why we still can't have anarchism in any shape or form. |
|
|
|
This entire solar system has had numerous failures of this kind.
So what's it about this solar system then? Is it in the air... er... I mean... the light spectrum or something? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
