Tournament Stats
47 Tournaments Played
5 Tournaments Won
7 Tournament Cashes
6.83 ChipsTournament Earnings

Ring Game Stats
326 Hands Played
#Coming Soon
#Coming Soon
6.57 ChipsRing Game Earnings

Nothing too impressive from me.  But you can see I like the ring games and I'm happy to see I've got a positive balance on both fronts

Yah, as far as I know, legendary rank is purely cosmetic.  There's no bigger signature or faster posting rights or anything else.  It's just a little nod to older accounts (with the fun of randomness added in---which seems appropriate, imo, for bitcoin).  Anyway, I don't know why anyone would treat legendary any different than hero when it comes to payments.

I wonder if it's some kind of encoding problem?  HTTP is notoriously ascii unless you send a header saying some other charset.  I dunno, I'm just guessing.  Still, strange this would pop up out of nowhere like this, right?

Thanks, I never saw that parameter before (but then again, I'm not into altcoins).  Still, I'm right that keyconv is a separate python package, right?  That's not part of vanitygen is it?

Indeed, make install definitely seems like the more normal thing to do.  OP didn't comment on why he didn't run make install and I just thought I'd follow up on the question about why the "./" (because what you're trying to run isn't on your $PATH).

Actually, Stunna ended the pay-per-post signature ad campaign quite a while ago (about 8 months?).  Those that are still wearing the sig are just doing so for the ref link, or out of love for Stunna, or both.  I don't think anyone is getting paid-per-post for that ad anymore.

Well, I believe that search is temporarily disabled.  But, FWIW, I'm one of the people you explained this to above.  The sha256 algo used to mine blocks just isn't the same procedure as the one to find and address.  So, alas, even our old stick miners can't help us here.

In my opinion, it's hard to tell whether the behavior of dadice is actually shady (ie, indicative of someone about to do a runner) or merely reflective of someone who feels like they're being pushed around.  That is, out of nowhere, all sorts of folks started demanding all sorts of proof about their bankroll.  At first, several competitors of dadice were the ones offering to "privately" verify the bankroll.  It seems to me that a perfectly legitimate interpretation is that dadice felt pushed around, decided to stand up for their rights not to reveal their private information, and to stand on their budding reputation as a legit site.

The other situation has also been clearly expressed by the detractors in this thread, ie, they won't prove their bankroll because they can't.  I'm in the camp which believes that the best thing to do here now is to let everyone's head-of-steam cool down for a while and see what happens.


Yes, of course they would.  But a lot of players will consider that withdrawing and deposting with success again and again is indicative of future success.  I'm not here to debate the logical flaws in that sort of reasoning, I just think it's worth bearing in mind that the point of view of the typical player isn't about whether some mysterious wallet backend banksafe exists (they don't expect to be able to see it if does), but whether the stuff they *do* see works well, ie, their own deposits and withdrawals.

Actually, you can just use a single term session.  Just kick off bitcoind in the background:


(see http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/103731/run-a-command-without-making-me-wait for a little more detail)


Specifically, you have to specify the ./ (or some path indicator) if the command you want to execute isn't on you $PATH.  You can also just add whatever directory your bitcoind/bictoin-cli binaries are into your $PATH. 
Do you really have to add -datadir to bitcoin-cli call?  That seems surprising.  Anyway, if you do have to do this, you can also alias bitcoin-cli to "bitcoin-cli =datadir=.... ".   (see https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/an-introduction-to-useful-bash-aliases-and-functions).

2 million hands and still windows only.  swc admins, can you update us on eta for alternative clients?  Also, what about a way to log into the website to recover our accounts from the old seals?

Quickseller isn't supposed to be on default trust anymore.  Is this no longer the case?  I see user melody82 as having 0 trust.  Also, I think if you talk to the owner of dadice you'll hear a few further words about what he thinks about QS's feedback.

@Carra23, thanks for stepping in and providing leadership during nhndc's absence.  I hope all is okay with the hobbit man.

Lol, Nultidah trolling hard here.  What about the fact that he owns the dice site?  Does this merit a triple-edit?

Finally realized that first character in your topic title is an emoji.  Most people don't have emoji fonts installed on their desktops so you might want to edit the topic so that people aren't seeing just the missing glyph box (as I am) when seeing your topic.  It makes something look broken.  Just an FYI.

I had no idea that vanitygen worked for any coin other than bitcoin.  Wish I could help?  Also, isn't keyconv command part of an external python lib?  Seems like there are several possible points of failure here.

If, 2 months down the road, all of the allegations come true then I will say "damn, those guys were right about dadice".  What else would I say?  The issue is that everyone has had their say and, as Dooglus says in the other thread about this, there's really no proof either way at this point so it's all speculation.  Quickseller has a known agenda against these guys so it's no suprise to seem him here trolling.  There's no problem with discussion and cetera but I'm prety sure that everything has already been said.  FUD and trolling aren't ever helpful. 

Actually, it's already answered above and referred to in the answer to that stackexchange that I linked to.  The deal is that Thai has some diacritics which can be stacked indefinitely.  Presumably the fonts that show the stacking are doing the right thing.  If I write "looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool", we can's say that it's "unicode screwery" that your font didn't shorten that to "lol",  it's just that what I wrote was some screwery in itself. 

QS, can't resist coming in here to spread FUD.  Shame, man, shame.

Anyone who read up on the controversy can make their own decision.  You coming in here trolling just makes you look worse than you already do.

I think I see what you mean.  But is it correct that that small percentage of miners can actually hinder the softfork.  That is, once you pass the 75% then all non-standard version X blocks get rejected, that means that those small percentage of miners have to keep getting 5% of the blocks hashed and also that they have to be hashing them to a version < X (because if they were hashing to a non-standard version X, they'd be getting rejected by most miners because of the 75% threshold having been passed).  I apologize if I misunderstood something.

FYI, to find the "lite" version you can selected it at the bottom of the page before you log in.  Or, once you're logged in, you can selected it at the bottom of the page.  I use old hardware and I also have issues with the regular version.  Lite version works very well though.

That is indeed very small because those resources are distributed to the public anyway.  Ie, if you want my browser able to use your css file, you're going to have to let me download it.  You may have obscured it a bit by making http requests for the file directly show blank, but I can still see the contents of these files by opening my browser's console and looking at the css resources that were downloaded.  Basically the same thing applies for javascript, unless this is server-side javascript.  Definitely not a "bug".  Certainly not something I'd pay for.