Hi
Probably discussed before but do you plan to release a browser lobby/ tables instead of an EXE ?
Indeed, I we've been griping about it for many pages. Supposedly an android client is next (which will solve my issue) then they're doing more desktop clients for other OSes, then finally html5. I dunno why it's not the other way around. |
|
|
|
@funtotry, I've never heard of PD asking for money for an account recovery and FWIW I'm pretty sure that 230Sat is below the dust limit so most wallets would just reject the transaction.
I guess it his bangsamiet's english getting in the way then... Blockchain wallet accepts down to a satoshi and I doubt the wallet would just "forget" the tx and pretend it isn't there. But yea I haven't heard of asking for money for recovery before either. Really? Would you send me a satoshi to prove this (use my profile address)? I'm quite aware that you can issue raw transactions however you like if you use bitcoind and RPC commands, however I was pretty sure that most (surprised not all?) wallets respect the dust limit. http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2unzen/what_is_bitcoins_dust_limit_precisely/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=239931.0 |
|
|
|
[snip]
Since As long as fees are percentage based, it doesn't matter as long as you factor the fees in. If you buy at 290, make sure you sell above 292.90 (1%) minimum. That accounts for round trip fees and you are at least a little better off than before you started. Obviously you'll want to go for bigger gains, but use that as a minimum or "break-even" trade.
[snip]
As long as fees are percentage based then you are right, however I'm pretty sure that I ran up against issues where the fee was X at minimum and then Y% when Y% was greater than X, ie a minimum fee. If you have minimum fees to run up against then trading in micro amounts can indeed be different than larger ones. Nevertheless, the spirit of your post is quite correct and I agree. |
|
|
|
|
@funtotry, I've never heard of PD asking for money for an account recovery and FWIW I'm pretty sure that 230Sat is below the dust limit so most wallets would just reject the transaction.
|
|
|
|
Hello dear,
Name: MarkMJ
Posts: 220
Activity: 168
Position: Full Member
Btc - 112RyTsEkxcj1wxrrK58RCgELL1pWyrpk3
That won't work. Please read the OP dear. Hello dear, Sorry,now I'm in. I really hope that these guys keep calling each other "dear". How, um, en dearing  . |
|
|
|
all player in here using 2FA or not? because im using it but always have problem about sign in.. today i can sign, but yesterday i can't  and then, when recover account, should we pay a small amount BTC to primedice? because i have recover my account but i told send 0.0000023 to primedice.. im a newbie, please enlightenment from master in here  Unfortunately it's not clear what you're trying to ask. I can say that I don't use 2FA on pd and that I haven't had any issue signing in. I wouldn't think you'd need to "pay" anything in order to recover an account. Perhaps they want you to deposit something from a given address in order to know you are who you claim to be. In that case you'd be able to withdrawal the amount after the recovery (I guess). Paying to recover an account would be pretty sleazy by the owner of the casino. But if you have balance in it that is worth more than the fee than it is definitely good to recover it. However if somone hacked my account I wouldn't really care because I never leave balance on it. They will not require you to make a deposit to prove it, signing it is suffice. Indeed, I'm pretty sure that BangSamiet isn't understanding whatever instructions he had received. Did they recover his accuont yet? 0.0000023 btc is NOTHING and if you were trying to scam people this would be ridiculous. Sending this much is probably worth the time of signing a message and giving it to them, its probably a good idea to send it if you already haven't. This proves that you own deposit address Right and now that I think about it, 0.0000023 is way below the primedice deposit minimum so this wouldn't even get credited to his account. I'm now more convinced than ever that BangSamiet's English is getting in the way of either him understanding what PD has asked from him or in the way of us understanding what he's trying to report. |
|
|
|
I wonder if some of you trade with very low amounts like $60 in BTC. Is there a chance that you can maximize that small amount by trading?
I tried doing so some months ago - just a small test amount, to see how I'd do. I did manage to increase it by some 5% - 10%, but not only do fees start getting to you with low amounts (though that depends on where you're doing the trading), but you also have less of a room to maneuver if something goes wrong. Anyway, I'm far from being a professional trader, or even a good one for that matter, so don't take my word for it. That's why I ask. I tried trading on btc-e and gained some small pennie amounts too but then I decided to send my bits back to my wallet. I thought it would be way too risky, as you said, you have not much room to play with it. But same as you, I am just someone who tried, who has no idea about trading. I think your best best is just to give it a try. Since you're talking about a small initial investment you might have fun and learn something too. I played around with trading at even lower stakes than you are talking about and I can tell that I found it frustrating to try to keep up with all the movements and altcoins and whatnot---then, as you said, the fees. So it didn't work out for me but you might have better luck. |
|
|
|
|
I've recently done some wordpress development so I may be able to help you out here. Let me take a look at your issue (ie, look at that link you posted) and then I can pm you some sort of estimate (or perhaps some follow up questions). My reservation is that I don't have a lot of time this week so it might have to wait until the weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
Fun that there's a drawing for full nodes, I had never seen that before. I'm not currently running one so I guess I can't play but I think it's great that this drawing exists. I also wanted to add that while most people running full nodes now probably aren't solo mining there was a time when most people running full nodes probably were solo mining and for sure running a node is pretty much a prerequisite to solo mining (which presumably some people can still do although I'd love to hear some figures about how many actually are).
|
|
|
|
Swansea 0 -- Liverpool 1
(cant' believe I actually got in on the beginning of this one!)
Hot damn, 5 mins left. No late goals and I win! Yahoo, Swansea 0, Liverpool 1 is the final. I can't believe I won the first time I finally got a guess in in the first few posts. Looking forward to my bet Thanks directbet! |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
Thanks for this.
So when I say bits, I mean bits, not a bit coin.
So when a site says I'm making bits & not satoshis, I should concentrate on those more than the satoshis sites?
B/c 60.00 bits is only one penny, so WTH is 60 satoshis? 1/2 a penny? LOL
Indeed, I find the use of "bits" to be very confusing and obnoxious, yet a few people persist in doing so. When you see "bits" you have to think uBTC (micro-BTC) or 100 Satoshis. You are absolutely correct that bits is not a bitcoin and if you want to be a good person, don't use "bits" say "uBTC" or "Satoshis" instead. |
|
|
|
all player in here using 2FA or not? because im using it but always have problem about sign in.. today i can sign, but yesterday i can't and then, when recover account, should we pay a small amount BTC to primedice? because i have recover my account but i told send 0.0000023 to primedice.. im a newbie, please enlightenment from master in here Unfortunately it's not clear what you're trying to ask. I can say that I don't use 2FA on pd and that I haven't had any issue signing in. I wouldn't think you'd need to "pay" anything in order to recover an account. Perhaps they want you to deposit something from a given address in order to know you are who you claim to be. In that case you'd be able to withdrawal the amount after the recovery (I guess). Paying to recover an account would be pretty sleazy by the owner of the casino. But if you have balance in it that is worth more than the fee than it is definitely good to recover it. However if somone hacked my account I wouldn't really care because I never leave balance on it. They will not require you to make a deposit to prove it, signing it is suffice. Indeed, I'm pretty sure that BangSamiet isn't understanding whatever instructions he had received. |
|
|
|
While we're chatting about posts and what is or isn't constructive, I have to say that I've always been surprised that most campaigns don't count the posts in other language sections. I mean, don't you guys want non-english users to roll your dice just as much as you want english users?
the main issue about this is that a campaign manager cant judge wether the post is a rubbish or a constructive post because the campaign manager cant understand the language, people can claim that all his post is constructive in local boards while the fact that he only posted spam useless post cant be known since the campaign manager doesnt speak that language That is a reasonable point, whatever you post in a foreign language section is basically unmoderated. Nevertheless, I think I also have a valid point which is don't these guys want the advertising there? Also, couldn't the campaign manager communicate with the moderator of that subforum if someone was making rubbish posts. I imagine that one of the conditions of being a subforum moderator would be the ability to communicate in English. |
|
|
|
all player in here using 2FA or not? because im using it but always have problem about sign in.. today i can sign, but yesterday i can't and then, when recover account, should we pay a small amount BTC to primedice? because i have recover my account but i told send 0.0000023 to primedice.. im a newbie, please enlightenment from master in here Unfortunately it's not clear what you're trying to ask. I can say that I don't use 2FA on pd and that I haven't had any issue signing in. I wouldn't think you'd need to "pay" anything in order to recover an account. Perhaps they want you to deposit something from a given address in order to know you are who you claim to be. In that case you'd be able to withdrawal the amount after the recovery (I guess). |
|
|
|
Just wanted to check in on an ETA for the android client. If I recall correctly, that's supposed to be dropping soon, right?
Micon, I know you've said "soon", I wanna say that a few days ago you were suggesting that it would be a few days for android client. Any updates possible? |
|
|
|
It would make more sense to evaluate the level of trust that should be given to the person actually holding the funds, as well as how payments are made. If payments are made directly to a website account then obviously the campaign should not be considered to be escrowed because the escrow has zero way to know for sure if anyone got paid or not. If you have some unknown person with no prior trade history or someone who is farming trust then it should be safe to say that the campaign should not be considered escrowed
I agree they should be trusted. It should only be considered escrowed if the funds are held by an existing trusted escrower like devthedev or another trusted member with previous history of payouts like evilpanda or hillariousandco. I simply think if one of the latter two were running a campaign there wouldn't need to be another escrow involved before it was considered escrowed. I think by having one of those run and hold the funds it should be considered escrowed by that fact. Except that, again, the definition of escrow is funds held by a third party. If the person holding the funds is the campaign manager then this is by definition not escrowed. This doesn't mean that there's a problem. Many deals can go down without escrow when all parties trust each other. Similarly, you're absolutely right that when something is escrowed, the person doing the escrow had better be a trusted person. But that doesn't change the definition of escrow. The campaign manager is not the one buying the advertising, the company is. The buyer is the company who the participants are advertising for. The seller is the various participants and the escrow is the manager. I really don't think it can be any more clear cut then that But if the campaign manager is being paid by the company then that's the conflict of interest which makes him not an escrow. Again, consider if you want to by my restaurant. I say, okay just send the money to the escrow which is my restaurant manager and then I'll know you're serious and we'll sit down and discuss the contract. The restaurant manager works for me so he isn't a third party. For a third party you need someone who isn't otherwise employed by either party. |
|
|
|
|
While we're chatting about posts and what is or isn't constructive, I have to say that I've always been surprised that most campaigns don't count the posts in other language sections. I mean, don't you guys want non-english users to roll your dice just as much as you want english users?
|
|
|
|
Swansea 0 -- Liverpool 1
(cant' believe I actually got in on the beginning of this one!)
Hot damn, 5 mins left. No late goals and I win! |
|
|
|
It would make more sense to evaluate the level of trust that should be given to the person actually holding the funds, as well as how payments are made. If payments are made directly to a website account then obviously the campaign should not be considered to be escrowed because the escrow has zero way to know for sure if anyone got paid or not. If you have some unknown person with no prior trade history or someone who is farming trust then it should be safe to say that the campaign should not be considered escrowed
I agree they should be trusted. It should only be considered escrowed if the funds are held by an existing trusted escrower like devthedev or another trusted member with previous history of payouts like evilpanda or hillariousandco. I simply think if one of the latter two were running a campaign there wouldn't need to be another escrow involved before it was considered escrowed. I think by having one of those run and hold the funds it should be considered escrowed by that fact. Except that, again, the definition of escrow is funds held by a third party. If the person holding the funds is the campaign manager then this is by definition not escrowed. This doesn't mean that there's a problem. Many deals can go down without escrow when all parties trust each other. Similarly, you're absolutely right that when something is escrowed, the person doing the escrow had better be a trusted person. But that doesn't change the definition of escrow. |
|
|
|
for every panic seller there is a buyer who gets cheap coins
exactly, every time price falls down drastically because people are panicking and start selling their stash, there are fat pocket buyers stationed on low price positions to take their btc out of their hands. Whales have been buying in small quantities for 4 months.. look at the facts.. all of this while poor fellas like OP buy on the catastrophic scenarios so they sell their cheap coins. They'll probably end up re-buying in the crazy FOMO of another bubble too, driven by the same market forces that had been over-correcting BTC down from $1100. BTC should have never gotten to 1100. Look up your facts, it was ARTIFICIAL. Define "artificial". It certainly wasn't artificial for the people who bought and sold btc at that price. Perhaps you mean "temporary". In that case, I wholeheartedly agree. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
