Maybe a special 1 time faucet draw.  You could say:

loyalty_reward=X*account_age+Y*account_wagered

Figure out a reasonable X and Y and then there ya go.  A nice present to everyone who's been around a long time, or wagered a lot, or both!

ranlo, I hope you're going to go ahead and make an account there.  I know you used to play at sealswithclubs.  bitcoinpoker.gg is a legit site (I've deposited and withdrawn) but has very few players at the moment.  There are daily 25mBTC GTD tourneys but my favorite poker (drop in ring games) are usually empty.  This will change as more and more folks hear about this site.  It's a pokermavens based site so nothing fancy, but also no problems with Windows or .exe or issues like that.  I hope you'll give it a try.

Also, I'm hoping that we can set up a weekly ring-game meetup or something like that so that those of us who want to play can log in at the same time.

@Quickseller, the level of obnoxious irony of your new flame-attack against dadice is astounding.  You accuse others of trolling, but here you are posting again and again in the thread of a reputable dice site (one you happily advertized for yourself), trying to say that they are untrustworthy because the do business with someone you have decided is a scammer.  Jesus, man, the fact that you actually have to have evidence for these kinds of accusations is probably why you were removed from default trust in the first place.  Now that you've been removed you're going to come here and start shaking your fist in the air?  All the while posting with a paid sig-ad and complaining that someone else posted negatively about you with a paid-sig-ad?  Despite your behavior here, I sorta doubt that we're gonna see dadice or nhndc go into the bit-x thread and start shouting about "working with flame-troll QS is causing unreliability!"

We all know what happened with you.  You showed promise as an upstanding member of the community, you were good at reading through blockchain evidence and you spent your life on the forum looking for shady posts from newbies and calling them out.  The problem is that you got caught up in your own importance and hubris has brought you down.  It's not an uncommon human story (see Greek mythology 101). Badbear promoted you to default trust, but you couldn't take it when someone called you out for your hot temper and irrascibility.  So you started using your default trust abilities to ding everyone and anyone who showed you anything but ass-kissing.  You got away with it for a while but eventually you alienated yourself and got yourself removed from power.  The question now is how far are you gonna go with this scorched-earth mentality?  Even now, if you gave up on the insanity, realized that you can be wrong sometimes, and went back to attempting to provide something positive to the community you might avoid going down completely in flames.  I think that's the path you should take, but then again, you won't hear anything from me because you've decided I am the evil you tread under your feet or whatever.

If I understand you, you're saying that when you downloaded and installed a wallet program you tried to create a new address but you got this one instead:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Bn9ReEocMG1WEW1qYjuDrdFzEFFDCq43F

As you saying that the particular app on the google play is actually a malware which gives people compromised addresses?  If so, you should probably try to report it on the play store.  If this is the case, you can't be the only one who has experienced this.  Are you sure you got the app signed by blockchain.info and not some look-a-like one?

Thanks for the straight-up info, Foerster.  So, if I understand you correctly, the number of doge to be produced is non-finite, but the number of coins created per year asymptotically approaches 0?  Is DOGE one of the POS/POW hybrids?  Above people were calling it a litecoin clone with a dog logo, but I don't think litecoin has any staking, does it?

About the bolded, me too!   A softer alternative might be to keep the default trust list around, but make it an opt-in.  So, a new user has a blank trust list, but when you got to your trust settings you see some info about how to add "DefaultTrust" if you want a starter list and don't want to make your own.

@OP, a similar idea, which I proposed in another thread, was to not remove the "scores" or the warning, but to change the text to something more descriptive.  Right now, it's the inflammatory "Warning...Extreme Caution".  But what if it said "This person has received negative feedback from someone in your trust list.  If the latter was implemented, people who don't know how the system works might react "huh, my trust list?" and then figure out that they have a trust list that they can edit and investigate.  As things stand, "Warning..." it looks like a message from God or something, not like something that has to do with your own settings.

Just an FYI to everyone that I processed another withdrawl on this site yesterday and all went smoothly.  Thanks, bitcoinpoker.gg.  I hope more folks join the fun soon!  I think it's a great site with a smooth layout.

Exactly what I was asking for above.

Hey, angerbot, I'm not an evil apologist but I can't understand the point of you trolling this once-dead thread about a now-defunct site for some situation where you feel they didn't do a good enough job.  The least you can do is troll the proper thread, right?  I don't know what you mean by "make myself known", I merely expressed that perhaps now that you've gotten your hate for Micon off your chest, we can go ahead and move on to more current affairs in more current threads.

Funny you bring up my "negative reputation".  One look at your trust page suggests this is something like the pot calling the kettle black.

Note, if your bitcoin instance is publically accessible then you don't want to be giving out the rpc password like this.  Otherwise, once you get the thing running, anyone can use that rpcpassword to send your bitcoins somewhere else.

As to why you get no reply from `which bitcoin-cli', it means that you don't have that executable on your $PATH.  This may be because you are building an old version of the software, iirc, bitcoin-cli superceded bitcoind.  So the fact that you have bitcoind but not bitcoin-cli seems to suggest that you built an older version before there was a bitcoin-cli command.

If I were you, I'd cut-n-paste your terminal session into your replies to this thread so that people with a lot of knowledge at reading command line sessions can help see something you might miss.

For the moment, it's possible that you made a mistake creating bitcoin.conf, perhaps you didn't put it in the right place, or perhaps you've got pemissions wrong.  Why not run "ls -la /path/to/bitcoin.conf" and show us the output so that we can see that your permissions are correct.

Finally, it seems strange that you're saying your an "bitcoind" with no args but then you're getting back a message about running it with the -server  option.  This is why it's valuable to actually cut-n-paste the terminal session (but redact passwords) when you want help, those little details that you might not think matter may end up being the difference.

Yah, mine's now also -5, I think this is explained by the fact that Blazr deleted and reset his negative.  MZ posted the forumula that shows how the rating "decay" over time.

FWIW, I think most of the people are not running a full node even today.  But this thread is about running a full node on a small soc computer.  Is that something you've tried?  Note: I have thought about it, and I have a pi (but not the pi 2) and I decided against it.

I think by "I'm on default trust" he meant "my trust list is just default trust".  "I'm on X" can mean "I have setting X", or that's what I understood him to be saying.

FWIW, I also see him as +1 (green)/-4 (yellow) +3/(3), my trust settings are:

Default Trust
~Vod
~Quickseller

(depth=2)


Looks like I have 7 "trusted feedbacks for him": 4 negatives from tomatocage, Blazr, dooglus, malevolent.  Then it looks like blazed out, bayareacoins, and dooglus left either positves (or neutrals, what's the difference?).  So I don't know why that adds up to a green +1.

I've also experienced this (although it seems fine for me now).  Certain weeks it will take between 20-30 seconds to load a page (or the connection even times out before the page fully loads), then the issue goes away.  I don't have any answers, and I figured it was just my ISP, but since others are reporting this too, I just wanted to add my name to the list of affected users.

^^^ Found the daily quickseller masterbation post!

Love it!

Follow up here, out of curiosity, is there any rollover on LP.  As in, if I have 90 but I score 20 this week, I get the bonus for LP, then next week do I have 0 or do I have 10?

Yup, welcome back ndnhc!  Just in time for some countin fun!  (I'm excited bout it, think I'm gonna get my LP bonus this week!)

Love how, as usual, QS talks as if he and only he has access to absolute and final information on who is/is not a scammer.  However, the real explanation for his unusal deference and jolliness comes in the next paragraph.
Yup, QS recognizes that TBZ is at or above his own power level.  Those above or equal to him, he uses the phrase "LOL, just kidding" in a jolly and fun way.   Offers strangely deferential language when referrring to his boss' trust of someone.  To others who disagree with him, those who aren't in his power-list, disagreeing brings out his signature phrase 'you are an idiot', and if you continue to do anthing other than bow down, you get neg-repped (potentially from multiple accounts).  Turns out, TBZ, you're in the immune class.  I didn't know it when I wrote above to watch out for the neg-rep.

Is that going on right now?  Did we miss it?

Really think it's a shame that it's just a facebook thing.  What about the non-spied-upon amongst us?

It doesn't seem like a bad idea.  And, imo, things like "X is trying to screw my by giving me negative trust" aren't really the same as "how do I sort my search results by icon?".  Ie, software and other meta items seem pretty distinct from issues with the trust rangers.